I live in Nuevo León, a state near Texas and the state Health Secretary called us reporters to a press meeting about the rising of measles cases in California and a travel warning for the NL citizens.
A woman from our state traveled over there and went back with measles symptoms, basically because she lacked the vaccine that is basically mandatory for children within six months and a year after being born, so there was this travel warning to people that might not have the vaccine and take the shot before going there.
Asked him about those measles being different from, well, the usual ones and if it had anything to do with the anti-vaccination movement from parents. The secretary said that it was part of it, but also, that without medical insurance getting a shot is pretty much difficult or impossible. Was he correct? My state is measles free since 1990 and the last case was around 1988, according to their numbers.
Vaccination is pretty much a given, either health workers have campaigns in schools or you can go straight to get one (I just got a influenza one in their bulding a few days ago) and it's completely free. Had that question all week long, since I don't know anything about how health and vaccines are managed in the US.
And yes, he even said that "those studies that link vaccines with autism are invalid, they can't prove the link between one thing and the other, how can you "get autism" anyway?" Or something like that. Then he bashed Twitter and Facebook, haha.