ethelred said:I thought this was what you guys wanted?
No, who the fuck said that?
ethelred said:I thought this was what you guys wanted?
cvxfreak said:I'm going to pull a JoshuaJSlone here. :lol
Time period between Resident Evil (PlayStation) and Resident Evil (GameCube): 6 years.
Time period between Resident Evil Zero (GC) and Resident Evil Zero (Wii): 5.5 years.
Crushed said:When?
schuelma said:No, who the fuck said that?
BrodiemanTTR said::lol Dude, come on. This is a cashgrab, end of story. Thinking it's going to lead to anything else is just setting yourself up for more of, well, this.
Close, this is what was wanted -6.ethelred said:I thought this was what you guys wanted?
Yeah, but how long is that gonna take? The GameCube was four years old when it finally got a full, new sequel.cvxfreak said:Everything's a cashgrab. That doesn't stop this from being a reasonable indicator of what's to come ahead. Eventually Capcom is going to run out of RE games to port, unless they decided to do the Outbreak games and Gun Survivor games, which is extremely unlikely. Capcom's own prior history with the Phoenix Wright series on DS also proves Capcom doesn't cashgrab and run off to do absolutely nothing with what they've built. It's not their style.
ethelred said:I don't know. It seems like all I ever hear these days are plaintive pleas for various companies to port X, Y, and Z games over to the Wii with special magical "intended from the start" remote control schemes.
Maybe, like, a year ago for Okami. You should get these voices you hear checked out.ethelred said:I don't know. It seems like all I ever hear these days are plaintive pleas for various companies to port X, Y, and Z games over to the Wii with special magical "intended from the start" remote control schemes.
ethelred said:I thought this was what you guys wanted?
There was probably one guy. And he represents the entire Wii userbase.schuelma said:Stop being misleading. No one here has ever clamored for a fucking RE Zero port. Come on.
Crushed said:"So RE4: Wii Edition and RE:UC sold fantastically, Zack & Wiki sold okay for an adventure game with barely any advertising, We Love Golf wasn't advertised and released at a bad time so it bombed in Japan...
Okay, we'll give you Monster Hunter 3... but we need to run more tests if you want more. Port Harvey Birdman and Okami (two of the biggest sales-generating forces in the industry) just to make sure. Oh, and Resident Evil 0. Seven tests should be enough if we're lucky."
(looks at le scans)Baiano19 said:BUT, if they upgrade the gameplay RE4 style, then it could make this game more palatable...
Uh? Resident Evil 0 came out just under a year after the GameCube was initially released. Like it or not, it was a FULL, new Resident Evil game... and just because it was a prequel does not keep it from being a legitimate entry.D.Lo said:Yeah, but how long is that gonna take? The GameCube was four years old when it finally got a full, new sequel.
D.Lo said:Close, this is what was wanted -6.
Yeah, but how long is that gonna take? The GameCube was four years old when it finally got a full, new sequel.
later said:Thanks capcom, another test right?
I quite clearly said sequel. RE0 felt more like a spin-off of REmake then a sequel. Which had more impact, RE0 or RE4?Chemo said:Uh? Resident Evil 0 came out just under a year after the GameCube was initially released. Like it or not, it was a FULL, new Resident Evil game... and just because it was a prequel does not keep it from being a legitimate entry.
grandjedi6 said:I wish they would at least combine them into a collection
Neither do I. I found it to be great., My only problems were the enemy designs were so retarded (giant animals and insects lolz), and the story was a mess. Everything else was pure old school RE goodness. I think a lot of people were just really tired of the formula by the time RE0 hit.Dragona Akehi said:I don't get all the hate for RE0.
Yeah, and I quite clearly said that you got it: It's a fucking video game. It doesn't matter if the "story" takes place after a previous game or before, it is the NEXT ITERATION OF THE FRANCHISE.D.Lo said:I quite clearly said sequel. RE0 felt more like a spin-off of REmake then a sequel. Which had more impact, RE0 or RE4?
D.Lo said:I quite clearly said sequel. RE0 felt more like a spin-off of REmake then a sequel. Which had more impact, RE0 or RE4?
As good as REmake and RE0 were (esp REmake), I felt like they were something of a waste of time in the end, as they delayed RE4 so long. An earlier release of RE4 (say, mid 2002) would have benefited the series and the GameCube immeasurably.
Zerodoppler said:Another victory for Wii. Resources are indeed shifting. Next gen is shaking in its boots.
cvxfreak said:
Prime Blue said:Never gonna happen. That would require them to re-record all pre-rendered backgrounds.
It's more knowing than expecting.It's inevitable.
Alaluef said:My reaction would be the same (and will be from the looks of it) no matter what game they were porting / remaking / wiimaking / toaster ovening. This needs to stop.
HK-47 said:Geez we wanted at least an RE2 Remake...not a port of a game I can play fine on my Wii already
Kintaro said:So basically, buying RE 4: Wii edition told Capcom that the Wii userbase likes RE ports! I kind of figured that would happen.
Kintaro said:So basically, buying RE 4: Wii edition told Capcom that the Wii userbase likes RE ports! I kind of figured that would happen.
Y2Kev said:This is kind of like porting DMC2 to Wii imo.
Y2Kev said:This is kind of like porting DMC2 to Wii imo.