blame space
Banned
Buckeye D is out for blood
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
College Football 2010-11 Bowls: *
- Thread starter Cyan
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
devildog820
Member
mYm|17| said:acc refs..................sooooooo good :lol
Jack Childress did our game. I thought Foley swore never to allow that to happen again after the 2003 UF-FSU game.
Rodeo Clown
All aboard! The Love train!
Yeah, given he broke the tackle, I don't have a problem with the call.Tamanon said:Um, he broke the tackle so forward progress is where he resumes the play, yah that's a safety.
jjasper said:Cause he broke the tackle and started moving forward again.
But he was pushed into the endzone, don't like it.
BertramCooper
Banned
I cannot fucking believe this.
Ninja Scooter
Member
LJ11 said:How is that a safety?
he broke the tackle and kept going. If he had broken it for 20 yards you think Tressel would be asking for it to go back to the 1? Refs are way too giving with the forward progress anyway.
bucknuticus
Member
0-10....
devildog820
Member
LJ11 said:But he was pushed into the endzone, don't like it.
Yes, but still fighting. The refs always give a little leeway for the runner to break out.
Dreams-Visions
Member
it shouldn't have mattered. his forward progress had stopped and he never regained it.Talon- said:Ironic that it's a safety because he broke out of the initial tackle.
bad call.
and damn, Arkansas is gonna get some points here.
what does this mean?bucknuticus said:0-10....
blame space
Banned
fuck it i dont even like sugar i go diet soda all day
yellowjacket25
Member
He didn't even go forward, he just didn't fall down immediately after being pushed back 4 yards. That seems like a bad call.
BakedPigeon
Banned
that dude had the same chance to break the tackle for a touchdown as the defense had the same chance to make that safty. good call.
devildog820
Member
Dreams-Visions said:it shouldn't have mattered. his forward progress had stopped and he never regained it.
bad call.
and damn, Arkansas is gonna get some points here.
what does this mean?
He did go forward, just a bit, but that's all that matters. He regained momentum for a brief second and fucked everything up.
FrenchMovieTheme
Member
tough call on that safety, i could see it from both sides. guy should have just gone down and it would've been marked at the 1
marathonfool
Member
This type of call happens all the time with kickoff fumbles. Runner gets pushed backwards, someone rips the ball out, and it's a fumble.yellowjacket25 said:He didn't even go forward, he just didn't fall down immediately after being pushed back 4 yards. That seems like a bad call.
3 yards turned into 5-10 yard? :loldschalter said:no, they are not. pushing people back 5-10 yards back, especially with multiple guys is fucking stupid and can lead to tons of injuries. it should be discouraged, as much as possible.
yellowjacket25 said:He didn't even go forward, he just didn't fall down immediately after being pushed back 4 yards. That seems like a bad call.
same. i get why some might think it was the right call, but dude pushed him back 4 yards into the endzone and then fell down. i don't think it should've been a safety.
ToxicAdam said:Block in the back down the field? Looked like it in full speed.
I thought so too.
Ninja Scooter said:he broke the tackle and kept going. If he had broken it for 20 yards you think Tressel would be asking for it to go back to the 1? Refs are way too giving with the forward progress anyway.
no, they are not. pushing people back 5-10 yards back, especially with multiple guys is fucking stupid and can lead to tons of injuries. it should be discouraged, as much as possible.
devildog820
Member
dschalter said:people are saying he should have gone down and he should have, but there was no whistle, so going down in the EZ would look awful and might be a safety anyway.
Maybe, but he should've known he was out of the endzone and had forward progress. Would've been overturned had that been ruled a safety. Of course, when you're getting hit by multiple defenders, it might be hard to make great decisions all the time.
devildog820
Member
Who is Chimdi? I gather he's an important defender?
It would've been placed at the 2 in that case.dschalter said:people are saying he should have gone down and he should have, but there was no whistle, so going down in the EZ would look awful and might be a safety anyway.
These officials have let both lines play all game, but they've been alright on calls.
Dreams-Visions
Member
considering there were 3 red jerseys closing, the whistle should have been blown. it's not like he was going to evade 3 tacklers with no momentum in the fucking ENDZONE.devildog820 said:He did go forward, just a bit, but that's all that matters. He regained momentum for a brief second and fucked everything up.
it was a bad call, period. any ref team worth their salt would have blown the whistle when he was half way down with 0 momentum in the endzone.
BakedPigeon
Banned
Slurmer said:same. i get why some might think it was the right call, but dude pushed him back 4 yards into the endzone and then fell down. i don't think it should've been a safety.
So if he broke that tackle and did not fall down and ran for a 100 yard touchdown would you still consider stopping him on forward progress?
bucknuticus
Member
Our best cornerdevildog820 said:Who is Chimdi? I gather he's an important defender?
Dreams-Visions
Member
Arkansas kicker is a fucking machine.
devildog820
Member
Dreams-Visions said:considering there were 3 red jerseys closing, the whistle should have been blown. it's not like he was going to evade 3 tacklers with no momentum in the fucking ENDZONE.
it was a bad call, period. any ref team worth their salt would have blown the whistle when he was half way down with 0 momentum in the endzone.
It wasn't likely he would have evaded them, but refs don't make calls on the potential that his forward momentum would stop. He could've broken it for a touchdown.
edit: dammit! beaten!
devildog820 said:Who is Chimdi? I gather he's an important defender?
A corner from the state of Florida (where osu goes to get SPEED)
Dreams-Visions
Member
it's the pressure.mYm|17| said:don't understand why the razorbacks don't want to challenge this secondary more
edit: oh god. what the fuck OSU.
Ninja Scooter
Member
dschalter said:no, they are not. pushing people back 5-10 yards back, especially with multiple guys is fucking stupid and can lead to tons of injuries. it should be discouraged, as much as possible.
That's what I mean, in those instances its fine to call it, but I see too often where refs are quick to call forward progress or give runners an extra yard or two for fucking up and getting tackled backwards.
BakedPigeon said:So if he broke that tackle and did not fall down and ran for a 100 yard touchdown would you still consider stopping him on forward progress?
yes? the play should have been blown dead.
devildog820
Member
Lonestar said:A corner from the state of Florida (where osu goes to get SPEED)
Oh, he was the SEC speed. Got it.
Forward progress...Shick Brithouse said:That was almost another safety.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.