Whitechocolatekrispies
Banned
Lovely idea.
But they claim you can't cut it ... sure ... sure ... <grabs oxy-acetylene torch>
But they claim you can't cut it ... sure ... sure ... <grabs oxy-acetylene torch>
Big bones would work even better, wider hip bones means the device is even less susceptible to be pulled.
Unless big bones is the politically correct way to say fat, then I don't know.
This sounds like a good idea in theory, but things may escalate further if a rapist encountered something like this. I believe most experts agree rape is more about dominance over a person, than it is about having sex with the victim. A person would use prostitutes if it was only about sex.
If a rapist finds they cant dominate the victim sexually, will they find another brutal means or possibly a deadly way to dominate the victims? I remember reading about a few serial killers who started off as rapists and once they could no longer get it up for the rape, they took things to the next level killing their victims to get aroused. This would be a good deterrent to date rapes and drunk victims who are unaware of what is going on though.
I'm not sure if anyone ever bothered to do a real study on this. All you got is anecdotal evidenceHonestly, I suspect this isn't the case nearly as much as people seem to want to say it is, and I'd like to see evidence that supports this kind of statement.
"It was devastating," he said. "I was getting harassed outside of work, harassed in work, it's just terrifying.
"Someone approached me and told me to stay away from my ex or basically he'd come back and finish me off completely. He punched me twice in the face and once in the stomach."
On his way to work, a clinical psychologist had no way of knowing he was about to be arrested. As he got out of his car, two police officers approached him, asked him who he was, placed him under arrest, handcuffed him, and drove him off to jail. He had been charged with sexually abusing his two-year-old daughter (Spiegel 1986).
I know of several similar incidents. A clinical psychologist was investigated by Child Protective Services for allegedly molesting his three-year-old daughter. A manager in a local supermarket was investigated for allegedly abusing his seventeen-year-old son, a local football star. He was fired as soon as the investigation became public. A drug and alcohol counselor was fired because it was rumored that he molested a counselee. A woman left her husband, a young army N.C.O., and informed him that she intended to keep all the appliances, furniture, and any other possessions she wanted (whether or not they belonged to her). And if he tried to stop her, she would turn him in for sexual abuse. The N.C.O. did nothing. His rationale was that his career in the service would be ruined.
The common strand in all these situations was that the allegations were found to be false. The clinical psychologist spent $50,000 in his defense, lost his practice and most of his friends (Spiegel 1986). The second clinical psychologist spent nearly $35,000 in Juvenile Court in his defense (criminal charges were never filed). Both psychologists reported suicidal thoughts, anxiety, and depression. The supermarket manager lost his job, his home, filed bankruptcy, and went through a divorce. He related these tragedies to the intervention of the state. The drug and alcohol counselor lost his job because of the rumor, even though a check of the local law enforcement agencies (city, county, and state) found no charges filed, nor was there any complaint filed with CPS. The N.C.O. was blackmailed by his former spouse.
I just wanted to chime in on this one. Jesus Christ, how do people still think like this?lol what? I like the "clubbing" part. Dont act like a slut, won't get treated like a slut. That simple.
Warning: Also leads to a large increase in women shitting their pants
Because the situations aren't always sketchy (like the first date thing they mentioned), and a girl going clubbing doesn't entitle someone to rape her even if they are drunk and horny?
RAPEX and these chastity hotpants
![]()
People are calling it a chastity belt. It's kind of (again) making the issue of rape about women having to protect themselves rather than teaching men not to rape. However, it does have some benefits though and I'm sure the women who purchase it will feel safer.
http://everydayvictimblaming.com/submissions/ar-wears-anti-rape-clothing-just-another-chastity-belt/
I'm not sure if anyone ever bothered to do a real study on this. All you got is anecdotal evidence
n summary, fighting, fleeing, and screaming/yelling are all associated with
decreased odds of completed rape. It is possible that verbal resistance is less effective than physical resistance, but without sequence information, this is unclear. Furthermore, these effective strategies do not appear to increase the odds of physical injury in studies that examine the sequence of offender attack, victim resistance, and injury/rape outcomes. Thus, research suggests that women should not be told to refrain from resisting as this increases their odds of experiencing completed rape
More research is needed about what resistance works in which situations, but thus far, it still appears that resistance needs to be as forceful as the offender’s attack and to match the type of strategy used by the attacker. In other words, if a woman is threatened, screaming may be enough to avoid rape, whereas if she is physically attacked, she may need to fight to be able to escape. Studies typically show that women do respond with verbal resistance to verbal threats and physical resistance to physical attacks
I can see where the frustration comes from here, as the mere existence of something like this product is grotesque.
However a "fundamental restructuring of our culture [to end rape]" is a (very) long term goal, even being optimistic.
These pants, are presented as a more immediate and short term "patch-solution" to the problem.
Yes they perpetrate a poisonous mentality, but in the assumption that they work, they also provide a concrete protection, to at least some forms of rape (like being raped while passed out drunk).
What i DO find really disturbing about the indie-gogo thing, is that they would make claims about something as serious as “studies show that resisting sexual assault lessens the chance of a rape taking place without increasing the violence of the attack”, without providing some source material.
The thought that they would endanger people's lives (or instill a sense of guilt, in case of some rape survivor) like this, just to sell some pants, is revolting, and i hope it's not the case.
I get the feeling those are two different groups of people.You guys can't have it both ways on the general mentality of rapists. In every other thread the prevailing opinion is that rapists can be anyone because men aren't properly taught about consent. In this thread suddenly every rapist is a psychopathic murderer just a hair-trigger away from going apeshit?
Exactly. Those are the kind of situations these are for, not the (very rare) gun to your head psychopaths.No, you are never going to stop the guys out there who are truly fucking insane, willing to serially beat, torture, or kill people. Those guys pretty much are a force of nature. They won't be stopped by these shorts.
What we're talking about here are the majority of cases which are opportunistic. The comparison earlier in this thread about burglary and a ladder was great. Imagine a typical scenario. Perpetrator comes across a girl blackout drunk at a party, decides he'll do something. He doesn't have a ton of time, people are all over this house. Being slowed by these shorts very likely could scare him off, for fear that someone will discover him, the girl will wake, etc. Or while racking his drunk brain for a way to get them off, maybe he'll realize he's doing something wrong.
Still, when you read how many guys say they would rape if they knew they would not get caught, even accounting for a small % of joke answers, our gender certainly does not look very good.
Edit: And shorts like this are basically Poe's Law in action. Jesus, how do guys hear about stuff like this and not have just a little bit of empathy?
That's quite a dark subject really. I suspect an alarming number of men would rape depending on the circumstances.
If you and a woman were the only people left alive on Earth, and the woman is incredibly attractive but completely not interested in sex, would you rape her? There are no consequences as you're the only humans that exist. I think for many men, that isn't an easy question to answer.
I think a lot of men in that scenario would probably rape her. It has nothing to do with lack of empathy or moral fibre, it would simply be because the desire to have sex would override rationality. There are no other women to have sex with, so it is either her or nothing. Nature isn't concerned with right or wrong, it is only concerned with the survival of the species.
That's an extreme case of course, but it emphasises the way in which society and a strong family unit keep us in check. A lot of men wouldn't rape in a normal society, but like violence and aggression, it is within our nature. Just like murder will always happen, rape will too unfortunately.
It may prevent rape, but the rapist may just become more violent, unfortunately.
That's a pretty bleak assessment. If you asked men if they'd eat a dead companion to survive, the responses would probably be much less obvious than you've assumed in the example you gave, and that's a survival situation. If what you say is true, it seems as though men would feel more entitled to sex than to staying alive.
You're comparing what might be a very unpleasant experience to what -- for a lot of people at least -- would be considered one of the best experiences we'll have in our lifetime. I don't think the two things are quite analogous.
Remember that you're not talking about sex though, you're talking about rape.
It seems like you're the one who skimmed through; I was responding to someone who was asking for evidence that rape allegations will ruin a man's life.You're not sure because you're too lazy to read the thread or skimmed too fast.
Never answered the question...
Men are less likely to rape someone in normal circumstances. It is not a question of lacking empathy, it is more to do with the circumstances in which you find yourself. Something that you perhaps wouldn't do in any other circumstance.
Never answered the question...
Men are less likely to rape someone in normal circumstances. It is not a question of lacking empathy, it is more to do with the circumstances in which you find yourself. Something that you perhaps wouldn't do in any other circumstance.
Seriously? No, I would not rape someone if we were the last two people on Earth.
They did provide a source. That was my first reaction and I actually read their indiegog page to see if they did. Why didn't you?
Those are not the only cases of rape.Its not gonna do anything sadly. Scum who rape have to be messed up in the head in the first place.
scenerio: knife to throat, "take these off or I'll kill you"
ugh, human race is so vile we have to make anti rape pants...
You have a very twisted view on the world, my friend.
Yeah. Kind of thought I would be misconstrued by this. I just recognise that there is a dark side within nature. It is not about how I conduct my life, I'm not a violent rapist. I just see that under extreme circumstances, natural impulsive drives could lead a human to do something they otherwise would not do.
I'm not saying you personally are just that you thinking that most will rape under such circumstances.
I'm not saying you personally are just that you thinking that most will rape under such circumstances.
The best reason not go to dance clubs to have fun is that dance clubs aren't fun.
The woman would get killed in that situation.
Oh, but of course, rape is worse than murder so it makes sense.
Those were designed for women in Africa, where the situation is pretty bad. It's something insane like 1 in 4 men have raped. As mentioned, not every rapist is a murderer, sadly rape is far more common than people believe, and the perpetrator isn't some psychopath most of the time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_during_the_occupation_of_GermanyThe majority of the assaults were committed in the Soviet occupation zone; estimates of the numbers of German women raped by Soviet soldiers range from the tens of thousands to 2 million.[2][3][4][5][6] In many cases women were the victims of repeated rapes, some as many as 60 to 70 times.[7] At least 100,000 women are believed to have been raped in Berlin, based on surging abortion rates in the following months and contemporary hospital reports,[4] with an estimated 10,000 women dying in the aftermath.[8] Female deaths in connection with the rapes in Germany, overall, are estimated at 240,000.[9][10] Antony Beevor describes it as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has concluded that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia alone.
you jest but I think something like that could actually work pretty great. like a buddy app that lets you get the thing loose if you type a password for extreme cases of wanting to piss/have drunk sex
I wish vagina dentata existed, someone dares to rape, they lose their dick.
Remember that you're not talking about sex though, you're talking about rape.
To the mind of someone raping a passed-out girl at a party, the line between these two things is less clear than you might think. I've often wondered how people can look at that aspect of rape and then say that "it's about power" when, often, sex is quite clearly the driving motivation.
They do, it's called RAPEX
![]()
I'd say different instances of rape, can have different motivators behind them.
So sometimes it can definitely be, mostly, about power and humiliation.
EDIT: I mean, i doubt anyone would think it's always about power.
I'd say different instances of rape, can have different motivators behind them.
So sometimes it can definitely be, mostly, about power and humiliation.
EDIT: I mean, i doubt anyone would think it's always about power.