• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Apple granted injunction against Galaxy Nexus

Status
Not open for further replies.
Filed in 2004.
Universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system

The present invention provides convenient access to items of information that are related to various descriptors input by a user, by means of a unitary interface which is capable of accessing information in a variety of locations, through a number of different techniques. Using a plurality of heuristic algorithms to operate upon information descriptors input by the user, the present invention locates and displays candidate items of information for selection and/or retrieval. Thus, the advantages of a search engine can be exploited, while listing only relevant object candidate items of information.

Isn't this what watson did way back in 2002?

http://www.karelia.com/watson/
http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/arti...eaks_Out_Against_Apple_Plans_Port_To_Windows/
 
Saw that the Verge article updated with the relevant section of the ruling, here it is:

The Court is persuaded by the evidence in the record that the '604 unified search functionality drives consumer demand in a way that affects substantial market share. Even accepting Samsung's argument that the intelligent voice-recognition aspect of Siri, as advertised, also contributes to consumer interest in the iPhone 4S, Apple has shown that the '604 Patented feature is core to Siri's functionality and is thus a but-for driver of demand for Siri. Accordingly, the Court finds that Apple has adequately established the requisite causal nexus between Samsung's alleged infringement of the '604 Patent and Apple's risk of suffering irreparable harm.
 
Holy shit a Google+ uprising, RIP Apple.

e:

"We've had enough, Apple. You suck as a company and we're done with you. We've had a thousand bad experiences and we don't agree with your practices as a company. You have become a new evil empire, and we're going to bring you down, because you deserve it."

Ahahahahaha
You know what RIP means right? lol

,but it’s the astounding adoption rate of the android revolution that’s eating Apple up inside.

You know that iPad and iPhone sales are SKYROCKETING right? The growth is insane. Especially the last couple of quarters.
 
You know what RIP means right? lol



You know that iPad and iPhone sales are SKYROCKETING right? The growth is insane. Especially the last couple of quarters.

And Android sales have not? Android has double the market share, over 50% in the US. That must really burn Apples ass, how much revenue they are losing out on with that big chunk of Android market share. A million activations a day. Apple has higher revenue of course, although its not much wonder when they charge such exuberant prices for their products..
 
And Android sales have not? Android has double the market share, over 50% in the US. That must really burn Apples ass, how much revenue they are losing out on with that big chunk of Android market share. A million activations a day. Apple has higher revenue of course, although its not much wonder when they charge such exuberant prices for their products..

They have what, 80% of all the profits of the entire mobile phone market? The top 3 selling smart phones in America are all 3 iPhone's on the market. If they had a 4th phone they would obviously own all top 4 spots. I doubt they are losing sleep.

And what iPhones cost an "exuberant price" compared to android? iPhones are priced pretty much exactly the same as similarly spec'ed Android phones.

Hell the 4 is going to be free on contract this fall.
 
I can see both sides really, if you'd built something that everyone wants, you'd naturally feel an entitlement to that audience you fostered, but of course if it's really needed to be a well designed phone, everyone should be able to do it.

The iPhone introduced multitouch capacitive interface 'smart' phones, essentially the format of all smart phones today, but in no fair world should they be able to be the sole producer of those products, it'd lead to obscene stagnation in the industry. How important universal search is to a phone though, I have no idea.
 
I'd be angry too at all the companies making a living off the market I created, but I can see both sides.
 
linechart.png

Yes, yes the whole world knows Apple has the highest revenue, the biggest profit and the most enviable profit margins. It’s no big secret to anyone they’re monopolising the majority of profits in the industry. But the interesting question is: Why are you rejoicing or taking pride in this fact?

Let’s look at this from an objective point of view shall we? Surely such crazy profits and obscene "world class" margins have to come from somewhere the end of the day? Somebody has surely got to be paying for it. From an accounting empirical sense, such profit margins can only come at the expense of:

i) the supply side/cost side of things

ii) at the expense of consumers

I’m sure as far as Foxconn employees are concerned, there’re certainly no ambiguities on their end who got fingered in the process. Their grievances are well known. But the interesting question is, why are you bent over backwards with a wicked smile on your face? ;-)
 
They have what, 80% of all the profits of the entire mobile phone market? The top 3 selling smart phones in America are all 3 iPhone's on the market. If they had a 4th phone they would obviously own all top 4 spots. I doubt they are losing sleep.

And what iPhones cost an "exuberant price" compared to android? iPhones are priced pretty much exactly the same as similarly spec'ed Android phones.

Hell the 4 is going to be free on contract this fall.

So imagine what their profits would be with a higher market share.. Fact is, Android is costing them huge profits. And I was referring to all their other over priced products, macbooks, macs, ipads. Paying the workers at Foxconn peanuts likely helps too.
 
But the interesting question is, why are you bent over backwards with a wicked smile on your face? ;-)

I think people tend to support the companies whose products they use and love. Apple is without a doubt the best example of this IMO. (myself included)
 
And what iPhones cost an "exuberant price" compared to android? iPhones are priced pretty much exactly the same as similarly spec'ed Android phones.

Hell the 4 is going to be free on contract this fall.
That is not true at all. The Galaxy Nexus has:

- A faster CPU
- Twice the RAM
- A higher resolution screen

The iPhone has:

- A faster GPU?? (not sure on this one)

iPhone - $649
Galaxy Nexus - $349
 
A higher resolution screen isn't objectively a plus for the Nexus. The iPhone is higher pixel density, they choose to have a smaller screen. That's a question of taste, unlike something like RAM.
 
That is not true at all. The Galaxy Nexus has:

- A faster CPU
- Twice the RAM
- A higher resolution screen

The iPhone has:

- A faster GPU?? (not sure on this one)

iPhone - $649
Galaxy Nexus - $349

They are priced the same for 99% of people.
 
That is not true at all. The Galaxy Nexus has:

- A faster CPU
- Twice the RAM
- A higher resolution screen

The iPhone has:

- A faster GPU?? (not sure on this one)

iPhone - $649
Galaxy Nexus - $349

The iPhone has a better ecosystem and experience.
 
A higher resolution screen isn't objectively a plus for the Nexus. The iPhone is higher pixel density, they choose to have a smaller screen. That's a question of taste, unlike something like RAM.

DPI is almost the same, both falling under the Apple's own definition of Retina Display. Point still remains that it's objectively higher specced even if it's not what everyone prefers.

The iPhone has a better ecosystem and experience.

That's completely irrelevant to the point he was replying to.
 
The iPhone has a better ecosystem and experience.

Thats a matter of taste.. GNEX shits all over iphone in that regard in my opinion. I also prefer the integrated Google ecosystem on an Android phone. If that justifies $300 for you then goodie.
 
In the UK iPhone 4S on Vodafone is £30, on the same contract it's free for a Nexus.

Pretty close.

Although the S3 is the new popular thing, so it's hard to really compare at this point, my S3 was only £19.
 
That is not true at all. The Galaxy Nexus has:

- A faster CPU
- Twice the RAM
- A higher resolution screen

The iPhone has:

- A faster GPU?? (not sure on this one)

iPhone - $649
Galaxy Nexus - $349

But the Galaxy Nexus just got a price drop. Not entirely fair to compare the two on price.
 
In the UK iPhone 4S on Vodafone is £30, on the same contract it's free for a Nexus.

Pretty close.

Although the S3 is the new popular thing, so it's hard to really compare at this point, my S3 was only £19.

Thats subsidized pricing, not the actual price.
 
The iPhone has a better ecosystem and experience.

As an owner of a 2g up to current iphone i heartily disagree. The gs2 andriod i own now is faster, more stable, has a bigger and therefore better screen, is more impact resistant in my experience, and is the best experience ive ever had by far.

How anyone can say iphone offers a better experience when it wont run flash is beyond me. Thats like 1/4 of the internet. Enjoy your walled garden.
 
But the Galaxy Nexus just got a price drop. Not entirely fair to compare the two on price.

How unfair, a newer, higher speced device got a price drop earlier.

http://i-cdn.phonearena.com/images/articles/59336-image/markets1.jpg[IMG]

Apple definitely, on average, has higher prices.[/QUOTE]

To be fair though, Apple only makes a single high end model and others like HTC and Samsung create a bunch of dirt cheap phones which bring down their averages.

[quote="twofold, post: 39413434"]It took 6 pages before Foxconn was brought up; I was expecting it around page 3. Impressive.[/QUOTE]

I got mine on page 3 :)
 
It's the price it costs the consumer. Which is what actually matters. I doubt the majority are buying their cell phones unlocked direct from the manufacturer.

We are talking revenue here. Do you think they only give Apple 30 pounds for that iphone you just got? I don't think so. The outright cost of these devices is much more than that. If you buy a 4S off contract its $649, Gnex is $349, US.
 
As an owner of a 2g up to current iphone i heartily disagree. The gs2 andriod i own now is faster, more stable, has a bigger and therefore better screen, is more impact resistant in my experience, and is the best experience ive ever had by far.

How anyone can say iphone offers a better experience when it wont run flash is beyond me. Thats like 1/4 of the internet. Enjoy your walled garden.

I think I can count the number of times I've missed flash on my iphone on one hand. I can't wait until flash is fully obsolete and is replaced completely by HTML5 - it's such a battery life drain.

I will agree with you about the screen size, though. After playing around with a friends One X, the large screen size is certainly appealing. It's nice to see that Jelly Bean is finally looking to be as smooth as ios, too. I've always thought the Android UI looked awful, but Jelly Bean's looks really nice. Matias Duarte is one of the best things to happen to Android.

I got mine on page 3 :)

Heh. Guess I'm a 50 post per page peasant then.

You should really look into data about Foxconn/China before bringing it up, though. Apple are arguably the best company at the moment when it comes to Chinese labour. They pay more than practically every other electronics company and they're being far more transparent about working conditions, too. It's a shame other manufacturers haven't followed their lead.
 
We are talking revenue here.

Nah I think you are. Those posters had zoned in on the actual individual costs of the phones specifically, not the revenue because of this statement:

And what iPhones cost an "exuberant price" compared to android? iPhones are priced pretty much exactly the same as similarly spec'ed Android phones.

A customer doesn't give a shit about the revenue of Samsung or whoever, just what they have to pay.
 
Oh I'm afraid the deflector shield will be quite operational when your friends arrive
Now witness the firepower of this fully armed (and trained in patent law) battlestation
A couple of things -
First of all, persecution laches is an extremely difficult defense, not only do you need to show that the delay was unreasonable and inexcusable, you need to show prejudice.
But more importantly, even a successful laches defense does not invalidate a patent, it just prevent you from collecting damages based on activity that happened before the filing of the lawsuit.

The article you quoted (but didn't link) is from a patent law firm, of course they're going to say that you should sue everyone all the time, that's how they make money.

So yeah, not filing an injunction against the galaxy will only potentially limit the amount of money they can collect if they decide to file a bullshit infringing lawsuit against it sometime in the future.
But that's the extent of it, I don't see how that justified such counterproductive behavior.

^Exactly. Well said. But this is not just limited to some moronic divine rights to a square, slidelock, or some fucking search imo, but a bigger war waged by Apple against the ideals of open source and their attempts at trying to stifle competition and innovation brought about through such mind share. Samsung is targeted primarily because they’re at the forefront of the android momentum, but it’s the astounding adoption rate of the android revolution that’s eating Apple up inside. This patent BS is their attempt at trying to halt competition (tbh such practices has always been at their core business philosophy, i.e. that of controlling competition hiding under the veil of quality control).

Seriously you nerds out there, wake up and see the big picture. Android is Google’s open source gift to everyone and if you value the freedom of choice, flexibility and pace of innovation brought about through such openness, do your part and shun Apple’s products from now on. Spread the word around. Spit on your friends/family (or educate them) and tell them what they’re standing for when they buy Apple. Their sacrifice is needed because of the important implications for future innovation.

The world deserves open source and open source deserves a chance to shine instead of being shackled by the tyranny of closed ecosystems. It’ll be a great loss if the strides made by android get halted by the deep pockets of certain companies and their clever trolling of patents. Because that’s exactly what the android open source project is to both Apple and MS. A very big threat to their existing business ecosystem (see how instead of its original free intention, MS is using patents as leverage to charge android OEMs their equivalent of a “windows licencing fee model” as future insurance in case its momentum cannot be stopped). And just like how there was a big investigation into MS antitrust practices of the 90s, similar questions must surely be asked now of how Apple is using their BS patents to similar effect.

Fuck you Apple!
I'm not sure what open source has to do with it.
Open source allows for patents (I mean, patent involve disclosure) and closed source does not require them.
 
Nah I think you are. Those posters had zoned in on the actual individual costs of the phones specifically, not the revenue because of this statement:

The costs of the phones are $649 and $349. No one mentioned subsidized pricing in the answer that was given. Subsidized there is not much difference. I don't care how much they make either, its not like I get a cut.. I wish.
 
As an owner of a 2g up to current iphone i heartily disagree. The gs2 andriod i own now is faster, more stable, has a bigger and therefore better screen, is more impact resistant in my experience, and is the best experience ive ever had by far.

How anyone can say iphone offers a better experience when it wont run flash is beyond me. Thats like 1/4 of the internet. Enjoy your walled garden.
You mean the software this is being dropped from Android? The one that never worked well on touch-based devices? The one that Adobe itself has come with alternatives for and is now actively killing off? That one? Ya, I don't miss it.

As for your other comments, I find them laughable. Android has been a janky mess since the beginning. Even now they are dedicating a whole team to smoothing out the experience. You can have your faster CPU or GPU. If it can't run the OS at 60fps, I frankly don't care.
 
They might not have patents in place to do so. Or maybe they are waiting to strike? Who knows. Maybe Apple will patent it now and say they 'invetented it' like they do with everything else.

As mentioned on the first page of this thread, the patents for the notification system have not yet been granted to Google. I posted the link to the application if you want to look for it.

You mean the software this is being dropped from Android? The one that never worked well on touch-based devices? The one that Adobe itself has come with alternatives for and is now actively killing off? That one? Ya, I don't miss it.

As for your other comments, I find them laughable. Android has been a janky mess since the beginning. Even now they are dedicating a whole team to smoothing out the experience. You can have your faster CPU or GPU. If it can't run the OS at 60fps, I frankly don't care.

Have you used Flash on mobile? It's not perfect but it was a lot better than getting missing plugin boxes on restaurant websites, at least you could read the menu...

Also, have you used a Galaxy S2? Even on Gingerbread it ran the OS at 60 fps for the most part, imho this was the reason why it was so much better than all the other Android phones released around the same time.
 
As mentioned on the first page of this thread, the patents for the notification system have not yet been granted to Google. I posted the link to the application if you want to look for it.

I hope they get granted because frankly, I think the whole Notification Center is a half-baked cop-out of an idea.
 
You know what RIP means right? lol



You know that iPad and iPhone sales are SKYROCKETING right? The growth is insane. Especially the last couple of quarters.

Google is activating ONE million devices per day. Day.

There's a reason Apple stopped showing activation numbers in their presentation. Their growth moved into a linear rate.
 
Have you used Flash on mobile? It's not perfect but it was a lot better than getting missing plugin boxes on restaurant websites, at least you could read the menu...

Also, have you used a Galaxy S2? Even on Gingerbread it ran the OS at 60 fps for the most part, imho this was the reason why it was so much better than all the other Android phones released around the same time.

Yes, I have used Flash on mobile. It sucks, badly. Yes, I've used a Galaxy S2, one of my good friends has one. It has slowdowns on scrolling and other operations like every single Android phone on the market. You can't deny the slowdowns when Google themselves put an entire team and project together to tackle the issue. Android has always been an fps mess.
 
You mean the software this is being dropped from Android? The one that never worked well on touch-based devices? The one that Adobe itself has come with alternatives for and is now actively killing off? That one? Ya, I don't miss it.

As for your other comments, I find them laughable. Android has been a janky mess since the beginning. Even now they are dedicating a whole team to smoothing out the experience. You can have your faster CPU or GPU. If it can't run the OS at 60fps, I frankly don't care.

I guess you missed the part where i said i was informed. You on the other hand are making comments that are two years old. Andriod on the gs2 is as smooth or smoother than any version of ios ive ever used.

Flash works just like would on my gaming desktop. Seamless and easy when in 4g or wifi. Its being dropped from andriod because adobe is suffering financial issues namely because of apple. All you would have to do is pick up any current iphone equivalent andriod device to know how silly you sound.
 
Google is activating ONE million devices per day. Day.

There's a reason Apple stopped showing activation numbers in their presentation. Their growth moved into a linear rate.

no it hasn't and they give you sales. If you divide those sales through 90 you get the activation of iPhones per day.
also, google is activating one million devices per day because they sell a whole lot of low-cost, below 3GS tier, semi-smartphones.

Apple activated 300,000 iPhones per day in the post-christmas quarter.

Comparing this to the same quarter last year, they sold double the phones.
They sold 2 million less than in the quarter that had both christmas and the introduction of the new model.

This does not count iPads and iPod touches, which would also factor into the number, since Android also adds tablets to this number.

source:
http://www.statista.com/statistics/12743/worldwide-apple-iphone-sales-since-3rd-quarter-2007/
 
I guess you missed the part where i said i was informed. You on the other hand are making comments that are two years old. Andriod on the gs2 is as smooth or smoother than any version of ios ive ever used.

Perception is not reality. Just because you want your Android to be as smooth as an iPhone doesn't make it so. If Google felt that way, why is Project Butter a thing now?

Flash works just like would on my gaming desktop. Seamless and easy when in 4g or wifi. Its being dropped from andriod because adobe is suffering financial issues namely because of apple. All you would have to do is pick up any current iphone equivalent andriod device to know how silly you sound.

Lying is not a good way to get your point across.
 
no it hasn't and they give you sales. If you divide those sales through 90 you get the activation of iPhones per day.
also, google is activating one million devices per day because they sell a whole lot of low-cost, below 3GS tier, semi-smartphones.

Apple activated 300,000 iPhones per day in the post-christmas quarter.

Comparing this to the same quarter last year, they sold double the phones.
They sold 2 million less than in the quarter that had both christmas and the introduction of the new model.

This does not count iPads and iPod touches, which would also factor into the number, since Android also adds tablets to this number.

source:
http://www.statista.com/statistics/12743/worldwide-apple-iphone-sales-since-3rd-quarter-2007/

Apples numbers after a release are always huge, then then flatten out. Their overall growth slowed and that's why are stuck around the 30% mark in market share when it comes to mobile devices.

Apple went from putting out activation numbers to sell through numbers because its a lot of upgrades being sold and not new users. Those figures from Google are always new activations.
 
no it hasn't and they give you sales. If you divide those sales through 90 you get the activation of iPhones per day.
also, google is activating one million devices per day because they sell a whole lot of low-cost, below 3GS tier, semi-smartphones.

Apple activated 300,000 iPhones per day in the post-christmas quarter.

Comparing this to the same quarter last year, they sold double the phones.
They sold 2 million less than in the quarter that had both christmas and the introduction of the new model.

This does not count iPads and iPod touches, which would also factor into the number, since Android also adds tablets to this number.

source:
http://www.statista.com/statistics/12743/worldwide-apple-iphone-sales-since-3rd-quarter-2007/

I hope you are getting your cut.
 
Yes, I have used Flash on mobile. It sucks, badly. Yes, I've used a Galaxy S2, one of my good friends has one. It has slowdowns on scrolling and other operations like every single Android phone on the market. You can't deny the slowdowns when Google themselves put an entire team and project together to tackle the issue. Android has always been an fps mess.

Just saying, getting no functionality is worse than getting mediocre functionality. I don't see how you can argue that point without coming across as a total fanboy.

The occasional hiccups might bother you on the GS2 but I can't imagine it is really that much better on iPhone. Maybe that shows my ignorance but I use the iPhone about as much as you use the GS2 (I am typing this on a GS2 with ICS installed), and the guy you are replying to has used both more extensively than either of us.
 
Yes, I have used Flash on mobile. It sucks, badly. Yes, I've used a Galaxy S2, one of my good friends has one. It has slowdowns on scrolling and other operations like every single Android phone on the market. You can't deny the slowdowns when Google themselves put an entire team and project together to tackle the issue. Android has always been an fps mess.

Ok thats just false. The gs2 doesnt have slowdown. Ive owned mine for 9 months and never experienced it at all. Maybe your friend had a ton of apps open or something or you just have an agenda but the gs2 is every bit as smooth as the ipad3, iphone4s or whatever you want to compare it to. Shall i make a side by side video with my 4s vs my gs2 using my ipad3?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom