I'd argue pre ups are even more vital for those making modest income.
If I make 30k and she take 15k im in an even worse place financially than someone with assets and a large income.
Inevitable? Haha...good lord.
Why not. The statistics back up that logic, but honestly it's just better to have that thought in the back of your mind so that you can prepare yourself for divorce. Better to be ready for it rather than for it to hit you like a bomb shell and leave you shell shocked with no clue what to do.
I generally laugh at all the men's rights activist b.s. since men have so many advantages in today's society, but one area where everything is out of whack is divorce court and family law in the US.
A lot of men fall on their sword and never quite figure out that divorce is a negotiation. They get a lawyer who is not a litigator or a negotiator and then go the easy route.
In many jurisdictions, 50/50 custody is now standard. But you have to ask for it.
If you are contemplating a divorce - do not move out. Keep up the same routine you have always had. Stay in the marital residence, and continue being a dad to your kids.
Don't settle out of court for anything less than 50% custody.
Many men, however, move out to "keep the peace." That is probably the biggest mistake you can make during a divorce as it establishes status quo and makes it really hard to prove that you share half of the parenting responsibilities.
The statistics do not back up that divorce is inevitable...unless you have your own meaning for the word.
-=::[Eagle-Vision]::=-;183795149 said:They can look forward to the divorce.
You might be surprised to learn many people enjoy taking care of their children.
Alimony was made because women didn't have employment opportunities. They do now.
Family law is one of the most deeply-sexist institutions in America today.
Women are discriminated against in society as a whole, absolutely, and I'd never argue otherwise. But in family law, men are heavily discriminated against, and only in the last few years have people really spoke out about that. Sadly a lot of the critics are MRAs with lots of other nasty baggage, but they are right on this issue.
There is hope on the horizon, though. Laws are changing to not favor either party based on gender, which is how it should be. Women should have no default advantage with child custody, and alimony/palimony is going by the wayside in most circumstances.
Marriage sounds horrible until you find someone you can't wait to get married to.
The statistics do not back up that divorce is inevitable...unless you have your own meaning for the word.
Literally? Yes, it doesn't back it up. But at 50% chance you could see it as inevitable anyway. At least I do since I hold a pessimistic view of marriage.
For clarity sake then, at 50% then your chances for divorce are high enough that you should be concerned that divorce could happen to you.
Marry someone with money. Every old guy tells me this and old guys usually know their shit.
Edit: Expanding on that - Do you find yourselves attracted to a female that is established in a high earning job or with a prestigious degree? People say that guys find this intimidating but I call bullshit. Huge turn on.
Literally? Yes, it doesn't back it up. But at 50% chance you could see it as inevitable anyway. At least I do since I hold a pessimistic view of marriage.
For clarity sake then, at 50% then your chances for divorce are high enough that you should be concerned that divorce could happen to you.
Marry someone with money. Every old guy tells me this and old guys usually know their shit.
Edit: Expanding on that - Do you find yourselves attracted to a female that is established in a high earning job or with a prestigious degree? People say that guys find this intimidating but I call bullshit. Huge turn on.
I don't see the point of marriage tbh, do you really need a ceremony to show someone you love them?
Obviously it's different if you're religious, which I'm not.
I would love to date another doc. Besides being financially secure, it Tells me that they're at least somewhat intelligent, and motivated to achieve their goals. I also feel like they're some of the only ones who would understand the time commitment and someone you could talk about work stuff to.
Other than that, I've also always thought it'd be cool to marry a musician or artist.
Im ok not getting married, but i see a wedding as a fun celebration party thing if you are planning to get really committed to someone.
If kids are in the future, such a commitment seems fine to me.
You might be surprised to learn that some people really enjoy their jobs too, but I'm sure they expect to still be paid for it.
And actually alimony was originally made as trade off for having children:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alimony#History
"The Code of Hammurabi (1754 BC) declares that a man must provide sustenance to a woman who has borne him children, so that she can raise them:
137. If a man wish to separate from a woman who has borne him children, or from his wife who has borne him children: then he shall give that wife her dowry, and a part of the usufruct of field, garden, and property, so that she can rear her children. When she has brought up her children, a portion of all that is given to the children, equal as that of one son, shall be given to her. She may then marry the man of her heart.[2]"
It then evolved to become a punishment measure in the cases of divorce with cheating:
"Liberalization of divorce laws occurred in the 19th century, but divorce was only possible in cases of marital misconduct. As a result, the requirement to pay alimony became linked to the concept of fault in the divorce.[5] Alimony to wives was paid because it was assumed that the marriage, and the wife's right to support, would have continued but for the misbehavior of the husband. Ending alimony on divorce would have permitted a guilty husband to profit from his own misconduct. In contrast, if the wife committed the misconduct, she was considered to have forfeited any claim to ongoing support."
And now:
"In the 1970s, the United States Supreme Court ruled against gender bias in alimony awards, and the percentage of alimony recipients who are male rose to 3.6% from 2001 to 2006, up from 2.4%, in the previous five-year period, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.[14] In states like Massachusetts and Louisiana, the salaries of new spouses may be used in determining the alimony paid to the previous partners.[11][15] Most recently, in several high-profile divorces, females such as Britney Spears, Victoria Principal, and Jessica Simpson have paid multimillion dollar settlements in lieu of alimony to ex-husbands who were independently wealthy.[16][17] According to lawyers, males are becoming more aggressive in the pursuit of alimony awards as the stigma associated with asking for alimony fades.[17]"
Then you are the immature, entitled, bratty 17 year old. Marriage is first and foremost a life-altering contract between two adults, not a fucking party.
I cannot tell if you are serious or not.
You guys all investment bankers here or something ? You all have millions and are so scared of potentially losing half of your assets that you want your partner signing prenup ? Yikes... there is some serious trust issue going on here.
I cannot tell if you are serious or not.
OP is asking a serious question and searched for answers on the net and showed us what he found. He now gets called immature for showing signs of worry.
I'm married myself, but I went trough two divorces before I was 15 years old thanks to my mom. I wouldn't ridicule any guy having second thoughts.
My two cents: Don't marry unless you plan having children.
Chris Rock.
I assume you're talking about looks. You can look fugly as hell and still be attractive to women if you're a good conversationalist, have a good sense of humor, have money, or have a skill. All of those things have to be developed over time (apart from the money thing, if you were born into wealth). Don't give up just because you think you're unattractive in one sense. You might just have to work harder at first to catch women's interest, if your appearance won't do that for you. Resilient relationships aren't based on looks anyway.I would love to have SO and kids. Don't mind the responsibility.
Too bad I'm unattractive to women.
I don't see the point of marriage tbh, do you really need a ceremony to show someone you love them?
Obviously it's different if you're religious, which I'm not.
Don't marry a gold digger or get a pre nup!
I assume you're talking about looks. You can look fugly as hell and still be attractive to women if you're a good conversationalist, have a good sense of humor, have money, or have a skill. All of those things have to be developed over time (apart from the money thing, if you were born into wealth). Don't give up just because you think you're unattractive in one sense. You might just have to work harder at first to catch women's interest, if your appearance won't do that for you. Resilient relationships aren't based on looks anyway.
Um... That's news to me.TBH, the thing that terrifies me the most about getting married is having children. I would hate to be a father, and living in Japan, there are very few women who don't want to have kids.
Honestly, being married WITHOUT kids itself sounds horribly boring, but with children, it sounds like hell.
Um... That's news to me.
The declining birth rate is not due to people getting married and then not having kids. It's due to people not getting into relationships.
Then you'd have thousands of shitty people locking up their kids in the basement and collecting checks.Whatever compensation Shaker Aamer receives for being detained in Guantanamo for 15 years should be viewed as the base marker for compensation to giving up your life to raise kids.