• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Confirmed: The Nintendo Switch is powered by an Nvidia Tegra X1

Status
Not open for further replies.
For a handheld console that is amazing. Show me a smartphone or tablet that has games that look better than Zelda or come close to the XB1

I'm talking about the console, docked, not the handheld.

original 360: A 180 watt beast that sounds like an airplane.

Switch: 11 watts docked/ 7 watt mobile portable.

And Switch is still more than a bit better.

11 watts or 100 watts, it's still only a bit better than an 11 yr old console.

In case anyone's wondering, I'm on about that bar chart comparing 360, Xbox one and x1.
 
More like 1/4 to 1/3 XBO

This news is hilarious if true. Nintendo charging a premium for mediocre tech whilst adding shit no one wants (joycons)

Nothing new here. Even more hilarious when you see that the number 1 reason for people buying SW seems to be for Zelda: a great software title that does not need accessories like joycons. I get it: they really want the casual crowd back, but I think its time for them to face reality and move on.
 
This was never a surprise.

Zelda looks dated alrady with blurry textures, low resolution, bad fpsi.

They really cheaped out this time...and to think I paid 400 for it since is sold out everywhere.
 
They really cheaped out this time...and to think I paid 400 for it since is sold out everywhere.

This assumes that there would have been some better SoC that they didn't use because of the price. And there doesn't seem to really be the case for Nintendo's intended use.
 
Everything pointed to a normal X1, Nintendo got them super cheap probably. But that brings us to another thing: if they got them super cheap, there is nothing to explain the 300/330 price. Which is another reason to believe they will drop the price by the end of the year, which will be the tru launch of the system.

I really hope you're right. I always felt that the Switch was a bit too expensive for what it is, and this revelation only further solidifies my feelings. I'd definitely get one if it were $100 (or maybe even $50) cheaper.
 
Playing two hours in your bed doesn't make it an handheld. It's so fragile you cannot even slide it in its dock without scratches or losses of paint, there's no way you gonna use it in subway unless money grows on your walls. As a home console, it's just weak at core and a waste of tech in peripherical devices.
 
But as a home console (which is what nintendo is pushing it as) its pathetic.

Don't forget to compare the other side, as it's way more pathetic what happens when you remove your Xbox from the shelf while it's running and walk out of the house with it. People who think it's a console same as the PS4/Xbox One because Nintendo says it is are being a bit too gullible / cherry picking their side. It's very clearly a portable device by definition (and that's not up for debate), that is an entire generation above the Vita, and multiple generations above the previous Nintendo portable. I also think people are conveniently not seeing exactly how many effects BotW is pushing either, there is a really large number of interactive things going on at any moment, and it sets a new standard in portable games without contest.
 
I at least expect you not to come in this thread and say "It's pretty much what we've been talking about this whole time". Because you didn't. I doubt that you don't remember all the discussions back and forth that we had until recently. Remember how much did you try to spin that first teardown photo into being some old devkit. How much you pushed the theory that Eurogamer has posted old information that is no longer valid. All the power draw talk and how it doesn't make sense for a X1.

Yes, speculating is fun, I also enjoy it a lot. But when your speculation goes wrong, own it, don't try to make it like you were right all the time when there are tens if not hundred of posts saying otherwise.

Here:

It fits with the Foxconn leak, 5x base frequency was already an assumption based on foxconn's 921mhz. It also gives a different multiplier from handheld to docked mode, instead of 2.5x it is 2.4x so slightly less performance available for the resolution bump, but more than the 2.25x required. This does make the foxconn leak many times more possible because Eurogamer's "final clocks" weren't final.

Edit: read the article, seems undocked clocks might be the only change and cpu unchanged.

That was from almost a month ago, pay attention to the edit. Funny how Eurogamer's info wasn't correct in the final clocks. I was speculating based on a legit leak, I'm not going to make some big deal out of this, because it isn't one.

As for the teardown, well the battery label does prove that it wasn't a full production unit, there was also no outer shell for the tear down so we really didn't have an idea about what it was.

Speculation is all I did, don't feel too upset about how I am reacting to the difference in power here, it's mostly unimportant which clocks were ultimately right, I just don't like posting fake facts like Wii U is 352gflops or Switch undocked runs 307mhz on the GPU, which thankfully we were able to wait for more "FINAL" clocks.
 
All of my personal speculation was based on a legit Foxconn leak and I always kept Eurogamer's clocks in my estimations of performance. Even my more recent posts in the teardown thread were saying that it could be either spec, and it's not 157gflops like everyone was saying a few months ago, it's 196gflops, the whole final clocks bs was nothing short of people just shutting down speculation.



Also to both of you, what do you do in a speculation thread but speculate? and again higher clocks did in fact happen 307mhz to 384mhz

I read all of your posts, you were not fanatical in saying what COULD be. No need to defend yourself to others over speculating in speculation threads.
 
I might be the only one glad that it's 20nm, I thought using fan cooled 16nm at this time is lunacy in context of building a future family of compatible products. This way a fanless model could be ready for next year when 3DS is phased out.
 
But as a home console (which is what nintendo is pushing it as) its pathetic.

I can't speak about places outside of Japan, but here they have always marketed it as a console you can't take on the go.

If someone chooses to keep it bound to the tv and not use its headline feature, that's on them.
 
I might be the only one glad that it's 20nm, I thought using fan cooled 16nm at this time is lunacy in context of building a future family of compatible products. This way a fanless model could be ready for next year when 3DS is phased out.

Yeah that is the big positive here, though they could have made a more compact design with the Switch on 16nm, though I still want one (my pre-order fell through)
 
Playing two hours in your bed doesn't make it an handheld. It's so fragile you cannot even slide it in its dock without scratches or losses of paint, there's no way you gonna use it in subway unless money grows on your walls. As a home console, it's just weak at core and a waste of tech in peripherical devices.

Pure BS, I have played the damn thing at work , in a car, in the subway etc. It is easily the best and most powerful handheld true gaming device ever made. And it will also be fine as a home console especially if you also have a PC or one of the other consoles. If it truly is the 3DS follow-up there will be a massive amount of Nintendo 1st party games and it will have the 3DS developers making games for it. I can't get that experience on the other consoles.
 
Also to both of you, what do you do in a speculation thread but speculate? and again higher clocks did in fact happen 307mhz to 384mhz

I'm not sure when I said people shouldn't speculate. I'm only saying that this is definitely not what people have been talking about this whole time.
 
This joke isn't as funny as it once was....

eh, it was never funny in the first place. :op

If the Switch had come out at £199 or something, yup you'd be correct and it's a good pelt 720p handheld the kids can kick around and it does portable Zelda. Good enough!

But the feature creep and bad production in other areas at £280 just makes the package look poor.../...HD rumble and JoyCon is never going to offer more than a slight spec bump would have for the handheld. Zelda wheezing on launch day is a terrible look for brand new exciting hardware you're looking at maybe half a decade with.

The dock .../...not sure Nintendo is passing on any savings whatsoever.

This trend of the company that charges you more for less is a more recent thing. Something about "Nintendo-like profits". Great for shareholders - not so good for customers.

Not jumping in until there's a cheaper, smaller revision with non-removable controls.
 

Oh, guess I misunderstood you then. You are absolutely correct, in terms of quantity there was support from 3rd parties. But I believe when people are asking for 3rd party support, they think of the next Call of Duty, Battlefield, Kingdom Hearts, Valkyria Chronicles, Nino Kuni 2. Nobody's really asking for games such as Hidden Expedition: Titanic, 4 Elements or 101 DinoPets 3D. And in that sense, the 3DS didn't really get much support. Sure, there was support from Level 5, and SE brought Dragon Quest and Capcom Monster Hunter over, but apart from that even Japanese 3rd party support wasn't particularly strong.

If you like to see all the shovelware as a pro, you are pretty much on your own as even Nintendo doesn't want that on Switch.
 
I'm not sure when I said people shouldn't speculate. I'm only saying that this is definitely not what people have been talking about this whole time.

X1 has been in the cycle of expectations surrounding Switch since the original semiaccurate article mentioned Tegra. When Eurogamer confirmed the devkits were Tegra X1, every reasonable speculator used it as a base. Even I haven't left the Tegra X1 speculation, and Foxconn's clocks were completely possible with a X1 chip, speculation revolved around power consumption and cooling, and how it was possible to meet those clocks with those limitations, but reasonable speculators would shoot down extra shader cores after we got a grasp on chip size, clocks, power consumption.

For the last 3+ months, we've pretty much based all our speculation around the X1.
 
Yeah, I'm not getting the "It's not really a handheld" argument. The thing is easy to hold and surprisingly portable. It's a fantastic handheld.
 
Oh, guess I misunderstood you then. You are absolutely correct, in terms of quantity there was support from 3rd parties. But I believe when people are asking for 3rd party support, they think of the next Call of Duty, Battlefield, Kingdom Hearts, Valkyria Chronicles, Nino Kuni 2. Nobody's really asking for games such as Hidden Expedition: Titanic, 4 Elements or 101 DinoPets 3D. And in that sense, the 3DS didn't really get much support. Sure, there was support from Level 5, and SE brought Dragon Quest and Capcom Monster Hunter over, but apart from that even Japanese 3rd party support wasn't particularly strong.

If you like to see all the shovelware as a pro, you are pretty much on your own as even Nintendo doesn't want that on Switch.


Now you're rewriting history. In Japan, 3DS had massive support from Capcom (Resident Evil, Street Fighter, Monster Hunter, Ace Attorney and even some AA games like EX Troopers or Gaist Crusher), Bamco (Dragonball, One Piece, Tales of the Abyss, Tekken, Project X Zone, Ace Combat) Square Enix (Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts) Atlus (SMTIV, Etrian Odyssey and a lot of other games) and of course Level 5.



Switch wishes it had 3DS's 3rd party support in Japan.
 
Yeah, I'm not getting the "It's not really a handheld" argument. The thing is easy to hold and surprisingly portable. It's a fantastic handheld.

Yep, this has always been Nintendo's graceful exit of the home console business, while maintaining a presence there. Switch is exactly the device I need to complement my home computer, not another box that plays games, but a portable I can take with me when my computer isn't around.
 
Now you're rewriting history. In Japan, 3DS had massive support from Capcom (Resident Evil, Street Fighter, Monster Hunter, Ace Attorney and even some AA games like EX Troopers or Gaist Crusher), Bamco (Dragonball, One Piece, Tales of the Abyss, Tekken, Project X Zone, Ace Combat) Square Enix (Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts) Atlus (SMTIV, Etrian Odyssey and a lot of other games) and of course Level 5.



Switch wishes it had 3DS's 3rd party support in Japan.

The system came out 2 weeks ago. People need to wait for E3 and TGS before freaking out over 3rd party support.
 
I'm not too happy about this, even discarding the whole 3SM/A72 arguments time ago, 16nm (and consequently higher clocks) and/or 128 bit bus where definitely possible with bigger investments and would have made the console more future proof than it feels now.

That said, I always expected more iterations down the line, so I'll just watch out for obvious improvements together with a better SO and more games. Hopefully now they have more time and money to come up with a proper customized chip, continuing to rebrand the Shield under Nintendo's name doesn't seem a good idea.
 
Oh, guess I misunderstood you then. You are absolutely correct, in terms of quantity there was support from 3rd parties. But I believe when people are asking for 3rd party support, they think of the next Call of Duty, Battlefield, Kingdom Hearts, Valkyria Chronicles, Nino Kuni 2. Nobody's really asking for games such as Hidden Expedition: Titanic, 4 Elements or 101 DinoPets 3D. And in that sense, the 3DS didn't really get much support. Sure, there was support from Level 5, and SE brought Dragon Quest and Capcom Monster Hunter over, but apart from that even Japanese 3rd party support wasn't particularly strong.

If you like to see all the shovelware as a pro, you are pretty much on your own as even Nintendo doesn't want that on Switch.

:/

The 3DS has a lot of 3rd party support. You can't literally talk about games like CoD or BF which have zero chance of running on a 3DS. Valkyria is laughable as big 3rd party support and so is Nino Kuni (which the 3DS did get for reference). 3DS got kingdom hearts too.

The system had pretty good 3rd party support for a handheld.

Now you're rewriting history. In Japan, 3DS had massive support from Capcom (Resident Evil, Street Fighter, Monster Hunter, Ace Attorney and even some AA games like EX Troopers or Gaist Crusher), Bamco (Dragonball, One Piece, Tales of the Abyss, Tekken, Project X Zone, Ace Combat) Square Enix (Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts) Atlus (SMTIV, Etrian Odyssey and a lot of other games) and of course Level 5.



Switch wishes it had 3DS's 3rd party support in Japan.

Do you remember what the 3DS's first year of software support looked like?
 
What made the joke work was that the Wii and Wii U used evolved gamecube hardware so there was some merit to the comparison. With a tegra, the comparison is pointless.

I understand where the joke came from. I just think it's jumped the shark at this point.
 

And yet, immediately after that post came these:

After reading the article, they say they had a look at the updated dev doc, so I'm not trying to stick to the foxconn leak, I just hadn't read the article yet. However the power consumption wouldn't match in portable mode, and the memory bump has also been disabled in portable mode as a compromise. They also take a look at this tear down as final hardware. We are less than a week away, so I see no reason to assume this is in fact final hardware since that is speculation right now. Nothing about the SoC would need to be changed to reach the foxconn clocks either, as they are within the X1's capacity already and moving to 16nm actually shouldn't increase or decrease the die size, as logic size doesn't change.

I'd also like to point out that clocking the Switch up to 768mhz from 384mhz isn't going to increase the docked power consumption from ~2.5w SoC to a 12watt power draw, it's a bit ridiculous to take all this stuff at face value, I'll wait a couple weeks still.

They are speculating here, the tear down could also be from a defective devkit and not final hardware, we will know more in less than a week, but what is even more interesting is that the power consumption of foxconn's clocks in portable would match what we see in battery consumption, however Eurogamer's new clocks would mean ~4hours of battery life minimum, not 2.5 that has been confirmed not only by Nintendo but people testing the system.

Well they did say that they got a look at that document a lot longer ago than December... The reason they posted the article on December 6th was said by them, it was venture beat's article that lead them to write their article, not seeing the docs that week, which they said they sat on for months.

What we do know is 500mhz X1 draws 1.5watts so you have 384mhz drawing at most a watt. Giving the SoC a maximum power draw of 2.83watts, leaving 3.6watts for the rest of the system? ridiculous.

Why do you keep saying this? 20nm with these clocks do not match up to power consumption we see in the battery. You've settled on some imaginary memory power consumptions that are almost the same as the SoC and a third of the entire device, but it's based on nothing but trying to fit a circle in a square.

Meanwhile the 16nm on foxconn clocks actually should draw 4-4.4watts for the SoC and leave 2 - 2.4watts for the rest of the system. That fits what we see in power consumption, so until we know more about the memory, 16nm actually fits the power consumption MUCH more.

It's also interesting that the gpu portable clock matches what was assumed of the foxconn clocks, allowing a 2.4x clock increase for the GPU to run 921mhz and hit 1080p.

In the end, we are still ignoring the Foxconn leak in order to accept the new information.

So someone checked the memory and said it would be 128bit? interesting if true.

I'm not sure how the foxconn clocks exist, so I'll just wait for more information to come in. Seems Eurogamer is using works like "likely" to detail the switch and their chart they keep posting with the clock speeds is a eurogamer chart and not from the updated devkit so if a developer said "yeah the undocked clock is 384mhz now" that doesn't mean they would know the other clocks, a 921mhz gpu clock seems needed if they raised the undocked clock but that is just my speculation and its always been on a leak proven true.

The tear down here certainly didn't come from a final production unit as the battery is different from the one on the last page, so like some of us assumed, it is a prototype/earlier production/devkit unit, meaning it can't confirm final hardware, but that is just over a day away.

We are close to real answers, at least we aren't getting shell shocked from our speculation as Eurogamer's clocks were definitely real and gave us the minimum spec that has already been improved on with the performance boost Eurogamer detailed. I'm glad we will be able to stop speculating on hardware soon, this is by far my favorite hardware design from Nintendo and they did a great job with performance. Battery life does seem to be a possible problem, so it will be confusing if Switch is indeed 20nm because they could have avoided this problem with a shift to 16nm.

This is only in the past 3 weeks. So tell me again how a stock X1 on 20 nm is exactly what you expected.
 
It's a handheld when it's convenient. And it's a home console when it's convenient.

While I guess the handheld mode seems fantastic the console aspect could have been better. They really should have made the dock supplementary for those who really want the Nintendo home console experience for their Switch. Especially since we're getting those ominous SCDs later down the road which could have been just slided into the dock.
 
Playing two hours in your bed doesn't make it an handheld. It's so fragile you cannot even slide it in its dock without scratches or losses of paint, there's no way you gonna use it in subway unless money grows on your walls. As a home console, it's just weak at core and a waste of tech in peripherical devices.

Keep pushing the narrative that fits you as fact.

It is a handheld, I carried it in the bus without any issues, at friends as well and at my job to play Bomberman with collegues. So that you want it or not, no matter what you say, it is, as a pure fact, 100% stone cold handheld.
 
Playing two hours in your bed doesn't make it an handheld. It's so fragile you cannot even slide it in its dock without scratches or losses of paint, there's no way you gonna use it in subway unless money grows on your walls. As a home console, it's just weak at core and a waste of tech in peripherical devices.

The travel case from Nintendo is quite lovely and I played it without any issues in the tram on the way to work. Now I can't wait to go home and gather the latest crop of money from my walls.
 
Playing two hours in your bed doesn't make it an handheld. It's so fragile you cannot even slide it in its dock without scratches or losses of paint, there's no way you gonna use it in subway unless money grows on your walls. As a home console, it's just weak at core and a waste of tech in peripherical devices.

That's true to a small extent. My Wii U game pad reaches my bed in my small apartment.
 
Yeah, I'm not getting the "It's not really a handheld" argument. The thing is easy to hold and surprisingly portable. It's a fantastic handheld.

I mean, it's a game console you can easily play in your hands. Trying to argue it's not a handheld because of Nintendo's PR is as absurd as believing that The Cloud is a magical processing multiplier, or that the PS2 could generate real emotions with its engine.
 
Did anyone poke Jen-Hsun Huang on twitter about his custom tegra yet?

But kidding asides, could they have used the gates that likely will not be used, like 4k decoders, for something else, using the same logic gates?

Before everyone freaks out about Nvidia "man years" :
The R&D for a custom Tegra API specific for Nintendo, made by Nvidia, is a lot more important for a company like Nintendo (not known for great devkit documentation or easy of development) than 20nm -> 16nm would ever have been. Nvidia has a lot of tricks and algorithms in their bags, they have dwelved into the code of pretty much all PC games out there.
 
I didn't really want to butt in, but seriously, who cares? I mean, what's the point of this all? Is someone winning/losing in the end? Like who cares? It's a tx1 and let's move on.

I mean, that guy called me out. Not only did he move goalposts, he forgot to move them to include himself.
 
The X1 remains as one of the most powerful mobile options out there. Even the latest A10 Fusion from apple has only just caught upto what the X1 can do in benchmarks. Obviously TX2 is more powerful but its only now getting to reach development partner levels. It was not anywhere near ready for Nintendo let alone when Nintendo came to Nvidia for a chip.

Nintendo did not cheap out or cut corners. They worked within what was available and realistic for mass production.

Just quoting this again, cos it needs to seemingly be repeating forever.

Good post, sums it up nicely.
 
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=232170765

Oh sorry, guess it wasn't 3+ months ago and only 2 months and 29 days.

And yet, immediately after that post came these:

This is only in the past 3 weeks. So tell me again how a stock X1 on 20 nm is exactly what you expected.

Exactly =! pretty much, Foxconn's clocks being inside of X1 stock specs is well within reasonable speculation, as is a shrink to 16nm, did I know that Nintendo used 20nm? no one did except insiders, so I don't see your point. You seem a bit obsessed and on a witch hunt. Eurogamer's clocks were wrong, and only recently updated.

I continued to speculate on power consumption and disagreed with memory power draw, which was unknown to us and used to fill a gap in working out one set of expectations.

Is this a zombie roast

Apparently.

Also Apparently, you can't speculate in a speculation threads.
 
Also Apparently, you can't speculate in a speculation thread.

Yes, because that's what I said. It's always like this with you. It's good that you don't get dizzy from all the spinning.

I will drop it though, I don't want to upset TLZ. You were right all along. You're always right and never wrong.
 
Yes, because that's what I said. It's always like this with you. It's good that you don't get dizzy from all the spinning.

I will drop it though, I don't want to upset TLZ. You were right all along. You're always right and never wrong.

Holy shit, are we dating? just ignore my posts man.

Consider changing your avatar, maybe some will be less agressive towards you.

I use to use the minish cap link as my avatar, someone else was using the same icon. Since I was a Zombie and this movie had just come out (I have never seen it tbh) I just grabbed it as a quick solution. Does it come off as aggressive or something?
 
The system came out 2 weeks ago. People need to wait for E3 and TGS before freaking out over 3rd party support.

:/

The 3DS has a lot of 3rd party support. You can't literally talk about games like CoD or BF which have zero chance of running on a 3DS. Valkyria is laughable as big 3rd party support and so is Nino Kuni (which the 3DS did get for reference). 3DS got kingdom hearts too.

The system had pretty good 3rd party support for a handheld.



Do you remember what the 3DS's first year of software support looked like?




A lot of the 3rd parties I cited where announced BEFORE the 3DS release, that is for Layton 5, Layton VS Ace Attorney, Kingdom Hearts, Ace Combat, Metal Gear Solid 3, Resident Evil Revelations, Super Street Fighter IV, Tales of the Abyss, Tekken 3D, One Piece, Dead or Alive Dimensions, Samurai Warriors Chronicles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom