Balya said:So I guess issue 4 is out, Enslaved cover. I tried to read the feature in the online preview but they did the thing where you have to turn the magazine sideways to read it... :lol
lunarworks said:Hmm. I was wondering if it was still around, because I've never actually seen it on a shelf anywhere.
SAB CA said:I can still see where it feels a bit sloppy (Why a Dead Nation review in the beginning of the mag? You throught Fist of the North star had only 4 playable characters (more unlock!)), but overall, it reminds me of what I like about Gamer's Republic, Gamefan, GameGO!, etc, more than most out there.
lunarworks said:I've never actually seen it on a shelf anywhere.
shidoshi said:the cover for issue five is terrible. That image would make me never, ever want to touch LittleBig Planet 2.
Son.Ralph.Funk said:Oh god, not Dave Halverson. This is the guy that would give any pretty good game that he liked at least a 97/100.
Son.Ralph.Funk said:Oh god, not Dave Halverson. This is the guy that would give any pretty good game that he liked at least a 97/100.
would, does, will.Son.Ralph.Funk said:Oh god, not Dave Halverson. This is the guy that would give any pretty good game that he liked at least a 97/100.
huh?Splatterhouse- 9
element said:huh?
djtiesto said:At times, it's a breath of fresh air in an increasingly cynical field.
bigdaddygamebot said:There are reasons to be disparaging about this fellow but his enthusiasm for games is not one of them.
Son.Ralph.Funk said:It's a breath of fresh air to give any half decent game at least a 95/100?
How are you supposed to differentiate between good, really good, and great games if they all score within the 95-100 range?
Son.Ralph.Funk said:It's a breath of fresh air to give any half decent game at least a 95/100?
How are you supposed to differentiate between good, really good, and great games if they all score within the 95-100 range?
Yeah, I'll take being jaded and realistic and resolute in the correct assumption that most things are mediocre, making the higher score you give that much more meaningful over blindly cheerleading anything that involves a cartoony art style or platforming catgirls or Sega any day of the week, thanks.djtiesto said:I don't listen to review scores to begin with... but I was saying the "breath of fresh air" was having someone with actual enthusiasm and appreciation for games writing about them, as opposed to many other magazines (EGM being very guilty of this) where the reviewers act all jaded and ironic (like "hipsters"), maybe making some not-so-subtle jabs at gamers for being nerds, etc.
Son.Ralph.Funk said:I'm not being disparaging about him. I'm criticizing the way he scores his reviews. If you are only going to use the 90%+ range, there is no point in even scoring games out of 100. I still have a couple old episodes of Gamefan from the 1990s.
djtiesto said:I don't listen to review scores to begin with... but I was saying the "breath of fresh air" was having someone with actual enthusiasm and appreciation for games writing about them, as opposed to many other magazines (EGM being very guilty of this) where the reviewers act all jaded and ironic (like "hipsters"), maybe making some not-so-subtle jabs at gamers for being nerds, etc.
Wehrwolf" said:A 'GameGO!' reference! You win my respect (I know you'd rather win something of real value, but that's all I got to offer)
I AM JOHN! said:Yeah, I'll take being jaded and realistic and resolute in the correct assumption that most things are mediocre, making the higher score you give that much more meaningful over blindly cheerleading anything that involves a cartoony art style or platforming catgirls or Sega any day of the week, thanks.
To me, original screenshots combined with the crazy colorful layouts is what sets the new GameFan apart from everyone else. I know it's easier to just run official PR shots, but that has led to every magazine showcasing the exact same set of images for every game. Using their own captured screenshots allows the layouts to have much more variety and impact.radcliff said:BTW, they use their own original screenshots and should share the capture techniques with others. Even Wii games look vibrant, crisp, and sharp. Not like the blurry, jaggy mess they often do in official screens.
Indeed it is.Aokage said:Retro GameFan is being resurrected in pdf form? This is relevant to my interests.
That certainly is the plan.ShinobiFist said:If they do all of them, I might consider getting rid of my MAGS then.
meppi said:Sorry about the bump, but I think retro gamers might be interested to hear that the first 2 issues of the original 1992 GameFan magazine are now available for purchase in digital form on the GameFan store.
![]()
GameFan Vol.1 Issue1 - october 1992
![]()
GameFan Vol.1 Issue2 - december 1992
Each issue costs only $2 and comes as a DRM free PDF file I believe, and should be useable on just about any device that has a PDF compatible application.
Issue 3 shouldn't be too far of as there are only a handful of pages that need to go through the restoration process before they can be turned over to Dave.![]()
I didn't buy those issues, I actually created them.djtiesto said:Have you bought those issues, meppi? The quality of the scans didn't seem that great, based on the sample images. Does the actual PDF file look a lot cleaner?
Sadly no. The originals seemed to have been lost.Boards of Canada said:Do you guys not have the original Quark files? Or PageMaker?
So I guess a new issue of Gamefan just came out a couple of days ago(I thought it was dead) anyone sub? is it still a decent mag?
There's a preview on the site www.gamefanmag.com
or just follow this link to get straight to it: http://c15110576.r76.cf2.rackcdn.com/index.html
I remember buying GameFan magazine when i was in Highschool. I also purchased my FM Towns Marty 2 from Dave.