• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Can we switch "Gamers" to "Players"?

People proudly call themselves Gaffer, so why not gamer? Player sounds good but I that reminds me of pimps for some reason. Personally, I prefer to be called interactive software supporter.

I mean like, maybe if they're working on a movie/TV set of course.

But like "I am a Gaffer/NeoGAFfer" is a weird thing to claim too. It just means you read threads with people asking if they should go to the doctor if blood is coming out of the orifices of their body or complain that a video game did them wrong.
 
i wore a street fighter Christmas sweater at my old job last year and one of my co workers said

"Oh, so you're a game-head right?"

I was stunned cuz it was the first time I heard this term. Then I heard three more co workers all separately used the term game-head a couple times after that

Guys, I think we should all call each other game-head
 
Nah, I am a Gamer, a Girl Gamer even. I'm not gonna let some stupid gators tell me otherwise. Fuck them. I will always be a gamer.

I 100%ed all 128 challenges in The Legend of Zelda: Tri Force Heroes online with randoms, I 100%ed all Wii, DS, 3DS, and WiiU 3D & 3D Marios, I have over 429 hours of Smash 3DS played online and over 150 of those were with a broken circle pad, I have played over 850 hours of 3DS this year. I have cred. Portable cred. :P

Seriously, I love video games and will never not be a gamer. And I won't let anyone tell me otherwise.
 
i wore a street fighter Christmas sweater at my old job last year and one of my co workers said

"Oh, so you're a game-head right?"

I was stunned cuz it was the first time I heard this term. Then I heard three more co workers all separately used the term game-head a couple times after that

Guys, I think we should all call each other game-head

It's the same as gear hear, metal head etc.

Just means you are really into something.
 
I already do this

Movie --> viewer, not movier
Book --> reader, not booker
Music --> listener, not musicer
Game --> player, not gamer

It's the linguistically correct way to refer to the person engaging in this activity. That's besides all the associations with mountain dew and angry teens.

But yeah, ultimately, GamerGate has necessitated this - I don't want the medium I love affiliated with that bullshit anymore.

Long overdue.
 
Might as well go with "consumer" if you put it that way.

I don't think "Players" is a good substitute for "Gamers". Don't know about other countries, but over here in Germany a "Player" goes as a synonym for "Playboy", referring to a man being devoted to the pursuit of pleasurable activities.

Why so offended?

Any time code is written, that's what the internal documentation will refer to. Any requirements doc will be drawn up for expectations of "the user". It's the proper way to refer to the party that is operating the software.

It covers the swath of those games that don't have much game to them as well as games that don't have much playing to them.

You are the user.

You are using the software.
 
Whatever it is you call someone who likes video games, I'm that guy, whatever you want to call me. I don't care.
 
don't hate the player, hate the gamer

is that the gist of your suggestion?

because, no, let's go with gamer. It works. It has worked. It will continue to work.
 
i wore a street fighter Christmas sweater at my old job last year and one of my co workers said

"Oh, so you're a game-head right?"

I was stunned cuz it was the first time I heard this term. Then I heard three more co workers all separately used the term game-head a couple times after that

Guys, I think we should all call each other game-head

Isn't that the term used for VR addicts in Red Dwarf?
 
I use 'game enthusiasts' for the hardcore and 'casual audience' for the silent, more normal majority who wouldn't count games as their main hobby.

Although a lot of the time it's easier to just use the more appropriate term, 'wankers'.
 
In 2015, a bunch of gamers trying to go by the name player is a lot more cringe worthy.

But if you still feel that way I have a guide for you.
Code:
[img]http://img3.shopimg.ca/content/zoom/20514703_main_zoom.jpeg[/img]
 
You might want to look up the other connotations of "player", OP. There is a cringe inducing comedy sketch about a "player" meet up in here somewhere.

Why are people so obsessed with labels?
 
This makes no sense though, we have terms for almost literally everything. A brunette is someone with brown hair, a pensioner is an elderly person, a gambler is someone who gamble. I can't get my head around why you would have a problem with this specific term to the point where you would prefer it be eradicated. It literally just means someone who plays games, nothing more. It has nothing to do with 'gamer culture', that's an association that you're applying to it. That's like saying you wouldn't call yourself a blonde because people say that blondes are dumb, despite the fact you clearly have blonde hair

You are making tons of false equivalencies.

I gave this example before but I'll give it again, my mom plays some world game on her phone. She wouldn't call herself a gamer. Because gamer has a certain connotation and it isn't "everyone who plays games". As much as you want it to mean that it simply doesn't.

The gamer term is associated with "gamer culture" without a doubt. There's a reason it's called gamer culture to begin with.

And, as we have established, I read books but I'm not a bookworm or a book reader because reading is just a normal thing that, at a certain level, doesn't define you. I also listen to a ton of music but I have no name for it and if I do is associated with the type of music I listen to and not the fact that is music.

Making comparison to sports (for some reason) or with stuff that has nothing to do with that doesn't make what I'm saying less true.

The term gamer has a meaning and a weight behind it even if you don't want it to have. My dad played all Tomb Raider games, if you ask him he wouldn't say he is a gamer. Because that term isn't used in that context. It's exclusive and it makes it seem like you have to define yourself with video-games to even enjoy it. Which is bollocks and not something that anyone should defend.
 
but you forget the sports or other examples. a hockey player is still a hockey player off the ice. no one is confused in the moment.

I'd like the term to be more inclusive to better reflect the reality of the situation.

Hockey and video games are not the same.

If you play League of Legends then you can say I'm a League of Legends player. But using it to mean all video-games doesn't make sense given the amount of diversity in the medium.

I already do this

Movie --> viewer, not movier
Book --> reader, not booker
Music --> listener, not musicer
Game --> player, not gamer

It's the linguistically correct way to refer to the person engaging in this activity. That's besides all the associations with mountain dew and angry teens.

But yeah, ultimately, GamerGate has necessitated this - I don't want the medium I love affiliated with that bullshit anymore.

Long overdue.

None of the terms you use for other mediums are actually used the way gamer is. People just don't say "I'm a viewer" meaning "I watch movies". It isn't a thing. Not in that context.
 
I already do this

Movie --> viewer, not movier
Book --> reader, not booker
Music --> listener, not musicer
Game --> player, not gamer

It's the linguistically correct way to refer to the person engaging in this activity. That's besides all the associations with mountain dew and angry teens.

But yeah, ultimately, GamerGate has necessitated this - I don't want the medium I love affiliated with that bullshit anymore.

Long overdue.

I'd say I was gaming not playing so for me gamer. You also play a lot of things. Like sports for examples. Saying "I'm a player" doesn't exactly narrow it down. You'd inevitably be asked "oh what do you play" or "sir we do not tolerate that behaviour here"
 
User is too broad, specifies the use of software, but not the kind of software. Are they playing games or using Linux?

Player is culturally assimilated as "a dude who is successful at picking up women".

If I go up to a random person and say I'm a player or user they're not going to understand what I mean.

Gamer is convenient because its term matches its intention (Video game enthusiasts). Its silly that so many on this forum want to distance themselves from a term that reflects their passion in their hobby, because of harassers on social media.

I see a lot of people saying that film enthusiasts aren't called filmers/moviers/ect. No, but they still have terms that reflect their passion (Film buff, Cinephile).

Assholes engaging in your hobby doesn't diminish the hobby itself.
 
Don't pay so much importance to stupid labels?

Gamers, player etc whatever you want to refer to it doesn't matter you play games, you game, whatever.


Also:
No one says, oh my wife is gaming Splatoon. She's playing.

I agree NO ONE says you are gaming Splatoon, you are playing Splatoon, but you are gaming. Basically my point is you don't have to use the same words, verb for everything or label yourself as something in particular.

Personally I consider myself a gamer, because I like gaming, meaning I like playing games, but I'm don't think that makes me a player.
 
LOL, quit complaining. Being a gamer used to be alot geekier in the 80's when I was still heavily into it. Nowdays cool people are playing games too so it ain't as geeky as you imply.
 
Games have very much defined and inspired me in terms of wanting to be someone creative. I love games and have learned quite a deal about myself from playing them. As someone who avidly plays them, I don't really care about whatever specific "common" term is associated with those who regularly get involved in the medium.

If people want to call me a gamer or use the word... sure. I won't hold umbrage to that fact. It's not an explicitly negative term and if people are trying to use that against me as if it's my entire character, well then that's their pejorative really. On the other hand if they want to call me a game player or just player, alright, I'm down with that too. Negative connotations of the sort being applied in media in my opinion has less to do with the term itself and more to do with games still being a young and heavily evolving medium compared to other mediums such as film, books and music, and even if it might have been rooted with negative intent this was something clearly an entire gaming landscape was ready to own.
 
I already do this

Movie --> viewer, not movier
Book --> reader, not booker
Music --> listener, not musicer
Game --> player, not gamer

It's the linguistically correct way to refer to the person engaging in this activity. That's besides all the associations with mountain dew and angry teens.
.

Hey we can't say linguistically correct and get the context wrong :P

When you watch a movie, you're the viewer.
When you read the book, you're the reader.
etc.

So when you refer your hobby, gaming, it doesn't work like that.

People who watch movies are known as cinephiles, and people who listen to music are audiophiles...

But I really doubt you want to call yourself a videogamephile or any similar term. lmao
 
You are making tons of false equivalencies.

I gave this example before but I'll give it again, my mom plays some world game on her phone. She wouldn't call herself a gamer. Because gamer has a certain connotation and it isn't "everyone who plays games". As much as you want it to mean that it simply doesn't.

The gamer term is associated with "gamer culture" without a doubt. There's a reason it's called gamer culture to begin with.

And, as we have established, I read books but I'm not a bookworm or a book reader because reading is just a normal thing that, at a certain level, doesn't define you. I also listen to a ton of music but I have no name for it and if I do is associated with the type of music I listen to and not the fact that is music.

Making comparison to sports (for some reason) or with stuff that has nothing to do with that doesn't make what I'm saying less true.

The term gamer has a meaning and a weight behind it even if you don't want it to have. My dad played all Tomb Raider games, if you ask him he wouldn't say he is a gamer. Because that term isn't used in that context. It's exclusive and it makes it seem like you have to define yourself with video-games to even enjoy it. Which is bollocks and not something that anyone should defend.

If you're going to say my examples don't count the very least you could do is explain why.

It doesn't matter what your dad calls himself, that has 0 effect on what the word means. It literally means 'someone who plays games'. I don't get how you think there's anything more to it than that. Someone who gambles is a gambler. It doesn't matter if they only gambling they do is once a month playing poker with friends, all that matters is that they gamble. If someone had brown hair, they're a brunette wether they call themselves that or not.

It's exclusive and it makes it seem like you have to define yourself with video-games to even enjoy it. Which is bollocks and not something that anyone should defend.

This is the part that continues to blow my mind. It's got nothing to do with defining yourself. People keep saying that and it's utter nonsense. If I describe myself as tall, I'm not saying or implying that being tall is what makes me who I am. If so said I was a stamp collector, that doesn't mean I don't have other hobbies or interests. Or if I say I'm blonde that doesn't mean I'm dumb because of a stupid stereotype. You are literally changing what the word means just to suit the argument. It is a description, not a bloody label that defines who you are as a person like you're making out. It's a term that means one specific thing, just like many other terms like golfer, thrill seeker, metal head, and thousands of others. Just because we don't have similar words for someone who watches movies or reads books doesn't mean we should stop using this one. That's like saying we should stop calling football players footballers because we don't call tennis players tennisers.

You are the one that has this weird, mind boggling view that some how this one word has this deeper, and potentially negative meaning when t is absolutely no different than the thousands of other words we use daily to name the collective group of people who tick a certain box. Pensioner, brunette, theif, driver, foodie, socialite, carpenter, painter, guitarist, photographer, gamer. They all just mean 'someone who ticks this box'. You thinking that gamer is different and somehow means more, or something especially negative, is your own problem. It's nothing to do with the actually word or what it means.
 
I hate both, what's wrong with just being labelled nerds ? chances are if you're into video games and are on a site like GAF you indulge in other Nerd fields, like tech, comic books, anime, collectibles figurines, D&D and so on.
 
No, I'm a gamer. I don't get the angst about this word. Don't like it? Don't use it, but don't turn around and request it be abolished. If people want to be called or call others gamers than let them for crying out loud.
 
I hate both, what's wrong with just being labelled nerds ? chances are if you're into video games and are on a site like GAF you indulge in other Nerd fields, like tech, comic books, anime, collectibles figurines, D&D and so on.
Because not everyone who plays games is a nerd? It's just a hobby. Not like my life revolves around them.
 
1. Your OP is actually kind of WHY we use "Gamer". They can use it as a derogatory term all they like, we're changing the meaning of it as there are more of us than of them.

2. The term "player" already has a quite prevalent slang meaning that most people would definitely recognize more so, which makes it a very poor choice to switch to.
 
Top Bottom