• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

AMC responds to 'texting' controversy

Status
Not open for further replies.
I must be one of the few people who aren't irritated with people on their phones... didn't think this was a big deal. I always have my phone on silent/airplane mode and stay away from it till the after the movie but it's never bothered me when other people do it unless they actually call someone.
 
Considering how HORRIBLE the idea was to begin with and how swift the response, this can be nothing but free publicity for them and that's all. I just can't see reasonably that they would have seriously considered such an idea.
 
ITT Ray Wonder wonders why people don't support his smartphone addiction.

We need more theaters who are willing to kick people out for violating the no phone policy. No refunds. I don't know how AMC thought it was ever a good idea to have texting theaters.
 
Do you work in the emergency services? If you don't, it's probably highly unlikely you will ever need to deal with something so urgent that you have to rush out of the cinema.

I don't know, maybe it's because I went the first 20 years of my life without having a phone at all, but it really doesn't seem like much of a sacrifice to me to turn my phone off when going to the cinema. I'm in my 30s now and so far I haven't missed any emergencies, nor have I ever witnessed anyone rush out of the cinema to deal with an emergency. It might be worth considering how important responding to something so promptly really is. Most of the time, it probably isn't, you've just been conditioned to think it is.


I'm much the same and mostly actively ignore my phone most of the day. It's handy to have easy access to email, the net etc. everywhere, but I feel no need to be constantly checking it, constantly communicating with people etc. Then again, I'm mostly a loner and my close friends are mostly the same and we'd rather just talk in person when we hangout rather than be texting or calling constantly.
 
I know smokers who don't go to theaters because they can't smoke. That's their choice but they still bitch about it.

If you can't go 2 hours without a smoke or your cellphone, I actually pity you. Deal with it or don't go.
 
You literally cannot prove that you being in the theater with people isn't annoying anyone either, but you assume it isn't because that's the obvious thing to do. It's obvious you're not. I don't need scientific theories and experiments to know I'm not bothering anyone.

What the hell are you even arguing about anymore?
 
I'd be happy if AMC started offering better food and local craft beer at their theaters.

C'mon now, we just stuck it to antsy phone fucks that care not about ruining the experience for others cause they get withdrawals if they go a minute without basking in the glow of their cellphones. We sure as hell don't need AMCs to become artsy-fartsy Hipster hubs. Keep that shit exclusive to smaller, indie-styled theaters, thank you very much!

Though, that would be kinda cool(food and beer).
 
I must be one of the few people who aren't irritated with people on their phones... didn't think this was a big deal. I always have my phone on silent/airplane mode and stay away from it till the after the movie but it's never bothered me when other people do it unless they actually call someone.

It's bright, distracting and annoying. The lights go out to immerse you in the experience with zero visual distraction. You're an outlier.
 
What the hell are you even arguing about anymore?

People accuse me of annoying people, without evidence that I am.

I inform them that I'm actually not.

They say I'm terrible, and tell me how impossible what i'm accomplishing is. Like i'm trying to get to the moon with a ramp and a tricycle.
 
People accuse me of annoying people, without evidence that I am.

I inform them that I'm actually not.

They say I'm terrible, and tell me how impossible what i'm accomplishing is. Like i'm trying to get to the moon with a ramp and a tricycle.

Crossfit people also think they're not annoying, because they don't realize they are and also think "lol they're talking about other people, I don't do that"
 
People accuse me of annoying people, without evidence that I am.

I inform them that I'm actually not.

They say I'm terrible, and tell me how impossible what i'm accomplishing is. Like i'm trying to get to the moon with a ramp and a tricycle.

exhibit a:

I'll still text, just turn the brightness down and shield the light a bit. If you just attempt to be an alright person while doing it, it's not hard to pull off.
 
I didn't have this process thought out, it just happens, because I'm thinking about who is around me. I typed it up for all of you.

I'm pretty sure you're trolling at this point, so this is my last response to you in case you're not.

No one is disputing that you're not thinking about those around you. It's the fact that you insist on placing your urge for texting above the those around you. Yes, you "consider" those around you by minimizing the light, bravo. I do the same thing... when putting my phone on silent before the movie starts. That's what most people do. You don't, because you seem to think you're better than everyone and can do it in such a way that no one sees. You're the exception to the rule. The plebs can't figure out how text in a theater because they're not considerate enough. That seems to be you're line of thinking. However, the reality is the plebs are more considerate than you by not even touching their phone until the movie is over.
 
Things you don't do during movies:

Talk
Text
Fart
Eat/Drink loudly
etc

If you're being "THAT GUY" and you know you're being "THAT GUY" you deserve to be banned from theaters.
 
There are probably plenty of people who use their phones at the movies without you knowing. If you've never seen them, how do you know they don't exist?
 
Crossfit people also think they're not annoying, because they don't realize they are

I'm willing to bet some aren't annoying. Solely because they're better at not being annoying than others.

The evidence is the overwhelming amount of people telling you it's annoying. Your word doesn't supercede everyone else's.

You clearly came in the end of the argument. I have a guide now. lol. It's not about whether seeing a phone lit up is annoying or not. I think it is too, but I know when I'm choosing to do it, it's not bothering anyone. Literally that's all I'm saying.
 
It was an incredibly dumb idea in the first place, but I'm glad they're not considering it any further. I'd like to see them go in the other direction and place a zero tolerance policy on texting and talking.
 
C'mon now, we just stuck it to antsy phone fucks that care not about ruining the experience for others cause they get withdrawals if they go a minute without basking in the glow of their cellphones. We sure as hell don't need AMCs to become artsy-fartsy Hipster hubs. Keep that shit exclusive to smaller, indie-styled theaters, thank you very much!

Though, that would be kinda cool(food and beer).

Speaking to the Regal VIP section I mentioned above, it doesn't draw that crowd at all as they just have the current blockbusters playing in those two theaters. So it's just the regular crowd for those flicks, minus the kids and teens (due to being 21+) and talker adults (the higher ticket price seems to keep them away).

So it's a better experience, in nicer auditoriums with fewer seats and all seats being big recliners with foot rests, full bar service and decent food (not just the concessions crap). We pretty much only see movies if they're playing there now and wait for Netflix for the rest that they don't show in those two auditoriums.
 
There are probably plenty of people who use their phones at the movies without you knowing. If you've never seen them, how do you know they don't exist?
You'd have to first prove they aren't noticed by others before that line of thinking makes sense.
 
I wouldn't mind theaters implementing a Spotlight of Shame and shines a ridiculously bright light on texters for the ushers - dressed as prison guards - to come escort the texter away.
 
I really don't want you guys to pretend that when you get a message, you don't glance at it. That's irresponsible. If an emergency were to occur, you'd have no clue, because you didn't look at your phone to know if you need to leave the theateer.

My phone is off during a movie. I will check my messages after the movie is over. And I highly doubt there are emergencies that require your immediate response. Whatever is happening in the world, it will be OK if you wait 2 hours to respond.
 
There are probably plenty of people who use their phones at the movies without you knowing. If you've never seen them, how do you know they don't exist?

If you like to sit in the back of the theater, especially in a newer theater where the back is pretty high up, you see those people near the front all the time. Sure, the people immediately next to the texter didn't see anything, but the people 10+ rows back did. People like Ray Wonder don't think about that, though.
 
You'd have to first prove they aren't noticed by others before that line of thinking makes sense.

You'd have to first prove they are noticed by others before that line of thinking makes sense.

I'm not saying everyone who uses a phone isn't annoying anyone, but I also don't think it's some crazy feat of ingenuity to use a phone without creating a distraction in a movie theater.

edit:

Like, as a general rule, people shouldn't text during the movie. If you need to do something, take it outside. I agree on all of these points. I also don't think it matters that much and if one guy really wants to text or tries to be super discreet, go for it. Who cares.
 
If you like to sit in the back of the theater, especially in a newer theater where the back is pretty high up, you see those people near the front all the time. Sure, the people immediately next to the texter didn't see anything, but the people 10+ rows back did. People like Ray Wonder don't think about that, though.

Apparently you didn't read my guide sir. Because I literally mention that I text while behind people because I sit further back than most while in a non crowded theater.
 
You'd have to first prove they are noticed by others before that line of thinking makes sense.

I'm not saying everyone who uses a phone isn't annoying anyone, but I also don't think it's some crazy feat of ingenuity to use a phone without creating a distraction in a movie theater.

Thanks to this thread I have a new idea for a VR game. Theater Texting Simulator. In this game you must attempt to send various texts in a movie theater while not alerting those around you. It will be a true simulator in that it'll likely be an impossible game to beat.
 
I don't have to, the onus is on you to prove because you made the assertion. All i've done is point out the flaw.

Prove what? That people might have texted without you knowing about it? Do you want to prove to me that there might be ants in your walls?

I'm saying it's possible for someone to text in a movie theater without someone else noticing. You're saying that's impossible. Which one is crazier?

Obviously it's annoying to notice and that people who want to be courteous just shouldn't take the risk. But if some guy insists that he's not bugging anyone I'm not going to call him a "bad person" because I've never seen him.
 
Prove what? That people might have texted without you knowing about it? Do you want to prove to me that there might be ants in your walls?

I'm saying it's possible for someone to text in a movie theater without someone else noticing. You're saying that's impossible. Which one is crazier?

Obviously it's annoying to notice and that people who want to be courteous just shouldn't take the risk. But if some guy insists that he's not bugging anyone I'm not going to call him a "bad person" because I've never seen him.

I was starting to feel insane in here to be honest.

I'm not going to read your stupid guide on how to almost not be an asshole.

This is pretty childish of an argument. lol. Like "Lalalala I'm not listening"
 
Prove what? That people might have texted without you knowing about it? Do you want to prove to me that there might be ants in your walls?

(...)
Obviously it's annoying to notice and that people who want to be courteous just shouldn't take the risk. But if some guy insists that he's not bugging anyone I'm not going to call him a "bad person" because I've never seen him.
Yes, you'd need to prove that no one notices, since you said it. People are dogpiling on Ray because he's being obtuse.
 
I was starting to feel insane in here to be honest.
This is pretty childish of an argument. lol. Like "Lalalala I'm not listening"

Not really. I have zero desire to text in a movie theater, and if I chose to do so, I'm pretty sure I could figure it out with out ever reading your guide. Nor do I care to know about the all the steps you take to be "considerate" of others.
 
If only they could double down and somehow put an enforcement policy in place.

This. Still people that do it or even take phone calls sometimes.

Apparently you didn't read my guide sir. Because I literally mention that I text while behind people because I sit further back than most while in a non crowded theater.

Why don't you just watch the movie you paid for? You can leave your phone alone for 2 hours. If it's an emergency that's one thing, but you act like you do it all the time. Which would be annoying to go with you.

Yeah the "what about emergencies" thing doesn't really fly. Are you a doctor on call? Is your wife due soon? If neither of these are "yes" then there aren't many other realistic "emergencies", just bad news you might not hear about for an hour. Which I appreciate people wanting to know about as soon as possible but that's a psychological thing more than a practical one.

I can bet you that near 100% of the time when people text at the theatre, it's not remotely an emergency anyway. The whole "what if it's an emergency" excuse is wearing thin.

Yeah unless you are an EMT/Dr/Firefighter or new parent or something there is no reason to check your phone or even leave it on vibrate/ring.
 
Believe me, I'm not [ashamed]. Even in the slightest.
Of course you aren't. Inconsiderate jerks never are.

I'm sure they did, and I'll leave this argument right here because I can't combat perfect situation anecdotal evidence unless I say something like "My buddies told me they couldn't see my light."
Your buddies are probably too nice to tell you that you're a jerkass.

I said I'm courteous while doing so. If you choose to believe that it's not possible, that's on you. Not me.
Why should we believe your claim when it's so spurious?

Do you work in the emergency services? If you don't, it's probably highly unlikely you will ever need to deal with something so urgent that you have to rush out of the cinema.

I don't know, maybe it's because I went the first 20 years of my life without having a phone at all, but it really doesn't seem like much of a sacrifice to me to turn my phone off when going to the cinema. I'm in my 30s now and so far I haven't missed any emergencies, nor have I ever witnessed anyone rush out of the cinema to deal with an emergency. It might be worth considering how important responding to something so promptly really is. Most of the time, it probably isn't, you've just been conditioned to think it is.
Crazy isn't it. How did we ever live before smartphones? How do people manage to spend 2 hours without looking at their phones??

I can bet you that near 100% of the time when people text at the theatre, it's not remotely an emergency anyway. The whole "what if it's an emergency" excuse is wearing thin.

Edit:
This is pretty childish of an argument. lol. Like "Lalalala I'm not listening"
Damn, now that's irony.
 
Yeah the "what about emergencies" thing doesn't really fly. Are you a doctor on call? Is your wife due soon? If neither of these are "yes" then there aren't many other realistic "emergencies", just bad news you might not hear about for an hour. Which I appreciate people wanting to know about as soon as possible but that's a psychological thing more than a practical one.
 
Gonna quote the top reddit comment because it basically captures how I feel about this "outrage" news

DynamicImpulses @Reddit said:
I'm glad to see the definitive statement against it, but I was really frustrated by how much the story was blown out of proportion in the first place.
If you read the initial interview, you merely have a new CEO who was asked a leading question about whether allowing texting or cellphone use may be something the company should consider to draw in a younger audience, and the new guy on the block basically said 'yeah, we have to be open to that and other ideas, as long as it doesn't piss off anyone else.' Somehow, that turned into "AMC wants to allow texting!!!"
 
I wouldn't mind theaters implementing a Spotlight of Shame and shines a ridiculously bright light on texters for the ushers - dressed as prison guards - to come escort the texter away.
The spotlight of shame is when the whole theater can see your phone and then everyone roasts you.
 
I don't see anything wrong with AMC asking people if texting should be allowed or not. This is a sign of a responsive, pro-customer company when they ask if you want something and then act accordingly.

With that said, there's almost no reason to text in a movie theater. When I'm waiting for the movie to start, I turn my ringer off and turn brightness all the way down. If I get a text during a movie I might check it by holding my phone close to my chest or in my lap while looking at lock screen notifications, so that other people can't see my phone. However, short of needing to respond to my babysitter, I cannot recall ever responding to a text during a movie. It's just not needed.
 
Yeah the "what about emergencies" thing doesn't really fly. Are you a doctor on call? Is your wife due soon? If neither of these are "yes" then there aren't many other realistic "emergencies", just bad news you might not hear about for an hour. Which I appreciate people wanting to know about as soon as possible but that's a psychological thing more than a practical one.

Exactly. Movies are my time. I'm never going to get a text, call, email etc. that not taking immediately would be a matter of life and death to anyone.

Bad news, a work "emergency" from a colleague or anything else will be there when I'm done. I've deliberately built a life for myself that's low stress, low drama and emergency free beyond the general death, illnesses etc to friends and family. And I'd rather get that kind of bad news after the movie since there's nothing I can do about it anyway.
 
There was so much anger in the original topic. I can't believe how passionate and furious people get over this. I only go to new movies in theaters like once a year though so I guess I'm just some schlub.
 
There was so much anger in the original topic. I can't believe how passionate and furious people get over this. I only go to new movies in theaters like once a year though so I guess I'm just some schlub.

i don't go very often but that makes it even worse because i've paid money and allocated a big chunk of time to see a movie i'm really interested in and some asshole lights up his or her cellphone in the middle of it. people who do that tend to be repeat offenders too, very rarely do i see a screen come up just once in a movie.

it's why i pretty much only go to alamo drafthouse these days. it costs more but they have a good beer selection and everyone knows the rules.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom