Chuckie
Member
PhoncipleBone said:Watch the original Superman and Superman II.
As I kid I was in love with Ursa. So hot and such a meany.
PhoncipleBone said:Watch the original Superman and Superman II.
Tence said:Now where are we gonna put the Hulk![]()
Ulairi said:Why the hate for Thor?
megashock5 said:Tier 1
Superman (78)
Batman Begins
X2
Spider-Man 2
Tier 2
Iron Man
TDK
Spider-Man 1
Superman 2
Tier 3
Iron Man 2
X-Men
Tier 9
X3
Spider-Man 3
then the rest
DryEyeRelief said:I would put TKD on the top as the best movie.
MisterHero said:why are people underrating Superman II when Spider-man 2 lifts its plot
why why why
Because of the changes the Salkinds and Richard Lester put into Superman II. There are parts of Superman II that are still damn near perfect to this day, then you get into the throwing the S logo at people and ice cream flying in a guy's face. It is funny how different Superman II is from scene to scene, but when the movie is working it is firing on all cylinders. It doesn't hurt that it has one of the best villains of any superhero film.MisterHero said:why are people underrating Superman II when Spider-man 2 lifts its plot
why why why
PhoncipleBone said:Because of the changes the Salkinds and Richard Lester put into Superman II. There are parts of Superman II that are still damn near perfect to this day, then you get into the throwing the S logo at people and ice cream flying in a guy's face. It is funny how different Superman II is from scene to scene, but when the movie is working it is firing on all cylinders. It doesn't hurt that it has one of the best villains of any superhero film.
But the parts that are amazing far outshine the bad parts. I absolutely love Superman II, but I would rank it below Superman I though. I just wish we could get Superman II made with today's technology and a tighter script, but keep the same cast. Reeve WAS Superman, and Terrance Stamp was just badass personified in that movie.megashock5 said:Spot on. Parts of it are amazing, but there are parts that keep it from being great as a whole.
PhoncipleBone said:But the parts that are amazing far outshine the bad parts. I absolutely love Superman II, but I would rank it below Superman I though. I just wish we could get Superman II made with today's technology and a tighter script, but keep the same cast. Reeve WAS Superman, and Terrance Stamp was just badass personified in that movie.
It was awful.Sanjuro Tsubaki said:Oh, this thread. Iron Man 2 should be tier 9 as well. What a clusterfuck.
You know I've asked that question for a long time and this didn't occur to me. :lolBlader5489 said:Spider-Man 2 takes it plot from a comic that predates Superman II by like a decade.
Yeah if anything the Richard Donner version shows that it could've been much improved.PhoncibleBone said:Because of the changes the Salkinds and Richard Lester put into Superman II. There are parts of Superman II that are still damn near perfect to this day, then you get into the throwing the S logo at people and ice cream flying in a guy's face. It is funny how different Superman II is from scene to scene, but when the movie is working it is firing on all cylinders. It doesn't hurt that it has one of the best villains of any superhero film.
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:Oh, this thread. Iron Man 2 should be tier 9 as well. What a clusterfuck.
megashock5 said:Sam Rockwell = higher than tier 9 by default.
Helicopter scene is still the king. The thing that sells that movie is the music by John Williams.megashock5 said:Superman I is nearly perfect (icy Krypton aside), especially for it's time. Superhero movies are so commonplace and nothing seems amazing anymore. That movie really capture the awe and wonder that people would have if they actually saw a person fly. That helicopter scene gives me goosebumps to this day.
PhoncipleBone said:Helicopter scene is still the king. The thing that sells that movie is the music by John Williams.
I don't know if I would say it is Williams' best score, but that period of the mid 70s to late 80s, Williams was on God Mode the entire time.megashock5 said:I grew up as a HUGE Star Wars fan. I still have boxes upon boxes of the toys, it ruled a good 6-7 years of my life. And I STILL think Superman is John Williams best score. I don't think it will ever be topped, it's utterly fantastic.
Nah, just which superhero movies we all love.krypt0nian said:I see the thread has devolved into the usual movie equivalent of Hulk can beat up Wonder Woman shit. :lol
wait...krypt0nian said:I see the thread has devolved into the usual movie equivalent of Hulk can beat up Wonder Woman shit. :lol
MisterHero said:wait...
is hulk really stronger than wonder woman?
PhoncipleBone said:Nah, just which superhero movies we all love.
Here, let me get it back on track:
I have a bad feeling about the new Spider Man movie. Garfield is a good actor, but the leaked pics look like shit. Emma Stone looks great as Gwen Stacy, but everything else about the film has given me a really bad feeling that this movie is going to be complete shit. I want to be wrong, but my gut is saying the film will be a clusterfuck.![]()
Is that more on topic?
Honestly, it's the creative decisions that have me more concerned than anything else.PhoncipleBone said:Nah, just which superhero movies we all love.
Here, let me get it back on track:
I have a bad feeling about the new Spider Man movie. Garfield is a good actor, but the leaked pics look like shit. Emma Stone looks great as Gwen Stacy, but everything else about the film has given me a really bad feeling that this movie is going to be complete shit. I want to be wrong, but my gut is saying the film will be a clusterfuck.![]()
Is that more on topic?
Solo said:I'm mostly curious to see how it performs at the box office. Are the masses willing to accept a new Spider-Man so soon?
brandonh83 said:It will have been five years and coming off the stench of Spider-man 3. I'm sure it has a chance. :lol
Don't forget great DVD sales and great ratings on TV.Solo said:Hey, BB came 8 years after Batman and Robin, and it hardly lit the world on fire. It eventually had a solid run due to WOM, but it didnt start off too well.
That is my curiosity as well.Solo said:I'm mostly curious to see how it performs at the box office. Are the masses willing to accept a new Spider-Man so soon?
MisterHero said:Nah Superman IV is really bad. It has some interesting concepts (like Clark finally letting Lois know and Superman trying to promote nuclear disarmament) but Batman and Robin at least has pretty (though overdone) effects like sky surfing. :lol
And screw the haters, Mr. Freeze was awesome. Badass actor in a badass costume with badass ice-related puns
x Power Pad Death Stomp x said:Spider Man 3 is bad, but it's not Batman and Robin bad. That has to be the worse superhero movie ever on every level.
megashock5 said:After seeing the first 3 in the theater, I stayed away for B&R based on the previews. I started trying to watch it on TBS years later, and could only get through about half of it. Without a doubt the worst ever (although I've never seen Catwoman), astoundingly awful.
x Power Pad Death Stomp x said:Catwoman commits the ultimate bad movie sin: it's not funny, it's boring. Outside of one line at the end, when Sharon Stone, powered by super makeup , knocks catwoman down and says "It's over!" and then Catwoman jumps up and says "No, IT'S OVERTIME!", it's a snoozefest.
DMczaf said:You forgot about the best basketball scene of all-time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNlmRId2FVQ
I still can't believe WB greenlit this and Batman Begins at the same time :lol
DMczaf said:You forgot about the best basketball scene of all-time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNlmRId2FVQ
I still can't believe WB greenlit this and Batman Begins at the same time :lol
Blatz said:If you can manage to separate good movies from movies you enjoy, then you should be able to see that TDK is a near perfect film. Regardless of genre.
Solo said:Not even remotely close. I mean, holy shit :lol
Casablanca is a near perfect film. 8 1/2 is a near perfect film. Taxi Driver is a near perfect film. The Dark Knight is a very ambitious but heavily flawed movie.
TDK is the perfect example of a movie that will not hold up with time. On multiple viewings, the plot holes become that much more apparent and the batman voice from Bale is absolutely ridiculous.Blatz said:BB and TDK are both Tier 1. Are you guys kidding? I'd put TDK at the top (if not the top) of the comic book movies all time.
If you can manage to separate good movies from movies you enjoy, then you should be able to see that TDK is a near perfect film. Regardless of genre.
Atonement is a good example. It was a very good film, but I hated it.
Solo said:Not even remotely close. I mean, holy shit :lol
Casablanca is a near perfect film. 8 1/2 is a near perfect film. Taxi Driver is a near perfect film. The Dark Knight is a very ambitious but heavily flawed movie.
Gui_PT said:Explain!
I'm not saying I don't agree, I'd just like to read your opinion.
Solo said:For every Heath Ledger, Gary Oldman and Aaron Eckhart turning in a great performance, you've got a Maggie Gyllenhaal, Eric Roberts, and Christian Bale hamming it up or sleepwalking (Bale does both as Batman/Bruce Wayne!) through the movie.
The editing/pacing is horrendous. The movie is a good half hour too long and it loses momentum and comes to a complete halt several times. Christopher Nolan also cannot direct or cut an action sequence to save his life, as we've been over 100 times.
The movie is so on-the-nose with its themes and hammers them in ad nauseum, and third act descends into stupidity of an even greater degree than BB's vapor vaporizer stuff. The ferry scene is just awful. Why does Alfred always seem to have a monologue waiting to get out?
For all the acclaim thrown at the series for being unsentimental and real, its just as cheesey as the Spider-Man movies, albeit completely unintentionally. Nolan continues to completely fail on injecting his movie with "humor" ("its like turkeys on Christmas!") which always stands out in a bad way, and some of the monologues and conversations are 100% cheddar, namely the big final scene between Joker and Batman, in which a combination of the writing and (mostly) Christian Bale's delivery turn it from what was supposed to be the emotional climax of the film into a scene that makes you chuckle.
In brief: ensemble cast is very hit or miss, writing is as subtle as a hammer to the nuts, corny, Christopher Nolan action LOL.
Solo said:For every Heath Ledger, Gary Oldman and Aaron Eckhart turning in a great performance, you've got a Maggie Gyllenhaal, Eric Roberts, and Christian Bale hamming it up or sleepwalking (Bale does both as Batman/Bruce Wayne!) through the movie.
The editing/pacing is horrendous. The movie is a good half hour too long and it loses momentum and comes to a complete halt several times. Christopher Nolan also cannot direct or cut an action sequence to save his life, as we've been over 100 times.
The movie is so on-the-nose with its themes and hammers them in ad nauseum, and third act descends into stupidity of an even greater degree than BB's vapor vaporizer stuff. The ferry scene is just awful. Why does Alfred always seem to have a monologue waiting to get out?
For all the acclaim thrown at the series for being unsentimental and real, its just as cheesey as the Spider-Man movies, albeit completely unintentionally. Nolan continues to completely fail on injecting his movie with "humor" ("its like turkeys on Christmas!") which always stands out in a bad way, and some of the monologues and conversations are 100% cheddar, namely the big final scene between Joker and Batman, in which a combination of the writing and (mostly) Christian Bale's delivery turn it from what was supposed to be the emotional climax of the film into a scene that makes you chuckle.
In brief: ensemble cast is very hit or miss, writing is as subtle as a hammer to the nuts, corny, Christopher Nolan action LOL.
Solo said:For every Heath Ledger, Gary Oldman and Aaron Eckhart turning in a great performance, you've got a Maggie Gyllenhaal, Eric Roberts, and Christian Bale hamming it up or sleepwalking (Bale does both as Batman/Bruce Wayne!) through the movie.
The editing/pacing is horrendous. The movie is a good half hour too long and it loses momentum and comes to a complete halt several times. Christopher Nolan also cannot direct or cut an action sequence to save his life, as we've been over 100 times.
The movie is so on-the-nose with its themes and hammers them in ad nauseum, and third act descends into stupidity of an even greater degree than BB's vapor vaporizer stuff. The ferry scene is just awful. Why does Alfred always seem to have a monologue waiting to get out?
For all the acclaim thrown at the series for being unsentimental and real, its just as cheesey as the Spider-Man movies, albeit completely unintentionally. Nolan continues to completely fail on injecting his movie with "humor" ("its like turkeys on Christmas!") which always stands out in a bad way, and some of the monologues and conversations are 100% cheddar, namely the big final scene between Joker and Batman, in which a combination of the writing and (mostly) Christian Bale's delivery turn it from what was supposed to be the emotional climax of the film into a scene that makes you chuckle.
In brief: ensemble cast is very hit or miss, writing is as subtle as a hammer to the nuts, corny, Christopher Nolan action LOL.