• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Brandwatch: Microsoft won E3 on Social Media.

This past week I've seen three threads, one saying Zelda: Breath of the Wild (therefore, Nintendo) won E3, one saying Sony won E3 and now this one saying Microsoft won E3.
 
So the Grand Canyon isn't too far from where I live. I think if I drive over and shout each of the Big 3's names in, then measure how long I can hear each one echoing back, I can determine the real winner of E3.
 
Nah guys, winning E3 is super important, that's what I've been hearing ever since all the Nintendo hoopla went down. Stick to your guns.
 
So the Grand Canyon isn't too far from where I live. I think if I drive over and shout each of the Big 3's names in, then measure how long I can hear each one echoing back, I can determine the real winner of E3.

Do eeett we need to clarify things noaw!!!
 
E3, everyone's a winner!

If these surveys are so wildly different it's fair to say that they're probably inaccurate.
 
I think what the important story here is that this year's E3 had a lot to like for a variety of people and markets. So all-in-all, a decent E3.
 
Didn't we just have a thread saying Sony won on social media?

Hmm.....

We did. This is just further proof that this kind of social media analysis is bullshit. I remember reading that Xbox won E3 2013 according to one of these. That was so obviously not true. It's probably impossible to come up with a methodology that gives meaningful results.
 
Literally no way this is true based on the reality of Sony and Zelda in the feeds. Must have been a very weird and narrow metric they used such as live reactions rather than full days afterwards.
 
Badmouthed or praised, MS was the most popular, as number suggests.

It does not imply it “won”, unless “winning” is “being the most popular”.

What a dumbass metric.
 
That's cool. I personally felt Sony had a stronger conference but I'm not about to list-war and fanboy out for a fucking corporation. E3 had a bunch of dope looking games. That's winning enough for me.
 
Microsoft won E3 due to millions of people tweeting "Microsoft lost E3".
 
Literally no way this is true based on the reality of Sony and Zelda in the feeds. Must have been a very weird and narrow metric they used such as live reactions rather than full days afterwards.

MS is not averse to paying for opinions. They were caught doing that with youtube stuff early in this generation. This charts seems to be measuring positive mentions. A easy thing to manipulate. What will be a more objective view is how their console/game sales respond. Next months NPD may reflect how little 'social media' wins mean.
 
MS is not averse to paying for opinions. They were caught doing that with youtube stuff early in this generation. This charts seems to be measuring positive mentions. A easy thing to manipulate. What will be a more objective view is how their console/game sales respond. Next months NPD may reflect how little 'social media' wins mean.

But how would you separate that from word of mouth and momentum? Sony is already selling 2:1. MS could have hands-down won E3 and I doubt it would translate to much difference in the next NPD.
 
What's their methodology? Because I highly doubt that the Ubisoft presser had more social media than Sony. Plus we have seen that Sony got way more mentions than MS and Ubi at Facebook right?

Something is not right.
 
MS is not averse to paying for opinions. They were caught doing that with youtube stuff early in this generation. This charts seems to be measuring positive mentions. A easy thing to manipulate. What will be a more objective view is how their console/game sales respond. Next months NPD may reflect how little 'social media' wins mean.

They're pretty good at 'weighting' data as well. As others in the thread have suggested, if this is weighted more on who was tweeting on the hour of the actual press conferences, of course Sony gets a hit as only nutters like me here in Europe stay up to watch it (same with a lot of the rest of the world).

Its all dumb anyway, as if theres perfect algorithms to scour all internet speak and come up with some clear data. The human element just has to assess the situation intelligently. Sony's 5 star conference and the dam bursting of Zelda talk were the clear takeaways.

EDIT: Oh wait? They didn't filter it to Xbox or gaming but just Microsoft so all general Windows 10 stuff and the LinkedIn buyout were included? Haha what a fuckup. MICROSOFT FAMILY OF NEWS TOPICS.
 
But how would you separate that from word of mouth and momentum? Sony is already selling 2:1. MS could have hands-down won E3 and I doubt it would translate to much difference in the next NPD.

It's tough to tell but usually pick moderate voices and see what they say. Reddit, Twitter, youtube etc... all have plenty of 'paid' opinions. I'd always take any consensus form there with a grain of salt.

So far only MS has been caught with their fingers in the cookie Jar. Nintendo doesn't seem to care and Sony might but has not yet been caught. They have done work to make their execs media friendly int he same way MS has.
 
EDIT: Oh wait? They didn't filter it to Xbox or gaming but just Microsoft so all general Windows 10 stuff and the LinkedIn buyout were included? Haha what a fuckup. MICROSOFT FAMILY OF NEWS TOPICS.

Methodology fail for sure. Linked in likely explains it.
 
..and I'm sure this has nothing to do with 'Microsoft' buying Linked In this week.

#datafail

I don't think their method of collecting this data was as simple as looking on social media for the word "Microsoft". They likely made sure that it was at least somewhat gaming related:

8POBUHa.png
 
Overall we found 102k mentions of the Sony conference throughout it’s runtime .

"That's a fair point, but it wins on overall share of voice for conferences as well as the largest mention spike, so any European mentions as they caught up the next day would be picked up too"

So yeah, theyre just weighting it on the live mentions of the conferences which is fucking stupid considering the 2AM+ bracket it was in for the rest of the world. The defence is it would have had a chance at getting a spike later the next day but that would depend on everyone in the rest of the world tweeting in the same hour block. Fucking data analysts.
 
Not so sure. Read the report, they show which terms they were tracking.

I've looked at the report twice, and can't find what terms they were using when comparing the conferences. But I may be blind. Can you show me?

The only thing I could find in comparison to actual mentions was the individual games one.
 
I've looked at the report twice, and can't find what terms they were using when comparing the conferences. But I may be blind. Can you show me?

The only thing I could find in comparison to actual mentions was the individual games one.

Go down to the Microsoft section of the report to see the type of words they were tracking during the MS conference. LinkedIn doesn't show up.

Additionally, the methodology on tracking during the time of the conference is stated at the top of the report.
 
This analysis is basically just collecting the peak mentions of keywords during the conference, so MS's conference was at a good time for EU and US people so it's obviously going to have higher social activity during the conferences. Sony's was at 2am in UK and 3-4am in other parts of Europe.
 
Go down to the Microsoft section of the report to see the type of words they were tracking during the MS conference. LinkedIn doesn't show up.

Additionally, the methodology on tracking during the time of the conference is stated at the top of the report.

It looks like it was all pretty ho hum until Scorpio.

They were tracking the word microsoft. Their press conference occurred during the same day it came out they were acquiring Linked in. There would be a ton more talk about that baseline.

To be fair, hardware gets folks talking more than games as well. So that would also be talked about more.
 
Top Bottom