Pellegri Testament
Member
Hey, Riot should join in, too. That Archer clearly rips off Ashe![]()
Ya, except Riot didn't create the character that archer is based off of
Hey, Riot should join in, too. That Archer clearly rips off Ashe![]()
Ya, except Riot didn't create the character that archer is based off of. This is basically why Valve has had to change the names and looks of multiple Dota characters because they were copies of Warcraft characters. Both these games on the other hand....made no attempt to try and hide the fact that the characters are clearly just chibi versions of Warcraft characters.
Well, the dev of DayZ was hired by Bohemia to create the standalone version, so they do indeed.
Im still surprised Bliz didnt sue Gameloft into oblivion for "Order and Chaos"
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YUGbooNm9M
Gameloft is owned by Ubisoft. Pretty sure they worked out a deal.
Well, the dev of DayZ was hired by Bohemia to create the standalone version, so they do indeed.
It is not. They were both founded by the same family but they are separate companies.Gameloft is owned by Ubisoft. Pretty sure they worked out a deal.
Ubisoft was founded by the five brothers, after which Michael Guillemot also founded Gameloft. So Michael played a part in both Ubisoft and Gameloft.I think it's that the CEO of Ubisoft and his brother are also the owners of Gameloft. I guess Ubi may have shares in them, but I don't think they own them outright.
Maybe because it's early and my eyelids are feeling heavy, but why does Blizzard sue a studio that's suing another studio for plagiarism. Does Blizzard have a similar type of game or are they the owner of this "ucool"?
Maybe because it's early and my eyelids are feeling heavy, but why does Blizzard sue a studio that's suing another studio for plagiarism. Does Blizzard have a similar type of game or are they the owner of this "ucool"?
Have you tried reading the thread? The characters in said game(s) are blatant ripoffs of DOTA characters.
I have read the OP and it wasn't clear that Blizzard owned the IP. I'm not too familiar with it. I thought Valve owned it, so how about you bother someone else.Have you tried reading the thread? The characters in said game(s) are blatant ripoffs of DOTA characters.
Only thing I can think of is that they believe that Lilith Games will win the case over Ucool and get Heroes Charge blown up, which then Blizzard will come in and blow Soul Clash up, taking money from not only Lilith, but the money they got from Ucool also. Why fight against 2 different companies when fighting against the company that made the original will accomplish the same thing with less effort?
That and well....they own just about all of the character designs in both games.
I still can't believe they lost with Dota 2 to be honestBlizzard still has a case for anything DOTA?
I thought they lost that war with DOTA 2
*Reminder:
Most of the original DotA stuff is straight up taken from Warcraft 3. Basically anything Valve changed going into DotA2, the reason is that it was Warcraft stuff.
Warcraft models, names, skills, etc.
Yeah. It was a mod for Warcraft 3. So it's obvious that most of the assets was from that game. And valve took the creator of Dota under his wings and let him design a game that he always wanted to make (without limitations of warcraft 3 engine). Maybe I read to much into it. But are you implying that valve ripped-of Dota too ?
Wasn't Rocket already an employee of Bohemia when he created the DayZ mod?
Most of the original Dota 2 heroes are about as blatant ripoffs of the war 3 characters as you can get. They've changed a lot of them over time because of it. It still surprises me that they left them so simialr to begin with (and many are still extremely close).
Yeah but most of War 3 characters are based on fantasy archetypes. Paladin, Archmage, Elf, Elemental,Undead,Orc. Brewmaster is only one remotly oryginal. And you cannot copyright spells and skills. The only original thing that warcraft has is the lore that binds it all together. Maybe I'm wrong but that's how I feel about it.
*Reminder:
Most of the original DotA stuff is straight up taken from Warcraft 3. Basically anything Valve changed going into DotA2, the reason is that it was Warcraft stuff.
Warcraft models, names, skills, etc.
in turn Dairy Queen will sue Blizzard.
This doesn't look like something from Blizzard. It looks too cutesy.
I feel they're suing them more as a "Bitch, don't go suing people for copyright infringement on stuff that you stole in the first place" more so than actually caring about the copyright infringement.
Wow. Sylvanas Windrunner. It's a blatant copy.
Im still surprised Bliz didnt sue Gameloft into oblivion for "Order and Chaos"
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YUGbooNm9M
And Blizzard blatantly ripped off Games Workshop. They've changed a lot over time because of it. It still surprises me that Blizzard left them so similar to begin with, and many are still extremely close.Most of the original Dota 2 heroes are about as blatant ripoffs of the war 3 characters as you can get. They've changed a lot of them over time because of it. It still surprises me that they left them so simialr to begin with (and many are still extremely close).
I feel they're suing them more as a "Bitch, don't go suing people for copyright infringement on stuff that you stole in the first place" more so than actually caring about the copyright infringement.
looooooooooool
Hey, Riot should join in, too. That Archer clearly rips off Ashe![]()
Hey, Riot should join in, too. That Archer clearly rips off Ashe![]()
Yeah but most of War 3 characters are based on fantasy archetypes. Paladin, Archmage, Elf, Elemental,Undead,Orc. Brewmaster is only one remotly oryginal. And you cannot copyright spells and skills. The only original thing that warcraft has is the lore that binds it all together. Maybe I'm wrong but that's how I feel about it.
And Blizzard blatantly ripped off Games Workshop. They've changed a lot over time because of it. It still surprises me that Blizzard left them so similar to begin with, and many are still extremely close.
Where will this madness end?!
Yes, I'm aware of GW not being entirely original too. ;-)
Maybe this is immature of me, but I secretly hope these IAP rip-off studios sue each other into oblivion so that maybe in their ashes we're left with a business model that doesn't suck the life out of gaming.
no they're notSo Blizzard is suing for the name,
You're implying Games Workshop could actually win a lawsuit.Games Workshop's chance do shine.
We're not talking about archetypes, we're talking about the designs of the characters. "paladin" is generic. "Zombie" is generic. Pudge looking exactly like a warcraft abomination is not.
Aside from orcs being green and savage, the actual looks of anything in Warcraft are more stylistically similar (and really only in the first two RTS games as you pointed out) than actual design ripoffs. Conceptual ripoffs, but they rarely look all that close, unlike valve with the dota 2 designs.
Heroes Charge is hardly a rip-off game (other than rip-offing character designs). It's pretty great and you don't have to pay much or anything, really.
I wonder when/why a company like Blizz decides to sue like this. I'm sure there are shittons of iOS games with blatant rip-offs based on well known gaming franchises.
Im still surprised Bliz didnt sue Gameloft into oblivion for "Order and Chaos"
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YUGbooNm9M
Haha, no.Aside from orcs being green and savage, the actual looks of anything in Warcraft are more stylistically similar (and really only in the first two RTS games as you pointed out) than actual design ripoffs. Conceptual ripoffs, but they rarely look all that close, unlike valve with the dota 2 designs.
Ya, GW orcs and Blizzard orcs look nothing alike, and the humans from GW are based off renaissance Holy Roman Empire/Prussia, and not based off generic medieval humans.
Yeah, and then Games Workshop should sue Blizzard for the same.