• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

A brand NEW world's smallest frog, 7.7 mm, also smallest vertebrate

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Gaborn

Member
main%20Austin5807dime.jpg


They just keep getting smaller. Barely a month after scientists identified the world's smallest species of frog, this little guy has been snapped relaxing on an US dime. At 7.7 millimetres long from snout to tail, it's even teenier than December's "smallest frog ever" - and this time it's the smallest vertebrate, too.

Paedophryne amauensis was discovered in Papua New Guinea in 2009 by Christopher Austin of Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge and colleagues. They have now published an official description.

P. amauensis is slightly smaller than the previous smallest vertebrate, a Sumatran fish called Paedocypris progenetica that was described in 2006. Females of this species grow to 7.9 mm.

There is another contender for the title of smallest vertebrate: one kind of male anglerfish is just 6.2 mm long. But this particular male lives his entire life attached to the (much larger) female, and his body is little more than a backbone and a pair of testicles - so many biologists feel he shouldn't count.

Regardless, the new frogs are just the latest in a parade of tiny animals discovered in recent years.

Back in 1996, the title of smallest frog was held by two species from Brazil and Cuba, both just 10 mm long.

In 2001, a tiny gecko was found that's just 16 mm long - giving it the joint record for world's smallest reptile, along with a closely-related species.

Then, in 2008, we found out about Leptotyphlops carlae: the world's smallest snake, barely as thick as a strand of spaghetti.

And just last month, we were told about two species of frog that measured just 8-9 mm.

Austin thinks that miniature frogs are not just oddities and may be quite common. He points out that 27 of the 29 smallest frogs skip the tadpole phase and hatch straight into adults, and also live in very moist areas. These factors may make it easier for smaller frogs to evolve. For instance, tiny frogs have a large surface area-to-volume ratio, which puts them at risk of losing a lot of water through their skin. The moist environment may help avoid dehydration.

How much smaller can they go? The new miniature frogs have simplified body plans compared to their larger cousins: they have fewer vertebrae in their backbones, and fewer digits on their feet. It's not clear how much more they could lose and still survive as free-living animals, but we're willing to bet the race is on to find one that measures just 6 mm long. Check back here in, oh, about one month's time.

Journal reference: PLoS ONE, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029797
Click to expand...

Story Here

Last month's story on the previous record holders here
 
A

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Bah, beat me to the photo.

I wonder how many of these you'd have to eat to get full?
 
triplestation

triplestation

Member
I think maybe Gaborn dropped acid and now he loves nature.

Nevertheless, this is fascinating and I wish to fill a 30 gallon long terrarium with about 50 100 of these.
 
G

Gaborn

Member
bangladesh said:
I think maybe Gaborn dropped acid and now he loves nature.

Nevertheless, this is fascinating and I wish to fill a 30 gallon long terrarium with about 50 100 of these.
Click to expand...

Naw, I've always liked nature and nature threads.

I agree though it'd be awesome to have a bunch of them!
 
H

Hours Left

Member
I bet those old tiny frogs that used to hold the record just feel like crap now.

Way to go dime frog, ruining lives one mm at a time.
 
T

TommyT

Member
Isn't the definition of a vertebrate meaning with backbone? Yet, something with a backbone isn't being considered a vertebrate?
 
G

Gaborn

Member
TommyT said:
Isn't the definition of a vertebrate meaning with backbone? Yet, something with a backbone isn't being considered a vertebrate?
Click to expand...

actually I misread that and got the wrong one, instead of progenetica the species of fish is Photocorynus spiniceps and the objection is not the body make up in terms of a vertebrate and testicles and nothing else (though I find that interesting) but rather that it apparently spends it's life fused to the female of the species and is considered a "sexual parasite." In other words if it was truly an independent swimming fish at 6.2 mm for males it would unquestionably be the smallest right now but because it does not live independently it is disputed and the females who do the swimming are much larger. In a sense some biologists consider the fish effectively hermaphrodites in fact.

mn_tinyfish.jpg


This is a picture of the female (the huge one) and the male (That tiny little nub)

From here

So I don't think it's clear cut whether it should be considered a truly independent animal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Gran Turismo 7 update 1.48 features 5 new cars, Café Menu, and World Circuit Events
News Hype
37
2K
ShaiKhulud1989 replied
World of Warcraft Patch 9.4 Info
12
1K
Krappadizzle replied
Diablo IV, Redfall, Forza Horizon 5 and more getting DLSS 3.0
26
3K
SlimySnake replied
Welcome to Your Bland New World of Consumer Capitalism
Opinion
12
6K
West Texas CEO replied
  • Locked
Congratulations! You just won Greed Island. Which 3 cards do you take? and why?
37
8K
HStallion replied
Top Bottom