• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

DC Comics Introducing Gay Chracter in June: "Major, iconic, male."

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slayven

Member
Was he? Hmm, I need to reread the first issue.

Shit yeah, he was stylin and profiling on the G6

Was he? Hmm, I need to reread the first issue.

Gotta be Guy Gardner

Guy_Gardner_018.jpg

Considering he is ready to swing on Fire for Ice getting messed up, I say no.
 

Ponn

Banned
I don't see the purpose in making black adam gay.

The majority of his stories (best stories) in old DC universe revolved around him, the people he protected, his family and his love. You could say he was in actuality one of the most passionate characters in the DC universe to the point where it put him at odds with the heroes causing him to be viewed as a villain on a lot of occasions.

If they want to keep the character similar in the New 52 and really want to show a strong gay character and not just say they are gay and then have an occasional panel of him on a date with a guy but really make a relationship stand out this would be the character. Loads of emotional depth and character driven stories to play with.
 
I'm telling you brahs it freakin' Tomcat.
Tom Cruise?
I think he means Wildcat. Which I could actually see, as he's an Earth-2 character that hasn't been introduced and it would be an interesting contrast to his Golden Age persona as a rough, tough macho boxer.

My take is that it's going to be either an Earth-2 character (one of the "big" Golden Agers) or one of the Before Watchmen characters (guess which one).

I could see either Power Girl or Black Adam.
We've already seen PG in the New 52 so it's not her.
What part of "MALE" aren't people getting?
 
Literally last week on Young Justice they revealed Wally hung up his hero garb during the time skip to focus on his studies, and his relationship with Artemis. And he's still clearly crazy about her on the show. This would really mess with the fans on what should be an established plotline, because the show does borrow heavily from comic plotlines (working around limitations as they can, so Speedy's heroine addiction became his self-destructive search for the original Roy Harper).

It would show incredibly bad communication on DC's part with their various production arms. But that's probably to be expected.

You have a point.
 

kswiston

Member
My take is that it's going to be either an Earth-2 character (one of the "big" Golden Agers) or one of the Before Watchmen characters (guess which one).

That would be taking PR fluff to the next level.

On a different note, at least with gay male characters you don't get heterosexual male-aimed sexploitation like the lipstick lesbian scenes in 52. Pretty hard to boast that you are embracing sexual diversity when you turn around and use it as softcore porn in your books.
 
That would be taking PR fluff to the next level.
I wonder though, just how much of this is PR and how much is a story that got away from them (them being DC). All of this started because of a response on LGBT diversity at a Q&A session, that got picked up on twitter and the comic blogs and within a day was making Fox News as "DC Comics Making Superman Gay?!?" sensationalism. And this "news" is now overshadowing anything else happening this week in comics, including Marvel's own planned announcements about a gay marriage in their books, and DC just keeps reaping the rewards with minimal effort on their part.
 

Slayven

Member
I wonder though, just how much of this is PR and how much is a story that got away from them (them being DC). All of this started because of a response on LGBT diversity at a Q&A session, that got picked up on twitter and the comic blogs and within a day was making Fox News as "DC Comics Making Superman Gay?!?" sensationalism. And this "news" is now overshadowing anything else happening this week in comics, including Marvel's own planned announcements about a gay marriage in their books, and DC just keeps reaping the rewards with minimal effort on their part.

Obviously Marvel will have to make Thor black to try to get back on top.
 

MisterHero

Super Member
It's a totally unspoken subtext implying a hidden love story, as Superman and Lex Luthor have gone further than any kind of couple could go in comics; they share a son genetically.

Before they were seperated by writing, Lois and Clark couldn't have biological children and couldn't keep/adopt Chris Kent, but Lex Luthor can have a son by Superman.

It seems to me that even heterosexual characters can't have developed and happy relationships and can suffer some incredibly dumb writing (One More Day), why would they want to do that to gay characters?
 
Hey, you know what would be really forward thinking? Introducing this gay character without going "HEY LOOK HE'S GAY!". This is black spiderman all over again -_-
 

TheSeks

Blinded by the luminous glory that is David Bowie's physical manifestation.
Making Batman gay would make me so happy just for the outrage.

The hell you going on about? Batman's always been gay. Hello there, Robin!

shanshan310 said:
Hey, you know what would be really forward thinking? Introducing this gay character without going "HEY LOOK HE'S GAY!". This is black spiderman all over again -_-

This. It wouldn't be bad if they just introduced him and a partner without it being completely beating you over the head obvious. Then again, my major worry is they're going to go with stereotypes or have Bioware level writing for the romance. :/
 

kswiston

Member
This. It wouldn't be bad if they just introduced him and a partner without it being completely beating you over the head obvious. Then again, my major worry is they're going to go with stereotypes or have Bioware level writing for the romance. :/

Neil Gaiman handled this surprisingly well in his Sandman series considering it was written 25 years ago.
 

remnant

Banned
My guess an interesting twist in both character and being a villain would be Black Adam.

QfKqr.jpg

The only reason DC is turning anyone gay is for the positive PR. What benefit is there to turning a villain gay?

Not that I wouldn't want to see that.
 
The only reason DC is turning anyone gay is for the positive PR. What benefit is there to turning a villain gay?

Not that I wouldn't want to see that.

Come to think of it Sexual frustration or someone with penis envy would make a good villain origin story. Something fellow comic readers could identify with. But the Comics Code Authority would roll in it's grave if that happens.


I wouldn't mind if it was Icon because that would mean he would be in the universe or have his on ongoing again.
 

MisterHero

Super Member
The only reason DC is turning anyone gay is for the positive PR. What benefit is there to turning a villain gay?

Not that I wouldn't want to see that.
Black Adam was more of an anti-hero since Infinite Crisis. He became a ruler of his own country and gained his own 'Marvel family'. He mellowed out for a while. He became a mentor to Mary after she lost her Shazam powers.

Well, until Isis and Osiris went and died.
 

Slayven

Member
Come to think of it Sexual frustration or someone with penis envy would make a good villain origin story. Something fellow comic readers could identify with. But the Comics Code Authority would roll in it's grave if that happens.


I wouldn't mind if it was Icon because that would mean he would be in the universe or have his on ongoing again.

They already did the gay alien with Starman 4 I think, which ever one was blue.
 

Parallax

best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
You know, Batman having sex is too weird for me. He's like a monk.

Because he's brooding? I think he has to have sex to keep his mind right. And with all the beautiful dangergous women throwing themselves at him, he probably has a very active sex life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom