Totakeke said:![]()
Looks sweet.
Not interested in tablets until there's some real handwriting functionality. The Atrix on the other hand, is pretty interesting.
I may be getting this phone.
Totakeke said:![]()
Looks sweet.
Not interested in tablets until there's some real handwriting functionality. The Atrix on the other hand, is pretty interesting.
Verizon has their own keynote this morning, natch.XMonkey said:Arc, the Atrix, and Samsung's Infuse look pretty sweet. ATT is cleaning up with Android right now. Wonder what we'll see from Verizon...perhaps an iPhone announcement already with the way ATT is going with Android right now.
After some poking around on the device, they concluded that the update was likely a small update for Gingerbread in the vein of Android 2.0 and 2.1, both of which were named Eclair. The biggest feature seems to be an uncompleted Google Talk app that would allow video calling
This is basically the future, but now(ish), right? That's incredible. I'm not entirely sure this particular implementation will set the world on fire, but down the line if this shit becomes standard...reKon said:
DrFunk said:So uh, did anyone notice this? A prototype LTE phone for At&t was spotted.
Download speed? 50mbits
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2375192,00.asp?kc=PCRSS03069TX1K0001121
![]()
I'm sure AT&T 3G was a couple times faster before a couple million smartphones (or however many/X square miles) were on it.Of course, speeds will be much lower on a real network with congestion and obstructions.
Bboy AJ said:So are we all in agreement that the Atrix is the best phone shown as of now? Very slick. I doubt I'd use the dock at all but the fact that it has the horsepower to do that is nice. I wonder what the battery life will be like.
Talon- said:I'm sure AT&T 3G was a couple times faster before a couple million smartphones (or however many/X square miles) were on it.
DrFunk said:So uh, did anyone notice this? A prototype LTE phone for At&t was spotted.
Download speed? 50mbits
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2375192,00.asp?kc=PCRSS03069TX1K0001121
![]()
Option A: Sell smartphones and tablets.kaching said:Atrix certainly has me wondering why we need tablets now. Just upgrade the thing to Honeycomb and produce a Tablet dock accessory. Tablets can become shells for our smartphones that just add a bigger screen and extra battery reserves, why not?
Why cannibalize your own product?kaching said:Option C: All of the above
The "we" in my question above was referencing the consumer, not the manufacturer. Even so, not every manufacturer would necessarily want to compete on all these fronts. Every device running its own distinct OS implementation is going to require ongoing maintenance, updates, its own separate development track, essentially. Producing fewer core computing devices that can be used in conjunction with a number of dumb terminals in different formfactors could be an attractive alternative.Talon- said:Why cannibalize your own product?
The Atrix is totally a innovative way for Motorola to hedge their bet. That said, how much is that dock/laptop going to cost? Genuinely curious.
Is it though? I mean we already know At&t is moving to LTE they just are behind the curve in terms of getting it up and running compared to their competition is Verizon. Obviously though since the LTE network was gonna go live later this year we'd be getting phones. It's just say 6 months in phone time is an eternity so most companies wouldn't bother right now.DrFunk said:the fact that one exists is the big news here, seriously
This would be great for the end consumer, but we know how much these manufacturers like to pull an Apple and work with proprietary standards. It's why these smartphone manufacturers put skins over Android - they need to differentiate their product.kaching said:Producing fewer core computing devices that can be used in conjunction with a number of dumb terminals in different formfactors could be an attractive alternative.
Brettison said:Is it though? I mean we already know At&t is moving to LTE they just are behind the curve in terms of getting it up and running compared to their competition is Verizon. Obviously though since the LTE network was gonna go live later this year we'd be getting phones. It's just say 6 months in phone time is an eternity so most companies wouldn't bother right now.
PS: I was more hyped about LTE and 4g in theory than actuality. Most of my phone time is already spent on WiFi anyways.
Confirmation from Google's Dan Morrillgcubed said:so i think its pretty clear that all this worry over dual core needs for honeycomb on phones was for naught. Its pretty clear its a tablet only build and that updates will continue to come to single core phones. How many updates has the Nexus 1 gotten (if you include the upcoming gingerbread?), i'm assuming that the nexus s will go through a few updates as well. The dual core Moto phone appears to be made that way in order to handle webtop.
Vyse The Legend said:Is anyone else worried/confused about the Motorola XOOM being glanced over at the Motorola conference?
The rumor is that the XOOM will be Google's flagship tablet, but Andy Rubin was nowhere to be seen. Google is always at the unveiling of their Android flagship devices (Droid, G1, etc.), but they were nowhere to be seen yesterday, which is very strange.
To make matters weirder, T-Mobile and LG have shown more of Honeycomb and their tablet (G-Slate), and they haven't even had their conference yet.
Maybe Google and Motorola will host a "coming out" party as it nears release -- or maybe, the first Honeycomb tablets--LG and Motorola--will be collectively the flagship devices?
yup, just saw that, right on cue :lolTalon- said:Confirmation from Google's Dan Morrill
Random note: there's no hard minimum processor requirement for Honeycomb. Trust me, if there were I'd know.
Link
Vyse The Legend said:Is anyone else worried/confused about the Motorola XOOM being glanced over at the Motorola conference?
The rumor is that the XOOM will be Google's flagship tablet, but Andy Rubin was nowhere to be seen. Google is always at the unveiling of their Android flagship devices (Droid, G1, etc.), but they were nowhere to be seen yesterday, which is very strange.
To make matters weirder, T-Mobile and LG have shown more of Honeycomb and their tablet (G-Slate), and they haven't even had their conference yet.
Maybe Google and Motorola will host a "coming out" party as it nears release -- or maybe, the first Honeycomb tablets--LG and Motorola--will be collectively the flagship devices?
LOLxtop said:
gcubed said:when is verizons? i'm at the end of my contract so i can make an informed choice. I just hate CDMA
.Talon- said:So, as a reminder, today is the first official day of the show.
11:30 AM EST
Gary Shapiro, CEA President and CEO, will give the keynote address kicking off the show talking about the state of the consumer electronics industry (expect shit tons of stats about smartphone penetration).
Immediately following him will be Gary Shapiro, Verizon CEO, who will probably tout LTE and then move into a lineup of phones to match or blowout whatever AT&T showed off yesterday.
tfur said:It feels like some timelines have slipped on Google's side, as far as the release of Gingerbread. I wonder what happened. Oracle/Java lawsuit related? They seem so quiet right now.
It is crazy to see all of these companies fawning over Android, and Google not being ready with Gingerbread or a solid showing of Honeycomb.
Also, where is the web market and music streaming service? I wonder if the media/content cock blocking that Google TV is getting, is also happening with their other planned services.
Too poor to afford one!Pein said:does t-mobile or sprint have a conference?
Pein said:does t-mobile or sprint have a conference?
Ephemeris said:T-Mobile presser at 11am PST.
http://ces.cnet.com/8301-32254_1-20027061-283.htmlTalon- said:Too poor to afford one!
I'm blind lol.Ephemeris said: