I am reading that a Bomb went off in Atlanta... anyone can confirmed such?
Where's the tree in the first pic?
I am reading that a Bomb went off in Atlanta... anyone can confirmed such?
this is the second explosion
I am reading that a Bomb went off in Atlanta... anyone can confirmed such?
I am reading that a Bomb went off in Atlanta... anyone can confirmed such?
I am reading that a Bomb went off in Atlanta... anyone can confirmed such?
http://publicshaming.tumblr.com/post/48093470152/two-explosives-went-off-at-the-boston-marathon-on
Ugh at Twitter comments. Fucking idiots.
Please tell me you are kidding or misinformed.
I was born in Boston and lived there most of my life. Can someone please remove this tag from me? It's incredibly insensitive to victims of terrorism and human beings.
And, here's somebody comparing Muslims to sharks.
ATLANTA -
Authorities are investigating a possible explosion in southeast Atlanta on Tuesday afternoon.
A man suffered minor burns after opening at package at a thrift store on 1599 Memorial Drive SE in Atlanta.
Investigators determined that the package was not a bomb,
Where's the tree in the first pic?
(AP) ATLANTA - Atlanta fire department officials say a thrift shop employee has been hospitalized with burns after a package he was opening exploded.
Atlanta Fire Department Captain Marian McDaniel says the unidentified worker was taken to Grady Memorial Hospital with burns to the hands and legs.
Authorities are investigating the incident.
Police and fire officials remained on the scene Tuesday afternoon.
Twitter is going crazy about it.. reason why I am asking.. I am confused.
Maybe I'm going blind, but that first picture is missing the tree in the "after" picture.
http://publicshaming.tumblr.com/post/48093470152/two-explosives-went-off-at-the-boston-marathon-on
Ugh at Twitter comments. Fucking idiots.
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/story/21994131/possible-explosion-investigated-in
so yeah, no. that's probably what you saw on twitter though
what? how could you disagree that soneone who kills innocent people (children even!) is a monster? His psychological background doesnt matter here at all
Sharks
As fucking dumb all of these are, the last one caught me by surprise and made me laugh. Godamnn Westboro Baptist Church has found their way to twitter too!
...really?
I wasn't aware we were talking about Muslims in general and not Radical Islamists. I sure left myself wide open to that joke!
Islamism =/= Radical Islamism
Maybe I'm going blind, but that first picture is missing the tree in the "after" picture.
Considering he willingly cooperated with investigative officials and gladly had them search his apartment, he is being treated as a witness and not a suspect.
Rightfully so I might add.
The New York Post really wants to continue fucking that chicken i see. Murdoch conglomerate doubling down because they looked like fools yesterday
The second picture is zoomed out, the tree is blocked/obfuscated by the people/news graphics, and the sign on the street light was obviously moved from the explosion.
There would be physical evidence of a shark bite and likely witness accounts of a shark in the water at a crowded beach.
I don't understand the point you're trying to make.
My point is all about assumptions. You think its wrong to assume a radical Islamic terrorist was responsible for this attack, but as you are not qualified to decided whether someone lost their leg from a shark bite or from jagged debris (and in my example there were no witnesses of the shark), you also no business saying that without evidence people are wrong to jump to a conclusion that, given America's history with bombings that are big enough to make the news, is understandable that anyone would make.
My point is all about assumptions. You think its wrong to assume a radical Islamic terrorist was responsible for this attack, but as you are not qualified to decided whether someone lost their leg from a shark bite or from jagged debris (and in my example there were no witnesses of the shark), you also no business saying that without evidence people are wrong to jump to a conclusion that, given America's history with bombings that are big enough to make the news, is understandable that anyone would make.
My point is all about assumptions. You think its wrong to assume a radical Islamic terrorist was responsible for this attack, but as you are not qualified to decided whether someone lost their leg from a shark bite or from jagged debris (and in my example there were no witnesses of the shark), you also no business saying that without evidence people are wrong to jump to a conclusion that, given America's history with bombings that are big enough to make the news, is understandable that anyone would make.
It's not racist or whatever to think that active terrorist groups who hate the US might be responsible.
Your analogy is still stupid. The equivalent which applies in this case would be people arguing that there was no explosive device, not about who was responsible. Stop trying to create a narrative which fits your personal biases and wait for evidence.
I have no personal biases! I actually think that this will turn out to be a case of domestic terrorism.I just thought what Gentleman Jack posted was stupid, so I posted my admittedly ill-conceived analogy as a rebuttal.
The father of a man injured in the Boston Marathon bombing says his son had both legs amputated.
Jeff Bauman says his son, 27-year-old Jeff Bauman Jr., is the man pictured in an Associated Press photo taken shortly after the bombing. It shows the younger man being pushed away from the explosion site in a wheelchair.
His father says on his Facebook page that his son had to have both lower limbs removed at Boston Medical Center because of extensive vascular and bone damage. He says his son also had to have another surgery due to fluid in his abdomen.
second explosion
![]()
![]()
![]()
(blurred by the news station)
![]()
Well, the location of that fireball sure seems to line-up with the location of that mystery bag.
Also, it looks like all the runners had just started squeezing to the other side of the street to make space for rescue efforts. They're lucky they did, because that second explosion's proximity would have taken a lot of them out. A few seconds earlier, and it could have been even worse.
This is a picture from the first bomb site (I believe) and not from the site pictured above with the bag. It does appear that the bomb went off behind everyone at the first site. No gore, just debris after the scene had been cleared. But you can see a black burnt spot on the ground.
http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston-bombs/pict4.jpg
Wow, I've never seen suits like that before. I'm assuming it's armor against any further explosions?