Gary Whitta
Member
Really? They just said on the news he was placed in handcuffs and taken into custody after the verdict was read.ezekial45 said:Worst part is he isn't going to jail. He's going straight home now.
This is BULLSHIT!
Really? They just said on the news he was placed in handcuffs and taken into custody after the verdict was read.ezekial45 said:Worst part is he isn't going to jail. He's going straight home now.
This is BULLSHIT!
Gary Whitta said:...yeah, I think I'll stay home tonight.
Gary Whitta said:Really? They just said on the news he was placed in handcuffs and taken into custody after the verdict was read.
You want more people to get hurt?Cereal KiIIer said:That is begging for an insane riot... Which I wish because this is fucking bullshit.
Gary Whitta said:You want more people to get hurt?
He didn't realize the he grabbed his 9mm. He thought it was has Tazer. 0____omsv said:How did this get construed as manslaughter?
Are you surprised? People can be petty and downright sick when they stop thinking rationally.Gary Whitta said:You want more people to get hurt?
It's pretty much impossible to convict a police officer of anything so it is a minor miracle that this guy got a guilty verdict at all.msv said:How did this get construed as manslaughter?
edit: Oh they believed the taser bit? FFS how naive can you be.
soundahfekz said:Fucking crooked ass good ol boy you pat my back I pat yours oh I didn't see that what I seen was this put that down on the police report tim ass muthafuckas man, fuck the police.
Tokubetsu said:"It's not simply fuck the police. It's fuck the system that enables them."
True. Fuck the police officers that commit these kind of crimes, fuck the police officers that enable them, fuck the judges and jury members that enable them, fuck the politicians that enable them.Tokubetsu said:"It's not simply fuck the police. It's fuck the system that enables them."
Cereal KiIIer said:Sometimes you have to to get the message in the ivory tower... I know it sucks but it's the truth.
Cereal KiIIer said:What was the jury composition?
DataStream said:It was all dumbass.
Cereal KiIIer said:What was the jury composition?
Not sure exactly how the jury got the verdict they got. I guess they believed Meserhle and that he didn't mean to kill the guy or thought he had his tazor or something.Involuntary manslaughter generally occurs in only two cases. The first is when someone is killed due to criminal negligence, and the second is when someone is killed during the commission of another crime, where the intent was not to cause bodily injury or death. (This is often called "misdemeanor manslaughter".)
Murder is the act of killing another human being with "malice aforethought". Malice aforethought is defined to be the intent to kill or to inflict bodily injury, either express or implied. If a deadly weapon is used, intent to kill will necessarily be implied by a court of law.
What? You do know that there are more good officers in the world then bad, right? You cant be that juvenile in your thinking.Cubsfan23 said:The people defending the police in this thread are fucking disgusting. Fuck you
lawblob said:Haven't been following the story, but I remember the video of the shooting. Amazing how much deference juries give to cops. The kid was laying on his stomach, being restrained by another person, and the cop shoots him point blank. Involuntary manslaughter is laughable. I don't remember much about crim law, but how could that have even been an allowable jury instruction? :lol
Maybe Boogie can shed some light but I thought police officers had to shoot to kill? If not, than why wouldnt the bart guy have just shot the guys leg/arm/etc? Why shoot him so close? Why not give him a warning? Why just automatically taze someone without thinking? Even if this was a family member of mine, I wouldnt care. They made the mistake, therefor they pay for it. Just like this situation. The guy clearly was fucked up for punching him, than shoots him even though hes restraint? What exactly was the purpose of the tazing someone who is restrained anyway?Bumblebeetuna said:Because it was an accident? Just because someone dies, it doesn't make it murder. You can accidentally kill someone and even if its due to your own incredible stupidity, it can still be involuntary manslaughter. Even second degree murder is a long shot in a case like this and AFAIK it isn't even a possible verdict in many cases like this, but California is one of the places where it could be.
Yes, he was careless and made a terrible, terrible mistake. But murder? :lol I wonder how many of you guys would think your wife/brother/sister should go to prison for life if they run a red light and kill someone? Is that murder? No.
And good God time to turn this stream off, it's becoming racial now. Apparently if Grant was white, the cop would have been in prison months ago. Give me a break. Anyway justice has been served, I'm gonna bow out of this thread now.
Combine said:I suck at understanding law. But quick wiki check says:
Not sure exactly how the jury got the verdict they got. I guess they believed Meserhle and that he didn't mean to kill the guy or thought he had his tazor or something.
Bumblebeetuna said:Because it was an accident? Just because someone dies, it doesn't make it murder. You can accidentally kill someone and even if its due to your own incredible stupidity, it can still be involuntary manslaughter. Even second degree murder is a long shot in a case like this and AFAIK it isn't even a possible verdict in many cases like this, but California is one of the places where it could be.
And good God time to turn this stream off, it's becoming racial now. Apparently if Grant was white, the cop would have been in prison months ago. Give me a break. Anyway justice has been served, I'm gonna bow out of this thread now.
lawblob said:Thanks for the pro tips. I think there's a biology thread somewhere, maybe you can jump in there an use meaningless anecdotes to describe another technical issue you know absolutely nothing about.
Common law murder includes "reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life.". Ding ding ding!
I'm too lazy to actually look up all the homicide categories in the CA penal code, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to recognize the cops defense was completely ludicrous, not to mention the fact that it was still an intentional act.
Can you really blame them :lol. Just take the idiots in this thread and put em in Oakland. It was great tho seeing Oakland citizens decrying the violence that may ensue on the news.Tarazet said:![]()
I have NEVER seen traffic this bad in Oakland. Everyone is trying to gtfo. :lol
mre said:
:lollawblob said:I don't have time to read, there's a super important Lebron press conference about to start!
Also: "Yes, your honor, i did kill my wife by striking her in the skull with a metal baseball bat, but in my defense, I totally thought I was hitting her with that novelty-sized foam finger we got at the Mets game last week"
X-Burner said:This guy kills a man straight up, and gets 2-4 years of jail time. Wow America. Wow.
Cereal KiIIer said:Sometimes you have to to get the message in the ivory tower
I know, he probably would of got 3-5 in Canada.X-Burner said:This guy kills a man straight up, and gets 2-4 years of jail time. Wow America. Wow.
Oakland is always the hotbed of race crime in modern day America. Can you burn a train?n3ss said:Injustices happens every day -but to riot over it...? I really dislike Oakland. Bigger injustice: an old co-worker drunk driving and killed her passenger: time served 0. That pissed me off to no end.
Time to get on Bart![]()
According to recent news (http://www.sfgate.com/). The sentence will be from 5-14 years.X-Burner said:This guy kills a man straight up, and gets 2-4 years of jail time. Wow America. Wow.
Combine said:According to recent news. The sentence will be from 5-14 years.
Celsior said:I know, he probably would of got 3-5 in Canada.