Funtruck said:even the Mac pros aren't overpriced, youre just not the correct market for them
if youre in the need of a really high end mac than you have no other choicebrucewaynegretzky said:Wait what? If I want those specs I can get them cheaper. That is overpriced.
The Mac experience is more than just specs.brucewaynegretzky said:Wait what? If I want those specs I can get them cheaper. That is overpriced.
Maybe, maybe not. I know a few music professionals (producers) who use Hackintoshes.Funtruck said:most professionals are not gonna build hackintoshes either
in terms of the raw speed they provide, sure. but Mac Pros use server-grade parts that carry much higher costs.brucewaynegretzky said:Wait what? If I want those specs I can get them cheaper. That is overpriced.
I don't think lots of people disable UAC. It was kind of the "cool" thing to do back years and years ago when Vista first launched because the prompts were annoying but Windows 7 toned it way way way down. Similarly, I haven't used Vista since Windows 7 came out but I think they may of slowed down there as well with updates.Dreams-Visions said:1.) Lots of people disable UAC entirely. Principally because UAC by default behaves a bit differently. Depending on the application you run, UAC will ask you *every time* for permission to open or run an application (see: HWMonitor, for example) unless you select to "run as admin" from the app's properties. Most people don't know to do that, so they just suffer with the regular warnings. This has led people to disabling it entirely. OSX warns you once and never again. The difference is *huge*. OSX requirement to enter the admin password to install something cannot be disabled. Malware can't infect the system without requesting the password to obtain said Administrator privileges.
yep, and the professionals in the market for Mac pros usually need server grade partsscorcho said:in terms of the raw speed they provide, sure. but Mac Pros use server-grade parts that carry much higher costs.
Funtruck said:yep, and the professionals in the market for Mac pros usually need server grade parts
people pointing out Mac pros to be the clear example of apples crazy prices always get a chuckle out of me
unlike the MacBook pros the Mac pros are really for pros
You might be right. Lots of people *I know* do disable it, though. Small sample size is small. That being said, regular UAC *is* more annoying than OS X's implementation. I use both daily. Some apps force UAC every time they're ran. If you don't use any of those programs (like GPU-Z), good for you. Again, it ONLY pops up on OS X when installing a program or seeking Admin access. In Windows, it will happen when installing an app or simply running certain programs.Houston3000 said:I don't think lots of people disable UAC. It was kind of the "cool" thing to do back years and years ago when Vista first launched because the prompts were annoying but Windows 7 toned it way way way down. Similarly, I haven't used Vista since Windows 7 came out but I think they may of slowed down there as well with updates.
I mean, I think I saw one prompt within the last week or two on my PC because I was adding a new Java environment variable in my control panel so I could run this XML processor we use at work for web development. Something I doubt most Mac users would ever do anyways... I guess when I install a program it pops up but no more often then the OSX password prompt would.
are you a professional that need Mac os x?eastmen said:i can still build a server of the same specs for less than the price of a mac pro.
All mac products except the iphone and ipad are over priced and even then some ipad /iphone models are a bit over priced
Funtruck said:are you a professional that need Mac os x?
Incorrect.eastmen said:All mac products except the iphone and ipad are over priced and even then some ipad /iphone models are a bit over priced
is this a serious question?eastmen said:Who in their right mind needs Mac OS X ? But I am a professional
Some people need Final Cut X.eastmen said:Who in their right mind needs Mac OS X ? But I am a professional
alot of professionals prefer working on os xeastmen said:Who in their right mind needs Mac OS X ? But I am a professional
Funtruck said:alot of professionals prefer working on os x
Copernicus said:People need to stop using "professional" as if it means something.
steve fucking jobs.
"Why does anyone in their right mind need a WinBox? For every program on Windows, there is a counterpart on Linux....which is comparatively cheaper. Preference is not the same as a requirement."eastmen said:Perhaps they do , however for every program on the Mac there is a counter part on the pc .
Prefrence is not the same as a requirement .
do i really have to explain how silly what youre saying iseastmen said:Perhaps they do , however for every program on the Mac there is a counter part on the pc .
Prefrence is not the same as a requirement .
huh? GPU-Z and HWMonitor are programs that need, much like some OSX programs, admin access. Onyx is an OSX utility that needs an admin password every time it's launched as well.Dreams-Visions said:You might be right. Lots of people *I know* do disable it, though. Small sample size is small. That being said, regular UAC *is* more annoying than OS X's implementation. I use both daily. Some apps force UAC every time they're ran. If you don't use any of those programs (like GPU-Z), good for you. Again, it ONLY pops up on OS X when installing a program or seeking Admin access. In Windows, it will happen when installing an app or simply running certain programs.
I stand corrected on that point, then. I forgot about Onyx.scorcho said:huh? GPU-Z and HWMonitor are programs that need, much like some OSX programs, admin access. Onyx is an OSX utility that needs an admin password every time it's launched as well.
the vast majority of both Windows and Mac programs do not require admin access to run and thus don't ask for a UAC prompt/password box.
LaserBuddha said:It's not solely due to that.Stop being sillyStop spouting bullshit you heard somewhere. Especially since this isn't a virus.
Dazzla said:Maybe it's the naivety of OS X users. I recently cleaned this up on my cousins Macbook..
4 trojans in 2 years? and no viruses? I probably won't be losing any sleep at all.bdizzle said:No it's very true. Mac's still have <15% market share in the US. They're still a non factor, but there's tons of vulnerabilities for that platform.
http://www.securemac.com/
As Mac's market share grows, so will the number of threats from attackers. Window's has been a huge target for almost 2 decades. Now apple is about to have their turn.
What the hell? This method is old as shit. How could anyone fall for that?Treefingers said:Looking at a video showing how it works, it is actually pretty damn clever. They convincingly faked an OS X window in a website.
I tried to buy a MacBook Pro and a Mac Pro. They didn't let me purchase without first verifying my employment. I needed a recent pay stub and a W-2. Shit is ridiculous.Copernicus said:People need to stop using "professional" as if it means something.
steve fucking jobs.
Google "XP Internet Security". It's the big Windows version going around right now. Basically, people see something that looks official and assume it is. I've removed it from at least 4 of my friends' computers. It's significantly harder to remove than this Mac thing. Quite the bitch, really.Teetris said:What the hell? This method is old as shit. How could anyone fall for that?
edit, holy crap. So it's basically "please enter your CC number here", but you have to do so many things to get there :/
I'd like to hear it actually, his comment sounded remarkably moderate.Funtruck said:do i really have to explain how silly what youre saying is
"Why does anyone in their right mind need a WinBox? For every program on Windows, there is a counterpart on Linux. Preference is not the same as a requirement."catfish said:I'd like to hear it actually, his comment sounded remarkably moderate.
Dreams-Visions said:You might be right. Lots of people *I know* do disable it, though. Small sample size is small. That being said, regular UAC *is* more annoying than OS X's implementation. I use both daily. Some apps force UAC every time they're ran. If you don't use any of those programs (like GPU-Z), good for you. Again, it ONLY pops up on OS X when installing a program or seeking Admin access. In Windows, it will happen when installing an app or simply running certain programs.
But yes, UAC is much less intrusive than the early days of Vista. Still annoying enough to disable, though.
Also, there are an awful lot of web developers here that use OS X with Coda/Dreamweaver. Why would you have assumed otherwise? That was pretty silly of you.
remarkably ridiculous and inconsiderate maybecatfish said:I'd like to hear it actually, his comment sounded remarkably moderate.
Dreams-Visions said:"Why does anyone in their right mind need a WinBox? For every program on Windows, there is a counterpart on Linux. Preference is not the same as a requirement."
do you have any reasonable objection to this comment?
lol that's exactly what we're saying.KiKaL said:I don't know if you are being serious but there is a reason why every machine in our office has Parallels and Windows installed as well as a Windows machine. Really not trying to jump in the whole Mac vs PC argument but not everything has a counterpart unfortunately. To each his own.
bdizzle said:As Mac's market share grows, so will the number of threats from attackers. Window's has been a huge target for almost 2 decades. Now apple is about to have their turn.
ha, yea it's not the safest move ever.gohepcat said:Wow. Disabling UAC is an AWFUL idea. The examples you are using are super rare and totally logical. (Both are accessing low level hardware. Both are not "normal" programs). UAC pops up in logical instances. It pops up the same places I would expect it to in OSX.
UAC was the BEST thing MS did with Vista/7. It forced developers to design their software such that privilege elevations aren't needed in the first place...and it WORKED. UAC prompts dropped as soon as developers realized they had to tighten up their shit.
Why would you be using GPU-Z or HWinfo everyday?
cause all the l33t hackers are too busy playing with their android phonesKung Fu Jedi said:So how come there are far more Macs out there today then there were in the OS 7, 8, and 9 eras, and yet there were far more viruses written for them back then?
Sure, market share remains small in comparison to Windows, but Apple sells a lot more Macs now then it ever has, and yet they had worse viruses issues in the 90's.
Funtruck said:yep, and the professionals in the market for Mac pros usually need server grade parts
people pointing out Mac pros to be the clear example of apples crazy prices always get a chuckle out of me
unlike the MacBook pros the Mac pros are really for pros
call me when you can officially install os x on itevil solrac v3.0 said:nope, I can build with server parts and it would still come out cheaper.
blame space said:hey how about instead of fighting like babies we focus our frustration towards people that get viruses and expect you to fix it because you're "good with computers!"
i guess it's not the fact that they ask -- it's kind of empowering to know that they can look to me for help -- it's just the fact that they NEVER EVER WANT TO CHANGE OR LEARN.
sad but true. then again, we here at GAF are most likely to be in the segment of tech junkies who don't mind wasting endless hours of our personal time to learn better, more efficient ways to use our electronics.blame space said:it's just the fact that they NEVER EVER WANT TO CHANGE OR LEARN.
blame space said:hey how about instead of fighting like babies we focus our frustration towards people that get viruses and expect you to fix it because you're "good with computers!"
i guess it's not the fact that they ask -- it's kind of empowering to know that they can look to me for help -- it's the fact that they never put forth the effort to change or learn. why should they, after all? i'm the one that's good with computers! -_-
Your argument is circular...Funtruck said:call me when you can officially install os x on it
uhhh noLonely1 said:Your argument is circular...
*shrug*brucewaynegretzky said:Wait what? If I want those specs I can get them cheaper. That is overpriced.
Slingbox doesn't work at all in Linux.Dreams-Visions said:"Why does anyone in their right mind need a WinBox? For every program on Windows, there is a counterpart on Linux. Preference is not the same as a requirement."
do you have any reasonable objection to this comment?
Captain Sparrow said:I love this.
It's so funny watching all these Mac users freaking out from atop their high horse.
Why did past iterations of Mac OS have more viruses?dorkimoe said:I stand by my theory that i have been telling customers who want to switch to mac for the last 2 years
Once mac becomes the majority consumer product, it will have just as many viruses/spyware/malware as pc does.
Why would anyone waste their time targeting the minority when you can go after the majority. (ie stealing info)