• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Brave director criticises Disney's 'sexualised' Princess Merida redesign

Status
Not open for further replies.
fun trivia: Aladdin was originally Chinese
Funner trivia: sort of not really.

The story refers to "China" as where it is set, but people back then didn't really know where or what China was - it was just some mystical foreign land. It's likely more accurate to set it in Arabia rather than China.

Disney is just so fucking boring. As a tomboy I fucking despised it. It was always for the girly girls.
I can see why you might have struggled to find a role model in the films, but that's a ridiculously sweeping statement.
 
She combed her hair and collected shiny trinkets. What an amazing character.

No she was a hoarder. Bet the castle is full of piles of crap now. Everytime something washes up on shore she has to drag it inside since she's ingrained it into her brain over the years.
 
No she was a hoarder. Bet the castle is full of piles of crap now. Everytime something washes up on shore she has to drag it inside since she's ingrained it into her brain over the years.

She was a hoarder of things from another world... who wouldn't be?

I can see why you might have struggled to find a role model in the films, but that's a ridiculously sweeping statement.

How come? The Disney morals were always ancient as shit and the girls pretty little princesses beyond few exceptions.
 
Funner trivia: sort of not really.

The story refers to "China" as where it is set, but people back then didn't really know where or what China was - it was just some mystical foreign land. It's likely more accurate to set it in Arabia rather than China.

I can see why you might have struggled to find a role model in the films, but that's a ridiculously sweeping statement.

Yeah. I didn't like that Cindy/Snow/Aurora shit either, but Jasmine, Mulan, Tiana, Merida and even Belle shouldn't be painted with the same brush.

edit: I agree with your point about the morals, but I think they've been better at developing the characters themselves recently.
 
There are plenty of Disney female characters who are not princesses, easily outnumbering those who are.

But do they act any different? Do they fight the arch nemesis? Do they save their kingdoms often? I remember Pocahontas being somewhat witty and Mulan taking action.
 
I want another East Asian princess now. Maybe from Oceania or Himalayas~~ Or perhaps nomadic mongolian or more northern Russian?
How about South American or Mayan?
Oh, and an outer space princess.

So many possibilities~

I also don't mind that they are princesses. I assume that means they are shoved into some kind of position of responsibility/political status that makes for good drama. Though I'd rather that the next set of princesses be more symbolic in their princessery, like more of taking on a leadership position or earning some kind of status through their badassery (warrior princess or mage princess kind of thing).
 
But do they act any different? Do they fight the arch nemesis? Do they save their kingdoms often? I remember Pocahontas being somewhat witty and Mulan taking action.

I would say that since the 90s at least, Disney's female characters have generally taken a fairly active role in their respective films and are fairly distinct in terms of character. Perhaps there is a bad habit of having them having to be rescued at the climax though, The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, Hunchback of Notre Dame and Hercules springing to mind.
 
I would say that since the 90s at least, Disney's female characters have generally taken a fairly active role in their respective films and are fairly distinct in terms of character. Perhaps there is a bad habit of having them having to be rescued at the climax though, The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, Hunchback of Notre Dame and Hercules springing to mind.

Yes they are better when compared to old Disney movies, but that's pretty much it and it's much said :b
 
That director needs to learn the difference between sexualized and glamorized. She was converted to a standard-looking 2d princess from a generic looking 3d pixar model.
 
That director needs to learn the difference between sexualized and glamorized. She was converted to a standard-looking 2d princess from a generic looking 3d pixar model.

One would think that a director would have some knowledge about the matter.
 
I want another East Asian princess now. Maybe from Oceania or Himalayas~~ Or perhaps nomadic mongolian or more northern Russian?
How about South American or Mayan?
Oh, and an outer space princess.

So many possibilities~

I also don't mind that they are princesses. I assume that means they are shoved into some kind of position of responsibility/political status that makes for good drama. Though I'd rather that the next set of princesses be more symbolic in their princessery, like more of taking on a leadership position or earning some kind of status through their badassery (warrior princess or mage princess kind of thing).
Maybe in a few decades. (I'm being generous.)
 
It's a bit crass to stick her in a sparkly dress and a corset when the film makes a point of demonstrating that she hates sparkly dresses and corsets.

Apart from that, I'm not sure how this is any more objectionable than any other aspect of the whole Disney Princess bit.

The dress they stuck her in for the princess line is the dress she hates in the movie.
 
You'd have to be blind (or willfully oblivious) not to see the differences between those characters...

-Waist: the first has a normal waist, the other has a anorexic impossible waist

-Bow replaced by a fancy belt: her weapon is replaced by something more "girly"

-Cleavage: I think it's self-explanatory...

-Dress: look at her fucking dress, it's dark and plain for the first one, and it's all glittery ornate and bright coloured in the Disney one.

-Face: less round for Disney and also all way paler, has make-up.

This needs to get quoted over and over again for all the posts that say "almost nothing got changed". Are you blind? I mean seriously. The waist alone, omg.

Additionally on first look, I found the original design way more appealing. And then I figured out why a few seconds later (see above).
 
The after looks better in the face (before she did have a bit to much blush anyway). Plus her dress isn't that much different really, its just sparkly.

Really I find it more disgusting that the creator of the character is annoyed and suggesting sexism then anything.

This needs to get quoted over and over again for all the posts that say "almost nothing got changed". Are you blind? I mean seriously. The waist alone, omg.

Additionally on first look, I found the original design way more appealing. And then I figured out why a few seconds later (see above).

Dispite that though it is still the same core character, it still projects the personality which the original character had.
 
This needs to get quoted over and over again for all the posts that say "almost nothing got changed". Are you blind? I mean seriously. The waist alone, omg.

Additionally on first look, I found the original design way more appealing. And then I figured out why a few seconds later (see above).

I think what's important isn't seeing them next to each other and saying "how close they are to each other", but covering the Pixar model up with your hand as if it didn't exist, and asking if the Disney design is the character Merida. Which it's not. If this was your introduction to the character, you would think they were a confident, somewhat sassy, glamorized, and mature. Which she's not, they're ridding the character of any awkwardness she had, her more human qualities.

I think that's what bothers Brenda, is missing the character. The thing is, this line has sort of missed representing correctly most of the characters. Especially Mulan, Belle, and somewhat Pocahontas.
 
That's the goddamn point. Merida didn't need to be attractive. Women don't need to be attractive to do anything. We absolutely can be if we so choose, and it does not make us "sluts". However, we can also accomplish just as much as ugly men can.

tumblr_mmrnakcPe61soyf72o2_500.gif

Good post.
 
Just to weigh in on the topic: I don't care at all about pretty characters and I think they're just fine in animation.... But changing an established character is naturally going to get push back. I can understand why many are pissed.
 
Funner trivia: sort of not really.

The story refers to "China" as where it is set, but people back then didn't really know where or what China was - it was just some mystical foreign land. It's likely more accurate to set it in Arabia rather than China.t.

haha just like the mandarin in iron man
 
If you don't realize the significance of the social pressure for women to have small/skinny waists, you really are willfully oblivious.
 
Merida was saved at least, too bad Mulan couldn't have been.

Meh, Mulan is the daughter of a wealthy/noble household. Her outfit seems par the course. The movie itself was a travesty, but I suppose a 12-year war campaign of barbarian-fighting badassery sans shitty dragon and cricket sidekicks would been too much to ask for from Disney.
 
Woah, woah can't have that.

What if they release an ugly toyline now??
What if the children play with the ugly toys and then think it is okay to play with the ugly children?

No one should play with the ugly children.
 
The way I saw it explained made more sense than just looking. I'll try to break it down.

1. They straightened her hair. Before it was messy and she didn't care, but then it was all brushed and nice looking.

2. They made her curvier, by shrinking the waist and widening the hips and bust.

3. They gave her make-up, which defeats the whole point of her being naturally beautiful.

4. Her dress is fancier, with the belt/sash, lowered shoulders, and glittery look.
 
I seriously cannot tell the difference besides that they added glitter. wtf.

The added make up is pretty evident.
The waist to hip ratio is also different, but i'd say that can very well be simply due to different artists/2d-3d transition.

The character model, at its core, looks exactly the same. Obviously woman should be banned from using variables like makeup and better clothes..
I haven't seen Brave, but i guess adding make up defeats the point of the character?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom