MvmntInGrn
Member
Quite confusing.Nekofrog said:Misleading subject is misleading. Shame on you.
According to this, it sounds more like he agrees with GAFs placement(edit: or more correctly its placement in regard to other Zelda games), not discrediting it. While he says newer Zelda are technically superior in fluidity and graphic fidelity, the have not bested Ocarina of Time.The "Zelda guy" himself discredits GAF's #1 game of all time:
Originally Posted by Eiji Aonuma:
It's complicated. Past things belong to our memories, and they grow bigger in there. If you play Ocarina of Time nowadays, you notice that it's not that good. Sometimes it doesn't move as fast as it should, graphics aren't as beautiful as they should be; there are some confusing parts... Any present Zelda is technically superior. Everything goes faster, more fluid... but to best Ocarina of Time, a great change comparable to what happened back then- must be introduced. And that'll be rather complicated.
Not meaning to attack anyones opinions, but I don't think he is saying what may are assuming him to, unless I'm missing something?
In the end you don't have to agree with him either, I think a lot of people are trying to be on "his side" without even being sure what that it.