• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

AVATAR - Sci-fi epic by James Cameron @ COMIC-CON

Status
Not open for further replies.
Scullibundo said:
I disagree completely.
I think it really heightens the tension, leading up to their landing on LV426. The Hadley's Hope scene where the colonists find the Alien ship (also serves as a nice bridge after coming straight off the first movie) does this. The ammo counters on the turrets going down is incredibly tense and the loss of Ripley's daughter makes her connection to Newt so much more meaningful. There is no greater feeling of dread than a scene cut out of the theatrical cut where Ripley farewells Hicks. Its a last goodbye before she descends into hell:

'See you...Hicks'
'Dwayne, its Dwayne'
'Ellen'
'Don't be gone long, Ellen'

That scene seriously gives you the biggest GULP moment. Its also a great bit of comradery.

Its the theatrical cut that is the reason that I can understand why so many people thought Cameron turned the Alien franchise into just an action movie. The Director's Cut it so much smarter and takes its time fleshing out characters and building tension that it comes across more so as a smart SciFi Thriller.

Director's >>>>> Theatrical.


Agree.
 
Shrinnan said:
Cameron related? T1, T2, Titanic, and True Lies. I have to see True Lies again to properly judge it because it's been years.
Surprisingly, True Lies (and it's visual effects) still hold up very well considering how many years it's been, even in HD.

Also if you haven't seen Aliens, there's no time like the present if you're a sci-fi fan. The tropes it created really are ubiquitous in today's "space/military" games and films. Whether it's the marine designs and Sergeant Johnson in Halo 1, or direct lines spoken in Modern Warfare, there are few properties in that spectrum today that aren't "inspired" in some way by Aliens.
 
Scullibundo said:
Its the theatrical cut that is the reason that I can understand why so many people thought Cameron turned the Alien franchise into just an action movie. The Director's Cut it so much smarter and takes its time fleshing out characters and building tension that it comes across more so as a smart SciFi Thriller.

Director's >>>>> Theatrical.

on that point, even with the theatrical cut, i never understood people claiming Aliens was nothing more than a big dumb action movie.

the action is no doubt spectacular and relentless (almost draining) but there is a good hour or more of build before anything even happens, and the tension and dread that is created before it does is incredible. even after all these times watching it i still get a horrible feeling in the pit of my stomach in the leadup to the first encounter, where they
find the woman cocooned in the wall and all hell breaks loose.
(i think some people in this thread still haven't seen it?) it's a wonderfully atmospheric movie and describing it as a big action flick does it a disservice.
 
Jtwo said:
So I finished reading the scriptment.
It seriously such a great read, my mind has been reeling all day imagining it.

I actually do not think too much has changed. Nearly every scene we've read about on blogs after the comic-conference was there nearly verbatim.

Ah man, it was incredible. I want to read it again.
I'm usually a spoiler nazi too, and I don't feel even the slightest tinge of regret after reading it.
It seriously captured my imagination that much!

God, I am even more excited now than I was before! :D

I'm glad you enjoyed it. :)
 
Edit: nm

Here is an old article from 2000 about the scriptment. I skipped the parts to prevent spoilers but I love how he is spot on with his impressions and thoughts in the last paragraph for example (how expensive it would be etc.). :)
http://www.aintitcool.com/display.cgi?id=5169
There is literally too much to describe. I was exhausted after reading this scriptment, and it would make one of the best sci-fi/action/adventures ever made. But the cost to make this movie would be incredible. It would take literally 200 million at least, and the Na'vi, the Avatars, and the creatures would literally have to be computer generated. Actually, this movie could be made and made well even without Arnie, but to see an Avatar version of Arnie would be could. Imagine a eight-nine ft tall blue-skinned, slender but powerfully-muscled Arnie with cat-like eyes, fangs, three-fingers and a thumb on each hand and a panther-like tail. That's what Avatar would give you.

ABking
:D
 
Scullibundo said:
I'm glad you enjoyed it. :)

I'm a little under half way through. I'm still iffy on box office due to the worst marketing job I've ever seen....But this is going to be a tremendous work if they've kept things the same. Haven't made it to the points that I had issues with from the cliffs notes version though. Still, even I must admit that it's terrific so far.
 
Jtwo said:
So I finished reading the scriptment.
It seriously such a great read, my mind has been reeling all day imagining it.

I actually do not think too much has changed. Nearly every scene we've read about on blogs after the comic-conference was there nearly verbatim.

Ah man, it was incredible. I want to read it again.
I'm usually a spoiler nazi too, and I don't feel even the slightest tinge of regret after reading it.
It seriously captured my imagination that much!

God, I am even more excited now than I was before! :D

Fuck.
Now I'm, tempted to give it a read as well...

No I cant...

I am tempted though :(

Maybe I'll just read like the first few pages...
 
A bit off-topic but has anyone a link to the paintings/sketches for Aliens made by Cameron himself? As far as I remember they looked pretty good but I can't find them anywhere. :(
 
Game over, Sculli wins. This should make as much as everyone has said it will. The scriptment is actionpacked, the story is extremely well told, the points that I thought stood out like a sore thumb fit well. It works even without the incredible effects, if it was just standard CGI it would be just as great.

I need to see them pull this off. I can't even imagine some of the things Cameron describes.

The only bitch I have left is to say that Fox can, as usual, suck a bunch of cocks because of their outright horrid marketing. If this movie fails point the finger at whoever thought it would be a great idea to wait until 4 months to even get a damn teaser out.

I bow to Sculli's superior wisdom. Roll on December!
 
critch said:
Game over, Sculli wins. This should make as much as everyone has said it will. The scriptment is actionpacked, the story is extremely well told, the points that I thought stood out like a sore thumb fit well. It works even without the incredible effects, if it was just standard CGI it would be just as great.

I need to see them pull this off. I can't even imagine some of the things Cameron describes.

The only bitch I have left is to say that Fox can, as usual, suck a bunch of cocks because of their outright horrid marketing. If this movie fails point the finger at whoever thought it would be a great idea to wait until 4 months to even get a damn teaser out.

I bow to Sculli's superior wisdom. Roll on December!

Admit it, you were just sorta playing bad cop until now. You boarded the hype train a long time ago. :lol

Also, Jesus Christ you bastards are gonna make me read the damn thing. I believe I read a few pages all those years ago when AICN first had an article about the movie but I stopped. I shall be strong now. I must be.
 
FirewalkR said:
Admit it, you were just sorta playing bad cop until now. You boarded the hype train a long time ago. :lol

Also, Jesus Christ you bastards are gonna make me read the damn thing. I believe I read a few pages all those years ago when AICN first had an article about the movie but I stopped. I shall be strong now. I must be.

Seriously, having been burnt by directors before, and the out-of-context bits of the scriptment and story, and the HUGE EFFECTS HYPE...I hear all that I think this would be Cameron's prequels.

Then I read the damn thing and I'm a fool. I needed convincing, you don't, so don't read it :-p
 
Hahaha one of us, one of us. Why do you think I've been hyping it these past 4 years? Glad to see you finally came around.

Funny few days. critch come around and praises the story and jett becomes a 3D convert. There is something in the air.
 
Can someone help me understand how FOX is so goddamn incompetent? (Outside of Fox Searchlight) It's like, they gotta fuck up every opportunity for a good movie that comes their way, either financially or quality wise. X-Men comes to mind immediately, and AVATAR could be a huge bomb if they don't start cranking up the marketing! It just blows my mind.

At least if AVATAR bombs, it'll hopefully take FOX with it.
 
On the one hand I would love for FOX to be bankrupted, on the other hand, if AVATAR bombs that would mean no Battle Angel from Cameron. I want Battle Angel. I want AVATAR to do fucking well.
 
Scullibundo said:
Funny few days. critch come around and praises the story and jett becomes a 3D convert. There is something in the air.

snm9ef.jpg
 
Scullibundo said:
On the one hand I would love for FOX to be bankrupted, on the other hand, if AVATAR bombs that would mean no Battle Angel from Cameron. I want Battle Angel. I want AVATAR to do fucking well.

Couldn't Cameron get any other studio to back the film? Or does Fox own the rights to Battle Angel?
 
Scullibundo said:
On the one hand I would love for FOX to be bankrupted, on the other hand, if AVATAR bombs that would mean no Battle Angel from Cameron. I want Battle Angel. I want AVATAR to do fucking well.

I have no fucking clue why he went with FOX of all people. The way I see it, Cameron is just giving a big fuck you to Hollywood, and just making a blockbuster his way, with as big a budget as he wants. However, I think there are two things that could save this from being a complete bomb: FOX actually steps up the marketing (somewhat likely), or it has incredible WoM (much more likely), which gives it Titanic-esque legs, with a bigger opening and shorter tail. Still, who the fuck thought it was a good idea to make the first glimpse of the movie be in IMAX theaters only for just one hour in the middle of August!? I understand he wants people to see it "the way its meant to be seen", but will people really drive to a remote IMAX location just to watch 15 minutes of free footage? I don't think so. Bad idea, IMO. Actually, scratch that, downright horrible idea.

(edit: actually, the whole WoM thing is helped by its December release, so it has a better chance at having strong legs)
(edit2: The third thing that could save this is a delay to next summer, with a HUGE marketing campaign ramping up until then. That's really unlikely though)

Also, I had a question regarding special effects: T2 and Titanic used ILM right? If so, why doesn't AVATAR have ILM effects? You'd think those two movies did spectacularly, partially due to their awesome effects, so what made him choose WETA? Not that there's anything wrong with WETA, just seems odd...
 
bluescreenoflife said:
Surprisingly, True Lies (and it's visual effects) still hold up very well considering how many years it's been, even in HD.

Oh, trust me, I'd believe that - especially since T1 held up pretty well as well (besides that one part with the full fledged Terminator, but even that wasn't totally unbelievable and the story was so strong that the effects really didn't matter because the way it was told was just so believable).

Also if you haven't seen Aliens, there's no time like the present if you're a sci-fi fan. The tropes it created really are ubiquitous in today's "space/military" games and films. Whether it's the marine designs and Sergeant Johnson in Halo 1, or direct lines spoken in Modern Warfare, there are few properties in that spectrum today that aren't "inspired" in some way by Aliens.

I can't wait to see it. I'm going to see Alien sometime this week and that's when I'll watch Aliens next. I'm only watching the first two, no Alien 3 or 4 for me.

Also, this talk about the Avatar script really makes me want to read it. I usually fall to spoilers but this is one movie I am taking a stand on - I really wish I hadn't read those impressions either but that's all the spoilers I'm going to take. I must hang on. I must.

Over the year, Cameron has quickly turned into my favorite director ever. Seriously, T1, T2, and Titanic are some of the best movies I've seen and all three would make it in my personal top 5.
 
the walrus said:
Also, I had a question regarding special effects: T2 and Titanic used ILM right? If so, why doesn't AVATAR have ILM effects? You'd think those two movies did spectacularly, partially due to their awesome effects, so what made him choose WETA? Not that there's anything wrong with WETA, just seems odd...

WETA did the LotR films. One pivotal factor for Cameron to believe that he could now do Avatar was Gollum.

Regarding the marketing stuff... I strongly believe that things will ramp up nearer 21/8.
 
FirewalkR said:
WETA did the LotR films. One pivotal factor for Cameron to believe that he could now do Avatar was Gollum.

Regarding the marketing stuff... I strongly believe that things will ramp up nearer 21/8.

I don't. How would they market it? They don't even have a fucking trailer! There's nothing they can tease us with! It's an announcement of an announcement!
 
There's a number or reason why specific post houses are chosen for films. Availablity is one, if ILM has already committed to projects over avatars production run then it will limit the amount of work they would be able to complete, and post houses typically book projects up quite far in advance.

Also WETA has a firm reputation in mocap which is used very, very heavily in this film, which is also one of the reason Tintin is being done with WETA.
 
the walrus said:
Also, I had a question regarding special effects: T2 and Titanic used ILM right? If so, why doesn't AVATAR have ILM effects? You'd think those two movies did spectacularly, partially due to their awesome effects, so what made him choose WETA? Not that there's anything wrong with WETA, just seems odd...

The Abyss, T2 and Titanic were a mutual effort from Digital Domain and ILM. At the time, Cameron was CEO of Digital Domain.
 
I see. Thanks for all the responses. I've never heard of Digital Domain though, what movies have they done? I mean, I don't have a really extensive knowledge of special effects and stuff, but I do know that ILM was Lucas' thing, and WETA is Jackson's. Was Digital Domain like Cameron founded or something?
 
Digital Domain was helped to be set up by an ex ILM staffer and Cameron, and another guy who had the cash. It was later sold to a consortium which includes Michael Bay. It's also famous for production the up and coming compositing software NUKE, which is on the verge of taking pover from shake as the dominant platform for vfx comp work.
 
They've been responsible for some of the best vfx in the business. Benjamin Button, Star Trek 2009, Transformers are there most recent, GI Joe and 2012 are being finished as we speak).

They def rate at the top end, along with ILM, WETA, Double Negative and maybe MPC.
 
Bluewire said:
They've been responsible for some of the best vfx in the business. Benjamin Button, Star Trek 2009, Transformers are there most recent, GI Joe and 2012 are being finished as we speak).

They def rate at the top end, along with ILM, WETA, Double Negative and maybe MPC.

Seems like I've been mixing up ILM movies and DD movies all the time now. Well, thanks for opening up my eyes, I didn't even know that Star Trek and TF2 weren't made by ILM.
 
the walrus said:
Can someone help me understand how FOX is so goddamn incompetent? (Outside of Fox Searchlight) It's like, they gotta fuck up every opportunity for a good movie that comes their way, either financially or quality wise. X-Men comes to mind immediately, and AVATAR could be a huge bomb if they don't start cranking up the marketing! It just blows my mind.

At least if AVATAR bombs, it'll hopefully take FOX with it.


FOX is running the marketing campaign according to what James Cameron wants.
 
WrikaWrek said:
FOX is running the marketing campaign according to what James Cameron wants.

I kind of see what you're saying, but, honestly, since when has FOX cared about what the director wants?
 
the walrus said:
Seems like I've been mixing up ILM movies and DD movies all the time now. Well, thanks for opening up my eyes, I didn't even know that Star Trek and TF2 weren't made by ILM.

Most of the animation work from TF2 has been handled by ILM ; Digital Domain is often recognized as a great compositing place, if not the greatest.

They do quite a lot of 3D work, also. Mostly lately.
 
Well, no, your also right. Most big budget films are now spread out amongst various facilities since the vfx producer will be looking to play to the vfx studios strengths, and most houses don't have the ability to look after an entire film by themselves.

ILM was the main vendor for Transformers, but that doesn't mean they got the biggest shots, just that they got the bulk.

So you'll find some post houses will get alot of the particle shots for a film if they'be shown in previous work they can perform to a high standard with those types of shots. Same with mocap, creatures, face replacement etc.
 
the walrus said:
I kind of see what you're saying, but, honestly, since when has FOX cared about what the director wants?

Since the director is James Cameron and not some small time dude making his first big movie.
 
Yea, as far as the trailer not releasing yet, that might be, in part, due to James Cameron's insistence about perfection.

Every trailer that was given to him, he has apparently turned down because it doesn't do justice to his movie. This is why I know Avatar is going to be something special and I can see his need for perfection (or at least as much perfection as one individual can achieve) in his past movies.
 
Man, today my mind has just been blown on how the Special Effects companies operate in movies! So, two last questions: Would these guys work on conventional effects (like most of the set pieces in TDK) or just the CGI stuff? And, who did the Special Effects for Terminator Salvation, because, even though it was a totally piece of shit movie, I was actually very impressed with the effects, much more so than TF2, tbh.
 
He's also very aware you often only get one chance to impress in todays world. He's in the difficult positon of marketing a 3d film via primarily 2d channels. You'd be very cautious too.
 
Oh, trust me, I'd believe that - especially since T1 held up pretty well as well (besides that one part with the full fledged Terminator, but even that wasn't totally unbelievable and the story was so strong that the effects really didn't matter because the way it was told was just so believable).

well there is another bit. When Arnold is in the motel room repairing his eye and it keeps switching between the wax head and his real head, it's sooooooooo bad.
 
Stan Winston's company did all the practical terminators (he also did all the original movies) while ILM, Rising Sun, Asylum and a couple im forgetting did the vfx. ILM i believe was the lead vendor.

By these guys you mean the aforementioned companies? They would handle all the cg work, different companies would look after the stunt/practical effects like explosions on set.
 
Scullibundo said:
On the one hand I would love for FOX to be bankrupted, on the other hand, if AVATAR bombs that would mean no Battle Angel from Cameron. I want Battle Angel. I want AVATAR to do fucking well.
Meh, it's the Wachowski brothers who should do Battle Angel Alita. That's been my dream since seeing Speed Racer. The Wachoskis doing the motorball sequences would be so amazing. The techniques they experimented with in Speed Racer would be perfect for Alita, possibly even necessary to ever even hope to do the ideas behind the combat justice. I don't think Cameron is appropriate for Battle Angel Alita at all.
 
Shrinnan said:
I can't wait to see it. I'm going to see Alien sometime this week and that's when I'll watch Aliens next. I'm only watching the first two, no Alien 3 or 4 for me.

By all means, watch Alien 3, provided it's the "Assembly Cut". It is a completely different movie. Alien 4 is pretty "meh".
 
I really don't understand why people are giving shit to Fox for this one. It's all Cameron on this one. Fox has given him something like a 250+million dollar Budget on a brand new property. SciFi even.

It seems more like Cameron is holding it back till it reaches the level that he wishes to show, Than Fox's lack of push. I'm sure Fox has been calling him up every day waiting for something to go with :lol

I think it just shows how much pull Director's like Cameron and Spielberg have in Hollywood.
 
Zenith said:
well there is another bit. When Arnold is in the motel room repairing his eye and it keeps switching between the wax head and his real head, it's sooooooooo bad.

I don't remember thinking much about that (when I was viewing it) as much as the full Terminator reveal - but now that you mention it, it was pretty bad for today's standards but, again, the story was so good that I just didn't care.

Tedesco! said:
By all means, watch Alien 3, provided it's the "Assembly Cut". It is a completely different movie. Alien 4 is pretty "meh".

I'll definitely take that into consideration. I'm just really wary of sequels that try to capitalize on something that doesn't need a sequel (Terminator 3/Salvation) although, to be fair to the Alien franchise, Cameron wasn't the director who came up with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom