Good for them. The main characters rarely spoke to me at all. One of the few that was cool was Mulan.
Not even Ariel? She combed her hair with forks, and was a trash hoarder.
Good for them. The main characters rarely spoke to me at all. One of the few that was cool was Mulan.
Disney is just so fucking boring. As a tomboy I fucking despised it. It was always for the girly girls.
Not even Ariel? She combed her hair with forks, and was a trash hoarder.
Funner trivia: sort of not really.fun trivia: Aladdin was originally Chinese
I can see why you might have struggled to find a role model in the films, but that's a ridiculously sweeping statement.Disney is just so fucking boring. As a tomboy I fucking despised it. It was always for the girly girls.
She combed her hair and collected shiny trinkets. What an amazing character.
No she was a hoarder. Bet the castle is full of piles of crap now. Everytime something washes up on shore she has to drag it inside since she's ingrained it into her brain over the years.
I can see why you might have struggled to find a role model in the films, but that's a ridiculously sweeping statement.
Funner trivia: sort of not really.
The story refers to "China" as where it is set, but people back then didn't really know where or what China was - it was just some mystical foreign land. It's likely more accurate to set it in Arabia rather than China.
I can see why you might have struggled to find a role model in the films, but that's a ridiculously sweeping statement.
How come? The Disney morals were always ancient as shit and the girls pretty little princesses beyond few exceptions.
There are plenty of Disney female characters who are not princesses, easily outnumbering those who are.
But do they act any different? Do they fight the arch nemesis? Do they save their kingdoms often? I remember Pocahontas being somewhat witty and Mulan taking action.
I would say that since the 90s at least, Disney's female characters have generally taken a fairly active role in their respective films and are fairly distinct in terms of character. Perhaps there is a bad habit of having them having to be rescued at the climax though, The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, Hunchback of Notre Dame and Hercules springing to mind.
That director needs to learn the difference between sexualized and glamorized. She was converted to a standard-looking 2d princess from a generic looking 3d pixar model.
Maybe in a few decades. (I'm being generous.)I want another East Asian princess now. Maybe from Oceania or Himalayas~~ Or perhaps nomadic mongolian or more northern Russian?
How about South American or Mayan?
Oh, and an outer space princess.
So many possibilities~
I also don't mind that they are princesses. I assume that means they are shoved into some kind of position of responsibility/political status that makes for good drama. Though I'd rather that the next set of princesses be more symbolic in their princessery, like more of taking on a leadership position or earning some kind of status through their badassery (warrior princess or mage princess kind of thing).
Battered person syndrome. Actually, she was working at Pixar before Disney bought them. You try to escape Disney, but they just pull you back in.Why did they work with Disney to begin with? It's like dancing with the devil then complaining when your toe is crushed by his cloven hoof.
While I agree it's against the idea of the movie/character, this is pretty funny considering she was an insufferable brat.
It's a bit crass to stick her in a sparkly dress and a corset when the film makes a point of demonstrating that she hates sparkly dresses and corsets.
Apart from that, I'm not sure how this is any more objectionable than any other aspect of the whole Disney Princess bit.
When does Leia get inducted?
You'd have to be blind (or willfully oblivious) not to see the differences between those characters...
-Waist: the first has a normal waist, the other has a anorexic impossible waist
-Bow replaced by a fancy belt: her weapon is replaced by something more "girly"
-Cleavage: I think it's self-explanatory...
-Dress: look at her fucking dress, it's dark and plain for the first one, and it's all glittery ornate and bright coloured in the Disney one.
-Face: less round for Disney and also all way paler, has make-up.
This needs to get quoted over and over again for all the posts that say "almost nothing got changed". Are you blind? I mean seriously. The waist alone, omg.
Additionally on first look, I found the original design way more appealing. And then I figured out why a few seconds later (see above).
This needs to get quoted over and over again for all the posts that say "almost nothing got changed". Are you blind? I mean seriously. The waist alone, omg.
Additionally on first look, I found the original design way more appealing. And then I figured out why a few seconds later (see above).
That's the goddamn point. Merida didn't need to be attractive. Women don't need to be attractive to do anything. We absolutely can be if we so choose, and it does not make us "sluts". However, we can also accomplish just as much as ugly men can.
![]()
I love the revelation of Jasmine being so short in all this artwork though! XD So awfulllll...
Funner trivia: sort of not really.
The story refers to "China" as where it is set, but people back then didn't really know where or what China was - it was just some mystical foreign land. It's likely more accurate to set it in Arabia rather than China.t.
As a response to the public outcry, Disney has quietly pulled the redesigned Merida from its Princesses website and replaced it with the original Pixar version. It seems like petitions actually are useful sometimes!
that for girls and women to have value — to be recognized as true princesses — they must conform to a narrow definition of beauty.
This is pretty damn ridiculous.
I wish I could make a pention to reverse the reversing.
I really truly hate modern social correctness.
Merida was saved at least, too bad Mulan couldn't have been.
I mean, for fucks sake.
![]()
1. They straightened her hair. Before it was messy and she didn't care, but then it was all brushed and nice looking.
2. They made her curvier, by shrinking the waist and widening the hips and bust.
3. They gave her make-up, which defeats the whole point of her being naturally beautiful.
4. Her dress is fancier, with the belt/sash, lowered shoulders, and glittery look.
Looks like this one will get fired. Obviously much too sexualized.
I seriously cannot tell the difference besides that they added glitter. wtf.
I haven't seen Brave, but i guess adding make up defeats the point of the character?The character model, at its core, looks exactly the same. Obviously woman should be banned from using variables like makeup and better clothes..