Steppenwolf said:
You are really ignorant towards the issue, arn't you? The teenager doesn't outdo him quality wise, he outdos him financialy and that is only because he still lives at home and gets everything paid by his parents, doesn't pays for the software he uses, doesnt pay taxes etc.
Hell, it's not even legal most of the times. There is no common ground where the both can compete fairly.
But the teenager alone isn't to blame. It's also the fault of the cheap ass companys who save money on the wrong end or simply can't tell the difference between quality work or something else.
I am rather ignorant about the graphic design business, I'm going by how business is done in other creative fields.
I still don't understand how someone in a particular field can say, "People who make shitty versions of what I make are taking away my customers."
Should movie directors complain about Youtube?
Should game developers complain about flash games?
Should writers complain about fan fiction?
Should artists complain about student artist commissions?
Should programmers complain about open-source code?
And then you're saying that in essence, teenagers are "subsidized" by their parents, and therefore can charge less for their shitty work. I still don't understand how this is taking away from your business. A serious business will hire a graphic designer for much more than a logo. How many teenagers are going to choose a color palette that can be reproduced for both web designs and print designs and provide multiple versions of a logo to be made for business cards, splash screens, logos, banners, and signs? And if the same graphic designer isn't doing the web page, he or she is going to make sure the web designer stays within the guidelines set forth by the original design.
Right now, all Dizzan has is a logo. Now he actually needs a webpage. But he'll have to know how to make a webpage, or hire someone else to make that webpage. And how do you know the web designer will like the logo that Dizzan got here? He might refuse to work with it, and then Dizzan's out $20. Besides, I haven't even given Dizzan the font or colors that I used (and I even edited the kerning and width of the font), and so it will be difficult to make the webpage without that information.
Complaining about the businesses that will accept cheap logos is a little more reasonable, but if they don't want to pay for a good logo, why do you have to get so upset about it? You get what you pay for.
gblues said:
One teenager out-doing one professional designer is hardly the basis to judge an entire industry on. Yes, it says something about that one particular designer, but generally you'll get a better product going through multiple revisions with a single designer than you will soliciting a single revision from thousands of amateurs.
I agree, and that's why I'm saying teenager graphic design should not be viewed as a threat. It doesn't take away serious potential customers.