• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Can anyone else not eat meat if its red inside?

Status
Not open for further replies.
A good tip:
Ask 100 chefs (or food critics or food writers or whatever expert you please) how they like their steaks. See how they answer.
 
I can, but the texture is yucky so I prefer not too :(

BTW I don't care about the "opinion of the experts", lol, that's not how preferences work.
 
Plants are a thousand times grosser. Sprouting and growing like mold. I usually cook vegetables because the crunch of fresh ones just feels so fibrous and alien sometimes.

Animals have entire organ systems dedicated to keeping their insides clean, filtering out shit so that the body can function. Plants are inherently dirty no matter what.




Do I sound insane?

kinda? I'm just talking about taste here, and I can't digest meat very well.
 
Depends on the meat and quality, but as far as I'm concerned with beef, knock the horns off, wipe it's ass, and serve it!
 
No need for "experts". The only tip you need is what your taste buds like.

for real. fuck what other people like.

that said the lowest i can go is medium. i aint about that rare, medium rare shit. may as well bite the cow while its still in the field at that point.
 
Had a medium rare fillet mignon (at Ollie's in Michigan). I was gagging. I returned it and got medium well and it was perfect.

Filet is very, very tender. So I wouldn't start with a filet when venturing into the medium rare waters. Since it's tenderness may shock you.

Try a ribeye at medium rare. Much better for converting well done dudes like you. That's how I converted my cousins.

Also filet mignon is considered a shitty cut by chefs and butchers :P. Ribeye or porterhouse all day ev'ry day!
 
Disgusting lol

I dunno why I can't everyone says it better that way but my mind says dont do it !

You aren't alone.

I don't like pink/red looking meat. It grosses me out. I've always been eating my meat well done, and it's always been delicious. As I tell people repeatedly, well done does not mean overcooked. I've eaten steak that's done all the way through that's still juicy and delicious.

But yeah. Solidaridy, my friend. I'm also one of those heathens who likes cheeseburgers with... just cheese. And bacon. Occasionally, some good bbq sauce will work for me on a burger.
 
Had a medium rare fillet mignon (at Ollie's in Michigan). I was gagging. I returned it and got medium well and it was perfect.

try some medium rare rack of lamb...it's like eating the most tender candy

l.jpg


We need some more appreciation for Lamb on GAF, I feel It doesn't get repped enough.
 
Somewhere between rare and medium-rare is my holy land.

Anything even approaching medium is too tough and flavourless for me.
 
No need for "experts". The only tip you need is what your taste buds like.

Certainly anyone can eat anything any way they want to. No one is saying any different. If you want a charred-to-a-crisp steak, go for it. The restaurant will choose its worst piece of meat, because it makes no difference to you.

But it's also true that many matters of the palate require a level of mental openness and sophistication. Just because your brain's immediate reaction is "this is what I like" doesn't mean you aren't missing out on something. When a child is only willing to eat the foods they "like", we don't assume "well, that's their taste", we assume that they need to be exposed to other things to develop their palate. And the foods you eat are directly linked to that.

People who work with foods on an everyday basis, who understand flavour combinations, who train for years to get this right, has a better food experience than someone throwing together random microwavable dinners. Now it's possible that Joe Microwave thinks his dinners are great and that any of them fancy vegetables or sissy stuff is nonsense. And what he feels is real--if you make him try something, he hates it, because he has a mental hangup. But if he were open to other things and exposed to other things, he would look back in his closed days and shake his head.

Budweiser is not a good beer. Some people enjoy it. That's fine, that's their right. But there is no one out there who is open to and drinks a wide variety of beer and comes back to Budweiser and says "Well, this one is the king of beers". Because a more sophisticated understanding of the different things at work in beer leads people to other choices. If you're scared of anything you can't see an ad for on TV, fine, drink whatever you want. But your unwillingness to try new things limits you, and pretending that your "taste" means it doesn't is wrong.

People who work with food their whole life, train, read, develop... people who dedicate their lives to the fullest experience of food possible... what these people think counts, and it counts because their expertise informs them and teaches them how the palate works and the full flexibility of the palate. It requires time. It requires experimenting. It requires trying to understand why something that doesn't quite work for you works for other people. It requires relaxing.

This goes for everything in life--the more confident you are that everything you know now is everything you need, the more closed you are to new things, then the more you miss out on. But by all means--a well done steak and a mashed potato, Budweiser in hand, if it makes you happy...

To the rare lovers, why not just eat it RAW?
jim-carrey-vomit.gif

Because a balance exists between ease of chewing the meat and preserving the flavour.

"If you're willing to eat squid, why not chew on a rubber ball"? "If you like sweets, why not just eat a cup of sugar"?
 
Pink, yes. Red, no.

Medium every time.

rodvinsmarinert-entrecote.jpg

The picture you posted is definitely not medium. Medium involves slight pinkness in the center and mostly grey-brown. Medium-rare is reddish-pink pretty much throughout. Rare is pretty near fully red. I have colour grading turned on on my monitor so I can't tell if that's pink or red, it looks pink to me. Probably medium-rare.
 
Certainly anyone can eat anything any way they want to. No one is saying any different. If you want a charred-to-a-crisp steak, go for it. The restaurant will choose its worst piece of meat, because it makes no difference to you.

But it's also true that many matters of the palate require a level of mental openness and sophistication. Just because your brain's immediate reaction is "this is what I like" doesn't mean you aren't missing out on something. When a child is only willing to eat the foods they "like", we don't assume "well, that's their taste", we assume that they need to be exposed to other things to develop their palate. And the foods you eat are directly linked to that.

People who work with foods on an everyday basis, who understand flavour combinations, who train for years to get this right, has a better food experience than someone throwing together random microwavable dinners. Now it's possible that Joe Microwave thinks his dinners are great and that any of them fancy vegetables or sissy stuff is nonsense. And what he feels is real--if you make him try something, he hates it, because he has a mental hangup. But if he were open to other things and exposed to other things, he would look back in his closed days and shake his head.

Budweiser is not a good beer. Some people enjoy it. That's fine, that's their right. But there is no one out there who is open to and drinks a wide variety of beer and comes back to Budweiser and says "Well, this one is the king of beers". Because a more sophisticated understanding of the different things at work in beer leads people to other choices. If you're scared of anything you can't see an ad for on TV, fine, drink whatever you want. But your unwillingness to try new things limits you, and pretending that your "taste" means it doesn't is wrong.

People who work with food their whole life, train, read, develop... people who dedicate their lives to the fullest experience of food possible... what these people think counts, and it counts because their expertise informs them and teaches them how the palate works and the full flexibility of the palate. It requires time. It requires experimenting. It requires trying to understand why something that doesn't quite work for you works for other people. It requires relaxing.

This goes for everything in life--the more confident you are that everything you know now is everything you need, the more closed you are to new things, then the more you miss out on. But by all means--a well done steak and a mashed potato, Budweiser in hand, if it makes you happy...

WWp01tY.gif
 
Put me in the pink but not red camp.

A few good steaks in my opinion are chuck eyes, flat irons, or even regular chuck steaks. Top blade is good but has the gristle in the middle. You don't have to pay top dollar for a good cut of meat like a rib-eye.
 
Yep. I keep beating that drum in everyone one of these threads, but people don't get it.

I weep for science education.



Rare is cooked, my friend. Have you ever eaten a raw steak? I have. There's a big difference even between those two states.

Sorry for the shitty picture quality but I made this 2 weeks ago and it was probably my best result yet. Awesome sear and perfect inside. Strip Steak is by far my favorite.

pdH6j47.jpg


 
Near-raw meat = inviting tape worms into your system.

People still believe this?

I mean sure, if the meat you're eating has been picked up off the ground and swirled in a toilet. And even then Pork is probably the only real risk of trichinosis, and raw pork doesnt taste as good as Lamb or Beef anyway.
 
Certainly anyone can eat anything any way they want to. No one is saying any different. If you want a charred-to-a-crisp steak, go for it. The restaurant will choose its worst piece of meat, because it makes no difference to you.

But it's also true that many matters of the palate require a level of mental openness and sophistication. Just because your brain's immediate reaction is "this is what I like" doesn't mean you aren't missing out on something. When a child is only willing to eat the foods they "like", we don't assume "well, that's their taste", we assume that they need to be exposed to other things to develop their palate. And the foods you eat are directly linked to that.

People who work with foods on an everyday basis, who understand flavour combinations, who train for years to get this right, has a better food experience than someone throwing together random microwavable dinners. Now it's possible that Joe Microwave thinks his dinners are great and that any of them fancy vegetables or sissy stuff is nonsense. And what he feels is real--if you make him try something, he hates it, because he has a mental hangup. But if he were open to other things and exposed to other things, he would look back in his closed days and shake his head.

Budweiser is not a good beer. Some people enjoy it. That's fine, that's their right. But there is no one out there who is open to and drinks a wide variety of beer and comes back to Budweiser and says "Well, this one is the king of beers". Because a more sophisticated understanding of the different things at work in beer leads people to other choices. If you're scared of anything you can't see an ad for on TV, fine, drink whatever you want. But your unwillingness to try new things limits you, and pretending that your "taste" means it doesn't is wrong.

People who work with food their whole life, train, read, develop... people who dedicate their lives to the fullest experience of food possible... what these people think counts, and it counts because their expertise informs them and teaches them how the palate works and the full flexibility of the palate. It requires time. It requires experimenting. It requires trying to understand why something that doesn't quite work for you works for other people. It requires relaxing.

This goes for everything in life--the more confident you are that everything you know now is everything you need, the more closed you are to new things, then the more you miss out on. But by all means--a well done steak and a mashed potato, Budweiser in hand, if it makes you happy...



Because a balance exists between ease of chewing the meat and preserving the flavour.

"If you're willing to eat squid, why not chew on a rubber ball"? "If you like sweets, why not just eat a cup of sugar"?

This is a great post and is probably the best explanation we can have to the immature palate people.
 
I was told once that ordering well done can be considered a faux pas in some upscale places - suggests you are from a poor, unsophisticated background.

Medium for life. Strikes the perfect balance. You still get some blood, but it doesn't cover your plate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom