Dai101 said:Even women where badass then .....
gdt5016 said:Chicks have gotten so much hotter since then.
Evolution, baby.
ana said:Perhaps some of you already know that library of congress has a flickr stream of color pictures from 1930-40..
http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/sets/72157603671370361/
Also really old russian color photos from 1909-1912 by Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/
This looks almost 3D.. and it's almost hundred years old.. :-o
The Emir of Bukhara, Alim Khan (1880-1944), poses solemnly for his portrait, taken in 1911 shortly after his accession
![]()
Seth C said:Yeah, a man who died prematurely due to all the vile shit he ingested, due to "unknown causes" like cancer. Awesome.
SolKane said:there were still hotties back in the day:
GDGF said:Oh of course. Look at any pics of silent film starlets for example and you will see gorgeousness.
![]()
Woow 1911 looked pretty real back thenana said:The Emir of Bukhara, Alim Khan (1880-1944), poses solemnly for his portrait, taken in 1911 shortly after his accession
![]()
:O those eyes...... :Osubversus said:Ukraine, 2010
![]()
gdt5016 said:Chicks have gotten so much hotter since then.
Evolution, baby.
SolKane said:there were still hotties back in the day:
![]()
Trent Strong said:These pictures are about 70 years old.
subversus said:Ukraine, 2010
![]()
Hari Seldon said:Looking at those pics makes me realized how soft our society has become.
This is a MAN.
the_log_ride said:I spy an Adam's Apple.
Antimatter said:The clarity and sharpness between these types of cameras at the image sizes we're viewing are negligible. A large amount of the color pics in the link are actually taken with sheet film (ones with the grooves on the edges), which pulls in a huge amount of detail, the original scans are around 9000x7000 pixels, it's just that the op's source has the badly compressed and artifacted versions showing.
Javaman said:I don't care what kind of camera was used, there's going to be major fading of the pigments. That color intensity didn't come from the original, that's for sure.
ATF487 said:2) Parts of Connecticut and Massachusetts still look like that. Especially the Connecticut one on the sea, that could have been taken this year
Lionheart1827 said:![]()
Yup this is it. My memory was hazy but jeez, amazing shit.
qftbill0527 said:These people sacrificed their bodies to help build a country, where 70 years later, people could sit at a desk in their air conditioning and make fun of them.
JetBlackPanda said:Love these pictures!
this seems like the perfect place to pimp:
http://www.shorpy.com/
If you guys are interested in this kind of stuff I would recommend you take a look.
Lionheart1827 said:![]()
Yup this is it. My memory was hazy but jeez, amazing shit.
I'm sure it was the cost. Color photography didn't really become practical cost wise until then I'd assume.iidesuyo said:Taken in 1915 Russia. It's weird that color photography took so long to become standard, many people used b/w cameras well into the 1980s.
Reno7728 said:Thought I'd bump this thread as the Big Picture Blog have just posted a collection of these old colour Russian photos
Some examples:
![]()
Trent Strong said:These pictures are about 70 years old.
G-Bus said:Nice thread.
People don't look too happy back then.