FF VIII actually was my first RPG (well, after Pokémon) and it really was very confusing to me, there were just so many things that I missed the first time strategy and gameplay wise... I realised this 3/4 into the game or so and just decided to start the game from the beginning again, paying extra attention to the tutorials and even then I didn't get some parts of the gameplay until later in the game (GF boosts being an example that I remember now, but also some bigger things). Partly this could be because English is not my first language of course, but I haven't had that with any other games.Himuro said:I disagree. Junctioning isn't hard at all, and the only reason I didn't understand how to play the game the first time was because I was still used to playing FFVII style. Might as well start off with FFVIII at the start.
Speevy said:-Dragon Quest 8
Himuro said:For an unbiased person like jinx
Lionheart said:Final Fantasy VII or IX would be my choice, both are very good and the gameplay is not too complex.
iapetus said:I still find that despite the haters, FFVII is probably one of the most newbie-friendly RPGs I've ever encountered. There are some truly hideous suggestions being made in this thread, by the way. Do people have some vested interest in driving jinx away from the genre?
Himuro said:I agree there, it's just that the game hasn't aged well so I wouldn't really suggest it.![]()
slayn said:I never tried FF7 since I have a personal bias against it
slayn said:jinx needs to play chrono trigger dammit!
FixedAniHawk said:Jinx, steal a GC or DC or something so you can play Skies of Arcadia*.
*may upto 528,239 random encounters per hour. Oh and excessive giggling.
2) Chrono Trigger sounds great -- it got a lot of recommendations -- but my PSP is not emulation-friendly. I'll just have to cross my fingers and hope that it comes out in some non-broken way for one of my systems in the future.
3) How difficult are the strategy aspects of games like Fire Emblem? Although I'd like to get into strategy games more, I'm CRAP at them. (Don't even ask how far I've gotten in Advance Wars 2...) Is the learning curve fairly straightforward, or should I stick with an RPG without the strategy aspects?
slayn said:You can avoid a lot of them. And whats more, once you kill an enemy its gone until you leave the area. So the battles, while some are forced, are not 'random.'
its sorta how like I would say Lufia 2 is not a random battle RPG. Because in the dungeons (where it matters) you can anticipate the battles and actively attempt to avoid them even though some are completely unavoidable because the monsters are too fast.
Blaster1X said:
Yes, I seriously think Mystic Quest would be a good place to start.Ristamar said::lol
I just want to know if the people pimping Mystic Quest are serious or not. I'm sure -jinx- could handle something with a bit more depth (and certainly something with a better story).
Mejilan said:Knights of the Old Republic is terrible (coming from a Star Wars AND RPG fan), and rather far from entry-level, IMHO.
Parallax Scroll said:Yes, I seriously think Mystic Quest would be a good place to start.
Red Scarlet said:Just look at the box: Entry-level Role-Playing adventure.
Bebpo said:Goddamn, you guys need to stop recommending 8-bit/16-bit 2d rpgs. It's not 1995 anymore. Just because we were introduced to rpgs with them and grew up with them doesn't mean newcomers to the genre should as well. Whenever someone tells a person that they should start rpgs with FF1 it's like telling someone new to FPS that they should start with Wolf3d.
It's nice that they have these re-releases of classic games so that people who already enjoy rpgs can go back and re-experience some of the classic greats, but for someone new to the genre it'd be nice if they got something a little deeper than "go to the 6 elemental dungeons and then fight the final boss all while tapping A non-stop for 20 hours of battles".