VS
What I'd like to see from a Galaxy 'Nexus S'
Given that all signs point to Samsung releasing a stock Android handset powered by Gingerbread in time for Christmas, I think now is a good time to review the areas where the 'Nexus S' needs to improve over the Nexus One in order to make it a must have handset for stock Android enthusiasts and developers. I'm focusing on hardware only, not what Gingerbread may offer in terms of software.
1. Screen
The issue - The Nexus One was one of the first smartphone handsets to employ an Amoled screen, delivering crisp blacks and outstanding colours. Where it lacked though is screen visibility in direct sunlight - In my home country of Scotland this isn't much of an issue (Grr Scottish weather!) but for a lot of people this can be a real bugbear
The answer - At the very least we need to see the next generation of Amoled screens on the Nexus S. That is of course Samsung's 'Super Amoled' technology offering even deeper blacks, better power management and most importantly better screen visibility in direct sunlight. Not perfect visibility but certainly a step up.
Likelihood - For me it's a 99% certainty we would see Super Amoled on a Samsung produced Nexus phone - It just wouldn't make sense to release a flagship Gingerbread handset and not use Samsung's market leading screen technology.
2. Touch Screen and capacitive keys
The issue - The Nexus One released to a huge fanfare - but it wasn't long before tech sites and users picked up on an odd issue with the screen. When using two finger pressed on the screen and swapping axis using those fingers it was possible to confuse the phone as to where you were actually pressing. This may have been as a result of Android not initially being designed with multi touch in mind (due to a rumoured gentlemen's agreement with Apple) and was a limitation of the touch screen panel chosen for the phone. In practice this actually has a negligible impact on the handsets day to day use, however it was blown out of all proportion mostly by iOS fanboys and technology sites looking to gain hits. There were also some odd issues on Android 2.1 with the handset sometimes registering single presses in the wrong place, something fixed when Android 2.2 was released. On top of this there were some complaints that the capacitive buttons on the handset weren't aligned correctly so that you had to press the top part of the keys to register a touch, again certainly overblown in the press but definitely an area where a small improvement is required.
The answer - Touch screen panels have come on significantly since the release of the Nexus due to ongoing pressure in the market to create bigger, better panels to stay one step ahead of the competition. Certainly the newer panels employed by Samsung and HTC allow for unlimited touch inputs and exhibit none of the issues with 'axis swapping'. Not only that but the Galaxy S handsets have been lauded for showing excellent touch responsiveness, including the capacitive keys. Therefore Samsung simply need to use the same touch technology in the next nexus handset.
Likelihood - 100%. It's unthinkable that we will have nexus one type touch screen issues on a modern panel. Samsung would have to take a step backwards for this to be an issue.
Internal Memory
The issue - If memory serves the Nexus One only has 190mb (from 512mb internal memory) on which to install apps which is simply nowhere near enough. Even with Froyo allowing you to move the bulk of selected apps onto SD card (the app has to be programmed to allow this and apps which support widgets should not be installable to SD), I constantly find myself having to uninstall apps in order to clear space, which is highly frustrating. Worse yet when the handset gets low on space (under 20mb of internal memory) it will reject incoming text messages with no way to retrieve them.
The answer - Greater internal memory. The Galaxy S line up already have significantly greater internal memory, thus making my Nexus issues a thing of the past. Where Samsung need to be careful though is the type of internal memory they use - Galaxy S handsets have suffered stalling issues when loading apps due to slow internal memory, something that would be unacceptable to me as it would be a backwards step from the Nexus One.
Likelihood - 100% we will see greater internal memory - where it gets murky is with the type of internal memory Samsung will use. Hopefully they have learnt from the stalling issues and if the handset has been tested on campus at Google I would expect them to not let this slip past un-noticed. The last thing a Nexus handset sequel needs is the kind of negative press that dogged the first few months of the Nexus One's release.
3. Build quality
The issue - The Teflon coating on the Nexus One was prone to either rubbing off or discolouration where the bottom contacts of the handset were. This was rumoured to be related to the neoprene slipcase the handset came with or the charging/bluetooth dock. This is something that has affected me personally. In all honesty due to the location of the discolouration and the nature of the handset bottom being quite dark, it's nigh on impossible to notice unless you are looking for it. Nevertheless if you are paying $529 dollars for the handset (over £350 after taxes and shipping in the UK) you don't expect build quality issues.
The answer - Fairly simple this one, more rigorous testing and learning form previous mistakes. I'd be amazed if Google haven't learnt from and ensured that all the issues that were complained about from the Nexus One weren't discussed with Samsung. What some people are concerned about are Samsung's love of plasticky products, which would be a step back from the solid feel of the original Nexus. As light and slim as the Galaxy S handsets are the plastic nature does tend to make them feel a cheaper option compared to recent HTC handsets such as the T-Mobile G2, HTC Desire HD and HTC Legend. Let's see some metal in the construction Samsung, a flagship Google handset should have the looks and build quality to rival the iPhone 4, in the same way the Nexus One was at the very least the equal of a 3gs.
Likelihood - 50/50. I don't think Teflon issues will come into play here, but I am concerned about overuse of glossy plastic and the handset coming off as a 3gs clone - certainly true of the European Galaxy S. Taylor of Android and Me has said a combination of metals and plastics are used in the construction. I certainly hope he is right.
4. Reception
The issue - Ok this is the biggie. There is absolutely no doubt that the Nexus One is not great at picking up a signal particularly in weak areas. Not only that but it has a worrying habit of dropping to no signal at all, sending incoming calls to voicemail without you even knowing it. When I first got my handset the phone would regularly drop data connection for no reason - Only fixed by booting the handset into airplane mode and back out again, which was incredibly frustrating. Come 2.2 and improved radios I no longer have this issue. However I do still have people telling me they tried to contact me but went straight to voicemail, even where I know I'm in an area with reasonable reception. Not only that but my 3g iPad absolutely smokes my Nexus when it comes to downloading data. Now part of this is down to the fact that both run on different networks, but I'm convinced that there is something wrong with the Nexus hardware. Sometimes when running speed tests the phone doesn't start downloading data until the time for the speed test is nearly elapsed, often giving me '0 scores'. If I were the only one, I'd put it down to a faulty handset. But the sheer volume of people reporting similar issues of the support forums led me to believe that HTC screwed the pooch here. A new Nexus MUST have a reliable and strong antenna - The worst PR for a phone is reception issues, something which has plagued the Nexus One and even the iPhone4.
The answer- Again really simple - testing, testing, testing! I haven't seen Galaxy S owners report reception issues in any significant numbers so I'm presuming (hoping) that this isn't going to be an issue for Samsung - obviously the original Nexus was manufactured by HTC. Google need to be 100% sure that they aren't going to see forums filled with complaints about reception issues if the direct to consumer model is going to be a success.
Likelihood - 95%. Simply can't see Google letting this one slip under the net. If they hadn't learned from the Nexus One they should certainly have learned from watching the iPhone 4 'grip of death' fiasco.
Need a breather after that!...
A few other things I'd like to see (I'll keep it short)
Improved camera - Not necessarily more megapixels, but certainly a better sensor. The iPhone 4 has shown itself to be a great mobile camera not because of numbers but because of a better lens and sensor quality. Given that Samsung make digital cameras, surely this isn't too great an ask? Can we make sure that the sound quality on HD video is good too? Especially outdoors. I don't want to have every noise obliterated by the sound of wind in the microphone. Oh and a Xenon flash would be awesome.
Screen resolution- This may depend on Gingerbread, but the iPhone 4 has upped the ante and it would be nice to see an Android response.
Front facing camera - See above, the iPhone 4 has lead the way and front facing camera will become the norm ongoing.
Better battery- I'd like to be able to get through a solid 24 hours between charges even with reasonably heavy useage. I'm currently getting about 14-15 hous at best right now.
HDMI out - Needs to be standard.
Processor/GPU - To be honest I think this is a given. The 1ghz Snapdragon might have been cutting edge at the time but the Hummingbird Galaxy S processor absolutely smokes it, particularly when running 3d games.
Trackpad not trackball - Just copy the T-Mobile G2 trackpad and have that led light up around the edges too, it's beautiful.
Phew, that's it. Anything else that GAF would like to see on the hardware front? Screen size? Kick Stand? Hardware keyboard? More ram??? Feel free to comment.