nintendork666
Member
Xenoblade Chronicles X, and Smash Bros.
duh.
Sunset Overdrive also looks frickin' awesome.
duh.
Sunset Overdrive also looks frickin' awesome.
Based purely on gameplay? I'm as excited for X as anyone, but the gameplay itself doesn't look that exciting (sort of like Witcher 3 might be my most anticipated game at the moment, but it's not because the gameplay itself would be the most exciting aspect of it). And Zelda didn't have almost any gameplay shown, not to mention Bloodborne.
I know mechs and fantasy worlds with unbelievable scale seem like superficial things, especially when talking about gameplay, but to the wanderlust when I see the game.
I guess it depends on what you count as gameplay. I don't really consider the exploration strictly as a factor in gameplay. It does tie into it in a way, but it's not directly gameplay in my opinion. Gameplay would be the game mechanics, both simple such as running and crafting and slightly more complex such as the combat.X isn't all about the battle system. I'm not even thinking about the battle system when I think about the game.
It's about the exploration in this game. I know mechs and fantasy worlds with unbelievable scale seem like superficial things, especially when talking about gameplay, but to the wanderlust when I see the game.
Ok here's a simple example.Yes. Based purely on gameplay. Gameplay defined as such: engaging real-time combat, collecting, and, the aspect in which it has every other game beat effortlessly, compelling exploration brought on by the poignant wanderlust the exquisitely designed environment evokes.
MGS5
Yeah, thought as much ....
On tree house the Nintendo sales people gushing over platoon (it was cringe worthy), and yet the guy GAFFER who posted his gameplay impressions when at E3 personally saying it got old real fast was almost ignored.
Trying to read impressions of people who actually played the games is not so easy - it would be great if there was a thread on games actually played.
For me and many others I trust E3 is about big shows by MS / Sony / UBI / EA etc, its exciting, and there maybe 50 or so new games / reveals / things we have not seen - new gimmicks / peripherals...on console and PC space...
And then there will be a video by Nintendo showing latest version of Smash and Zelda or a couple of games we sort of already know about...
If you cannot see the disparity here then fair enough - but its so large Mr P is just having a laugh at the obvious elephant in the room.
Thanks for bringing that game to my attention. Just watched a demo and it looks amazing. Totally on my radar now.I am amazed at how little attention Shadow of Mordor is getting.
I saw over an hour of gameplay footage of that game at E3 and I even got to demo the combat system briefly. Everything about that game is screaming next gen.
Visually, the graphics are stunning. The facial animations and environment look fantastic, and could arguably be considered more impressive than The Order: 1886.
The unique combat system is fresh and incredibly smooth to go along with a very interesting and elaborate nemesis system. Also it is loaded with what looks to be a rich story, side-quests, and many compelling characters.
I did not see this one coming at all, but it should easily be the most anticipated game to release later this year.
The witcher 3 without a doubt. Can't wait to get immersed by that game.
Rainbow 6 seemed to take everything I've loved about round based shooters like socom and counterstrike and put a new twist on it with solid next gen visuals
You are trying too much, really. Give it a rest. .
I thought the Witcher 3 demoed terribly on Microsoft's conference.
The boss battle with the bird was so damn clunky and more cutscene than gameplay. Boring as hell.
Developers need to play more Dragon's Dogma if they are hoping to create interesting battles with bigger monsters. That game still completely outclasses every RPG's combat.
Yeah, thought as much ....
On tree house the Nintendo sales people gushing over platoon (it was cringe worthy), and yet the guy GAFFER who posted his gameplay impressions when at E3 personally saying it got old real fast was almost ignored.
Trying to read impressions of people who actually played the games is not so easy - it would be great if there was a thread on games actually played.
1. More than just one gaffer has played splatoon, they had a positive view on the game, ironic as you said we were ignoring the one gaffer.
2. This was a short demo of the game with 1 mode. If you watch the Nintendo Treehouse, you'd know they have more modes planed for the game, also they will allow straight duel analog controls in case the thought of motion aiming bothers you.
That being said, knowing both these games are going to get more content when released, Splatoon and Mario Maker.
Edit: To those who are saying you don't kill in Splatoon, I get that it's not the main purpose, but you can kill the other team in the game.
Still don't get Ad Hominem do you. Its a PERSONAL attack on someone rather than the argument.
I have not made any personal comments on anybody - I say what I want about a game or company, that is my opinion.
My opinion on the tree house company sales format stands, its not Ad hominem, its an opinion on a sales technique which I found distasteful.
Not everyone likes in house employees gushing over their own product so much, irrespective of which company it was. It looked forced.
I cant be bothered to argue with you, if you want to go through my post history to pick an argument then fine. If you want to tell the world how great Spaltoon is fine.
(the WiiU is as alive as my Vita and as relevant)
Yeah, thought as much ....