Bitmap Frogs
Mr. Community
subversus said:are they really spinning it like that?
fuck...
Yeah!
Their line is that if the country defaults the government won't be able to spend beyond its means which in turn will force fiscal responsability.
subversus said:are they really spinning it like that?
fuck...
Oh yeah, an entire political party and the most powerful person in Congress (the speaker of the house) just threatening to destroy the entire global economy over taxes, even exlcusively on the rich, is simply "trolling," not something to be taken seriously after they hijacked unemployment benefits, threatened tax increases on the lower and middle classes, and shut down state governments over the last 9 months over these same issues.BruiserBear said:Everyone is being trolled by these politicians. There is no chance they're not going to reach a debt deal by Aug 2nd.
They're just playing games with one another in hopes of making the other side look bad.
They aren't lying. In fact they have historical precedence. Most countries never pass austerity reforms unless something forces them to.Bitmap Frogs said:Yeah!
Their line is that if the country defaults the government won't be able to spend beyond its means which in turn will force fiscal responsability.
*Looks at Greece, Ireland and Portugal*Bitmap Frogs said:Yeah!
Their line is that if the country defaults the government won't be able to spend beyond its means which in turn will force fiscal responsability.
The right is spinning this as though obama is seeking a debt ceiling raise so that he can approve more wasteful spending and debt for the country. They are not treating this as though raising the debt ceiling must be done to prevent an immediate economic catastrophe, and, in fact, claim that the compromise is a debt ceiling increase in exchange for spending cuts.subversus said:are they really spinning it like that?
fuck...
You want the IMF to come in and dictate your economy? If you think raising taxes on the rich is bad, you should see what those guys do. They sell all the US's assets for peanuts, hell they'd sell the nuclear arsenal to the Chinese if that's what'll get the US debts under control.Ripclawe said:*Looks at Greece, Ireland and Portugal*
yep
There are not enough lols in the world.onadesertedisland said:If recent history is an indicator, the new "republican party" is willing to let the house burn down just to remove the tenant (Obama). If I had to guess the motive? Simple racism.
The GOP's demand for a short term increase is pure politics. Having to go through this whole charade 3 more times in the next 15 months is embracing economic uncertainty and brinksmanship.. There's really no practical benefit to such an action.TomServo said:Who was replying to me. See how this works?
I'm glad GaimeGuy came out and said the poster from the last page was an idiot. That said, it's a general attitude or leaning of a discussion that allows an idiot to post something like "100% taxation" and feel like he's adding something meaningful. That's what I meant by "jumping the shark".
I've become far more liberal since the Great Recession began, as it has challenged some of my core beliefs. Frankly I'm on Obama's side with this issue, but let's not act as if only one side is playing politics. Obama's demand that any agreement cover the debt limit beyond the next election, for example? Pure politics.
yes, everytime someone opposes Obama on anything it is motivated by racism. This is the sort of nonsense I expect to hear on black radio shows like Tom Joyner, I have higher expectations for neogaf even on this subject.onadesertedisland said:If recent history is an indicator, the new "republican party" is willing to let the house burn down just to remove the tenant (Obama). If I had to guess the motive? Simple racism.
During Bill Clinton's presidency Republicans won both the House and the Senate and they endlessly hammered the guy too. However, some say Clinton was the first black president so...onadesertedisland said:If recent history is an indicator, the new "republican party" is willing to let the house burn down just to remove the tenant (Obama). If I had to guess the motive? Simple racism.
Quickly =/= efficiently.remnant said:Except that we do. In what other time in history have wealth been gained and lost as quickly as now?
But hey, if you think our society is inefficient, there still North Korea.
Bitmap Frogs said:Yeah!
Their line is that if the country defaults the government won't be able to spend beyond its means which in turn will force fiscal responsability.
The socialist, kenyan, marxist, birth-certificate attakcs on obama all havethe same underpinnings as racism: that he's an outsider, a foreigner, someone "different" who doesn't belong. Same thing with the attacks on his use of a teleprompter and being a "community organizer" who never had a real job: it all has an underlying message that he's "different," and that such differences make him inferior. It has the exact same underlying tones as racism, or xenophobia in a broader sense.Ripclawe said:yes, everytime someone opposes Obama on anything it is motivated by racism. This is the sort of nonsense I expect to hear on black radio shows like Tom Joyner, I have higher expectations for neogaf even on this subject.
Your debate technique is poor, sir.Ripclawe said:yes, everytime someone opposes Obama on anything it is motivated by racism. This is the sort of nonsense I expect to hear on black radio shows like Tom Joyner, I have higher expectations for neogaf even on this subject.
[Nintex] said:You want the IMF to come in and dictate your economy? If you think raising taxes on the rich is bad, you should see what those guys do. They sell all the US's assets for peanuts, hell they'd sell the nuclear arsenal to the Chinese if that's what'll get the US debts under control.
"Statue of Liberty?... anyone... ? Sold to Dubai for 5k!"
Did any of them say Bill Clinton wasn't born in America?Spokker said:During Bill Clinton's presidency Republicans won both the House and the Senate and they endlessly hammered the guy too. However, some say Clinton was the first black president so...
The head of the Republicans dismissed the birther issue. It was a bunch of Tea Party idiots harping on that front, not mainstream Republicans. Other high-ranking Republicans have rejected the birther movement explicitly.GaimeGuy said:The socialist, kenyan, marxist, birth-certificate attakcs on obama all havethe same underpinnings as racism: that he's an outsider, a foreigner, someone "different" who doesn't belong.
Spokker said:The head of the Republicans dismissed the birther issue. It was a bunch of Tea Party idiots harping on that front, not mainstream Republicans. Other high-ranking Republicans have rejected the birther movement explicitly.
No, we don't. Look at any chart of the distribution of wealth over the 20th and 21st centuries. Wealth has become more concentrated not less; the remuneration for productivity among the majority of the Western population is decreasing.remnant said:Except that we do.
Lazy argument.But hey, if you think our society is inefficient, there still North Korea.
Zaptruder said:So when the government fails to raise the debt ceiling, who's gonna get the blame according to the common folk?
Spokker said:The head of the Republicans dismissed the birther issue. It was a bunch of Tea Party idiots harping on that front, not mainstream Republicans. Other high-ranking Republicans have rejected the birther movement explicitly.
Spokker said:The head of the Republicans dismissed the birther issue.
Austerity =/= fiscal responsibilityRipclawe said:*Looks at Greece, Ireland and Portugal*
yep
I was reading this article on CNN earlier:Zaptruder said:So when the government fails to raise the debt ceiling, who's gonna get the blame according to the common folk?
Both parties are playing politics with this because they're trying to influence the 2012 elections, not fix the problem. Nobody is worried about the problem, they're more worried about long-term power. If this goes away quickly then Obama and the Democrats can claim a victory over the debt problem in 2012. If it doesn't, then Boehner and the Republicans can use it as a millstone to hang around Obama's neck.A key sticking point remains how much to raise the debt ceiling: Democrats want it raised enough so the issue won't come up again until after the November 2012 election. Boehner has said that is impossible; he wants it raised in two, smaller increments.
balladofwindfishes said:Did any of them say Bill Clinton wasn't born in America?
Or that he was a secret Muslim because of his name?
I don't understand how anyone could not see racism as the underlying factor in all of this. It should have become blatantly clear what the message was when they hammered that Obama was born in Kenya. Why would they try to say Obama was not born in the US? Why use that to discredit him? What put the ideas into their little heads that Obama may not be from America?
Averon said:So apparently, the Dems caved. Their plan have all spending cuts and no revenue increases. No cuts to defense *sigh*
I guess this was inevitable. The GOP always had the advantage in this game of chicken since they were more than willing to crash the car in the economy. Economic terrorism works!!!
outunderthestars said:interesting poll numbers:
"According to a Wall Street Journal poll, the public supports Obama's grand bargain by a 22% margin. ABC News and The Washington Post reported that 77% believed that the GOP has not done enough to compromise on the deficit, compared with 58% saying the same about Obama. According to CBS News, 71% of those surveyed were unhappy with how the Republicans were handling the negotiations, compared with a 48% disapproval rate for Obama." cnn.com
Earlier this week, Jon Stewart's Daily Show spliced together a series of talking heads on cable news using poll results to make wildly contradictory claims about public opinion on the debt ceiling debate (beginning at about 1:45 in the video).
One says a majority of Americans "want nothing to do with a tax hike in the debt deal," the next claims "the vast majority of Americans want tax hikes to be part of the debt ceiling deal." One cites "an almost two-to-one majority" of Americans who "want their member of Congress to vote against raising the debt limit," while another says more Americans are ready to say "raise it, they understand the implications for the economy." And so on. The result, per Stewart's quip, is a lot more obfuscation than clarity.
Ripclawe said:*Looks at Greece, Ireland and Portugal*
yep
Nopeoperon said:The IMF is the US, that scenario doesn't apply
_Xenon_ said:OK I'm smelling a massive scam when I'm looking at the stock prices. Buy stocks at low due to uncertain debt deal and sell them after a deal is made. Who will make the most out of it? The people who sign the deal.
McCain spent his early life abroad and wasn't even born in the traditional America (on a base).BruiserBear said:Did Bill Clinton spend a good portion of his childhood living abroad? Was Bill Clinton's father a muslim? Did Bill Clinton attend a muslim school as a child? In fact, can you name me a single American president who has shared those three qualities with Obama?
balladofwindfishes said:McCain spent his early life abroad and wasn't even born in the traditional America (on a base).
Where were the wild accusations that McCain was not really American?
Why should I answer your arbitrary set of guidelines? Obviously Obama is a unique case, as he's the first black president, and the only president in history with any possible ties to islamic beliefs.
Vox-Pop said:Does Australia want US citizens?
unomas said:Panama doesn't need a central bank because of the US dollar? Please connect the dots for me on exactly why that's the reason they don't need a central bank? And why exactly Panama has had a lower rate of inflation than the US for the last 20 years despite using the almighty dollar.
unomas said:Discussing anything with you at any point in this thread is worthless if you can't even see something as simple as inflation. To ignore the simple facts is beyond insane, and yet you pretend to be receptive to information when you're beyond understanding even the most basic of monetary concepts. Enjoy your inflation and QE3, the blindness caused by the American ego is never to be underestimated.
That didn't insulate the Right's criticism of Kerry as a coward who deserted from the military, which wasn't even true...BruiserBear said:Being born abroad was only one part of the equation. Having a foreign born father, who was also a muslim, and then you attended a muslim school for a portion of your childhood.
That's a lot more to run with than "He was born on an army base abroad".
Mccain also has the whole "war hero" badge to wear, which obviously insulates you from that type of thing.
I really don't get this. If defaulting doesn't matter, then why on Earth are they so concerned about the debt in the first place? They offer no mechanism for any of their policies are supposed to work.Bitmap Frogs said:I thought it was funny how Fox was spinning the line that a default wouldn't necessarily be bad but in fact would be good.
Trurl said:It's as if they have no concern for answering the question of cause and effect when defending their proposals. Instead, it's as if they're operating on a series of self-selected economic moral standards that, if followed, the holy economy will magically reward us for following.
I don't know what "the markets" think, but I would suggest most people involved don't believe it's impossible to get this done on time. Congress did several impossible things at the height of the 2008 financial crisis.TxdoHawk said:So how come the markets aren't collectively pooping themselves yet? We are past the point where politicians suggested we could reasonably introduce a plan, debate it, and vote on it before 8/2.
TxdoHawk said:So how come the markets aren't collectively pooping themselves yet? We are past the point where politicians suggested we could reasonably introduce a plan, debate it, and vote on it before 8/2.
TxdoHawk said:So how come the markets aren't collectively pooping themselves yet? We are past the point where politicians suggested we could reasonably introduce a plan, debate it, and vote on it before 8/2.
Except for one minor differenceGoldenEye 007 said:Didn't President Kennedy catch a lot of shit for being Catholic? Seen as someone that would let the Pope influence US policy? Doesn't Mitt Romney currently catch shit just for being Mormon?
It is quite common for presidential hopefuls to catch criticism simply due to their beliefs or background if they do not align with what the country is used to. Obama isn't unique in that regard.