• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Apple obtains exclusive rights to custom, super-durable metal alloy

Status
Not open for further replies.

rezuth

Member
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/08/09/apple_obtains_exclusive_rights_to_custom_super_durable_metal_alloy.html said:
Apple has entered into an exclusive agreement to utilize amorphous metal alloys with unique atomic structures, allowing products that are stronger, lighter, and resistant to wear and corrosion, AppleInsider has learned.

The metal alloys owned by Liquidmetal Technologies were developed by a research team at the California Institute of Technology, and their amorphous, non-crystalline structure makes them harder than alloys of titanium or aluminum. Introduced for commercial applications in 2003 through the Delaware-based Liquidmetal corporation, the product has been used to create technology for the U.S. Department of Defense, has been found in medical equipment, and is even used to create sporting goods like tennis raquets and golf clubs.

In a Form 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission last week, Liquidmetal Technologies indicated that it had granted all of its intellectual property assets to Apple. According to the terms of the deal, Apple was awarded "a perpetual, worldwide, fully-paid, exclusive license to commercial such intellectual property in the field of electronic products in exchange for a license fee."

Though the licensing agreement grants Apple exclusive use in consumer electronics, Liquidmetal is still allowed to license its products to other companies for any use outside of markets where Apple competes, meaning its deals with defense contractors, sports equipment manufacturers and medical suppliers are likely to remain intact.

The agreement was made on Aug. 5, and was revealed to the SEC on Monday. It was signed by Larry Buffington, president and CEO of Liquidmetal Technologies.

30k6op4.jpg


The company's official website gives examples of where Liquidmetal's products were used in portable electronics in the past. It touts that Liquidmetal alloys are 2.5 times the strength of commonly used titanium alloy and 1.5 times the hardness of stainless steel found in portable electronic devices. The technology is said to allow for thinner, smaller design while offering greater protection for internal components, and giving users a scratch and corrosion resistant exterior.

"As the demand for product 'miniaturization' continues in the electronic casings industry, Liquidmetal alloys enable smaller, thinner and more durable designs," the company's website reads. "Current casings technology is pushed to the limit in supporting these new designs and specifications, especially requirements for larger LCD screens, thinner wall sections and pure metallic surface finishes for products such as mobile phones, PDA's and cameras."

15wxd7s.jpg

Thinner, stronger and more scratch resistant products? Awesome!
 
Dynamite Ringo Matsuri said:
Next iPhone to use this metal for its back place please.
Rumor age

"Pegatron is expected to start mass production in December and will supply to both US-based Verizon Wireless and China-based China Telecom," the report said. "The CDMA iPhone's back plate will be forged from metal materials and will feature an integrated antenna."
 
jonremedy said:
I used to have a Sandisk Sansa, which had a LiquidMetal back. Never got a single scratch.
the same - liquidmetal has ridiculous durability.
 
Apple is getting closer to it's goal:

apple-logo.jpg


+

liquidmetal_lg.jpg


=

Star_Trek_USS_Eenterprise_D_starship_in_orbit_freecomputerdesktopwallpaper_p.jpg


It's all starting to make sense, baby steps till Universal Domination, the K'theluthalex peeps need their iPads & iPods too you know
 
rezuth said:
Rumor age
Freakin hot if true. I love the way the iPhone 4 looks, but its inherent fragility makes me paranoid. I never had a case for my 2g and I've dropped it tons of times and it wasn't all that worse for the wear. This new alloy could help the next iPhone retain the 4's form factor and significantly strengthen it as well. It would result in the perfect phone.
 
My Metal brings all the boys to the yard,
And their like
It's better than yours,
Damn right it's better than yours,
I can teach you,
But I have to charge

...oh, and you know they going to charge.
 
Stumpokapow said:
*shakes head* material sciences patents *shakes head*
Hell yes! Lets screw over companies that invest money to create better products. Lets just let them invest millions of dollars and then take their technology. That way they will lose lots of money! Hooray.
 
Dynamite Ringo Matsuri said:
Freakin hot if true. I love the way the iPhone 4 looks, but its inherent fragility makes me paranoid. I never had a case for my 2g and I've dropped it tons of times and it wasn't all that worse for the wear. This new alloy could help the next iPhone retain the 4's form factor and significantly strengthen it as well. It would result in the perfect phone.
holding out for iPhone5 then.. :S
 
Is it significantly more expensive than other alloys? Why wasn't everyone already using this?

Also, they should change their name to Magic Metal. :lol
 
Stumpokapow said:
*shakes head* material sciences patents *shakes head*
I don't really see how the right to patent a specific material that you researched and designed is any different from the right to patent any other invention. You're Stumpakapow though, so I'll give the benefit of the doubt that you have some very well thought out argument as to why its a bad thing.
 
Tobor said:
Is it significantly more expensive than other alloys? Why wasn't everyone already using this?

Also, they should change their name to Magic Metal. :lol

stack-of-money.jpg


The_Technomancer said:
I don't really see how the right to patent a specific material that you researched and designed is any different from the right to patent any other invention. You're Stumpakapow though, so I'll give the benefit of the doubt that you have some very well thought out argument as to why its a bad thing.

You're patenting a chemical reaction. Taken to its practical end, the very idea is absurd.
 
Nearly 260 ksi of yield strength? Does some oily fat obese rich Saudi want a staircase made of Macbooks or something?
 
Sho_Nuff82 said:
[You're patenting a chemical reaction. Taken to its practical end, the very idea is absurd.
I don't see how it is absurd seeing as to come up with that you need to invest lots of time and money. Would you rather that no one developed it?
 
Always-honest said:
holding out for iPhone5 then.. :S
The iphone 4 is an amazing device in spite of a few clear drawbacks (reception issues and durability), both of which could be solved with a case. I just dislike cases as they detract from the design and form factor of the device. I've dropped my 2g on asphalt, on ceramic tile, etc. Quite a few times but never from a height of higher than 3 feet. The thing could take a beating though, and aside from scratches and a little dent or two it kept on ticking. I highly doubt my 4 could take the same punishment.
 
Sho_Nuff82 said:
You're patenting a chemical reaction. Taken to its practical end, the very idea is absurd.
But this isn't some naturally occurring reaction in nature that someone is taking advantage of. This material had to be researched, the process for creating it consistently had to be developed, chemists/materials scientists had to be paid to churn through hundreds of reactions to discover the one that worked, by most measures I can think of, it is a clearly created "thing".
 
Srsly said:
It begins:

Apple is really SkyNet!

Then we've got nothing to fear as they'll all fucking break before they get a shot off.
 
rezuth said:
I don't see how it is absurd seeing as to come up with that you need to invest lots of time and money. Would you rather that no one developed it?

Many scientific fields wouldn't progress at all if we had to pay, not just cite, everyone who's work we built upon to do our latest research.

At least in chemistry, it doesn't really take long for people to find a work-around for patent-restricted or patent-hidden synthesis problems, once the structure is out there someone WILL reverse engineer it, and everyone benefits.
 
Dynamite Ringo Matsuri said:
The iphone 4 is an amazing device in spite of a few clear drawbacks (reception issues and durability), both of which could be solved with a case. I just dislike cases as they detract from the design and form factor of the device. I've dropped my 2g on asphalt, on ceramic tile, etc. Quite a few times but never from a height of higher than 3 feet. The thing could take a beating though, and aside from scratches and a little dent or two it kept on ticking. I highly doubt my 4 could take the same punishment.

iSteel it is then
 
I think people are forgetting that polymers are also materials and a lot of research went into them and many of them are patented.
 
Meh. Seems like marketing bullshit more than anything. If you're going to charge a consumer 2-3 times more for a similar product, you need some bullet points to back it up.
 
viakado said:
this would go against apple's philosophy.
They always use cheaper parts and hardware.
Uh huh. That's why the Macbook line is still 100% plastic, right? /rolls eyes
 
viakado said:
this would go against apple's philosophy.
They always use cheaper parts and hardware.
Yes, that glass, whole piece aluminum, IPS display, magnets, retina displays and so on are really cheap. I do think that they rarely ever go beyond what they think is necessary in terms of actual computing power.
 
What is the chance the liquidmetal will be used to coat the band of the antenna to prevent attenuation? Actually - would it provide that type of insulation?

I remember the back of my Sansa e250 w/liquidmetal coating being extremely shiny and smooth to the touch.
 
I read this as "Obama obtains exclusive rights to custom, super-durable metal alloy". :lol
 
makes a lot of sense for apple. btw, if you think the current generation iphones/ipods are sturdy enough - i've seen some units in the wild that gave the impression they were hit with hammers/tested with industrial machining equipment. it's a miracle they still worked. and the kids using them did not seem bothered one bit by the fact they were carrying in their pockets something which likely has a high-energy battery of damaged integrity.
 
Sho_Nuff82 said:
You're patenting a chemical reaction. Taken to its practical end, the very idea is absurd.
EDIT: I suck at reading.

Thank god that the agreement doesn't limit the use of this stuff to consumer electronics. That'd be such a waste.
 
Lard said:
Copyright - snuffing out innovation, one patent at a time.

Yeah, how dare those engineers expect to get paid for their discovery!

Tell me, what would be the motivation for innovation if, once you figured something out, everyone could use it without paying you a dime?
 
As a material scientist those guys at liquid metal just scored big. You have to be first or very innovative in order to make money off your material process patents.

What I find surprising is that amorphous metals with out crystalline grains have better properties. All I can think of is that it has to be quite ductile because adding texture and grains in metal decreases ductility increase stiffness.

But what are they going to use this metal for? Aluminum is light machinable and cheap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom