lo escondido
Apartheid is, in fact, not institutional racism
Celsior said:WTF is that piece of Land between Somalia and Eritrea?
Djibouti
Celsior said:WTF is that piece of Land between Somalia and Eritrea?
The west cares about the people of Algeria, no. But they do love their oil.Cloudy said:The West doesn't give a fuck about Algeria. They'll be silenced quickly
Yep, I goofed on that one. At least it's in the area.lo escondido said:Djibouti
no, no you can't. there are Jews in Egypt. In fact one of the famous old time Egyptian Singers was a Jew. Layla Murad, she had such a lovely voice and the people of Egypt of all ethnicity and religious background loved her.Manos: The Hans of Fate said:You could actually ask the same about the former with Egypt too.
I don't either. I was saying the French government does have an interest in the region.
7aged said:Some pictures of the protests in Yemen, copied from another forum.
These are from the city of Ta'izz:
Zapages said:something is stirring up in in Pakistan... But nothing substantial from what I have gathered.
Pakistan Revolution... Inqillab means Revolution...
![]()
Khat break time?Norwegian Wood said:This won't last long, knowing what goes down in Yemen during the afternoons
.Jeels said:It will never happen in Pakistan, and if it did, there would be blood spilled all over the place. Seriously, Pakistan is nothing like these North African and Middle Eastern countries when it comes to education of the average citizen and unity among the different parts of the country.
Neo C. said:After Tunesia and Egypt now Algeria and Yemen?
Excellent.
zsidane said:Algerian Jews decided to leave the country. Worse, they decided they are not algerian when France offered them the opportunity to be French citizen (as opposed to Muslims who were treated like non-human shit with barely no civil rights) and this was back in1870! Once the revolution started in 1954, they failed again to show support to muslim algerians and chose their side with the French. When France got kikced out of Algeria in 1962 they continued to act like the French and left the country and went back "home".
Norwegian Wood said:Algeria maybe, Yemen? hell no.
The youth were out protesting on Friday and disappeared during lunchtime. The president will still be there come 2012 unless something drastic happens which i highly doubt
Smiles and Cries said:none of these are on CNN's front page
FlightOfHeaven said:One of the guys in the Yemen photo looks doped out. : (
ummmm nope, Islam and monarchies don't mix. It is forbidden so that assumption is inaccurate. The only reason as has been stated the monarchy will stay in power is for the same reason the oligarchy in America will remain. You give them dumb dumbs trinkets and they will go play in their corners happily like monkeys. Take those away, then you might have something.RustyNails said:Besides, the Monarchy has presented itself as the protectorate of Mecca and Medina, which sort of started with King Fahd during the mid 80s. To go against the Kingdom is to go against Islam and putting Mecca and Medina in danger. Not happening in a million billion years.
The Experiment said:There's a lot of dudes at these rallies...
Mustaphadamus said:ummmm nope, Islam and monarchies don't mix. It is forbidden so that assumption is inaccurate. The only reason as has been stated the monarchy will stay in power is for the same reason the oligarchy in America will remain. You give them dumb dumbs trinkets and they will go play in their corners happily like monkeys. Take those away, then you might have something.
Replace the "some guy in a turban" with some marketing Ad Exec and the "stringed beads" with iphones and xboxs and you have the flip side of that coin. The difference, in one instance you have people fighting for survival and in the other people are fighting to remain economic slaves.Chrono said:Lack of women gives you a good idea on how much progress is going to happen in those places, democracy or not.
It's different than those other monkeys that play with stringed beads and repeat and do whatever some guy in a turban tells them to. Now those monkeys are hardcore, you need more than trinkets to keep them off your back. (or maybe, just maybe, people are happy with their lives and don't want your idea of how things should be? There are all kinds of people of course).
On a semi-related note, I think it might come to the point where some of those middle eastern countries allied to the US will try to get the people on their side by being anti-american/israeli. I can see Jordan cutting off relations with Israel and even leaving the peace treaty. King Abudllah isn't going to favor Israel over his own survival. Saudi Arabia might step in with fund him with whatever the US might cut in return. Or Jordan could be more like Syria, a mysterious country that manages to be a more brutal and oppressive arab government than most or all its neighbors while not being 'backed' by uhmerika.
I understand the way it's supposed to work, but that is now how it works in KSA. Over there people are conditioned (I want to say brainwashed, but it's too strong a word) to believe that the sanctity of Masjid Al Haram and Masjid Al Nabwi is inexplicably tied to the security of the monarchy. This started around the early 80s when Kings of KSA threw away their royal titles and replaced them with one title: "Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King ____ bin Abdul Aziz". The youths over there may not be so conditioned as their parents' generation, but there is a sort of hesitancy over there if someone says "lets revolt". When I was there, such words were sedition-talk and you could be executed for uttering them.Mustaphadamus said:ummmm nope, Islam and monarchies don't mix. It is forbidden so that assumption is inaccurate. The only reason as has been stated the monarchy will stay in power is for the same reason the oligarchy in America will remain. You give them dumb dumbs trinkets and they will go play in their corners happily like monkeys. Take those away, then you might have something.
Mustaphadamus said:Replace the "some guy in a turban" with some marketing Ad Exec and the "stringed beads" with iphones and xboxs and you have the flip side of that coin. The difference, in one instance you have people fighting for survival and in the other people are fighting to remain economic slaves.
Chrono said:By the way, you have no idea how hilarious it is to see a leftist muslim talk about 'economic slavery' when your prophet was a pro-slavery businessman (that's actual slavery, the kind that if you've been through you'd pray and beg night and day for 'economic slavery' with iphones and xboxes). Although he urged his followers to treat them well, he gets credit for that. LOL.
L0st Id3ntity said:Prophet Mohammad's (PBUH) eventually freed slaves were war prisoners, he even prohibited war prisoners except when the battle was in self-defence. He also has a famous saying: "The worst kind of humans are those who trade humans".
In "Bani Almostaleg" battle he married a women of the defeated tribe so that all his companions would free all of their prisoners (they said we can't enslave a person related to the prophet's wife, so they freed them all).
A cute little story: when mohammad was born, his uncle's slave delivered the news to him, his uncle was so overjoyed he freed her lol.
And on the other end, some of his last words on his death bed were: "Prayer prayer, and beware god of your slaves".
Meer Ismail, a medieval historian, writes in Buloogh al Muram that his household and friends freed 39,237 slaves.
You see, Mohammad's whole prophecy was about freeing human beings from slavery of all kinds, the word Islam itself has the meaning of anti-slavery and submission.
Pro-slavery indeed.
The high point of Arab slave trade was well after that pbuh dude came along.L0st Id3ntity said:(..)
Slavery was extremely widespread before islam in the arab peninsula, it was a huge population, banning it immediately would've been irrational and could've created chaos plus people will be reluctant in joining islam. Just like how islam banned alchohol eventually not immediately.
(...)
I'd link a research paper, but I can't find it on my hdd.Historians agree between 11 and 18 million Africans were enslaved by Arab slave traders and taken across the Red Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sahara desert between 650 and 1900,[4][5][6] compared to 9.4 to 14 million Africans brought to the Americas in the Atlantic slave trade[7] from 15th century to the early 19th century.