RedNumberFive
Banned
Can we please stop rewarding these Dorito-munchers with hits? We shouldn't be encouraging this behavior.
In any case, we certainly aren't looking at the kind of difference in graphical quality you see in some cross-platform games from earlier in the PS3 and Xbox 360 generation, where graphical details could differ significantly between platforms
In any case, we certainly aren't looking at the kind of difference in graphical quality you see in some cross-platform games from earlier in the PS3 and Xbox 360 generation, where graphical details could differ significantly between platforms
I agree with the article and I hope the majority of th general gaming public will too![]()
I agree with the article and I hope the majority of the general gaming public will too![]()
Tech sites?
Yeah, because the behaviour on Gaming forums like this one have been a shining beacon of civility.
In any case, we certainly aren't looking at the kind of difference in graphical quality you see in some cross-platform games from earlier in the PS3 and Xbox 360 generation, where graphical details could differ significantly between platforms
Quote worthy
Arse Technica said:In any case, we certainly aren't looking at the kind of difference in graphical quality you see in some cross-platform games from earlier in the PS3 and Xbox 360 generation, where graphical details could differ significantly between platforms. As we've mentioned, these two consoles are largely capable of rendering the exact same scene in the exact same way. Even though the Xbox One has a slightly faster CPU, the PS4 has a larger GPU. And both consoles take different approaches to delivering developers similar amounts of memory and memory bandwidth.
Someone needs to get these media people new glasses.
Microsoft and Sony will bend over backwards to tell you how different one console (their console) is from the competition...
Not sure what you guys want? They said the PS4 has a performance edge, just that they think it'll be slight.
You can agree with factually incorrect shit, but it doesn't change that it's factually incorrect. The public agreeing with factually incorrect shit does not therefore make it any less incorrect.
They do have glasses, and they are made of money.
What is factually incorrect? Specifically?
In any case, we certainly aren't looking at the kind of difference in graphical quality you see in some cross-platform games from earlier in the PS3 and Xbox 360 generation, where graphical details could differ significantly between platforms
Games running at 1080p vs 720p is not a slight difference. It's double the pixels being rendered.
I ask you all to just imagine for a moment, that it's 2006 and Ars Technica is reviewing the competing high definition disc formats. Bluray vs HD-DVD. Bluray is capable of 1080p, and HD-DVD is capable of 720p for most movies. There wouldn't even be a discussion there. The 1080p format would win.
Now I know that's not a perfect analogy, but the fact is they wouldn't parse words in such a comparison. 1080p is a much cleaner image. Yet when it comes to these consoles, suddenly everyone is falling over each other to downplay that difference. "It's minor", "it's unnoticeable to most people", etc.
Are they lying in the article? I'm seriously trying to understand.Can we please stop rewarding these Dorito-munchers with hits? We shouldn't be encouraging this behavior.
Isn't this a lie? Isn't this EXACTLY what is happening with these launch titles?
Pretty much the entire freaking article.What is factually incorrect? Specifically?
What? PS4 isn't miles ahead? Get 'em boys, we can't let that stand.
Are they lying in the article? I'm seriously trying to understand.
Just a heads up, this guy is going to do this for the duration of the thread. Proceed if you wish.What is factually incorrect? Specifically?
What? PS4 isn't miles ahead? Get 'em boys, we can't let that stand.
Yes it is... the differences are LARGER than last gen by a great margin. Its not even fucking close. They are just flat out lying.
Every single person that co-signs this bullshit willfully sacrifices his/her right to criticize the gaming media from this day forward. If you nod your head in agreement to this bullshit, then you clearly don't care about worthwhile journalism anyway, so don't go complaining when your favorite game gets an 8.5/10 review score 2 years from now.
This. Shouldve been titled "why specs dont matter"Why bother doing a spec comparison if you then negate the results as non-factors.
You can agree with factually incorrect shit, but it doesn't change that it's factually incorrect. The public agreeing with factually incorrect shit does not therefore make it any less incorrect.
Just a heads up, this guy is going to do this for the duration of the thread. Proceed if you wish.
This is the equivalent of saying "We are going to do a hardware comparison between the Galaxy S4 and the iPhone 5S. By the way, the iPhone wins because it has more apps and the specs are irrelevant."
It is a very flawed way of performing an objective analysis.
I find this, "they're both the same" narrative very interesting. Who is the tech press trying to convince, folks like us, or the average consumer who just found out last week some new consoles were coming out.
Please point out the incorrect facts in that article. The article seems well balanced and the conclusion is sound.
What is factually incorrect? Specifically?
Is Ghosts the only game to run at 720 on X1 and 1080 on the PS4?
Why the fuck do y'all care so much?