posting a comment like that its even easier.
I've been cheated on, and it really, really sucked, but that was a private matter between her and I.
I wouldn't wish this leak on anyone, because it fucks up your entire life, not just your relationship.
posting a comment like that its even easier.
It was not unethical at all. The part that really brings on a case of the eye rolls is the police trying to defend/protect the users of the site, and calling them "victims"! LMFAO!
*tries not to make a comment about "To Protect and Serve the Ruling Class" *
Hold your ground everyone, you're doing great.
Agreed with this post, some of the comments are disgusting.I am suprised at some of the responses to suicides is boiling down to "fuck em, they cheaters anyway". Am I in twilight zone here? First of all, whatever the fuck happened to right to privacy? Secondly, suicide is a manifestation of very disturbing underlying psychological problem. This is not a whistleblower situation where we caught people embezzling money our defrauding taxpayers. No. This is purely bedroom business that none of us has the right to peek into. Are we back to being a tar and feather society?
It was not unethical at all. The part that really brings on a case of the eye rolls is the police trying to defend/protect the users of the site, and calling them "victims"! LMFAO!
*tries not to make a comment about "To Protect and Serve the Ruling Class" *
Hold your ground everyone, you're doing great.
*edit*I can't argue with it not being a crime. Would it still not be any of my business if someone close to me was cheating on their spouse?
Nope.
So if this hacking happened to a site that you believe was doing something good, would they change into victims then?
Why is the site completely absolved of responsibility? Numerous articles state that "security was an afterthought" at AM.
So got a call, from our church leaders yesterday, saying my husband's work email was on [redacted], oh my!
As a divorce attorney who often searched AM for my clients (and found a couple of cheaters there), I think it should be addressed that there are most likely women who merely joined AM as guests without paying or ever actually engaging- for the sole purpose of attempting to catch a cheating spouse.
author said:An outcome I hadn’t foreseen was some people thinking that any result for an email address on [Have I Been Pwned?] meant a presence on Ashley Madison:
This was actually for Adobe, the same breach I had three different accounts in!Look dude, my wife want a divorce now since my email shows 'owned' when she put it in. Can you explain to her it's not for the Ashley Madison hack its checking the all pwned sites
adultery is a punishable offense under the U.S. Army's Uniform Code of Military Justice, and while simply having an active account at this website doesn't indicate any wrongdoing, it's possible that as the data become more publicized, some people are in for a lot of headaches.
author said:[...]in desperation to find information, some people were resorting to downloading what they thought was the Ashley Madison breach, but evidently was something different altogether:
It seems easy to download the complete list from the pirate site. However the associated applications seem very dodgy
Oh, I totally agree that the site is responsible too. They deserve to be sued.
So the hackers and AM themselves.
Why is the site completely absolved of responsibility? Numerous articles state that "security was an afterthought" at AM.
There's a lot that focuses on the hackers, but if a bank left the doors wide open the money would quickly be stolen.
It's going to be pointless but why?
Fortunately, morally superior assholes on the internet don't require a breach of data to get exposed.People who cheat are selfish liars and deserve to be exposed. I am not particularly moved by one of these people selfishly killing themselves (that is, assuming that they aren't mentally ill).
Not only that, the site told former members it had deleted their accounts and information, when it did no such thing.
And the robbers and the bankers would be at fault. At the same time just because you can do something does not mean you should. The hackers are definitely at fault in this. There's no denying that AM was weak but at the same time it's not really the same thing. If a bank is robbed your money is still secure. Provided that you're using a legal bank.
People who cheat are selfish liars and deserve to be exposed. I am not particularly moved by one of these people selfishly killing themselves (that is, assuming that they aren't mentally ill).
Has anyone posted this yet? Here’s what Ashley Madison members have told me. By a guy who made a search tool to find out if your email is in data leaked from Ashley Madison (or a number of other security breaches).
A small selection:
So got a call, from our church leaders yesterday, saying my husband's work email was on [redacted], oh my!
There's a lot that focuses on the hackers, but if a bank left the doors wide open the money would quickly be stolen.
Fortunately, morally superior assholes on the internet don't require a breach of data to get exposed.
Fortunately, morally superior assholes on the internet don't require a breach of data to get exposed.
It's going to be pointless but why?
For a fee too, irrc.
Could literally be a motto for AM.
People who cheat are selfish liars and deserve to be exposed. I am not particularly moved by one of these people selfishly killing themselves (that is, assuming that they aren't mentally ill).
Biggest spender in MS, $7000. HOW?!
Sorry but one is actually illegal and the other should be dealt with within the family. I'm not going to pass any moral judgment on these people because it's none of my damn business what they do between the sheets.
I'm surprised people don't see that this doesn't just hurt the cheater it also hurts the family involved. All of a sudden everyone knows your business, you're the person that got cheated on. Now your friends know about it, now your coworkers know. Not everyone is wants everyone to know they've been cheated on.
Everyone noisy knows your business... I haven't searched for people I know because I don't care... so there's that element too.
Okay? Name-calling really isn't necessary. If you have something to say, say it.
People who cheat are selfish liars and deserve to be exposed. I am not particularly moved by one of these people selfishly killing themselves (that is, assuming that they aren't mentally ill).
You would think companies would learn from each other, but they don't.
So if this hacking happened to a site that you believe was doing something good, would they change into victims then?
really
fucking really?
Are we really going to go down this route?
They are victims. They had their personal info stolen, and are being strung up by blackmailers. Two have already supposedly committed suicide.
And yet you are going to harp on the choosing of the words by police?
Faithful for 16 years and counting. Come at me."Oh no it turns out a cheater thinks I'm an asshole"
VS
"Oh shit I got caught and my family is coming undone because of my actions"
LOL all of us morally superior assholes are really afraid of what you'll think of us.
My friend has over 16 accounts here,he finds married women for sex. We call him homewrecker, he just doesnt give a shit.
It indeed was.People who cheat are selfish liars and deserve to be exposed. I am not particularly moved by one of these people selfishly killing themselves (that is, assuming that they aren't mentally ill).
Because they are people not moral chess pieces. We as a society, shouldn't celebrate or use this this time to say who bad cheaters are.Someone should change their position because seemingly unstable people killed themselves after being outed as cheating on their partners?
What about that should result in a position shift?
Faithful for 16 years and counting. Come at me.
There's a difference between, "these people are doing morally wrong things", and "I'm glad there was a breach of security, because the people are doing morally wrong things".
"He who is without sin cast the first stone" and all.
Oh hello there, deflection!
So if a "potential cheater" (or just someone who was interested in a discreet relationship) got assaulted by a random stranger with a baseball bat, they wouldn't be assault victims. Got it.No, they are not.
I wouldnt expect you to. That's a very different position than this though:I'm all for these potential cheaters getting legal justice and compensation for the breach but I just don't feel sorry for them.
People who cheat are selfish liars and deserve to be exposed. I am not particularly moved by one of these people selfishly killing themselves (that is, assuming that they aren't mentally ill).
Labelling suicide a cowards way out is fucking low.
Bit of a dick move to say that, lowlife material actually
Oh wow. When I read that statement from the hackers about Pass1234, I thought that was some kind of hacking application used to brute-force access something. Didn't realise that was the actual password!There is one thing I want to say about this Ashley Madison hacking scandal. I agree with the sentiments that the act itself was unethical, etc, etc. but it should be pointed out that some anger and blame should be thrown upon Avid Life Media. The security they have is a function of the I.T. team they are willing to hire to defend it. How much were they investing in protecting the security of their data? My guess is not a whole lot when the password to the root of your server is Pass1234.
No? From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdulteryExtra marital affairs aren't illegal.
Adultery remains a criminal offense in 21 states, although prosecutions are rare.[145][146] Massachusetts, Idaho, Oklahoma, Michigan, and Wisconsin consider adultery a felony, while in the other states it is a misdemeanor. It is a Class B misdemeanor in New York[147] and Utah, and a Class I felony in Wisconsin.[148] Penalties vary from a $10 fine (Maryland)[149] to four years in prison (Michigan).[150] In South Carolina, the fine for adultery is up to $500 and/or imprisonment for no more than one year [South Carolina code 16-15-60], and South Carolina divorce laws deny alimony to the adulterous spouse.[151][152][153]
In the last conviction for adultery in Massachusetts in 1983, it was held that the statute was constitutional and that "no fundamental personal privacy right implicit in the concept of ordered liberty guaranteed by the United States Constitution bars the criminal prosecution of such persons [adulterers]."[154] Whether a conviction under this statute would be possible today (especially after Lawrence v. Texas (2003)) is not known.
In Utah, the adultery law only applies to the married party (the law states that "A married person commits adultery when he voluntarily has sexual intercourse with a person other than his spouse.")[155] However, Utah also has a fornication law that applies to any unmarried person (also a class B misdemeanor).[156]
In Florida "Living in open adultery" (Art 798.01) as well as "Lewd and lascivious behavior"(Art 798.02) which includes, among others, a man and a woman who "not being married to each other, lewdly and lasciviously associate and cohabit together" are both misdemeanors of the second degree.[157]
South Carolina's adultery law came into spotlight in 2009, when then governor Mark Sanford admitted to his extramarital affair. He was not prosecuted for it; it is not clear whether South Carolina could prosecute a crime that occurred in another jurisdiction (Argentina in this case); furthermore, under South Carolina law adultery involves either "the living together and carnal intercourse with each other" or, if those involved do not live together "habitual carnal intercourse with each other" which is more difficult to prove.[158]
In Alabama "A person commits adultery when he engages in sexual intercourse with another person who is not his spouse and lives in cohabitation with that other person when he or that other person is married." Adultery is a Class B misdemeanor.[159]
In the U.S. Military, adultery is a potential court-martial offense.[31] The enforceability of adultery laws in the United States is unclear following Supreme Court decisions since 1965 relating to privacy and sexual intimacy of consenting adults.[160] However, occasional prosecutions do occur.[161]
It was not unethical at all. The part that really brings on a case of the eye rolls is the police trying to defend/protect the users of the site, and calling them "victims"! LMFAO!
*tries not to make a comment about "To Protect and Serve the Ruling Class" *
Hold your ground everyone, you're doing great.
It was not unethical at all.
This is one of the most horrible posts I've read on GAF, and I've been in a lot of GamerGate threads. You can't even pretend you feel some minimal empathy for your fellow man, damn.People who cheat are selfish liars and deserve to be exposed. I am not particularly moved by one of these people selfishly killing themselves (that is, assuming that they aren't mentally ill).
This comes close too. Fuck those cowards who are suffering from mental illnesses without anybody giving a damn about it, yay!Ironically that's kind of how I feel about people who take their lives. Sling all the insults you want my man, it won't change my view on how cowardly an act it is.
But I digress as this isn't the topic for that.
Doxxing people is unethical. Airing the laundry of these people isn't deserved by the public.
These cheaters deserved to be outed but if I was the hacker I wouldn't publicly disclose it. The information should be forwarded to the involved couples. Obviously something like that would require effort but it would've been the ethical way to handle this.