I actually agree to some extent to what they are saying, but they should know better that the best way to deal with all this is to ignore.
They are just going to add more fuel to the fire, because those that are on a mission to bring this game down will keep doing it no matter if the game is good or bad, its not like they are going to play it anyway.
Thats not all though. They should focus on hearing the legit criticism from those that actually played it and didn't like it/part of it and keep doing their job to correct it and improve as game devs. People overreact about everything nowadays, its not only about them, even if it does seem like this game brings the worst out of the gamers on the internet. Even then, to deal with these controversies is part of their job. Trust in your product and focus on what matter. I kinda feel for them and understand why they are struggling with this a little bit, Order being their first big game and all that.
Why wouldn't I?
Shouldn't we approach every game from the same standpoint to be fair? Why can't the same arguments for the defense of The Order be used for other games?
Where was this attitude with RYSE?
Seems no one had a problem jumping down the throat of RYSE and not giving it any kind of chance. I think it's hilarious the amount of hate RYSE got for having QTEs, that ended up optional, while The Order has forced ones on top of 2.5 hours of cutscenes and apparently that's fine....
Doing whatever you are claiming to be the best online behavior would be an excellent start you know. But speaking about what really matters...
The ryse comparison really deserves no place in a thread like this though. The game got complaints in totally different circumstances, it was the start of a new gen and people clearly thought it looked like a tech demo back then. Not really entering the merit of this discussion, since I never played it, so I can't say if its true or not. Just pointing out what I remember of that.
The Order is getting all this talk for different reasons like length, and stylistic choices more than anything. In the end all it seems is like superficial internet talk that amounts to nothing when looking for a decent debate about (not only in this case) the quality of the games. As I said though, there is some legit criticism floating around here on GAF, its just that it gets mixed/lost amongst all these sidetalk about console warriors and whatnot, which is extremely annoying, completely misses the point and makes it almost impossible to have legitimate debates over what the game does well or not.
I am personally going to approach all this by finishing the game first (I am probably getting it tomorrow) and then talking about it on the OT whenever its posted. Hopefully it will be more civil by then.