So in keeping with "Columbia as a monument to Booker/Comstock's sins." What does the Boxers' Rebellion signify? I don't recall it being mentioned that Booker took part in that.
Booker, as Booker, didn't partake in the Boxer Rebellion, but Booker as Comstock did, causing Columbia to kill scores of Asians, which inflamed the U.S. and became the catalyst for Columbia's secession from the Union.
You can see it as an example of Comstock Booker having no remorse for what he did at Wounded Knee, due to his religious awakening, and him taking his bloodbath to the next level.
You can see it as an example of Comstock Booker having no remorse for what he did at Wounded Knee, due to his religious awakening, and him taking his bloodbath to the next level.