-Pyromaniac-
Member
but those are in-earBboy AJ said:
but those are in-earBboy AJ said:
-Pyromaniac- said:Yes please before I hit the order button!
zedge said:Well... unfortunately they sound fucked up on my Galaxy S, which has been my experience with most other headphones other than the ones that came with the phone.
I dont get why.. the plugs look the same.. its weird.
Sorry. Not sure if the Nexus S would have the same issues.
Your iphone headphones (or compatible) with mic and remote WILL NOT work correctly in the Samsung Galaxy. Because the 3.5mm headphone jack is also used for TV out it is wired differently, basically it is wired the same as a Nokia is wired. I have the Etymotic HF2 and they do not work only one ear works and the other only works when i hold down the remote button. I've ordered a Nokia headphone adapter which should fix the problem. In the meantime, the supplied headphones are very good quality.
"the samsung headphone jack layout is four pole t/r/r/s left right mic ground i think
it will not recognize an aftermarket headset with iphone jack config where the ground and mic is reversed or t/r/r/s left right ground mic the samsung pin layout is similar to nokia's"
Ah. I thought you meant no 'in ear canal.' See the difference between the UB5 and the others on that site. The UB5 are similar to the iPod ones in the way they fit, if you ask me.-Pyromaniac- said:but those are in-ear
he list of specifications reads like a mobile enthusiasts wish list, and includes: 4.3-inch screen, 1.2GHz Snapdragon dual-core processor, 8 megapixel rear-facing camera with dual-LED flash, 5 megapixel front-facing camera, Wi-Fi b/g/n, Bluetooth, GPS, aGPS, 16GB of internal storage, micro-SD card slot (compatible up to 128GB), 1800mAh battery, and Android 2.3.
Pctx said:![]()
Because we know you haven't had enough yet... looks like the Thunderbolt might actually be worth a @#!*% . *NOTE* BGR says this is listed as the EU GSM version
*rumored specs*
The original Xperia X10 Mini was announced at the last Mobile World Congress and we expect they will do the same for the sequel. We will be in Barcelona to check out MWC, so check back in February for a hands-on report.
Rumored specs for the new Xperia Mini include:
Android 2.3
1 GHz Snapdragon CPU with Adreno 205 GPU
3.0 inch screen (320 x 480)
Rear and front-facing camera
Slide out QWERTY keyboard
No love for any of the ROMs out there? They can't be any worse than what I'm using on my Incredible, and that's become my daily driver.Mercury Fred said:Argh the wait on Gingerbread for Nexus One is killing me =/
I'm not rooted. Though I've been thinking of doing it lately...XMonkey said:No love for any of the ROMs out there? They can't be any worse than what I'm using on my Incredible, and that's become my daily driver.
Mercury Fred said:I'm not rooted. Though I've been thinking of doing it lately...
Charred Greyface said:When do you think there will be a high end Android phone with a 'retina display' screen resolution?
Totakeke said:Why stop at "retina display" resolution?
RevoDS said:At or better makes no difference. He clearly meant that the iPhone 4 remains the highest resolution smartphone on the market, and one would expect at least one Android device to catch up at some point.
Well yeah, theoretically the human eye can not distinguish pixels on a screen with 320 ppi (at the typical distance smartphones are held away from the face when used). Anything improvements after that would nott be noticed by a human eye. It doesn't need to be a 3.5" screen with 960x640 pixel resolution. It could just a well be a 3" screen with a fewer number of pixels. But all the Android manufacturers (apart from that lone Chinese one?) seem maxed out at 800x400 pixel resolution on much larger screens that 3.5" and, like that Sony phone above, reduce the resolution for smaller screens. Is this Google's fault or the hardware folks?Totakeke said:So it makes a difference before retina display but not at and after?
Sharp's IS03 Android phone packs retina display, minus the branding pretenseCharred Greyface said:When do you think there will be a high end Android phone with a 'retina display' screen resolution?
It's not that it doesn't make a technical difference, but for argument's sake, the current benchmark is the Retina display's 960x640 resolution, still unmatched by Android device manufacturers (except one, it appears?). What's the point in arguing about currently theoretical resolutions (for the screen size, that is) if it has yet to catch up with the current best? We have to compare with what's on the market, not with what's in some obscure engineer's basement.Totakeke said:So it makes a difference before retina display but not at and after?
Charred Greyface said:Well yeah, theoretically the human eye can not distinguish pixels on a screen with 320 ppi (at the typical distance smartphones are held away from the face when used). Anything improvements after that would nott be noticed by a human eye. It doesn't need to be a 3.5" screen with 960x640 pixel resolution. It could just a well be a 3" screen with a fewer number of pixels. But all the Android manufacturers (apart from that lone Chinese one?) seem maxed out at 800x400 pixel resolution on much larger screens that 3.5" and, like that Sony phone above, reduce the resolution for smaller screens. Is this Google's fault or the hardware folks?
Nice avatar by the way.
RevoDS said:It's not that it doesn't make a technical difference, but for argument's sake, the current benchmark is the Retina display's 960x640 resolution, still unmatched by Android device manufacturers (except one, it appears?). What's the point in arguing about currently theoretical resolutions (for the screen size, that is) if it has yet to catch up with the current best? We have to compare with what's on the market, not with what's in some obscure engineer's basement.
But sure, if that makes you happy, of course they should shoot for better, Captain Obvious.
Yes, indeed. I can readily admit I did not know about that phone only sold in Japan until another poster came along with a link. Congratulations, you won that part of the argument, I guess?Totakeke said:I see.
So you obviously just shot down your previous argument. Good job.
Just root it & flash to a 2.2 ROM, that's what I had to do with my vibrant. Its faster than the stock with Touchwiz ever wasWeenerz said:I regret going with my Captivate more and more each day. Samsung has been slow as hell updating us to 2.2 and with 2.3 already on some devices, I feel more and more like they will just stop updating the devices. Bleh.
I don't know anyone who waits for official releases. Root that thing and join the rest of us.Weenerz said:I regret going with my Captivate more and more each day. Samsung has been slow as hell updating us to 2.2 and with 2.3 already on some devices, I feel more and more like they will just stop updating the devices. Bleh.
Napoleonthechimp said:I finally have my Desire HD. I don't really care about this dual core business when I know I'd never make use of the extra power. However I don't like how the menu pages seem to stutter on certain widgets. I didn't expect any slow down on this phone but that's exactly what I get in certain situations.
What is the procedure for rooting the phone and how can I tailor the phone to my needs?
To be fair, that Sharp phone would technically work on CDMA networks here in the US, but I think you'd have to get around a whitelist on Verizon (not sure on Sprint either).RevoDS said:Yes, indeed. I can readily admit I did not know about that phone only sold in Japan until another poster came along with a link. Congratulations, you won that part of the argument, I guess?
Oh, I can just replace the launcher without problems? I knew I got an Android phone for a reason.tabsina said:Try a launcher from the market rather than one that comes with the desire hd, if that is the only place you are noticing slow down.. i recommend adwlauncher, launcherpro, or zeamlauncher.
If you want to go ahead with rooting and the works, your best bet would be to check out the Desire HD Android Development subforum on xda-developers and follow any guides they have for that
Napoleonthechimp said:Oh, I can just replace the launcher without problems? I knew I got an Android phone for a reason.
Oh wow, just read a preview. This looks a great value.wario said:
Jamesfrom818 said:The MSM8960 being in the Thunderbolt doesn't make sense because that isn't due out until 2012. The 1.5 GHz QSD makes more sense.
http://gizmodo.com/5722598/somebody-tell-me-what-all-these-people-are-in-line-for
all these people were waiting in line for the Meizu M9, the Android 2.2-powered successor to the Meizu M8. Pretty impressive turnout for something that once started as a ripjob.
Apparently, there was no limit on how many units each person could get. I'm assuming half of them already hit eBay.
LP is great but I switched to adw launcher (ex paid version). Check it out as well.ZZMitch said:LauncherPro is amazing, give it a shot!
Koshiba said:I was going to get the captivate but I'm thinking I should at least wait till the end of the month before I upgrade.