There's no doubt the game looks great and that the use of in-game assets for the movies is seamless transition,
but there's still a fair amount of screen tearing and texture pop in.
A certain British gaming website had praised Assassin's Creed since it was announced. They'd run previews, interviews, did a lot to hype the game. When they played the final built, they finally realized it wasn't that great, so it got a 7/10. But instead of acknowledging AC's mistakes, Ubisoft got furious, pulled all ads from the site and cancelled all placed orders (mid five figures) indefinitely. A planned live interview with Jade Raymond isn't going to happen either. According to Ubisoft everything would have been fine though, if the site had just put an 8 instead of a 7 under the same text.
j-wood said:I'm curious...those of you playing the ps3 version...what resolution are you running it at?
Psychotext said:Might as well make it a proper conspiracy.
http://softrockhallelujah.blogspot.com/2007/11/disaster-ubisoft-with-vengeance-give.html
BS or not? Who knows. Fits with the crazy thread though! :lol
Psychotext said:Might as well make it a proper conspiracy.
http://softrockhallelujah.blogspot.com/2007/11/disaster-ubisoft-with-vengeance-give.html
BS or not? Who knows. Fits with the crazy thread though! :lol
It's not EG. Or at least if it is they haven't got rid of their existing Ubisoft ads yet.nofi said:I'll just say I dunno. Fairly obvious which site, tho.
That'll teach me to skip reading classes in school!SolidSnakex said:It doesn't fit at all though as that suggests it's UBI getting upset when according to Rayne.S the changing of reviews is all Sony's doing.
Psychotext said:It's not EG. Or at least if it is they haven't got rid of their existing Ubisoft ads yet.
SuperCat said:Update:
PS3 version is missing the extra ending after the credits unlike the 360 version!
SuperCat said:Update:
PS3 version is missing the extra ending after the credits unlike the 360 version!
SuperCat said:Update:
PS3 version is missing the extra ending after the credits unlike the 360 version!
glaurung said:Oh come on... Even if that were true, why the hell would they do it?
Shit, now IGN will print it as news again... God damn.
danwarb said:Assassins Creed has a more consistent framerate and slightly less pop-in and tearing on 360. CoD4 has lower resolution textures on PS3 (1/16 resolution in some cases) and frame rate is worse as well.
Psychotext said:Might as well make it a proper conspiracy.
http://softrockhallelujah.blogspot.com/2007/11/disaster-ubisoft-with-vengeance-give.html
BS or not? Who knows. Fits with the crazy thread though! :lol
TTP said:fixed for accuracy
Assassins Creed has a more consistent framerate and slightly less pop-in and tearing on 360. CoD4 has lower resolution textures on PS3, framerate is the same, but COD on ps3 has much better Aniso filtering
It does NOT have the same framerate.f@luS said:Now this is what i call fixed
It's hard to tell which of your posts are a joke, and which are serious.Mojovonio said:I heard Area 51 runs better on the 360 too!
Another average game slightly better on M$' console!
Poor Sony
neojubei said:And why should we trust you? lol. In any case I'll buy the PS3 version. I like the cool blu-ray boxes.
shouldn't this have been in the huge AC thread?
glaurung said:How the hell can this measly HD era turn each and every player into an effing graphics whore?
We do not need this kind of talk everywhere. Crying out loud here.