Asian martial arts extend into medicine, rehab, philosophy.
Unfortunately, the above is dying off. Dudebros just want MMA training with almost no knowledge getting extended into non-fighting aspect of martial arts.
It is sad that the Gracie-school is one of the last English-speaking schools.
Unless you learn Chinese I believe that in the next two generations a lot of techniques and knowledge is going to die off.
Why cant MMA and TMA exist in harmony. Why does it have to be "MMA dudebros" and "kung fu larping chi pantywaists"? Is it so ridiculous to suggest that perhaps they might be able to support each other and work together. Let's be real- a lot of TMA schools have become outmoded, form based and shun physical contact and sometimes conditioning. It's more common to find a Traditional Martial Arts school with a fat sifu in full 36 chambers larp gear, a belt system, and huge fees than the real McCoy. Forget the other stuff like traditional medicine and philosophy, the MARTIAL applicability of most TMA has eroded. MMA is helping to bring a lot of that focus back. On practicality, application, and competition. It has its downfalls, but by and large MMA is helping to revitalize and update a lot of old schools, and bring them back to a combat focus.
I agree that martial arts are dying off in terms of breadth of techniques, knowledge, and philosophy... But what do you expect in an era where their applicability has become lessened so much thanks to evolving weapons and increased legal accountability for fighting? You can't just blame MMA for all that. And you HAVE to acknowledge that many TMA schools jus dont test the rigor of their curriculum enough in real time.
I kind of submitted the post and then thought, "you know, you probably could rephrase that" and then thought, "fuck, it's miller time, go home".I don't feel like Baji or Xingyi are heavily philosophical. There is a lot of abstract explanation in both, but i think that there is a lot more philosophical teaching in even some Karate schools.
Unfortunately, MMA/TMA are commercialized much like yoga or pilates. You need to pay to learn. Fat sifu and MMA dudebro are happy to take your money.Why cant MMA and TMA exist in harmony. Why does it have to be "MMA dudebros" and "kung fu larping chi pantywaists"? Is it so ridiculous to suggest that perhaps they might be able to support each other and work together. Let's be real- a lot of TMA schools have become outmoded, form based and shun physical contact and sometimes conditioning. It's more common to find a Traditional Martial Arts school with a fat sifu in full 36 chambers larp gear, a belt system, and huge fees than the real McCoy. Forget the other stuff like traditional medicine and philosophy, the MARTIAL applicability of most TMA has eroded. MMA is helping to bring a lot of that focus back. On practicality, application, and competition. It has its downfalls, but by and large MMA is helping to revitalize and update a lot of old schools, and bring them back to a combat focus.
Applicability is not lessened. In fact TMA stresses stability, coordination, balance, and range of motion that 99.999% would love to have. You don't need to fight to learn these things.I agree that martial arts are dying off in terms of breadth of techniques, knowledge, and philosophy... But what do you expect in an era where their applicability has become lessened so much thanks to evolving weapons and increased legal accountability for fighting? You can't just blame MMA for all that. And you HAVE to acknowledge that many TMA schools jus dont test the rigor of their curriculum enough in real time.
I kind of submitted the post and then thought, "you know, you probably could rephrase that" and then thought, "fuck, it's miller time, go home".
I was being overly broad, and I apologize. My "heavily" scale was meant more along the internal/external scale of expressions of the martial arts and I was trying to use simpler terms for someone who hadn't been around it much. Honestly, the degree of "do"-ness of any given martial art really depends on the instructors. I've seen some incredibly internal expressions of Muay Thai, for instance. I've also seen some incredibly external expressions of judo. Karate is really all over the place, depending on the school.
I was really asking the question not to throw up a "dude" barrier between traditional and non-traditional martial arts but to get a bead on what the guy really wanted to do, because the answer to "teach me how to punch fite" has a million different, yet all appropriate, answers, and, "how do you want to punch fite" is often a question a lot of people fail to ask.
Mine doesn't. The difference between fat sifu and MMA dudebro is that at least "MMA dudebro" teaches with a combat and conditioning emphasis, and may at least offer competition. MMA and TMA dont need to be at odds, they can grow using each other. MMA is not a new concept anyway, dont let an aesthetic distract you from the obvious advantages of how it is put in practice today.Unfortunately, MMA/TMA are commercialized much like yoga or pilates. You need to pay to learn. Fat sifu and MMA dudebro are happy to take your money.
A real TMA master does not charge for anything.
Applicability is not lessened. In fact TMA stresses stability, coordination, balance, and range of motion that 99.999% would love to have. You don't need to fight to learn these things.
People are not smart enough or don't have the medical background to comprehend the implications. There are maybe a handful of people in the world that are: fluent in English & Chinese AND have backgrounds in medicine, rehab, & fighting.
Unless you grew up in a rural area you are probably conditioned to sit in desks, wear shoes, drive cars, and use a computer for hours a day. I would say you need a master in old-school traditional learning who grew up without these hindrances and understands how to unteach them.As for coordination, balance, flexibility, range of motion... Do you think that you can't learn these from western MA or the MA learned most frequently by MMA competitors? Because that is flat out wrong.
Did you not glean from the rest of my post that I train TMA?Unless you grew up in a rural area you are probably conditioned to sit in desks, wear shoes, drive cars, and use a computer for hours a day. I would say you need a master in old-school traditional learning who grew up without these hindrances and understands how to unteach them.
Take a look at the Russian kick dance. Almost impossible for a city-born kid to do. But simple for any country-boy to do. I don't know how good you are - but can you do this kind of stuff?
I'm guessing a US city-born kid
http://youtu.be/3QG-APBZQH0
Russian soldiers
http://youtu.be/rNXKuwhhC1c?t=1m15s
They are both doing the same thing, but can you explain how one is different from an anatomical and physiological standpoint and teach someone how to do the proper way. There are very few masters on any level that can teach this kind of stuff. In fact there are very few people who can kick properly. Fundamentals of real TMA.
If your MMA training encompasses this level of strength, flexibility, coordination, balance well I applaud you.
instructor paired me with an experienced guy who taught me things. no one was out to rip my head off. day 1 sparring was really all boxing where you learn not to drop your hands or you'll get hit.I whole-heartedly disagree with sparring day 1 in Muay Thai.
Focus mits, maybe some controlled light contact...get a feel for it for at least a month.
Then move to sparring.
Unless you grew up in a rural area you are probably conditioned to sit in desks, wear shoes, drive cars, and use a computer for hours a day. I would say you need a master in old-school traditional learning who grew up without these hindrances and understands how to unteach them.
Would really like to get into BJJ but feeling that having recently turned 29 I'm just too old (have never taken a martial arts class in my life, not even karate as a child).
Maybe some of you more experienced guys could let me know if I have missed the boat or not?
Would really like to get into BJJ but feeling that having recently turned 29 I'm just too old (have never taken a martial arts class in my life, not even karate as a child).
Maybe some of you more experienced guys could let me know if I have missed the boat or not?
There are guys who roll well in their 60s. In fact, they credit their training with helping them maintain flexibility and mobility when other guys their age are slowing down and hobbling around.Would really like to get into BJJ but feeling that having recently turned 29 I'm just too old (have never taken a martial arts class in my life, not even karate as a child).
There are guys who roll well in their 60s. In fact, they credit their training with helping them maintain flexibility and mobility when other guys their age are slowing down and hobbling around.
First bjj class was a ton of fun. We did some wrestling take downs. It was so fun. I worked with a 15 year old kid he could've owned me haha. I really sucked I didn't get all the motions but the kid was super supportive everyone was nice. Ton of fun I didn't want to leave.
Anyone want to recommend some Martial Arts books? Not training manuals or history lessons, but rather an author's experience training. Ideally with some international travel.
Thanks everyone, I guess I always associated martial arts with something you try as a kid and either stick with or discard. I literally had no idea you could take this up at ages over and above my own. Looking into some BJJ classes local to myself in Liverpool, UK.
Thanks again!
I know some of the guys in Manchester and Birmingham, if you see a school in Liverpool PM me if you like and I can find out if they are legit.
^ Do this.
BJJ is a young enough discipline where every single black belt is able to trace their lineage (who gave them their black, and who gave THAT person their black, all the way back up the tree to Maeda). AND be very willing to share it or detail it on their webpages. It's rarely more than 5-7 steps removed.
MMA is the new big thing, so a lot of schools will offer MMA / BJJ without legit instructors. Just do some basic research, ask around (or check with SteveWD40), and then try them out in person. Usually you will get at least one free class. Some will do a free week.
As for no-gi or gi BJJ, almost all high level guys will tell you to do both. It's classically learned in a gi, where one may grab on to the clothing of the opponent, so it's much easier to make grips, and thus compounds any mistakes or actions. It's much more technical.
In no-gi, one cannot grab the other person's clothing, and with the rashguards/tshirts and shorts, most people are covered in sweat. It's much more athletic, and much more forgiving of mistakes. This is also more pertinent to MMA.
Usually schools will focus more on one or the other, but will still offer both.
Thanks everyone, I guess I always associated martial arts with something you try as a kid and either stick with or discard. I literally had no idea you could take this up at ages over and above my own. Looking into some BJJ classes local to myself in Liverpool, UK.
Thanks again!
Ive been contemplating making a martial arts training thread for a while like FitnessGAF. I noticed that some people are logging their shit in here. It would be nice to chop it up with gaffers and share knowledge.
Any interest?
I am interested.
I want to bounce jiu jitsu ideas off of other jiujitsu folks
I am interested.
I want to bounce jiu jitsu ideas off of other jiujitsu folks
instructor paired me with an experienced guy who taught me things. no one was out to rip my head off. day 1 sparring was really all boxing where you learn not to drop your hands or you'll get hit.
I'd really like a martial arts thread. I've been going to jiu jitsu for three weeks and love it.
I've been doing mainly boxing classes with some muay thai and mma/everything goes on the side for about a year. My grappling is much worse and I haven't had enough opportunities to to spar I guess.
What do you guys feel about the amount of time you spend on training per week? I know some guys like to do like 2-3 hours per day for almost every day but I'd rather just do more intense training for shorter periods of time.
I've been doing mainly boxing classes with some muay thai and mma/everything goes on the side for about a year. My grappling is much worse and I haven't had enough opportunities to to spar I guess.
What do you guys feel about the amount of time you spend on training per week? I know some guys like to do like 2-3 hours per day for almost every day but I'd rather just do more intense training for shorter periods of time.