Are early screenings first come first serve?You know, I just realized I'm planning to, potentially, stand in line by myself for four hours tomorrow.
I... I better bring a mason jar to piss in.
Thought it was that Twitter link.
Are early screenings first come first serve?You know, I just realized I'm planning to, potentially, stand in line by myself for four hours tomorrow.
I... I better bring a mason jar to piss in.
Are early screenings first come first serve?
Thought it was that Twitter link.
But I would've still needed to have signed up for that thing right (which I can no longer do)?It is both. Early screenings are free so they are able to give out about 2-3 times as many "tickets" to ensure that they end up with a full house.
Why are you in the review thread if you're scared to click on a link that's labeled a review?I didn't click it because I'm afraid of spoilers, sometimes, I find it that people who don't like a movie don't care much about dishing out spoilers without warning.
so it's a joke review? is it safe to watch? for laughs?
That's because the movie is well-received so far & we don't have much else to discuss until the next waves of reviews drop tomorrow.Hahaha. This thread. Not as great as the bat v supes meltdown but still fun none the less
But I would've still needed to have signed up for that thing right (which I can no longer do)?
Its still 100% right?
OK, its only like 6 hours open... But damn.If not in real life, then in our hearts
(Yes out of 14 reviews it's still 100%)
I have no problem reading review. I'm just a bit more wary toward negative review, because I've seen a couple negative review toward other movie or games where the reviewer really didn't care for the movie/game that they openly mention spoilers without warning. While at least for positive reviews, I find it that the reviewer usually like the movie enough that they don't want to ruin it for other people and take extra care not to mention potential spoilers.Why are you in the review thread if you're scared to click on a link that's labeled a review?
I think we'll get another batch tomorrow or at least by the weekendOK, its only like 6 hours open... But damn.
I think this evening we could get the first realistic score? Since it cant be that good, right?
When do you guys bring up Iron Man 3?
I mean, we all know that the score will begin to dip & eventually level out at some point. But for now, the fact that we're at 100% for this long kinda fuels our hype. So for now, it's kinda fun to bask in said hype.
When we are done with our Thor 2 discussion, dammit!
When we are done with our Thor 2 discussion, dammit!
I'd say the vast majority of the reviews are judging the movie absolutely on its own merits with some references to BvS because movies don't exist in a vacuum. The action, character development, and all that is the same whether or not BvS existed or not.Seems like this movie is getting a noticeable bump on the review scorecard for not being Batman vs Superman.
When everything evens out and it is judged on its own merits it will be interesting if it holds up vs Winter Soilder or not
I'd say the vast majority of the reviews are judging the movie absolutely on its own merits with some references to BvS because movies don't exist in a vacuum. The action, character development, and all that is the same whether or not BvS existed or not.
Of course, when the second major superhero movie of 2016 releases mere weeks ago, it would seem silly to expect reviews to not mention it in some shape or form. (ie. Mad Max Fury Road reviews mentioning Furious 7, which had released the month before, since they're both vehicular action movies but with different approaches)
I guess the part of the fan base that hates Iron Man 3 along with the part that liked Iron Man 3 counteracts to reach the mediocrity levels found in Thor 2. Personally I'm on the team that though Iron Man 3 was great.
Thor 2 is a masterpiece, BvS is our generations Citizen Kane, IM3......who?
That should be plenty of time. I hopeGetting in line at 2:30pm tomorrow. 5 hours early. If I don't get in, the theater's going down with me.
Getting in line at 2:30pm tomorrow. 5 hours early. If I don't get in, the theater's going down with me.
Getting in line at 2:30pm tomorrow. 5 hours early. If I don't get in, the theater's going down with me.
Technically speaking we've already gotten 2 Amazing Spider-Man moviesThe most important thing will be, that after 12 fucking long years, we will finally get a amazing Spider-Man movie.
12
Fucking
Years.
San Fran. 4:30 would've been apt in Houston when I lived there but there's more people at these SF ones.What city? Hopefully we're not going to the same place.
I.... WTF did I just read???
The Marvel paychecks are flowing like and endless river of Milk and Honey!We got one more! 15! 15 out of 15 positive! Huzzah! Light the beacons! Oh joyous day!
San Fran. 4:30 would've been apt in Houston when I lived there but there's more people at these SF ones.
I didn't know there we're people who liked Thor 2 over the first one.
My MCU ranking would be as follows:
Great:
Iron Man
TWS
Iron Man 3
Good:
Captain America
GotG
Meh:
Antman
Avengers/AoU
Thor/Incredible Hulk
Crap:
Thor 2
Iron Man 2
Technically speaking we've already gotten 2 Amazing Spider-Man movies![]()
I think it'll definitely stay above 90%
I am a part of that camp. Thor 2 was pretty fun.I am in the small camp that actually really enjoyed Thor 2. It is a fun remake of Krull, even if the original is better.
I love the insinuation that Marvel pays off critics. Wouldn't it just be more cheaper and efficient to make a good movie?
I am a part of that camp. Thor 2 was pretty fun.
Isn't it just a meme? Or are there people out there that actually believe it?
Isn't it just a meme? Or are there people out there that actually believe it?