• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Color pictures from depression era US

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mrs. Viola Sievers, one of the wipers at the roundhouse giving a giant "H" class locomotive a bath of live steam
6UWTk.jpg



Women workers employed as wipers in the roundhouse having lunch in their rest room, Chicago and Northwest Railway Company
JUm3M.jpg


Even women where badass then .....
 
ana said:
Perhaps some of you already know that library of congress has a flickr stream of color pictures from 1930-40..

http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/sets/72157603671370361/

Also really old russian color photos from 1909-1912 by Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii

http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/

This looks almost 3D.. and it's almost hundred years old.. :-o

The Emir of Bukhara, Alim Khan (1880-1944), poses solemnly for his portrait, taken in 1911 shortly after his accession
03959u.jpg



Different photograph from different angle

russia_9.jpg


2005-702.jpg
 
Seth C said:
Yeah, a man who died prematurely due to all the vile shit he ingested, due to "unknown causes" like cancer. Awesome.

He didn't die prematurely. People nowadays live too long.
 
gdt5016 said:
Chicks have gotten so much hotter since then.

Evolution, baby.

These people sacrificed their bodies to help build a country, where 70 years later, people could sit at a desk in their air conditioning and make fun of them.
 
I've really noticed how the sexes are so seemingly to the gender roles. Males are very masculine, females are very feminine (with the exception of those rail workers).

Hari Seldon said:
Looking at those pics makes me realized how soft our society has become.

This is a MAN.

He looks like he's half lizard.
 
Very interesting. My grandmother passed a couple years ago and would've been 96 this month. She lived through the depression and could barely talk about it since it was so bad. My mom and her brothers and sisters say they have seen some of these things many times, like the African Americans hoeing cotton, the juke joints, and farmers hauling their crop to town with mules. Most of them didn't have shoes to wear in school either, and were dirty ragamuffins. There is a noticeable difference in the poverty level between the photos of the northern states, and the photos of Mississippi and Louisiana. You can still see some stuff pretty close to this in parts of the Mississippi delta.
 
1) Love the Chicago pictures, especially the railway and the PBR sign. It's amazing how many places have inferior train travel compared to older generations...

2) Parts of Connecticut and Massachusetts still look like that. Especially the Connecticut one on the sea, that could have been taken this year
 
Antimatter said:
The clarity and sharpness between these types of cameras at the image sizes we're viewing are negligible. A large amount of the color pics in the link are actually taken with sheet film (ones with the grooves on the edges), which pulls in a huge amount of detail, the original scans are around 9000x7000 pixels, it's just that the op's source has the badly compressed and artifacted versions showing.


I don't care what kind of camera was used, there's going to be major fading of the pigments. That color intensity didn't come from the original, that's for sure.
 
You're talking about the 1911 portrait right? I was only trying to say as far as detail goes the depression era stuff will be equally, if not more clear than that portrait. But yeah, there's definitely been some restoration work done on that thing.
 
Javaman said:
I don't care what kind of camera was used, there's going to be major fading of the pigments. That color intensity didn't come from the original, that's for sure.

True, the original is not even a photograph (in the classic sense of the word) it are three glass plates.

I posted the way they 'reprinted'/restored it earlier in the thread.

Edit: This was it; http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/making.html
 
ATF487 said:
2) Parts of Connecticut and Massachusetts still look like that. Especially the Connecticut one on the sea, that could have been taken this year

I got that feeling too. My wife and I just did a weekend in Vermont where we stayed at a little inn and went to the local farms / farmers markets / cider makers / cheese makers / etc. It's amazing how they've managed to hold on to that kind of life.

Edit: and to everyone talking about how "ugly" the women were back then, have you ever seen a woman past her mid-20s without makeup? Those women are probably in their 40s and they've seen a lot more in life than you or I. That stuff shows. That's why women wear makeup.
 
Lionheart1827 said:
p87-7001.jpg


Yup this is it. My memory was hazy but jeez, amazing shit.

Taken in 1915 Russia. It's weird that color photography took so long to become standard, many people used b/w cameras well into the 1980s.
 
iidesuyo said:
Taken in 1915 Russia. It's weird that color photography took so long to become standard, many people used b/w cameras well into the 1980s.
I'm sure it was the cost. Color photography didn't really become practical cost wise until then I'd assume.
 
It's kind of insane to think about how far we've come in 100 years. I can't really imagine what large cities will be like in the late 21st century with the way technology progresses exponentially faster.
 
These are just blowing my mind right now. I've seen surreal used a couple times in the thread and I suppose it is the perfect word for it. I've always loved black and white movies, history, things like that, but there has always been a disconnect without color. Black and white is really capable of driving home that something is old. But these are just...wow.
Pictures of people in Russia from a century ago? That died long ago? And they look to me like they could've been taken yesterday.
 
America is a beautiful country. George III really screwed up. I also notice how black people in the US even before the 50's were better clothed than many are in Africa nowdays. Kinda sad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom