• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Any chance this years VGAs will be a bit more professional? [Geoff asks for feedback]

If you're only going to announce the winners of the voice-over categories during the pre-show rather than including the categories themselves during the main telecast, could you at least inform the nominees in advance? Also, they should be seated on the main floor, not the balcony. Tara Strong and Mark Hamill were not pleased by their treatment last year.

It's always a challenge. Who deserves a better seat at the VGAs: Sefton Hill or Mark Hamill?
 
It's always a challenge. Who deserves a better seat at the VGAs: Sefton Hill or Mark Hamill?

In a perfect world all the nominees would be treated equally, and don't tell me that the organizers really had too chose to put one of those two in the nose bleeds. Why was there not a section reserved for the nominees (and invitations sent out) to see their category announced? Show a little respect, to everyone who was nominated.

I think the whole not telling the nominee when their award was being announced was the bigger issue anyway.
 
Yes, Linkin Park and Tenacious D are performing. Gustavo will also be there for The Last of Us and there are other surprises not yet announced in the musical realm. Linkin Park and The D may not be for you, but think about it this way: Fans of those bands may watch the show and be exposed to NEW games that they didn't know existed. Maybe a Linkin Park fan will tune into VGAs and see The Last of Us or BioShock for the first time and get interested to learn more. We can keep talking to each other, or we can talk to a wider audience.

The problem is, in the process of talking to a wider audience, the fear is that you're not talking to us. I'm all for being inclusive - heck, it's the only way this industry can survive in the long term, and I recognise that - it's just this approach to inclusivity excludes us. The irony is palpable.


That said, the tempter about orchestral music has piqued my interest. I await results with curiosity. And if not, there's always Dara.
 
Did anyone else post this? I feel like it greatly exemplifies how most of us feel:

http://www.giantbomb.com/news/the-2011-spike-video-game-awards-on-teabagging-cupcakes-and-charlie-sheen/3853/?page=5&sort=first


Interestingly, Keighley chose to engage my thoughts on the show directly, asking me what I'd like to see done differently. I explained to him my beef with the needless celebrity pandering, the fact that the awards felt completely secondary to the big exclusive trailers, and that the winners often seemed bewildered as to why they were even there. Keighley was gracious, at least made overtures that my feedback was something he cared about, and asked me to give this year's show a shot. He seemed legitimately enthused about what he and the show's producers had cooked up, so I promised to watch this year's broadcast with an open mind. I won't pretend I didn't still have reservations, but truth be told, nothing would have made me happier than to watch an awards show the video game industry could be excited about, and perhaps even proud of.

Then last night happened.

Doesn't this sound like exactly what's going on in this thread? Why come and ask us what we want to see when it's not going to change the fact that we were never the target audience to begin with?
 
Did anyone else post this? I feel like it greatly exemplifies how most of us feel:

http://www.giantbomb.com/news/the-2011-spike-video-game-awards-on-teabagging-cupcakes-and-charlie-sheen/3853/?page=5&sort=first




Doesn't this sound like exactly what's going on in this thread? Why come and ask us what we want to see when it's not going to change the fact that we were never the target audience to begin with?

lol it's fucking deja vu. Right down to asking for input when it's too late to change anything this year, and the "watch it anyway we'll surprise you!" pleas.
 
What you are describing is the Game Developers Choice Awards, and nobody gives a shit about it.

Says a lot, doesn't it? When more people enjoy watching a celebrity ramble on about Tiger Woods' promiscuity, people acting out a gesture done by the most childish of online gamers, and group of people whose job it is to judge these games neglect to pay attention to the majority of the awards so they can focus more on the awards they know people are watching for, it stops being an "awards show" and starts becoming "entertainment."

Then when people cry "WHY OH WHY AREN'T GAMES TAKEN SERIOUSLY?!" I can point them to the clusterfuck of absurdity that is the VGAs and show them how legitimate awards shows don't have any attention paid to them.

I don't know what exactly you meant by "nobody gives a shit about it," but I sincerely hope you're not trying to imply that more viewers = quality.
 
Says a lot, doesn't it? When more people enjoy watching a celebrity ramble on about Tiger Woods' promiscuity, people acting out a gesture done by the most childish of online gamers, and group of people whose job it is to judge these games neglect to pay attention to the majority of the awards so they can focus more on the awards they know people are watching for, it stops being an "awards show" and starts becoming "entertainment."

I don't know what exactly you meant by "nobody gives a shit about it," but I sincerely hope you're not trying to imply that more viewers = quality.

Some truth bombs in here. Also it is odd to hear all the cries that no one wants a boring show for lame serious people, when that is what is asked for every single year. Imagine if roles were reversed - if there were an Oscar like VG awards on tv, would you see any complaints that what the show really needed was some tea bagging?
 
Some truth bombs in here. Also it is odd to hear all the cries that no one wants a boring show for lame serious people, when that is what is asked for every single year. Imagine if roles were reversed - if there were an Oscar like VG awards on tv, would you see any complaints that what the show really needed was some tea bagging?

Exactly. Your awards show stops being an awards show when you start adding childish skits to it. Oh, sticking your balls in someone's face. Hilarious, especially when it happens in real life! In front of a crowd, even! Those are the kind of gamers we take seriously!

Geoff, you're not a stupid man. But surely you must realize that if outsiders don't take your awards show seriously, they won't take your game journalism job seriously either.
 
Says a lot, doesn't it? When more people enjoy watching a celebrity ramble on about Tiger Woods' promiscuity, people acting out a gesture done by the most childish of online gamers, and group of people whose job it is to judge these games neglect to pay attention to the majority of the awards so they can focus more on the awards they know people are watching for, it stops being an "awards show" and starts becoming "entertainment."

Then when people cry "WHY OH WHY AREN'T GAMES TAKEN SERIOUSLY?!" I can point them to the clusterfuck of absurdity that is the VGAs and show them how legitimate awards shows don't have any attention paid to them.

I don't know what exactly you meant by "nobody gives a shit about it," but I sincerely hope you're not trying to imply that more viewers = quality.

All genres have those kinds of awards shows. Music has the MTV awards, which are a clusterfuck of bad sketches and bits and people watch it more for shock value than the actual awards. Movies have the MTV movie awards and stuff like the People's Choice Awards which are all fluff as well. The reason movies and music can also have more "presentable" shows like the Emmys, Oscars and Grammys is because those types of entertainment have stars. There are no stars in video games. Your average viewer probably turns in to the Oscars to see who George Clooney's date is, or what Salma Hayak is wearing as much as they tune in for awards. The truth is that video games are NOT on the same level in this sense and probably never will be, because unlike movies and music, video games don't lend themselves very well to create stars that people want to watch on television. To this point, the VGA awards (though I do admit, the quality could be improved, but even then we are talking about raising it to MTV standards) is probably the best we are ever going to get, while there will be smaller scale stuff like the GDC awards that will be much lower key.
 
All genres have those kinds of awards shows. Music has the MTV awards, which are a clusterfuck of bad sketches and bits and people watch it more for shock value than the actual awards. Movies have the MTV movie awards and stuff like the People's Choice Awards which are all fluff as well. The reason movies and music can also have more "presentable" shows like the Emmys, Oscars and Grammys is because those types of entertainment have stars. There are no stars in video games. Your average viewer probably turns in to the Oscars to see who George Clooney's date is, or what Salma Hayak is wearing as much as they tune in for awards. The truth is that video games are NOT on the same level in this sense and probably never will be, because unlike movies and music, video games don't lend themselves very well to create stars that people want to watch on television. To this point, the VGA awards (though I do admit, the quality could be improved, but even then we are talking about raising it to MTV standards) is probably the best we are ever going to get, while there will be smaller scale stuff like the GDC awards that will be much lower key.

Oh, I'm not saying that other mediums don't have bad awards shows. But it says a lot when a crappy awards show is considered the most "watchable" in the industry. Yeah, I just called the VGAs "crappy."

My point is that the VGAs aren't quality. If the MTV movie awards have fluff, the VGAs might as well be MADE of fluff. So much so that Gabriel Iglesias would be jealous.

There's barely anything of substance. That's my problem. When an awards show with such little substance becomes the standard for all game awards shows, it's really saddening. GDC is probably the most credible game awards show and it gets no attention because of the VGAs.

Load of crap, is what it is.
 
Great discussion topic, why don't you guys tell me what you WOULD like to see this year. I'm at our office now working with the writers and producers so happy to share your thoughts...

It's always a challenge to balance the interests of "GAF" with the need to create a show that appeals to a mass audience. We know how to deliver core programming like our E3 coverage and GTTV, but the VGAs are a different beast and, for a variety of reasons, need to skew more mainstream.

The question about how many "awards" to present is a constant debate. This year we are creating an entire second-screen experience (also streaming on the web and hosted by GT's own Daniel Kayser) which will dive much deeper into the awards categories.
Ignore trying to appease GAF. Just put out a show that wouldn't embarrass the majority of your internet audience.

Please take note, I am referring to shit like this:
the oscars of video games

2080478-teabaghsr6b.gif


No. Just....no.
 
In a perfect world all the nominees would be treated equally, and don't tell me that the organizers really had too chose to put one of those two in the nose bleeds. Why was there not a section reserved for the nominees (and invitations sent out) to see their category announced? Show a little respect, to everyone who was nominated.

I think the whole not telling the nominee when their award was being announced was the bigger issue anyway.

One of them happening would be one thing. Both happening is just problematic.
 
A big problem with the VGAs is that I think way too many people have to take their bows back stage. Games are made by a lot of different people. We don't get to see awards for amazing audio design, animation, marketing, character models and programming/scripting. The designers, producers and studio presidents take their bows in front of everyone but everyone works hard and is a star in my books not just them.

To do a proper VGA would take a very damn long time but I guess it comes down to just what I want out of an event that celebrates what was created.

My idea of an awards ceremony for me would be like the top 10 games of the year and the entire team sitting down in the centre of a circular room just shooting the shit doing a post mortem recounting the fun times of development and figuring things out. What were the worst bugs, the best bugs, the cool things they had to cut. The greatest moments when they just knew they loved their game or hated it. Make the event more about the games and the people that made them. Don't just pander the event like it's meant for an audience with the attention span of a child who drank coca cola for the first time. Make people see what went into the game and realize the dedication these people have to make a game and this especially lets families and friends see just how much we love it.

Hell I would love to hear people from other game companies just sitting down and recounting what they love about the top games as well.
 
Wait... they have a Most Anticipated Game Award?

Wait what?

What?
Voted on by the public which would accurately reflect the award. Or do you think no publicly influenced awards should exist? (For comparison, BAFTA has a publicly voted award as well.)
 
How funny would it be if one year they played it completely straight. Everyone wearing nice suits. Nice calm host making jokes and calling people up to present awards. Overall elegant and quiet.

It would be unintentionally funny because of how out of character it would be to do it like that. Try it next year!
 
Voted on by the public which would accurately reflect the award. Or do you think no publicly influenced awards should exist? (For comparison, BAFTA has a publicly voted award as well.)

I don't know, it sounds like something that is more akin to advertisements than actual award. Especially considering the overall climate about video game "journalists" these days; that kind of name doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

.......but eh, this show is apparently more big on showing trailers for upcoming games than the actual award themselves so I don't know.
 
Some other thoughts:

- Not really sure why you think it's "dishonest" for me to be asking for feedback 5 days before the show. A lot of the things you're talking about, like the tone of the script, are determined in the days before the show as we work with our host and writers. The nature of any awards show is that the production team comes together for a few weeks before the show to pull everything together - same goes for the Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and so on. This is a LIVE show so decisions are made up until the minute we go to air.

So "a few weeks" = 5 days now? Dude, I don't see why you even bother. You don't really give a shit (I find your constant display of understanding and pretending our feedback matters rather amusing), Spike doesn't give a shit, the stuff will air and it will be the same crap as every year. As you mentioned, DICE and BAFTA are not TV show awards. And I agree, but where I come from I would like to think you could educate your viewers and still make the show interesting. It seems you and Spike understand that as simply pandering to the lowest common denominator in the audience. That's ok.

Besides, it will air at 3am here in Germany. Just give me good trailers so I can YT them in the morning.
 
So "a few weeks" = 5 days now? Dude, I don't see why you even bother. You don't really give a shit (I find your constant display of understanding and pretending our feedback matters rather amusing), Spike doesn't give a shit, the stuff will air and it will be the same crap as every year.

Besides, it will air at 3am here in Germany. Just give me good trailers so I can YT them in the morning.

Yeesh you wake up and step on a lego getting out of bed?
 
Yeesh you wake up and step on a lego getting out of bed?

How is anything I wrote not true? I simply find Geoff dishonest, that's all. As other people mentioned, he did the same last year and look what we got. I am simply annoyed by his attitude "I'm listening to you guys, please give me your feedback" where it is obvious he doesn't. He can be a man and just come up front and say what we all know: "Spike VGAs are not for you, GAF. Cheap thrashy show and low-brow entertainment sells way better. I'm sorry, try to stomach it and enjoy the trailers!".

He cannot really do that. Why? Because all the suckers from GAF will tune in as they do every year for a CHANCE it might be different. Ratings go up, Spike makes money, which is what Geoff is paid for. But I don't work for Spike and I'm going to call him out on that.
 
Maybe Geoff does genuinely want to hear our opinion and he truly appreciates them; it's just that maybe even if he tries to follow them the real boss of the show won't let him?

How much power does he have over this event anyways?
 
Maybe Geoff does genuinely want to hear our opinion and he truly appreciates them; it's just that maybe even if he tries to follow them the real boss of the show won't let him?

How much power does he have over this event anyways?
If he's interested in our opinion but he's powerless to do anything about it he's wasting our time.

I don't think the VGAs will ever be or even have to be a high brow award ceremony, so I'm willing to believe he's being honest in his interest on maybe raising the bar a little bit, and making a mainstream show that is actually fun to watch. Last year was embarrassing so it shouldn't be that hard.

But that's the best case scenario, anyone expecting something akin to the GDC awards from the VGAs should just carry on and keep playing them games.
 
There are lots of people involved in the VGAs and I share your feedback with everyone. I'm really excited about this year's show and certainly look forward to the comments, the good and the bad. I really think what we're doing with a live orchestra will be quite special.
 
There are lots of people involved in the VGAs and I share your feedback with everyone. I'm really excited about this year's show and certainly look forward to the comments, the good and the bad. I really think what we're doing with a live orchestra will be quite special.

You've gone and done it now. I'm officially upset that I will be at school giving a presentation during the live show.

I don't have any way of recording it (no cable tv), any estimate on how quickly the archive will be available?
 
This year the archive will be instantly available after the show and on demand for 48 hours on the web and on Xbox Live worldwide.
 
This year the archive will be instantly available after the show and on demand for 48 hours on the web and on Xbox Live worldwide.

Cool thanks. Looking forward to getting home and watching it so I can provide feedback.

If I wasn't busy and had infinite monies as well as prior knowledge of a live orchestra I may have actually accepted Spike's red carpet invitation. Oh well, maybe when I acquire some dosh and free time.
 
The problem is, in the process of talking to a wider audience, the fear is that you're not talking to us. I'm all for being inclusive - heck, it's the only way this industry can survive in the long term, and I recognise that - it's just this approach to inclusivity excludes us. The irony is palpable.


That said, the tempter about orchestral music has piqued my interest. I await results with curiosity. And if not, there's always Dara.

No video game fans enjoy the Tenacious D or Linkin Park confirmed!

What is with this "I am a video gamer! I am above pop culture, music and any telecast that doesnt take itself deathly serious, and so is every other video gamer!" attitude going on here in this thread.
 
Voted on by the public which would accurately reflect the award. Or do you think no publicly influenced awards should exist? (For comparison, BAFTA has a publicly voted award as well.)

Public-influenced awards always hold little significance to the industry overall, but I think that one is the most sketchy. The chance of winning that award is directly proportional to the amount of marketing efforts but the publisher, not an achievements of the game itself. And what message does that give to consumers and/or developers?
 
And what message does that give to consumers and/or developers?
That one game is more popular than the other. Better question: What kind of msg does this whole show give to developers? Which developers takes it even seriously? Isn't it just free PR for bigger games and franchises?

Trailer here we come.
 
No video game fans enjoy the Tenacious D or Linkin Park confirmed!

No real video game fan does!

I kid, I kid. Put down your pitchforks.

What is with this "I am a video gamer! I am above pop culture, music and any telecast that doesnt take itself deathly serious, and so is every other video gamer!" attitude going on here in this thread.
I just appreciate being treated like an adult. That doesn't require being deathly serious, it just requires being handled with a little respect, because some of the content of VGAs past has just been insulting.
 
Wanna make it professional?


less youtube comedians and teabagging hosts and more of the heres the guy who does the RDR song
 
It would need to be fundamentally revamped in order to be 'good', so I think I'd rather it get worse. Linkin Park is a good direction, but how about Limp Bizkit and Korn (they could play their Haze song but change the lyrics to be about Fuse or something)? Are the Frag Dolls still a thing? Maybe you could trot them out to do a skit.
 
No real video game fan does!

I kid, I kid. Put down your pitchforks.


I just appreciate being treated like an adult. That doesn't require being deathly serious, it just requires being handled with a little respect, because some of the content of VGAs past has just been insulting.

you sound like your too fukin old to be watching this then.
there IS an age limit on the mtv award shows and the like. your obviously past it.
 
We need more pre-award coverage of the studios nominated. I also like the idea of a dress code. We need less cursing and more insight into the amount of effort it takes to produce some of these games. It would also be great if you could always get key industry people to show up and voice their opinions.
 
It's always weird when people are on stage during the VGAs. On the one hand you have the celebrities who are rarely gamers themselves and just talk a load of crap, and then you have the developers who mostly look like a deer in the headlights and don't really know how to hold a speech.

Not sure if there's a way to make them not awkward in one way or the other.

And of course are hardcore gamers probably the most critical audience you can get.
 
you sound like your too fukin old to be watching this then.
there IS an age limit on the mtv award shows and the like. your obviously past it.
I'm amazed you didn't post 'old man yells at cloud' to go with it :-)

The problem is the fact that the mass market - including non-gamers - are aware that there's more to the music industry than the oh-so-achingly-trendy MTV Music Awards. That's what makes it fine.

In a sense I think what bothers me isn't *really* the fault of the VGAs themselves. If they want to make an awards show that's down with ver yoof, that's kind of okay. The problem is, though, it's become a figurehead for all of gaming, and what they're presenting doesn't deserve to be that.

Geoff: I think ultimately my stance is that it's far better to bore some of your audience than to insult the intelligence a different portion of them; don't be afraid to raise the level of discourse on the subject. But then, I guess I'm biased... and I don't actually have to think in terms of producing a product that makes profit.

To put it slightly pejoratively (Don't take this too much at face value, but it sort of underlines the sentiment): It feels like there's good money in insulting our intelligence.
 
Top Bottom