• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Club where girl, 12, stripped will keep license

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can believe than a 13 year old girl or so can look over the age limit. I mean, there are a whole hell of a lot of girls over the age limit who looks really young (like the girl from that pedo movie). Personally, I think it is just as weird to go after a girl who looks young even if she is legal. Pedos confused me sometimes, I wonder if its banging a young looking girl that makes them happy or banging a girl who says is under the age limit happy? because on the dateline pedo show they use 18+ girls who fool thesee pedos into thinking they are about to bang a 14 year old girl, so if they are getting turned on by that, what stops them from just going out and banging young looking girls legally? confusing stuff.

kozmo7 said:
What was the number rule again?

Your age x 1 - half your age? Er, no wait, that's the pedo rule

I thought the pedo rule was anything older than the size of your penis in inches?
 
200px-601_image_21.jpg


Its my hot body. I do what I want!
 
my name is ed said:
he banged someone two years younger I think? thats not being a dumbass. Being 18+ and banging a 13 year old is. This reminds me of that guy who has that "she swallowed that shit. Im clean" tag. He had a girl give him a bj and she was younger than he thought she was.
That's what made me join GAF
 
Linkzg said:
I can believe than a 13 year old girl or so can look over the age limit. I mean, there are a whole hell of a lot of girls over the age limit who looks really young (like the girl from that pedo movie). Personally, I think it is just as weird to go after a girl who looks young even if she is legal. Pedos confused me sometimes, I wonder if its banging a young looking girl that makes them happy or banging a girl who says is under the age limit happy? because on the dateline pedo show they use 18+ girls who fool thesee pedos into thinking they are about to bang a 14 year old girl, so if they are getting turned on by that, what stops them from just going out and banging young looking girls legally? confusing stuff.



I thought the pedo rule was anything older than the size of your penis in inches?

Most of the time its because they missed out on girls during their time period of when they were that age.
 
DarthWaiter said:
My philosophy is:

Old enough to be 7, old enough to be ate.

Old enough to drive, young enough to thrive.

If there's grass on the field, playball.

If there's no grass, play in the dirt.
i'd like to add to this, something far more simple:
how many beers does it take?
 
viakado said:
i'd like to add to this, something far more simple:
how many beers does it take?

I'll offer my philosophy on that ongoing saying of "i'd hit that after a six pack".

If you ever say you would screw a girl after a certain amount of beers, it really means you would fuck her anyways, but its just a shoe-out around your friends to say that you think she's sorta ugly when deep down you find something about them attractive.
 
viakado said:
i'd like to add to this, something far more simple:
how many beers does it take?
for the heavier drinkers it would probably need to be divided by two.
like me (19), in order to bang a 16 year old would need ....like 10 beers. so actually, divide by 3
 
Linkzg said:
I thought the pedo rule was anything older than the size of your penis in inches?

Now you're saying 2 year olds are fair game? You sick fuck
 
I will clarify a bit more:

I've very exquisite taste in women, out of 100 adult women considered generally hot, I'd find at most one or two that suit my tastes. That does not change when it comes to teenagers, out of 100 generally considered hot girls, I'd find one or two to my tastes. Prepubescent, zero attraction.

Given that I've no preference in terms of age, with the exception of the ability to postpone healthy reproduction for longer. It seems that I'm within what most of humanity finds and has found since time immemorial attractive.

Furthermore my evidence for tolerating consensual sex among teenagers, is based on the fact that the majority of the data indicates there is no short nor long term psychological harm, to consensual sex with protection. Physically it is basically a fact, that there is no physical harm, and that on the contrary having sex is very good both psychologically and physiologically for the individuals involved.

On what exactly do those opposed to this base their beliefs, or moral compass on? It definitely ain't science, nor reason, and I'm sorry but primitive scientifically unfounded irrational belief and moral systems have no place in this world.

Gut feelings can go the way of the dodo for all I care. There are many people who are also opposed to consexual sex between blood related adults, even when protection is taken and there is no chance for reproduction. There is no rational basis for such beliefs or feelings.
 
HotByCold said:
I've seen plenty of 12-13 year olds that look like 20.

This particular girl claimed to be 17 years old when I banged her but turned out to be 13 years old:

2nqr1cg.jpg


It's not that easy nowadays.

Uhh, that girl looks younger than every college freshman I saw in my last year of college.
 
... said:
:lol


Most teenagers are already sexually active, nice try bub. But we're not talking prepubescent kids here. 18 in some countries 16 in others, and even lower in still others. And you honestly can't really tell when they're close to those arbitrary barriers due to differences in development. So how many 18 years old are you saying should shoot themselves for having sex with their 17 year old girlfriends? 17 year olds with 16 year olds? 16 year olds with 15 year olds?

Studies have been done, if protection is used there is no psychological damage in the short nor long term. Your conservative laws have no basis, but religious anti-sexual fundamentalist overly conservative moral rules derived from the writings of deranged uneducated primitive men millenia ago(who likely scored with many a 15 year old and even lower, just look at Muhammed for example.), the irony.
First, I´m pretty sure most people won´t flip because teenagers are having sex with someone aroud their age, that´s not the point.
So, please don´t use with this as an excuse to justify why you think it´s ok for a 30, 45 or 63 years-old to prey a 15 years-old, or a 14, or a 12 maybe (you know yours "arbitrary barriers due to differences in development"). Unless, of course, you have some study to back that, which I doubt.
And sorry I´m an atheist.
So there´s no "religious anti-sexual fundamentalist overly conservative moral rules derived from the writings of deranged uneducated primitive men millenia ago". Unless of course, if, for you, any reasonable law to live in a social enviroment that come to be similar to the ones in myth books are always "fundamentalist overly conservative moral rules derived from the writings of deranged uneducated primitive men millenia ago".
And why are you attacking this Muhammed guy, calling him uneducated, primitive? You seem to share the same preferences for teens! The irony!

... said:
The world needs change, and there is a reason why people like me are given power, enough to bring about such change. Save your bullets for the real psychos.
Great, so your using all your given power to have sex with teens.
I´d use it to ease hunger or help development of Science. But, then again, I´m not people like you.

... said:
As for my extreme measures, in the eyes of some:

I'm a survivalist, the ability to survive even super-volcano long winter, meteor long winter, and even nuclear winter is within my grasp. ;)
I would prefer that such did not happen for I like the improvements of the human condition. But if such happened, I'd be the least of your problems. Theft, rape, murder, torture, slavery would go rampant amongst the survivors in some areas, human rights and most laws would go down the toilet.
The end in 2000... errr...2012 is aroud the corner! Be prepared! And yeah, pedos raping teens/kids would be a problem in some areas too! Better buy more bullets!
Hey better check if all your electronic device detection equipment is working. Who knows who is reading this tread.
 
... said:
I think if there was growth hormone added to increase height, a very high fat diet, especially with chicken filled with human-hormone-like-substance (read about the male truck drivers with boobs and lactating due to too much cheap fried chicken filled with hormone-like substances) from childhood accelerating puberty by 3+ years, and was exposed to heavy smoking from their parents deteriorating the skin's quality significantly and making it look older with a few spots and wrinkles...

It is possible a twelve year old could pass for a 20+ year old, and most here would bang her.(READ PRECEDING PARAGRAPH FOR CLARIFICATION) Of course she'd have to lose weight to be accepted at most any strip club or on a date with most people.

But personally, I don't buy the whole "jailbait" BS, these are primitive religious nut overly conservative laws, if a teenager looks hot, she looks hot. With adequate protection, there is really no problem with consensual sex, if you ask me. AND AFAIK it is not illegal to go out and have a significant relationship with someone under 18 so long as you don't have sex. And good luck proving the latter in a strong long term monogamous relationship when protection is used, without some major invasion of privacy :lol .

You simply can't do it without basically tossing the constitution out the window. Neither partner will betray the other, and there won't be physical evidence. Smart people also use electronic device detection equipment before carrying out any activity, so no hidden fbi surveillance for you. Combined with infrared blocking bed sheets, and steel reinforced doors, you ain't breaking in and catching them in the act either. Tough luck carrying out your antiquated laws.

Laws against anal sex, and homosexual sex fell down through time, these ones will fall too, in time they will come crashing down.

um what the fuck. There is more to it than physical harm you cock sucker. Lets talk about the emotional harm for a few minutes, shall we?
 
... said:
words and more words
I highly doubt you will find more than 8 conservative people on GAF. The maturity levels are what should stop or encourage people to engage in consensual sex. A 13 year old is nowhere near as mature as an 18 year old. Also, you sound like you think highly of yourself. Also you keep saying there is no psychological harm based on evidence but where is this evidence?
 
my name is ed said:
I highly doubt you will find more than 8 conservative people on GAF. The maturity levels are what should stop or encourage people to engage in consensual sex. A 13 year old is nowhere near as mature as an 18 year old. Also, you sound like you think highly of yourself. Also you keep saying there is no psychological harm based on evidence but where is this evidence?
it's just some harmless sex.
chill dude
 
Youta Mottenai said:
First, I´m pretty sure most people won´t flip because teenagers are having sex with someone aroud their age, that´s not the point.
So, please don´t use with this as an excuse to justify why you think it´s ok for a 30, 45 or 63 years-old to prey a 15 years-old, or a 14, or a 12 maybe (you know yours "arbitrary barriers due to differences in development"). Unless, of course, you have some study to back that, which I doubt.
Besides the many tribes and cultures where it is allowed for men to have relationships and marriage with teenage girls and such societies do not collapse, and many of such women turn out happy and psychologically fine. There are many studies of children even a small percentage of babies engages in sexual play, and turn out fine as adults. There are also studies of communities that allow sexual play amongst children, and they turn out fine.


The fact is that thanks to tissue engineering + knowledge of the genetic basis of negligible senescence in animals. Ageless young skin will very likely be made available within this century, anti-aging research and medical advances will also exponentiall increase lifespan, with such it is very likely that you will see 50+ year olds that look like they're 18 and if they desire even younger. Their tissues will also very likely be of such biological ages.

And sorry I´m an atheist.
Nice, but that is not the case for the majority of the society in which you live, and the social pressure and information has had an influence on you. The reality is in societies where this is condoned, most condone it and accept it, even atheists. You just happen to be socially influenced by such primitive moral and irrational systems, especially during childhood development.


Muhammed guy, calling him uneducated, primitive? You seem to share the same preferences for teens! The irony!

I use him as an example of the way the religious contradict the actions of the founders of their religions, banging a 9 year old, who by all accounts ended up a happy fulfilled woman with no psychological trauma. Many of the apostles, and the early leaders of the christian church probably banged their fare share of teenagers too.
Great, so your using all your given power to have sex with teens.
I´d use it to ease hunger or help development of Science. But, then again, I´m not people like you.
No I wouldn't have sex with a teenage girl, unless she insisted on it and couldn't be convinced out of it, I'm patient I can wait for them to pass these ridiculous arbitrary barriers(precaution against law enforcement, there obviously ain't no harm in consensual sex before the 18 birthday in a strong monogamous long term relationship with protection.).

The end in 2000... errr...2012 is aroud the corner! Be prepared! And yeah, pedos raping teens/kids would be a problem in some areas too! Better buy more bullets!
Hey better check if all your electronic device detection equipment is working. Who knows who is reading this tread.

Photorealistic graphic will cripple the laws in the realm of information, or else constitutional freedoms will have to be lost, and that is just around the corner. Later this century, when even old people are biologically indistinguishable from teens, the laws will fall too in the physical realm.
 
Holy fucking shit this is a fucked up thread. I don't think there's ever been a thread on Gaf where so many fucking pedo's have come out before.
 
bluemax said:
um what the fuck. There is more to it than physical harm you cock sucker. Lets talk about the emotional harm for a few minutes, shall we?
for consensual sex? :lol

I'll give you that if it is with a psychopathic manipulative @sshole or b!tch that could cause some real damage. Heck, that can cause damage and even suicidal thoughts and actions even in adults.

But in a real normal longterm relationship with consensual sex, being what's debated here, and even allowing for them to have the initiative, and only if they've been previously sexually active, and using protection? Good luck proving that, when all the data points otherwise. There are plenty of 15 year olds that have dated and even married 18 year olds and lived for decades together happily ever after. Even some convicted adults, resume their romantic relationship and marry after getting out of jail. So what was the point of sending them to jail in the first place?
 
EternalDarko said:
Holy fucking shit this is a fucked up thread. I don't think there's ever been a thread on Gaf where so many fucking pedo's have come out before.

i'd say that every person in this thread is a pedo, because reading news about a 12 year old stripper obviously peaked your interest.
 
my name is ed said:
I highly doubt you will find more than 8 conservative people on GAF. The maturity levels are what should stop or encourage people to engage in consensual sex. A 13 year old is nowhere near as mature as an 18 year old. Also, you sound like you think highly of yourself. Also you keep saying there is no psychological harm based on evidence but where is this evidence?
Are you claiming that throughout the ages there's been long term highly negative psychological trauma across the countless cultures, and that the many cultures that still allow below 18 sex and marriage are all psychologically disturbed?

If sex between a 17 and an 18 year old, is ok. Sex between a 40+ year old and a 17 year old, is not too different from that. You're claiming that the added years somehow result in psychological trauma that wouldn't have occured otherwise. Which is BS.

Things like the westermarck effect explain why a large chunk of gaf is probably against consensual incestual sex amongst adults. Evolution put it there, that disgust feeling, but it doesn't cease to be an irrational and primitive belief that has no place in this world. I believe consensual sex amongst blood related adults is perfectly fine so long as no reproduction is involved.

Had this society condoned sex with teenagers, gaf would be filled with people who would accept the reality of what science and reason tells us. But having many family members and friends, that would go bonkers at the thought of condoning such, influenced them strongly throughout their childhood, adolescent and adult years.
 
... said:
If sex between a 17 and an 18 year old, is ok. Sex between a 40+ year old and a 17 year old, is not too different from that. You're claiming that the added years somehow result in psychological trauma that wouldn't have occured otherwise. Which is BS.

I'd be more concerned about the 'added' girth on a 40 year old's knob that sends the tight little 17 year old's honey pot to the ER crying for stitches...
 
:/

You guys are really making a big fuss over nothing. Shit happens, it gets revealed on the internet, everyone moves on. Jesus, its not like the guy RAPED HER AGAINST HER WILL or something. And on top of that, I don't know about you, but if what he says is true, then clearly US sentiments and laws don't apply to Sweden.

Really, this thread got so off topic.

oh, and just for the record, I believe the calculation for the creepiness silver lining is your age divided by 2, plus 7.
 
ForzaItalia said:
I'd be more concerned about the 'added' girth on a 40 year old's knob that sends the tight little 17 year old's honey pot to the ER crying for stitches...
?
There are 17 year olds with pretty large and thick organs. There are also plenty of 40+ year olds with tiny members. Hope you didn't expect increased size with advancing age.

A healthy 40+ year old will be within adequate weight parameters, and organ performance will not match the 17 year old.

Also I should add that I believe in naturism, which is also know as nudism. So a 12 year old getting naked is nothing to cry a river about. The fact that she performs a few sexy moves while naked is no big deal IMHO. There are plenty of dances, where grinding and extreme sexual in nature moves are performed by 12 year olds and it is considered fine and legal behavior. Her performing moves that are sexual in nature while naked, is no big deal.

The problem is this society also has the clothing and body issues that HURT PSYCHOLOGICALLY MANY TEENAGE GIRLS AND FORCE MANY TO COMMIT SUICIDE. But body acceptance which goes in hand with naturism, is obviously seeing as taboo despite being healthier and better psychologically for girls.


I mean just look at the way some people are riled up over a girl getting naked and performing moves that are likely less sexual in nature than those she might have in a modern day party.
 
Gig said:
It looks like Mandy Moore, I think.

I never found out who the old girl was. :( Who!?

And yes, fucked up thread. But I will admit that the photo girl looks at least 15/16 in my opinion. Definitely not college, but I would guess high school by the looks.

Also, I assume she is Swedish, and maybe it is just me, but Swedish people tend to look more mature or something to me. /shrug
 
... said:
?
There are 17 year olds with pretty large and thick organs. There are also plenty of 40+ year olds with tiny members. Hope you didn't expect increased size with advancing age.

A healthy 40+ year old will be within adequate weight parameters, and organ performance will not match the 17 year old.

ima go ahead and say it. I've made many girls cry either from them being 15 or 35.
 
bluemax said:
Uhh, that girl looks younger than every college freshman I saw in my last year of college.
She looks easily 17-18 there. And I sometimes see them all the time (18 year old sister with shitloads of friends).
 
... said:
Besides the many tribes and cultures where it is allowed for men to have relationships and marriage with teenage girls and such societies do not collapse, and many of such women turn out happy and psychologically fine. There are many studies of children even a small percentage of babies engages in sexual play, and turn out fine as adults. There are also studies of communities that allow sexual play amongst children, and they turn out fine.

Strange, you talk about a lot of "studies" but till now haven´t showed any. And at first it was about 17, 16 years-old. Now even babies are fair game. Again, according to these studies, that you didn´t show.

... said:
The fact is that thanks to tissue engineering + knowledge of the genetic basis of negligible senescence in animals. Ageless young skin will very likely be made available within this century, anti-aging research and medical advances will also exponentiall
increase lifespan, with such it is very likely that you will see 50+ year olds that look like they're 18 and if they desire even younger. Their tissues will also very likely be of such biological ages.
So why worry to have sex with a teen if you can have legal sex with someone who looks young, again?

... said:
Nice, but that is not the case for the majority of the society in which you live, and the social pressure and information has had an influence on you. The reality is in societies where this is condoned, most condone it and accept it, even atheists. You just happen to be socially influenced by such primitive moral and irrational systems, especially during childhood development.
So when my parents told me to not talk to strangers, they were primitive and irrational? And I thought that it was they cared about me.
So once again where are the studies that say that a 45 years-old preying on teens is ok?
Since I don´t want to be called irrational primitive.


... said:
I use him as an example of the way the religious contradict the actions of the founders of their religions, banging a 9 year old, who by all accounts ended up a happy fulfilled woman with no psychological trauma. Many of the apostles, and the early leaders of the christian church probably banged their fare share of teenagers too.
How do you know she ended happy? Your source is the same you called "the writings of deranged uneducated primitive men". So you´re like any religious people, take the part that fits your views, discard the dirty rest.


... said:
No I wouldn't have sex with a teenage girl, unless she insisted on it and couldn't be convinced out of it, I'm patient I can wait for them to pass these ridiculous arbitrary barriers(precaution against law enforcement, there obviously ain't no harm in consensual sex before the 18 birthday in a strong monogamous long term relationship with protection.)
Obviously, how could an adult convince a teen to not have sex with him? I see, it´s the teen´s fault, right?
Strange, some posts ago you were the powerful guy who is going to bring change so pedos could fuck teens without having to worry about high-tech anti-surveilance systems. Now you have to wait? And so it´s ok if a 12 years-old have sex with a 52 year-old if it´s "in a strong monogamous long term relationship with protection".



... said:
Photorealistic graphic will cripple the laws in the realm of information, or else constitutional freedoms will have to be lost, and that is just around the corner. Later this century, when even old people are biologically indistinguishable from teens, the laws will fall too in the physical realm.
So having sex with kids is a constitutional right?
 
... said:
Are you claiming that throughout the ages there's been long term highly negative psychological trauma across the countless cultures, and that the many cultures that still allow below 18 sex and marriage are all psychologically disturbed?
If sex between a 17 and an 18 year old, is ok. Sex between a 40+ year old and a 17 year old, is not too different from that. You're claiming that the added years somehow result in psychological trauma that wouldn't have occured otherwise. Which is BS.
I can play that game too..
So you're saying theres no difference between a 17 and 40 year old men? Holy shit, better let everyone know that all those immature as hell 17 year olds can manage themselves and a family!
Don't put words in my mouth. To be fair, its not like women could have let it known there was psych trauma seeing as they are historically been hushed. Even these days, it is thought that a portion of women who are raped never report it. If that goes unreported, Im sure there would be other things to be reported. To me, 17 is the age where you should be considered an adult. You've lived long enough to suffer consequences of bad decisions.


Things like the westermarck effect explain why a large chunk of gaf is probably against consensual incestual sex amongst adults. Evolution put it there, that disgust feeling, but it doesn't cease to be an irrational and primitive belief that has no place in this world. I believe consensual sex amongst blood related adults is perfectly fine so long as no reproduction is involved.
I thought it was well known why incest was bad. For some reason, you seem to be disregarding that many people are against abortion. If someone does get preggers from a family member and doesnt believe in abortion then it becomes a problem

Had this society condoned sex with teenagers, gaf would be filled with people who would accept the reality of what science and reason tells us. But having many family members and friends, that would go bonkers at the thought of condoning such, influenced them strongly throughout their childhood, adolescent and adult years.
How about you give some of us merit when it comes to individual thinking. I go against a whole lot of what my parents thought, and if you hadn't either, I highly doubt you would be saying what you are right now. Also, no matter what, sex will always be tied with romantic relationships. I really couldn't imagine a relationship with someone who is volatile as most teenagers. I dont see why you seem to isolate sex when you need to include all that comes with it like emotional attachment and possible pregnancies
 
I'm still under 18 by a few months so if Hotbycold could uh send a pm.....


And on topic: WHAT THE FUCK GAF. A pedo is someone who is attracted to those who look young. Being aroused by a 12 year who looks old does not make you PEDO. That said it is illegal to bang them unless you are of close age (check your state laws).
 
ForzaItalia said:
I'd be more concerned about the 'added' girth on a 40 year old's knob that sends the tight little 17 year old's honey pot to the ER crying for stitches...
I honestly don't know how you are still here.
 
kozmo7 said:
What was the number rule again?

Your age x 1 - half your age? Er, no wait, that's the pedo rule

I believe it is:

Your age divided by 2 plus 7.


So a 24 year old can be with with a 19 year old.
40 with 27.
12 with 13?! (obviously it only works for higher ages)
 
DarthWaiter said:
i'd say that every person in this thread is a pedo, because reading news about a 12 year old stripper obviously peaked your interest.

By Thor! I read some topic about murder. I´m must be murderer.
Hey I like to watch Law & Order and L&O SVU. Now I´m a crook, robber, assassin, rapist, wife abuser too.

Why do pedos always get pissed and play the victims of the lack of understanding of the society card when they are called about their behaviour?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom