What was the thing being disliked for artistic reasons?Disliking something for artistic reasons and being labeled a homophobe for it. That one is always fun to see.
What was the thing being disliked for artistic reasons?Disliking something for artistic reasons and being labeled a homophobe for it. That one is always fun to see.
I walked into a classroom the other day and this dude was praising the god awful Shadow the hedgehog intro as something that was incredibly badass. You can imagine my reaction after I asked what was up with that? And he went on a long rant about how Shadow is some deep character that many people don't understand.
EDIT:To go more indepth, the guy despite comments from others was very loudly playing the intro and went on a long rant in front of everyone, (trying to complete work mind you), about how well written the characters were.
Some wowhead told me smash bros was a kids game and that I was a freak for playing nintendo games. This dude pours hours into cod and wow. (In 2016.) Needless to say, I fired him.
Can't have people who verbally judge other people like that working for me.
Hope it was worth it.
Some wowhead told me smash bros was a kids game and that I was a freak for playing nintendo games. This dude pours hours into cod and wow. (In 2016.) Needless to say, I fired him.
Can't have people who verbally judge other people like that working for me.
Hope it was worth it.
What was the thing being disliked for artistic reasons?
WOW skews to older demographics, but COD is clearly targeted at teenagers.
Bullshit. You realize the whole reason people were calling out the homophobia was because there was pretty overt homophobia and sexism with those posts what with people saying she was a lesbian stereotype and had a manly jaw and hands. Saying the artist designed Ellie as a "lesbian stereotype" reeks of homophobia. There's nothing that screams lesbian stereotype about this designMost recent case being Ellie from Last of Us 2. Apparently, if you don't like the new design, you're a homophobe for some reason. I remember when you could simply dislike something without having a label put on you. I find the whole thing sad and desperate.
Calling out others for liking something.
In English class, when I was fresh into school at the age of 12 years old, we all had to write a short speech about something we liked, and speak it to the whole class.
Being of that age, I decided to do my talk on. I can only imagine the insurmountable amount of cringe I inflicted on the class that day, but then, I was blind to it.Broly
Bullshit. You realize the whole reason people were calling out the homophobia was because there was pretty overt homophobia and sexism with those posts. Saying the artist designed Ellie as a "lesbian stereotype" reeks of homophobia. There's nothing that screams lesbian stereotype about this design
I used to run official Pokemon tournaments (its all sanctioned and you get prizes and points to go to higher competitions) and this guy used to come, claimed he had women 'eating out of the palm of his hand' and constantly bragging shit about his sexual prowess in front of the younger kids we had attending league sessions and tournaments and that.
We had a new girl show up, which was kinda rare, she was real nice and real good at the game and all. Bragging guy was paired up against her in round 3 or whatever, she beat him easy, and he fucking exploded 'I DIDN'T GET BEAT BY A GIRL SHE CHEATED, FUCKING BITCH' I was getting in telling him to call down or he'd be getting disqualified, but he was going mad. She very gracefully agreed to redo the match to placate him, she beat him again, and he was fucking bouncing off the walls 'FUCKING SLIMY BITCH, SHE WAS FLASHING HER TITS AT ME DISTRACTING ME SHE SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED' And in the end, he was disqualified and we never saw him again.
Thats top of my list.
I used to run official Pokemon tournaments (its all sanctioned and you get prizes and points to go to higher competitions) and this guy used to come, claimed he had women 'eating out of the palm of his hand' and constantly bragging shit about his sexual prowess in front of the younger kids we had attending league sessions and tournaments and that.
We had a new girl show up, which was kinda rare, she was real nice and real good at the game and all. Bragging guy was paired up against her in round 3 or whatever, she beat him easy, and he fucking exploded 'I DIDN'T GET BEAT BY A GIRL SHE CHEATED, FUCKING BITCH' I was getting in telling him to call down or he'd be getting disqualified, but he was going mad. She very gracefully agreed to redo the match to placate him, she beat him again, and he was fucking bouncing off the walls 'FUCKING SLIMY BITCH, SHE WAS FLASHING HER TITS AT ME DISTRACTING ME SHE SHOULD BE DISQUALIFIED' And in the end, he was disqualified and we never saw him again.
Thats top of my list.
And sometimes, (a lot of the time with this medium, it's audience, and concerning humanized female character design especially), opinions are laced with sexism and if Ellie wasn't canonically a lesbian no one would even suggest that she looks like a lesbian stereotype, when even shoulder length hair is considered a lesbian stereotype there's a huge issue on the part of whoever holds such an opinion when it comes to their views of lesbians and what'd they typically would look like:Guess what? Sometimes an opinion is just an opinion. Justify the shitty reactions to it as you wish. But it's still pretty sad.
Bullshit. You realize the whole reason people were calling out the homophobia was because there was pretty overt homophobia and sexism with those posts what with people saying she was a lesbian stereotype and had a manly jaw and hands. Saying the artist designed Ellie as a "lesbian stereotype" reeks of homophobia. There's nothing that screams lesbian stereotype about this design
This reminds me a roommate of mine a year ago kept incredibly disturbing figurines from a jrpg series that looked like literal children dressed in lingerie directly on his work desk in our home. Like dude why do I have to explain why this is an issue? :|Someone explaining to me why they think Camilla (Fire Emblem Fates: Conquest) is the tits in every uncomfortable detail.
Cool that you "like" the character, but I just want to buy my game & go home, man. :/
Um...Some wowhead told me smash bros was a kids game and that I was a freak for playing nintendo games. This dude pours hours into cod and wow. (In 2016.) Needless to say, I fired him.
Can't have people who verbally judge other people like that working for me.
Hope it was worth it.
And sometimes, (a lot of the time with this medium, it's audience, and concerning humanized female character design especially), opinions are laced with sexism and if Ellie wasn't canonically a lesbian no one would even suggest that she looks like a lesbian stereotype, when even shoulder length hair is considered a lesbian stereotype there's a huge issue on the part of whoever holds such an opinion when it comes to their views of lesbians and what'd they typically would look like:. Especially when it comes to women looking and acting more like actual women instead of pinup models.Like normal people with no defining characteristics
Guess what? Sometimes an opinion is just an opinion. Justify the shitty reactions to it as you wish. But it's still pretty sad.
Um...
There are plenty of people who dislike something for "artistic reasons" to hide their racism, homophobia, sexism, etc. And many don't even realize they're doing it.
The problem is that the dude viewed that artwork as her having a manly jaw, no hips, and manly hands, none of which are true especially in that artwork, followed by the assertion that all of these things must be a combined effort to make a lesbian stereotype. Lesbians like most LBGT look like regular people. Ellie looks like a regular person.I understand where you are at, but I do think there is a leap in logic here. Specifically in thinking you understand why they have issue with the design. If you believe it's simply because she's been humanized and not slutted-up, yeah, you would think it was homophobic. But sometimes it's the humanized design and not the choice to humanize that is the issue.
Point is, it's possible to not like something for what it is and not what it represents. I think far too often the two are lumped together and that is wrong.
WatSome wowhead told me smash bros was a kids game and that I was a freak for playing nintendo games. This dude pours hours into cod and wow. (In 2016.) Needless to say, I fired him.
Can't have people who verbally judge other people like that working for me.
Hope it was worth it.
Key word is verbally. No one asked him what his opinion was on Nintendo games. He was just being a jerk. The only reason I brought up the games he plays is to show that he too is a gamer, so he's a hypocrite.Um...
The problem is that the dude viewed that artwork as her having a manly jaw, no hips, and manly hands, none of which are true, followed by the assertion that all of these things must be a combined effort to make a lesbian stereotype. Lesbians like most LBGT look like regular people. Ellie looks like a regular person.
Okay, I just remembered something:
First of all let me tell you this was real and I am not making up anything.
I go in the school cafeteria and see a dude cosplaying as Ash Ketchum, he also has a bunch of printed stuff with him filled with numbers, in front of him there are two guys and he gives them instructions, they are role playing, which is okay, I guess. Every time they encounter a Pokémon, the guy dressed as Ash takes out a plushie or a toy out of his bag and (wait for it) imitates the cry of the pokemon. They keep going at it even after I leave.
Now, let me tell you we aren't talking about kids: the guys roleplaying were college students, so we are talking about three 20 somethings dudes, one of them dressed as Ash Ketchum making the cries of pokemons while playing with pliegues or toys and the other kids giving orders to their own pokemons.
Because people are quite fed up with how ingrained these things are in the gaming community. Especially outside of GAF.And I support that person being called out on their ignorance. Those aren't the instances I take issue with.
And you and I are discussing this issue, but I'm not speaking of you when I decided to bring this up, so no disrespect intended. I just think terms like homophobe and misogynist are used a little frivolously these days.
That wasn't the only reason you fired him right?Some wowhead told me smash bros was a kids game and that I was a freak for playing nintendo games. This dude pours hours into cod and wow. (In 2016.) Needless to say, I fired him.
Can't have people who verbally judge other people like that working for me.
Hope it was worth it.
Not fucking shower
He was caught hacking the work wifi as well as a huge number of other things. The Nintendo stuff happened after I had already decided to fire him. It just pushed the date closer.That wasn't the only reason you fired him right?
He was caught hacking the work wifi as well as a huge number of other things. The Nintendo stuff happened after I had already decided to fire him. It just pushed the date closer.
Because people are quite fed up with how ingrained these things are in the gaming community. Especially outside of GAF.
You referred to the guy as a "wowhead" and had to specify he was still playing these games in 2016. We know what you were trying to say.Key word is verbally. No one asked him what his opinion was on Nintendo games. He was just being a jerk. The only reason I brought up the games he plays is to show that he too is a gamer, so he's a hypocrite.
Hahaha. But yeah. He would brag about hacking it and show his coworkers what other people were doing online. He was also very rude to everyone, lost us a ton in sales. He was not a good employee.
Not negatively? I was trying to paint you a picture of someone who's still playing an old game, assuredly for nostalgia, talking shit about someone playing other games for nostalgia. If I didn't tell you which games he liked, it wouldn't show how hypocritical he was. I didn't know "wowhead" was offensive. My bad.You referred to the guy as a "wowhead" and had to specify he was still playing these games in 2016. We know what you were trying to say.
These two posts outline why that logic doesn't work quite well.I get that. But it's no excuse. No ones actions should dictate the way we act. More so when you are trying to educate someone. If you sink to their level and start spewing anger, your message is lost. No loss to them, but a big loss for what is being fought for.
I take no offense, and I understand what you mean. I think the aggressiveness comes from the fact that a lot of questions about the same subjects over and over, particularly in threads that have already extensively covered the answers, can come across as being disingenuously asked or implicating an ulterior motive on part of the minority group(s) being discussed. There is an inherent element of defensiveness on part of minorities in terms of educating people on issues of inequality because there has historically been an overwhelming expectation that minorities are supposed to be infinitely charitable even in the face of dehumanization, that we're always supposed to take bigotry and casual ignorance as a teachable moment and just never get fed up with the insurmountable wave of people who just don't "get it," because to just throw our hands up would in turn be a moral condemnation.
For example, there was a noted rush in the media to get the victims of the Charleston Church massacre to offer forgiveness to Dylann Roof and hold them up as an example of black excellence, mostly to stand in contrast to political unrest and protests being conducted by BLM. It in turn comes across as a backlash against acknowledging the racial problems of this country, as if people were pulling their shirt collars while saying "So yeah, uh, there was a white supremacist attack on your people at a historical black church...that brings up bad memories, but we're cool right?!".
And just like the white people who were wringing their hands about how on-the-nose the attack was in terms of historical context, who were scared about what a lack of forgiveness would have said about the nation's character, so too do the deflections away from Judd's overarching point into the irrelevant minutiae of her characterization of the industry in order to discredit her, and the attempts by men in this thread to paint themselves as "marginalized gamers-" the real victims- come across as doth protesting too much, an unnecessary, almost infantile reaction to having to acknowledge a problem and reconcile that with what that may or may not say about the moral character of anyone who plays games that can be criticized as sexist.
This gets tiring as hell. No one wants to explain what should be self-evident and be the bigger person all the time, especially to people who enter a conversation with pistols drawn and without any marked demonstration that they've researched the basics of the issue beforehand. People, particularly straight male gamers, need to understand that communication is a two-way street and patience is a finite resource. Minorities are not saints and should not be expected to be. So if people desire for minorities and their allies to be less abrasive to people in majority groups who don't have firsthand experience of what it's like to be a woman or black or gay or whatever else, there needs to be an earnest attempt on part of majority groups to pick up the slack on their own and ask questions that aren't demonstrable of a lack of prior engagement and thus are borderline insulting.
"Where is this misogyny in the gaming community?!!" and any of its variants are, honestly, stupid-ass questions whose answers can be gleaned from just cursory reading about the subject through a Google search or an appropriate NeoGAF thread, and its sincerity doesn't improve when it's coupled with ostracizing othering shit like "This is why outsiders shouldn't talk about games!" However, CrustyBritches' question of "What kinds of solutions do you have for improving representation of women?" is a GREAT question because it recognizes the problem and shows an earnest interest in hearing ideas from the horse's mouth. This is a real conversation to be had. I can work with this. I can educate someone who is curious. I can't educate someone who denies the problem and is overtly hostile on top of it.
There are several reasons for this.
1) A very high percentage of those who purport to have questions actually have already taken a side. This is not immediately apparent, and it's not until they have been engaged and their questions answered (something that a) derails the discussion being had, and b) takes time and energy, more on this later) that their questions become more slanted and reveal them for what they are.
2) When well-intentioned people actually take the time to inform yet another supposed newbie or to dispel the usual myths, thinking they may be at least informing someone, only to have them spit back at them and realizing they've been talking to someone that simply wanted them to talk themselves into something they could disagree with (often simply by way of a strawman), they get burned. They are less likely to engage and answer the questions of a purported "person with questions" the next time.
3) Repeat this cycle literally hundreds of times (each time a thread like this pops out, multiplied by each "curious" person that pops in each), and each time you engage with someone, you have a high chance of getting burned, making you less likely to engage the next.
4) None of these people get anything out of this. Nobody is getting paid nor compensated for their time and energy (huge amounts of it, if we were to address everyone), and we don't even get thanked most of the time. We don't owe anyone to inform them, we are not salespeople for societal awareness. If somebody is truly invested in understanding what life is like for other people outside their gender/race/sexual orientation, and what challenges they face, the Internet is full of resources to get informed without burdening others with their education. If one can't get bothered to do that, it's very unlikely they can get bothered to change their minds anyway, because that takes much more effort. In fact, if you don't show the empathy to realize someone else might not be interested, that's already a sign you might not have the empathy needed to give a shit about minorities or sexism in the first place.
I linked to it above, but it bears repeating: this article should address your observations in full.
Edit: And also Nepenthe's excellent post above mine, which I hadn't seen.