Thanks, yeah I figured as much

It's this one, yes?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=494812
Yes.
RE is survival horror to me and not the third person shooter that it's turned into. I'm not saying it's what makes RE6 a bad game though like I said even if you put that aside it has plenty of issues that make it far from it perfect.
That's what many people say, but really, it's not the truth.
See, Biohazard was a game with a very specific theme that released on hardware that had nothing to do with today's standards, and whether it was a design decision or one based on HW capabilities, and restraints, the series evolved over the course of many years.
In all those years only twice an entry managed to bring something new to the series.
The first time was with Bio 4 which actually changed the way many games play since then, and not just Bio, and also was a design choice of the series creator himself, and the second time, whether you like it or not, was with Bio 6, which expanded the gameplay, made it more fluid, more responsive and undoubtedly deeper.
The series is about over the top anime characters, fighting against shadowy corporations or organizations who use bioweapons. It's action packed, it's crazy, it uses body horror tropes all the time, and nicely sculpted human anatomy.
It shows the characters growing older, changing allegiances, gaining more experience, and even turns rookie cops into badass killing machines, cause that's what fighting for years does for you.
It reads like a soap opera most of the time, cause that's what it is.
Biohazard is not about zombies in a mansion. It hasn't been ever since the later half of the first game.
I have heard many criticisms about Bio 6. Like the one about it being too much about action, while Bio 5 was so much truer to the series. May i remind you that Bio 5 was literally a Bio 4 reskin, with identical encounters, so it was the least original of the entries, and that it also features muscleman vs boulder, which outright negates any criticisms about Bio 6 going over the top.
I also hear that Bio 6 is overall not a true Bio, as it is an action game and not a survival horror like the other games. Which other games exactly? Bio 3 maybe? Or CV? Cause these were the Bio 6 of their time, action packed ridiculous hero vs bioweapons of mass nerdgasm.
Thing is, the series was always over the top, and the community can be as divided as they want, classics vs over-the-shoulder, tank controls vs move-and-shoot, or whatever you want, but saying something like "i want a true survival horror RE, like 3" is either nostalgia or ignorance, truly.
Bio 6 did a lot of things wrong, but calling it not a true RE game, is inaccurate to say the least. If anything, it is very much a RE game, following all the familiar tropes.
Excuse my mini rant, but i like calling things what they are. I have always been a fan of the series, and i have criticisms for each and every one of the entries, while i love them all at the same time, but seriously people, move the fuck on. The series isn't going back to fixed camera angles and stupid slow pace. Mostly because technology allowed us to do more with the hardware, and also because the series creator introduced a better approach to the gameplay 11 years ago.