The problem is, these games are still on the PlayStation 3, and Microsoft isn't offering much in the way of improvements to these titles.
Pretty much the sing song for multiplatform titles for the past ten years. Xbox and Gamecube multiplat titles often looked better on the competition instead of the PS2, and in terms fo the Xbox, had a stronger online component. Didn't hurt Sony.
What else does Microsoft have in the way of exclusives? Halo is a system-seller, sure, but Metal Gear Solid IV is still a PS3 exclusive.
Halo 3 also sold more consoles and more copies than MGS4, so I don't see where MGS4 has any impact.
Xbox Live is a great service, but it's not clear that all of its features are needed. While the hardcore complain about Nintendo's friend codes, most mainstream gamers are more than willing to put up with them. And Microsoft's competitors aren't standing still; Home could be the silver bullet that finally gives Sony the edge in online play. The PS3 has one of the most anticipated casual games ever with LittleBigPlanet, and the branding of Sackboy is already amazingly strong.
What features aren't needed?
Online gaming. Achievements spure game sales. Movie rentals. Messaging.
So, what you're saying is,
wait for Home? No thanks. I've heard that song and dance before, basically right around the time the PS3 came out.
Add idiosyncratic games, such as Flower, that are coming to the PS3 and Nintendo's absolute dominance of the casual market, and you have a gaming world where cherry-picking old franchises is no longer enough. Gears of War 2 looks great, but Resistance 2 and Killzone 2 look just as good in terms of scale, graphics, and online play.
What about the idiosycratic games on the 360? Wasn't the whole world set on fire by Braid just last week? What about Geo Wars 2? Galaga Legions? PacMan CE? Why look over these? Because it makes the overall point less of an impact.
So, Halo and Gears of War have similar competition on a competing console. How is MS teh doomed?
The new Viva Pinata game looks good, but that was a game that didn't set the world on fire with its first iteration.
Sold over a million copies and spun off to a kids TV show.
Microsoft has spent so much time trying to match Sony's past glory in terms of game selection that it finds itself somewhat at a loss now that Sony has managed to keep some games as exclusives, at the same time it's developing all news ones.
That's probably because the PS2's game selection is what made it such a popular console. Having a wide range of games on your system, along with exclusives, is key.
MS is at a loss now that Sony has managed to keep some games as exclusives? What games? Any third party or are we talking about first party, and Sony funded development?
The new firmware update that will refresh the UI of the 360 looks strong, but the press gave it a scarily icy reception at E3; the full-scale plagiarism of the concept and design of the Nintendo Mii had many onlookers audibly laughing. It was not a comfortable moment.
I imagine it's a similar situation to how everyone reacts to Sony's Second Life rip off, but the author's critical eye again ignores this.
Will Halo be enough in the future? With Bungie now independent, that's a very large, very open question.
Halo exists without Bungie, so it doesn't matter.
It's time for Microsoft to find its own voice and give itself a unique feel in the market. Its old tricks and the "first to launch" advantage isn't enough anymore. Find a home in the world
It has. There are plenty of 360 exclusives, downloadable or store shelf, that keep me coming back to the 360. Better online components to boot.
but Europe has to be seen as a major battleground.
I believe Europe, and the way it leans when it comes to games, is the
exact reason Halo Wars went into development. When the first vids for it were shown off it was explicitly stated that it was created to appeal to the largely PC centric EU gamers who tend to follow RTS games.
Whether or not Microsoft has fixed its Red Ring of Death problem,
Whether or not? It's largely fixed.
the fact remains that most gamers think the hardware is untrustworthy.
I blame the internet. The 360's failure rate is similar to the PS2's failure rate. Unlike Sony, MS offered to repair the busted 360s.
And let's not forget that Star Ocean 3 didn't even
work on some versions of the PS2, and Sony wouldn't even address the issue.
The PlayStation, on the other hand, is damn near rock-solid.
Maybe the PS3, but it has it's share of problems. Fact remains, the PS2 was unreliable. DVD drives constantly failed. Same thing with the PSX. The internet makes the issue larger.
As anecdotal as it is, I imagine for every person I know to have had to send their 360 back to MS, free of charge, I know someone who has had to buy a new PS2. This was back before the price drop.
Sony's newly-launched in-game XMB adds a ton of functionality, and the Trophies it brings seem to be gaining popularity;
Okay. We pay for service and got this three years ago. It's just now coming to your free service, and may even have to be patched into games that were about to go Gold.
How is this a win?
The PSP-PS3 connection gives you so much cool functionality that it makes consumers want to own both for a great media experience. Microsoft has no competition for that at the moment.
I have a PSP and couldn't give a fuck about the PS3. Don't speak for all gamers.
How should Microsoft fix these issues?
What issues? So far, you've brought up Sony's first party development and the fact that they have a free, but out dated, online service.
What's clear is that the competition is now much stronger across the board, and that's a good thing for gamers.
True.
But I think we need to bring up some real issues here.
Live should be free. The fiasco with the CoD4 and Halo 3 launch proved that the money we use isn't going any where.
MS needs to work on advertising, price drops, bundles, and incentives to buy. They need to show off
why their console is better. They did this with GTA4 and the downloadable content, but that's as far as I've seen it go.
MS is wide open to criticisms, but jesus is this a one sided article.
MWS Natural said: