Ulysses 31
Member
I'd it sad the only reason I'm not jumping on this is because it's not black?
Yes
I'd it sad the only reason I'm not jumping on this is because it's not black?
I'd it sad the only reason I'm not jumping on this is because it's not black?
The gamepad it's a neat evolution no matter how anyone looks at it. It improves the user experience a fuck ton, and also adds a ton of other gameplay possibilities.I would love to see the gamepad just become an expensive accessory for the system. I can't see Nintendo ever admitting that it was a mistake though.
The gamepad it's a neat evolution no matter how anyone looks at it. It improves the user experience a fuck ton, and also adds a ton of other gameplay possibilities.
Is it a mistake because it costs money and that money can't be inverted on having more powerful chips?
This industry has to crash again and be totally reinvented around it's traditional values.
that post is just continuing proof of morons existing.
The gamepad it's a neat evolution no matter how anyone looks at it. It improves the user experience a fuck ton, and also adds a ton of other gameplay possibilities.
Is it a mistake because it costs money and that money can't be inverted on having more powerful chips?
This industry has to crash again and be totally reinvented around it's traditional values.
That's the same as saying "buttons are only good to taunt on SFIV".Yep, without it how would we honk in mario kart?
![]()
It's not incompatible with local multiplayer, I mean, there are a ton of local multiplayer games on the WiiU, and as a gamer and not a shareholder, I would never sacrifice gaming evolution for more quota on the market.It is a neat evolution brought down by terrible execution. It is also too expensive and incompatible with local multiplayer, rending to being used as nothing more than a novelty in most Wii U games thus far.
It is the albatross that will prevent the Wii U from succeeding. Consumers don't seem to find value in it, developers don't seem to find utility in it, and it prevents Nintendo from being able to get the system into a more apt price point for a system that exists as gamer's secondary platform choice.
You speak as a shareholder, I speak as a gamer.
That's the same as saying "buttons are only good to taunt on SFIV".
It's not incompatible with local multiplayer, I mean, there are a ton of local multiplayer games on the WiiU, and as a gamer and not a shareholder, I would never sacrifice gaming evolution for more quota on the market.
You speak as a shareholder, I speak as a gamer.
Its wrong why? Since when a gamer cares about:That...is wrong. That's just wrong.
It is the albatross that will prevent the Wii U from succeeding. Consumers don't seem to find value in it, developers don't seem to find utility in it, and it prevents Nintendo from being able to get the system into a more apt price point for a system that exists as gamer's secondary platform choice.
No, that's not a reasoning based on being a gamer. As a gamer, I bought the WiiU because I liked that concept of the gamepad, and as a gamer I want it to sell well because I think it's a neat evolution of traditional gamepads.outunderthestars said:Well, as a gamer, I am annoyed that the system has failed to connect with the public, thus dooming the console to an early death and fewer games made for the platform. With such anemic sales numbers, I cannot imagine third party studios greenlighting any WiiU exclusives, thus further dooming the tablet controller to being nothing more than an expensive minimap display tool.
What's the chances of it dropping to $100?
I'd buy it at that price
Its wrong why? Since when a gamer cares about:
Those are reasons only a shareholder would put to ditch the gamepad. So it's a good device, but since consumers aren't interested on it and third parties don't put a lot of money on it it should get ditched in favour of a more limited but cheaper approach.
I don't want Nintendo to fail as a company, but that's because I like Nintendo's philosophy of playability first, graphics second. If in order to survive they have to turn themselves into a bad copy of the western companies and start to produce "graphics first, second and third" games, then I prefer them to die with dignity.
No, that's not a reasoning based on being a gamer. As a gamer, I bought the WiiU because I liked that concept of the gamepad, and as a gamer I want it to sell well because I think it's a neat evolution of traditional gamepads.
That being said, the company (Nintendo) is the means, but not the goal. To me the goal is having innovative and enhanced devices that can evolve gaming, and this is why I would like that console to sell much better.
On the other hand, to you it's the opposite, Nintendo's success seems to be your goal, that's why you ask for that controller to be eliminated, because to you the gameplay is only the means and the company the goal, thus speaking like a shareholder.
Wait a year.What's the chances of it dropping to $100?
I'd buy it at that price
No, gamer care about gameplay, shareholders care about sales. Gamers can care about sales if they help a certain gameplay aspect to evolve, but a gamer that wants a more limited device because he cares more about sales?You are just wrong here. As a gamer I want Nintendo to do well because it means their ability to make and court more games for their system increases.
As a gamer I'm disappointed in the mistakes Nintendo has made. Has nothing to do with being a shareholder. As a gamer I was disappointed in the limitations of the Wii but shareholders were quite happy with its success.
This "I'm a gamer" crap is Sarah Palin levels of silliness. Real America : Real Gamer
No, gamer care about gameplay, shareholders care about sales. Gamers can care about sales if they help a certain gameplay aspect to evolve, but a gamer that wants a more limited device because he cares more about sales?
Well, then that's a gamer that before anything it's also a shareholder...
No, gamer care about gameplay, shareholders care about sales. Gamers can care about sales if they help a certain gameplay aspect to evolve, but a gamer that wants a more limited device because he cares more about sales?
Well, then that's a gamer that before anything it's also a shareholder...
How can a gamer play games when the system sells so poorly that no more games are produced?
As I said you before, the company is the means but not the objective. If the gamepad is ditched out, then why buy a WiiU instead of a PS4?How can a gamer play games when the system sells so poorly that no more games are produced?
You want to ditch a positive evolution of gaming devices because of the stock market, so it's pretty obvious that I'm not the one playing with this.turnbuckle said:go play the stock market, the ultimate Nintendo non-game. I guess.
As I said you before, the company is the means but not the objective. If the gamepad is ditched out, then why buy a WiiU instead of a PS4?
You want to ditch a positive evolution of gaming devices because of the stock market, so it's pretty obvious that I'm not the one playing with this.
The gamepad it's a neat evolution no matter how anyone looks at it. It improves the user experience a fuck ton, and also adds a ton of other gameplay possibilities.
Is it a mistake because it costs money and that money can't be inverted on having more powerful chips?
This industry has to crash again and be totally reinvented around it's traditional values.
Quoted for truthiest of truth facts.
Yes the industry should crash so nintendo fans can get what they want, fuck everyone else. That's about the level of nonsense it has gotten to.
.Still too much.
.
Call me when it's $200 or maybe $150.
After using my 3DS no way I'm paying that much for a toy-quality console
I would love to see the gamepad just become an expensive accessory for the system. I can't see Nintendo ever admitting that it was a mistake though.
Both the Gamepad and the 3D screen in the 3DS were mistakes. Going forward, Nintendo probably needs to keep their features and/or gimmicks within reasonable measures. Targeting the lower price venue will probably serve them best seeing what markets they seem to serve best, ie; younger audiences, aux devices for core gamers, etc.
(that and I like to pretend that if the 3DS didnt have that stupid screen, maybe we could have at least gotten a reasonable 480p resolution)
This is pretty much exactly how I feel. Both systems invested too much of the sticker price on features that I actively dislike. And the market appears to agree with me as both systems are selling well below their predecessors.
In a fictional scenario where Nintendo ditches the gamepad in favour of more mainstream and generic solution, why do you think they would stick with their gaming design philosophies?For the exclusive software perhaps? You think the people who did buy the WiiU wanted it because of babby's first tablet and not because they love Nintendo franchises?
ZombiU to name one, but every single game benefits of a much better UI. I know that to shareholders or hardcore experiencers the UI is not anything important, now name me one single think that can be done with the traditional gamepad and impossible to do on the WiiU gamepad.hey_it's_that_dog said:You keep saying it's all about the games. Please tell us about all the amazing games I can buy that are only possible (and a "fuck-ton" better) thanks to the gamepad.
That's true, and this industry has evolved to a "only graphics and immersion matters" philosophy. That's not a matter of how many people, it's a matter of priorities.hey_it's_that_dog said:In real evolution, not every mutation is beneficial. The market (i.e., gamers) don't think the WiiU tablet is particularly desirable. It's hard to make the case broadly that it's a positive evolution. Even if you happen to like it yourself.
That's to you, because to you technology is first. As I said, I'm a hardcore gamer and not a hardcore viewer, to me the PS4 (an off-the-shelf design by the way) is the easy path of going cheap while not risking even a bit.DoYouEvenLift? said:So are you even open to the possibility that your opinion is a minority, and companies don't find it to be plentiful enough to cater to anymore? I think the gamepad was a lazy attempt at bilking customers to pay modern-tech prices for generation-old tech. Nintendo succeeded admirably with that with the Wii so they thought they'd give it a go again.
To a hardcore viewer/experiencer that plays as a means to something else of course having the same character on two different games makes those games the same.DoYouEvenLift? said:That's the thing to me... people bitch about the lack of creativity in the industry or the inability to sustain the budgets, etc... etc... but they point to Nintendo as this bastion of creativity and game design? Why is the umpeenth Mario platformer so innovative and creative?
It's not creative on the areas you look for, on the ones I care, it's as I said more creative in each iteration than other studios on their recent trajectory.DoYouEvenLift? said:Note that I'm not saying it's not FUN, but it's not creative.
No, it's not, but as I said, it's a matter of priorities.DoYouEvenLift? said:It's as much of a franchise milk as Halo 3, 4, 5 or CoD 20, 21, 22. Yet the latter two get shit on for "sequelitis."
Not nintendo fans, but gamers in general.Tallshortman said:Yes the industry should crash so nintendo fans can get what they want, fuck everyone else. That's about the level of nonsense it has gotten to.
I don't want Nintendo to fail as a company, but that's because I like Nintendo's philosophy of playability first, graphics second. If in order to survive they have to turn themselves into a bad copy of the western companies and start to produce "graphics first, second and third" games, then I prefer them to die with dignity.
Not nintendo fans, but gamers in general.
$219 is too much, think I'll bite on $210 but not a penny more!
Actually, there's a MUCH better deal for the Wii U. This bundle, however, is only available to members of the U.S. Marines/Navy, it might actually work for the other branches too, not sure.
But they're offering a 32GB bundle with both New Super Mario and Super Luigi U for $199.99 with FREE shipping. Offers valid I think up until the 24th of December.
For those interested, log into the NEX site with your last name, last 4, and DOB, then do a search for product number: 8931388
![]()
Just a heads-up for anyone trying to get the NEX deal: even though the website said they were out of inventory, my brother called in and was able to order 2 over the phone.
Yup. Wii U needs to drop to $199 or $179 to interest me.Still too much.
What you want is for people to adore Nintendo games and other types of games are okay as long as they don't become too popular to interfere with Nintendo's success. An industry crash wouldn't reset micro transactions or F2P casual games. It also wouldn't save Nintendo?
Amazing how people are moving the goalposts all the time.
It's pretty pathetic.