• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

China blasts U.S. 'rape and murder' at U.N. Human Rights Council

Status
Not open for further replies.

Walpurgis

Banned
China blasts U.S. 'rape and murder' at U.N. Human Rights Council
"The U.S. is notorious for prison abuse at Guantanamo prison, its gun violence is rampant, racism is its deep-rooted malaise," Chinese diplomat Fu Cong told the Council, using unusually blunt language.

"The United States conducts large-scale extra-territorial eavesdropping, uses drones to attack other countries' innocent civilians, its troops on foreign soil commit rape and murder of local people. It conducts kidnapping overseas and uses black prisons."

Fu was responding to a joint statement by the United States and 11 other countries, who criticised China's crackdown on human rights and its detentions of lawyers and activists.

"These actions are in contravention of China's own laws and international commitments," said U.S. Ambassador Keith Harper, who read out the statement backed by Australia, Japan and nine northern European countries.

"These extra-territorial actions are unacceptable, out of step with the expectations of the international community, and a challenge to the rule-based international order."
In China's crackdown, police have detained about 250 human rights lawyers, legal assistants, and activists since a nationwide crackdown began last July, although many have subsequently been released.
giphy.gif
 
While I agree with the criticism, I don't believe whataboutism is a good line of argument for China's own heinous record.
 
Difference being can a Chinese man speak those criticisms of China in China without government harassment?
America has its dirt, but at least you can call it out without being thrown in jail. (even if thats a relatively recent phenomenon in American history)
 
While I agree with the criticism, I don't believe whataboutism is a good line of argument for China's own heinous record.

At a certain point it does not matter anymore. At least not enough not to have this conversation based on who the sender is.

I'm not American, and I find this rhetoric to be a shorthand for deflecting from these accusations because China has a lousy record. You can be an appalling country and still have a good point.
In the case of China, they are not marketed as the best country of the world. There motto is not freedom and equality. That's not the case for America- A country which has raped and pillaged itself literally to becoming the sovereign self ruler of the world.
Wanting to call out the US on this and wanting them to reform doesn't have to mean anything more than a desire to simply seeing a country living up to its potential. The US doesn't have to be this way, because it is better than the road it has currently gone down in the last 35 years.
But on GAF and elsewhere you do have apologists who excuse Iraq, NSA, Drones and everything else is justified because of this perceived threat. It's all bullshit. You have a way bigger chance of being killed by guns than anyone from this war on terror. That doesn't mean the US hasn't engaged in genocidal killings that they have tried to keep hidden from the public..
 
Reminds me of the old Soviet defense - "And you are lynching negroes!"

Entirely true and entirely inconsequential in justifying human rights abuses.
 
In China if you say something the government doesn't like you get arrested

In America if you say something people don't like you get shot

Don't know which one I like more honestly
 
Difference being can a Chinese man speak those criticisms of China in China without government harassment?
America has its dirt, but at least you can call it out without being thrown in jail. (even if thats a relatively recent phenomenon in American history)

The U.S. was pretty rough with Edward Snowden. Here is the 2015 World Press Freedom Index.

USA - #49
In the United States, 2014 was marked by judicial harassment of New York Times investigative reporter James Risen in connection with the trial of Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA officer charged under the Espionage Act with giving him classified information. US journalists are still not protected by a federal shield law that would guarantee their right not to name their sources or reveal other confidential information about their work. Meanwhile, at least 15 journalists were arbitrarily arrested during clashes between police and demonstrators protesting against black teenager Michael Brown’s fatal shooting by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri.

Meanwhile, China is #176. :p

I just think that the U.S. needs to practice what it preaches.
 
The UNHRC is quite literally a gigantic troll-vehicle used by nations with shoddy human rights records. The only thing they agree on is criticising Israel (not hard when only the US is really willing to make excuses for them), otherwise any actual examination of human rights abuses is studiously avoided.

Example: Testimony by an NGO on the well-documented state oppression faced by atheists in a number of countries, including Saudi Arabia, is repeatedly interrupted when the Saudi delegate repeatedly throws a tantrum.
 
The U.S. was pretty rough with Edward Snowden. Here is the 2015 World Press Freedom Index.

USA - #49


Meanwhile, China is #176. :p

I just think that the U.S. needs to practice what it preaches.



Bradley Manning exposed mass murder hidden by the US military. It is staggering to me how many Americans actually believe that he deserves to sit in a dungeon from exposing the inexcusable fuckup that has never been addressed or apologized for before (to my knowledge.)
It's one of those myths that people like him and Snowden leaked information, that doing that supposedly "endangered" US foreign sensitive interests like sleeper agents and such, despite the contrary having been confirmed time and time again- Except for one case, where a journalist didn't know how to use Microsoft Paint to censor bar sensitive information in an article.
This myth joins others like many Americans belief in the death penalty and that torture is an appropriate use of force, despite the fact that all evidence shows tha neither the death penalty or torture causes effective results.
The belief that these things work are mental constructs. The Anti-Snowden/Manning rhetoric is a completely different beast though. I don't quite understand the reasons behind it, but I find it bonkers that so many people are defending Obama and Hillarys stance on them.
I find it in an act of evil that you want to give yourself a free pass when you commit genocide. It's not up for the debate that the US military haven't purposely tried to cover a lot of this shit up.
The difference is that Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib are much more marketable with pictures that makes those programs harder to defend. Manning is spending most of his life in isolation. Something the UN has deemed in and of itself, an act of torture.
 
In China if you say something the government doesn't like you get arrested

In America if you say something people don't like you get shot

Don't know which one I like more honestly

In Europe if you say something people don't like you get stabbed

In Australia if you say something a kangaroo doesn't like you get strangled to death

Exaggerating/making shit up is fun.
 
In Europe if you say something people don't like you get stabbed

In Australia if you say something a kangaroo doesn't like you get strangled to death

Exaggerating/making shit up is fun.

How About No

This has to be a joke.


Ok I might have been a little hyperbolic about my country's problems here. You don't actually have to say or do anything at all to get shot. Like a leg cramp, it just sorta happens!
 
lol

Are you saying change hasn't happened? Are you saying we can't talk about it?

I say that on some fronts change has not happened and conversation in the public sphere about these things is near impossible, yes. Still killing people and overthrowing governments of countries that are not yours like it's 1973, still supporting big business exploitation of poor development countries like it's 1987.

Now don't spin this into thinking I thus condone China's behavior, they're the same.
 
Well that's not wrong but I don't think the Chinese government can talk about human rights...

Yup, there's almost always going to be some level of hypocracy when governments call each other out on something, but China is one of the least qualified countries to talk about any of this.

Even Hong Kong isn't safe any more, some publishers linked to anti-Chinese Government publications "mysteriously" vanished and wound up days later in custody in mainland China.
 
When I tried to make an actually reply of some sort, the technology I was trying to make it from intentionally "fucks up" to silence me from speaking against/up about certain things. "Funny", that. Intentional "failures".
 
Bradley Manning exposed mass murder hidden by the US military. It is staggering to me how many Americans actually believe that he deserves to sit in a dungeon from exposing the inexcusable fuckup that has never been addressed or apologized for before (to my knowledge.)
It's one of those myths that people like him and Snowden leaked information, that doing that supposedly "endangered" US foreign sensitive interests like sleeper agents and such, despite the contrary having been confirmed time and time again- Except for one case, where a journalist didn't know how to use Microsoft Paint to censor bar sensitive information in an article.
This myth joins others like many Americans belief in the death penalty and that torture is an appropriate use of force, despite the fact that all evidence shows tha neither the death penalty or torture causes effective results.
The belief that these things work are mental constructs. The Anti-Snowden/Manning rhetoric is a completely different beast though. I don't quite understand the reasons behind it, but I find it bonkers that so many people are defending Obama and Hillarys stance on them.
I find it in an act of evil that you want to give yourself a free pass when you commit genocide. It's not up for the debate that the US military haven't purposely tried to cover a lot of this shit up.
The difference is that Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib are much more marketable with pictures that makes those programs harder to defend. Manning is spending most of his life in isolation. Something the UN has deemed in and of itself, an act of torture.
Good post. I can't believe I forgot about her. She uncovered footage of U.S. soldiers playing with a mini gun and murdering a Reuters reporter. It really is rather scary that there are so many willing to defend such things due to nationalism.

At everyone else, there's really no question that China has a horrible human rights record. They were called out by a bunch of countries in the OP. However, the Chinese diplomat has pointed out that there is a hypocrite among those countries. That country is the U.S. The U.S. is rather unique in the West in this regard.

Does it not bother you that your country preaches freedom, equality and human rights but ignores all of these things? I find that many turn a blind eye to the ugly truth. Everyone in the west knows about China but not everyone knows about the U.S.'s darkness.

I find it amusing and even cathartic that the country with one of the worst human rights records on this Earth can call the U.S. out as hypocrites on human rights and actually be right.
 
Difference being can a Chinese man speak those criticisms of China in China without government harassment?
America has its dirt, but at least you can call it out without being thrown in jail. (even if thats a relatively recent phenomenon in American history)

Both of them suck, but only one of them pretend to be morally superior. For decades America has preach being better than most countries and recent events are showing America has no leg to stand on. you cannot preach human rights violations when you are doing the same crap.
 
Both of them suck, but only one of them pretend to be morally superior. For decades America has preach being better than most countries and recent events are showing America has no leg to stand on. you cannot preach human rights violations when you are doing the same crap.
Not to mention the fact that they use "human rights violations" as pretexts for invasions and as an excuse to impose economic sanctions against countries that they don't like. Meanwhile, they give their bedfellows like Saudi Arabia a free pass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom