RustyNails
Member
Edit: LOL wrong thread
OnPoint said:Man... thread backfire backfire. There are some decent designs in here.
Yeah, I understood the original post. It was just yours that made me think to post, hence the quote. A few people always don't mind trying to whip something up -- or even find it fun -- and the OP usually leaves mildly satisfied.OnPoint said:I think it adds to the flavor of the thread and can sometimes guide the results in humorous ways. I'm just surprised at the amount of real attempts here.
travisbickle said:They must use Helvetica in the original? Mustn't they?
It's a question of the right tool for the job. You can do page layouts in Illustrator too. It's not an especially good idea.WanderingWind said:I am not a professional designer. I think this much is clear. However, to claim, as one guy did, that it's impossible to create mockups in InDesign is flat out false. I even admitted that it's an egregious waste of efficiency. I started in print, so that's how I do things. It's not ignorance...just a different, slower, less concise way of doing things.
A Wacom's just an input tool. You'd still need to use a program of some sort.If I didn't suck at drawing, I'd probably do all my mockups on a Wacom or something.![]()
This couldn't have been a more obvious statement.Milchjon said:The font looks like shit, the letter spacing is off, the spacing of the line is too close, the tree is way too detailed to work with the font, the pale blue makes it borderline unreadable, and it doesn't give you one clue what the site is all about.
Look, I'm not trying to attack people who are just having fun, but you don't know what you're talking about. And I'm not even a designer.
so you're claiming that print design is by its very nature a practice in wasting energy? or have you just never heard of illustrator?WanderingWind said:I am not a professional designer. I think this much is clear. However, to claim, as one guy did, that it's impossible to create mockups in InDesign is flat out false. I even admitted that it's an egregious waste of efficiency. I started in print, so that's how I do things.
josephdebono said:"Hey Tech GAF! I'm a designer and Photoshop isn't starting on my machine. I have something which needs to be done by tonight. AAAARGH."
Tech GAF would just help and not bitch about devaluing our work.
There is a difference between "can I get advice on fixing my computer" vs "fix my computer for me," just as there is between "can I get some advice on making a logo" vs "make my logo for me."josephdebono said:"Hey Tech GAF! I'm a designer and Photoshop isn't starting on my machine. I have something which needs to be done by tonight. AAAARGH."
Tech GAF would just help and not bitch about devaluing our work.
what specifically about indesign is giving you the troubles? its a pretty different beast then AI or PS, but its a great program.itwasTuesday said:InDesign is confusing home-slices. Did a newspaper style insert recently and tried using InDesign, got frustrated and ending up using Word, PS and Ai.
Kano On The Phone said:There is a difference between "can I get advice on fixing my computer" vs "fix my computer for me," just as there is between "can I get some advice on making a logo" vs "make my logo for me."
itwasTuesday said:InDesign is confusing home-slices. Did a newspaper style insert recently and tried using InDesign, got frustrated and ending up using Word, PS and Ai.
Rabbitwork said:This couldn't have been a more obvious statement.
Thank you for this. Just what I needed during a particularly hard day at work.segasonic said:David Thorne epic troll
WanderingWind said:Wow. So, you're not a graphic designer, but still feel qualified in calling it shit, and saying (based on your no experience) that I'm not qualified to say something looks nice?
there's zero reason to give your "points" the respect of a rebuttal when you present it as though you have the slightest idea of what you're talking about (when you've admitted as such that you do not). instead of saying things like "the font looks like shit" a normal, helpful, and altogether not-an-asshole person might say "hey that font just isn't working for me, maybe try something with a heavier weight, or a serifed font to make it a little more classical in appearance".Milchjon said:I guess so. Although I would really appreciate a more in-depth rebuttal of the points I made. Shouldn't be so hard?
Oh I'm not really asking for help, I just jumped into it without ever really messing around with the program before. But I was getting annoyed with grabbing and selecting things precisely. Thanks though.Rabbitwork said:what specifically about indesign is giving you the troubles? its a pretty different beast then AI or PS, but its a great program.
Yeah I'll sit down and play with it sooner or later and try and learn some stuff. Regarding Word, that was just for writing the articles.shidoshi said:InDesign isn't hard once you get used to it. It's like anything - you just need to figure out how it works and what it takes to do stuff. I can't imagine EEEEEEVER using Word for anything with actual layout or design.
Rabbitwork said:there's zero reason to give your "points" the respect of a rebuttal when you present it as though you have the slightest idea of what you're talking about (when you've admitted as such that you do not). instead of saying things like "the font looks like shit" a normal, helpful, and altogether not-an-asshole person might say "hey that font just isn't working for me, maybe try something with a heavier weight, or a serifed font to make it a little more classical in appearance".
its terrible that i feel like i have to give you a lesson in positive critique, but as you've stated you're uneducated on the subject so i suppose i can understand.
sensational.segasonic said:From: Simon Edhouse
Date: Monday 16 November 2009 2.19pm
To: David Thorne
Subject: Logo Design
[awesome]
itxaka said:I hope that the same guys complaining about their job never come to gaf and ask about help with their computers. It's my job and you are devaluating it asking for free help!
Nobody asks you guys to do anything if you don't want, but for example I do not care helping my fellow gaf members with some free help related to my job.
PounchEnvy said:http://i.imgur.com/k5ZTU.png
Since it's somewhat topical could someone give me some tips on this? It's for a class and my professor said something about better integrating the text and I can't think of a thing.
http://i.imgur.com/MQlKo.png
This is what I did buy honestly I don't like many of them. The thumb being an "L" annoys me. Any real tips, GAF? Not really asking you guys to do it for me.
Honestly, I'd probably lose the actual thumb (unless it's absolutely necessary) and turn the U into a less overt thumb instead, or keep the thumb/crown idea but simplify it as much as possible.PounchEnvy said:Any real tips, GAF?
ShaunBRS said:Honestly, I'd probably lose the actual thumb (unless it's absolutely necessary) and turn the U into a less overt thumb instead, or keep the thumb/crown idea but simplify it as much as possible.
Something like this, to show you what I mean.
![]()
AlexMeloche said:Thumbs are a bit too fat to look like a L.
Also, I just tried something quickly on Photoshop with the words :
![]()
Dunno if it helps.![]()
I hope my professor doesn't see this because I think that's perfect. Mind if I imitate this?ShaunBRS said:
Yeah definitely. Mine were a bit too plain in the way the text was oriented.AlexMeloche said:Thumbs are a bit too fat to look like a L.
Also, I just tried something quickly on Photoshop with the words
Dunno if it helps.![]()
Nice edit on the original, I like this design and also think it works well.ShaunBRS said:Honestly, I'd probably lose the actual thumb (unless it's absolutely necessary) and turn the U into a less overt thumb instead, or keep the thumb/crown idea but simplify it as much as possible.
Something like this, to show you what I mean.
![]()
Go ahead. Now that I think about it, though, it might be worth playing around with and making THUMB the leading word and using the U in that instead, likePounchEnvy said:Mind if I imitate this?
Sorry, already trademarked.PounchEnvy said:Thanks again guys for the input.
I hope my professor doesn't see this because I think that's perfect. Mind if I imitate this?
As somebody who is qualified to carry out carpentry work and a hobbyist in computers. Sometimes I do a bit of joinery or fix a computer for somebody just because I can and they asked. It's called doing somebody a favour and it's nice. And guess what, people do free shit for me sometimes too.Kano On The Phone said:There is a difference between "can I get advice on fixing my computer" vs "fix my computer for me," just as there is between "can I get some advice on making a logo" vs "make my logo for me."
xelios said:

I'm really sorry for bumping this but since I still can't create new threads (and this one is so epic) I'm going to ask for some help here.
Here's the deal: I'm a med student here in Brazil and member of a study group focused on psychiatry - we study and discuss mental health and help people with mental problems in public institutions. The problem is, our study group has poor logo, a really poor logo
It's not that of a big deal, but it sucks when we have to send material to advertise some lecture or some fund raising event that we organize monthly.
It would be really nice if someone could help, just keep the same structure and writing of the old logo, please.
Thanks!
You do realize this thread was everyone shitting on that guy for asking for a free logo, right?
Yeah! But he got some awesome stuff along the way.
I mean, just look at this thing we are using![]()
You could probably improve that logo quickly simply by ditching the gradients and drop shadows. Keep the colours solid - dark green on the shape and the "Liga de Psiquiatria" text, and a light green on "LIPSI".
There's a lot more you could do - improve the kerning on the P/S pairing in LIPSI, repositioning the full name etc. - but I think even those simple changes would give you a far more attractive logo that would reproduce better and wouldn't look quite as busy.