The question is, if a publisher cancels a game because it is bad, did the developer make a bad game? Or if a publisher decides that a game the developer is making is too flawed for release, and forces them to change the game against their will, and those changes make it a great game, did the developer make a good game?
I ask because this is basically Retro, a company many people are bringing up. Nintendo has canceled at least 5 games Retro has been working on, some due to quality issues, and of course Nintendo came in and totally changed Metroid Prime in mid-development because it just wasn't turning out good, and Miyamoto forced changes upon them that the team disagreed with (most notably making them change the game to first-person), to the point that the producer quit.