Tin foil hat garbage and lots of inaccuracies (like saying naked guy was a suspect).
I means do they really think Craft International would wear uniforms so easily identifiable if they were in on this? Not much stealth for an inside job. Dumb.
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Boston Marathon Bombings: Discussion Thread 2 | Bomber charged
- Thread starter Joel Was Right
- Start date
- Status
I means do they really think Craft International would wear uniforms so easily identifiable if they were in on this? Not much stealth for an inside job. Dumb.
I think whoever made this has the ability to see more detail in photos than exists when normal people look at it. Specifically the blood bit.
Almost nothing is accurate in whatever the hell that is. He's pointing at wrong people, misidentifying people, objects, and elements within those photographs. Everything he showed can be disproved with FACTS. It's just conspiracy bs.
Good Job Bob
Member
Thanks for the autopsy pics warning.
It would be great if you edited your post and just deleted that link. Such shit.
thanks for the nsfw warning dipshit.
Zero-Crescent
Member
At first I thought it was a joke album, since one of those pictures was originally created to make fun of conspiracy theorists. But yeah, it's just nonsense, made even more hilarious by the fact that they included a joke picture designed to make fun of them as "proof."
Something has been bothering me since this all started. Where is the information about the second bomb that went off at the marathon? All of this "evidence" from both conspiracy theorists and the fbi only show the finish line.
Why isnt there images of the second bomb being placed?
Why isnt there images of the second bomb being placed?
Do you mean the reverse?
The conspiracy theorists have no idea what they're talking about. As for the FBI, all the information they have discussed publicly is on the second bomb (allgedly placed by Dzhokhar).
With the higher rate at which information travels these days, it seems that in the absence of concrete news these theories start to appear.
20 years ago you didn't have 200,000 people following a manhunt on a police scanner online. People probably were more patient to just wait and see what news came out on tv and in the papers. Now there's such a huge demand for breaking news on big stories like this that, when there isn't much going on like in the past couple days, people start to fill in the gaps with their own theories and such.
Hell that's what happened with all the stupid theories about the missing Brown student.
But for the record I still have no idea what the deal was with that naked guy. I saw him mentioned repeatedly on Friday and Saturday, but I haven't bothered to see who he was since every site/source will give me a completely different answer.
I'm not sure those pics are real. The doctors said his body was injured so badly they don't know the cause of death. All I see there is a bullet wound, some facial wounds and an open medical wound.
Exactly. I saw that post Monday or Tuesday, and then when the events of Thursday/Friday came I thought "okay, I guess we'll never see this conspiracy theory again, because then he'll have to admit he's an idiot". Cause, you know, nothing matched up. I'm shocked that anybody after the fact is trying to show that and pass it off as matching the real events.
I guess I still manage to overestimate the intelligence of the conspiracy community, though I'm not sure how that's possible given my prior opinion.
It reminds me of that JFK = Abe Lincoln thing that has made internet rounds several times before, except not a joke.
I love how the government is so powerful yet it has to stage attacks to pass new laws. They can't, you know, just do it. Yep, makes perfect sense!
There's always an excuse with these people. They want to expose these conspiracies but can't because of the media being owned by a secret corporation. They want to expose this secret corporation but they can't because of a shadow government. They want to expose the shadow government but they can't because of ?????
Maybe, just maybe... it's because they're complete wack jobs?
There's always an excuse with these people. They want to expose these conspiracies but can't because of the media being owned by a secret corporation. They want to expose this secret corporation but they can't because of a shadow government. They want to expose the shadow government but they can't because of ?????
Maybe, just maybe... it's because they're complete wack jobs?
Good hell. Does EVERYTHING have to be a conspiracy theses days?
Also look at the picture that says "who does the bag belong to" you see the backpack is destroyed. Yet if you scroll down to the picture that says "backpack identified" you CLEARLY see it on the dudes back AFTER THE BOMBING.
The other bomb site that was picked up by the store cameras is the second bomb, which Dzhokhar is accused of planting. It's the site with the 8 year old kid. Most of the conspiracy theory stuff is from Bomb Site 1/Finish-Line (Tamerlan). I'm not sure what you're asking for
I guess i was just combining it all into one spot when looking at everything. I thought it was all from the finish line
bla bla bla...all I see is ppl trying to discredit CT ppl but know one is saying why none of the backpacks matches. I'm just getting into this subject and that's all I see, and know one doesn't even say what's wrong with the photos. It makes you worst then the CT ppl not even stating why the photos are wrong and not showing proof why they are wrong. Think how many ppl are like me and don't believe in CT but also don't trust the government.
This post..
I'm going to pray you're trolling for the sake of humanity and not take the bait.
Pick a photo and I'm sure someone will oblige. The backpack after the blast is shredded and has black and white material, which Dzohkhar's has as well. You can say it doesn't resemble his backpack after the blast but you can't say it's not his. The interior of the pack is likely dark.
We have some low-resolution shots of the backpacks the suspects wore and a single low-res shot of a thoroughly destroyed backpack that I don't recall ever being 100% confirmed to have housed a bomb. And even then the shredded backpack looks similar enough to pass scrutiny. In your mind, does this adequately stand up to a gigantic mountain of evidence showing that we have the actual culprits?
was expecting a dumb post like this with no answers.
thx for not replying like the above post
Heart Attack
Member
so, was it proven that they were behind the marathon bomb?
Because any reasonable person with common sense would figure the FBI did look into them and ruled them out. Shit, how do you know they weren't undercover BPD/FBI at the event looking for suspicious things such as what happened? If so, clearly they failed, but I seriously doubt they were completely looked over in the investigation.
Just because the FBI/BPD doesn't tell the public absolutely everything that went on during the investigation doesn't mean they didn't look into it.
Not all posts warrant answers.
We have some low-resolution shots of the backpacks the suspects wore and a single low-res shot of a thoroughly destroyed backpack that I don't recall ever being 100% confirmed to have housed a bomb. In your mind, does this adequately discount a gigantic mountain of evidence showing that we have the actual culprits?
was expecting a dumb post like this with no answers.
thx for not replying like the above post
Nobody ever confirmed that was even a backpack.
What's the issue with this one here?
that's the photo they been showing on the news from what I remember saying it was his bag.
Foxy Fox 39
Banned
I laughed at that picture but the one thing no one has explained is those military dudes. I don't think they bombed Boston...I'm pretty sure they all still have their backpacks, but their presence is unnerving.
Authorities never claimed this, from what I've read. And how awkwardly would that girl have to be standing for that bag to be visible like that between her legs? And fully lit like that? It seems more likely to me that the circled object is in front of her.
They didn't necessarily say they had footage that we haven't seen. But what we know they have is plenty enough. They have the pictures we've seen of Dzhokhar and they have at least one eyewitness who positively identified Tarmalan.
Axis
Member
It seems that she's standing at an angle and so is the girl next to her. Where the back leg is hidden by the front one and there's a space between them where you can see the backpack. I could be wrong, tho.
it's most likely NOT the backpack
if it was and dzokhar had just dropped it, he should be talking on his cellphone (or at least pretending to be)
they were among the first questionable images out there once this thing went off, and there haven't been any explanations for them, except guesses that they're private security contractors. Is that even true? Contracted to whom, and what were they doing and not doing. Training mission? Surely that had to be cleared with someone.
I really wish the naked guy would come out and hold a press conference of sorts. So many people believe he is Tamerlan! Supposedly the aunt even swears 100% that the naked guy is Tamerlan.
EDIT: Press in Australia are wanting the naked guy to come forward as well - http://www.news.com.au/world-news/n...ostons-naked-man/story-fnh81jut-1226627017169
IT'S one of the enduring mysteries of the chaos in Boston last week. Just who was the naked man law enforcement authorities paraded in front of the cameras?
After the shooting of a police officer at MIT and the high-speed chase through Watertown that followed, the Boston Police arrested and questioned a man and ordered him to strip. CNN broadcast footage of the nude man being escorted by police to a waiting wagon.
It was a riveting moment in the foggy TV coverage of the issue, where it (wrongly) seemed like there was resolution to the case.
But days later the naked man has yet to come forward, and the Watertown police department has not clarified the man’s identity – fuelling conspiracy theories about the man’s identity.
After the shooting of a police officer at MIT and the high-speed chase through Watertown that followed, the Boston Police arrested and questioned a man and ordered him to strip. CNN broadcast footage of the nude man being escorted by police to a waiting wagon.
It was a riveting moment in the foggy TV coverage of the issue, where it (wrongly) seemed like there was resolution to the case.
But days later the naked man has yet to come forward, and the Watertown police department has not clarified the man’s identity – fuelling conspiracy theories about the man’s identity.
They have -- they have security footage from the restaurant in the background of that photo showing him from behind dropping the backpack as well as photos from the front showing it at his feet. It's described in the complaint
The stuff described does not match that alleged photo of the bag. I'm sure the actual evidence will come out as the trial progresses
Fair enough. I was under the impression that was among the footage already released. Looking at the complaint, I was definitely wrong because they're describing exact frames of time (18 seconds talking on the phone, etc...).
They do training and security going from what is on their site, so who knows. Looks like do everything from guarding schools to training people in the military.
The description I was talking about:
my rough attempt at copying the complaint said:
edit: nm, I see you read it
Actually I was referring to the contents of Stump's post. Although I had read what you posted and must have forgotten how detailed it was.
- Status