• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Bombs detonated at Boston Marathon finish line

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, the location of that fireball sure seems to line-up with the location of that mystery bag.

Also, it looks like all the runners had just started squeezing to the other side of the street to make space for rescue efforts. They're lucky they did, because that second explosion's proximity would have taken a lot of them out. A few seconds earlier, and it could have been even worse.

Yeah, the first frames of the explosion in the video seem to centre on the kerb as well, but it doesn't necessarily mean that was the bag if they think they were black bags.

da4hDXJ.png


The table and chairs are relatively unscathed, maybe as they were surrounded by people. If the bomb was further back you might see more damage to the chairs and the black fence that surrounds the restaurant area? The Mailbox could have been left relatively undamaged due to the direction of the explosion.
 
CNN is talking about the tracking of the nails from production to sale. Feel like I'm watching L.A. Noire.

Apparently there was a defect in the nails, limiting them to select retail sales.

Aw yiss, thats the kind of investigating that I'm taliking about.
 
CNN is talking about the tracking of the nails from production to sale. Feel like I'm watching L.A. Noire.

Apparently there was a defect in the nails, limiting them to select retail sales.

They were talking about that this morning -- it was in reference to another bombing
 
With all the respect and my deepest sympathies to the people of Boston and all who were directly or indirectly hurt by this unspeakable tragedy, I am, as a non-american, wondering what do you guys think would happen if the authorities proclaimed the bombing was orchestrated by Al-Qaeda?
What if they proclaimed it was a terrorist group from Iran or Syria?
Now keep your first answer in mind and imagine that it turned out that the terrorist group originated from a European country. What do you think would happen then?

I am wondering this because we've all seen what the USA is capable and willing to do after a terrorist attack (9\11) and I am very curious as to your predictions to what might happen should the first scenario occur, and on the other hand what would happen should the second scenario turn out the be true. Would the USA act the same way in both cases?
 
Images are starting to flood in now. Awesome.

They have another one following a person fleeing from the scene. Not accusing him or anything, but still looks out of place while everyone is down on the ground.
 
Images are starting to flood in now. Awesome.

They have another one following a person fleeing from the scene. Not accusing him or anything, but still looks out of place while everyone is down on the ground.

If it was a remote detonation, they probably were somewhere far away, hiding.

So them fleeing the scene doesn't really make much sense to me.
What exactly did they fuck up?
Srry i missed it cus i live in europe.

They accused some Saudi National as being a prime suspect when he turned out to be just a witness.
 
have people in here mentioned about the guy on the roof of building not reacting to the bomb ? the sun has an article bout it aswell

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4890021/boston-marathon-bombing-mystery-man-on-roof.html

From that location, neither explosion is visible to roof man. He'd only be reacting to sounds. Also, that photo was shot the exact second the bomb went off, so what is a "reacting" person supposed to look like? Half the runners crossing the finish line barely reacted to the first explosion.
 
For the good of sense and rationale, I seriously hope people tune out of all Murdoch owned media on this one.

good luck with that! not when you have assholes in this thread saying shit like "oh he's running away funny, i bet he had something to do with it".
 
If it was a remote detonation, they probably were somewhere far away, hiding.

So them fleeing the scene doesn't really make much sense to me.

That's not the point. The point is you can start linking movement, actions of people from numerous submitted media.
 
I got even more angry today when I thought about how this sick piece of shit blatantly wanted to blow people up from the waste down at a fucking marathon :( Just some seriously demented fucked up shit think up.
 
That's not the point. The point is you can start linking movement, actions of people from numerous submitted media.

Yeah hopefully.

You would think the store outlets would have surveillance cameras and could see someone placing a bag down.
 
Its pretty crazy how little we know about anything. It leads me to believe they are following some good leads and don't want to blow anything.

I hope at least.
 
Its pretty crazy how little we know about anything. It leads me to believe they are following some good leads and don't want to blow anything.

I hope at least.

Or they don't know jack shit.

I can't remember which but I remember hearing on the news that one case of bombings took 7 years to figure out. :/
 
From that location, neither explosion is visible to roof man. He'd only be reacting to sounds. Also, that photo was shot the exact second the bomb went off, so what is a "reacting" person supposed to look like? Half the runners crossing the finish line barely reacted to the first explosion.
Indeed. That photo literally captures the moment of the blast. There will be a delay between the explosion occurring and him receiving the sound, and then reaction time on top of that.

Such an embarrassing article, and I'd expect nothing else from The Sun.
 
I don't really understand why CNN is trying so hard to push the old runner that fell as a hero. When they interviewed him yesterday he basically just said he fell, someone helped him up and he finished the race, checked his time and went home feeling good. He didn't seem to really be aware or care that there was a bombing. I'm not bashing him or anything, but there are much more inspirational stories they could push
 
Not sure if i remembered this correcly but did the bombsquad find a third bomb and detonated it soon after the two explosions? Im wondering where that bomb was found and why it was detonated rather then used as evidence or kept for examination. Seems very strange to detonate them. I suppose they can easily dismantle the bombs cus they were not professional.

Anyone have more info on this?
 
Not sure if i remembered this correcly but did the bombsquad find a third bomb and detonated it soon after the two explosions? Im wondering where that bomb was found and why it was detonated rather then used as evidence or kept for examination. Seems very strange to detonate them. I suppose they can easily dismantle the bombs cus they were not professional.

Anyone have more info on this?

No, that was all made up by the media. They didn't find any additional devices
 
Not sure if i remembered this correcly but did the bombsquad find a third bomb and detonated it soon after the two explosions? Im wondering where that bomb was found and why it was detonated rather then used as evidence or kept for examination. Seems very strange to detonate them. I suppose they can easily dismantle the bombs cus they were not professional.

Anyone have more info on this?

Wasn't a bomb after all. They detonated it because they didn't know if it was a bomb, and if it was whether it was on a timer or remote, to risky to approach and try to disarm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom